SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 form a desktop pairing that sits in the 82nd combined percentile of all tracked builds. This configuration combines a power-efficient 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a high-bandwidth Ampere flagship GPU, creating a system that is heavily weighted toward graphics throughput. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance discussion here is estimated from the individual benchmark scores and percentile positions rather than direct in-game data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture using TSMC’s 3 nm process node. It packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The CPU maintains a 35 W TDP, which is remarkably low for a desktop chip with this core count, making it a clear outlier in the high-core-count desktop space. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 pool, giving it a substantial 17.8 billion transistor budget to feed those cores.

Benchmark results show a processor that is strong in multi-threaded workloads but less dominant in single-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the 265T scores 31,558 points in multi-core and 4,455 points in single-core. The multi-core score places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the single-core result is more modest relative to its peers. The Cinebench R20 numbers tell a similar story: 13,254 multi-core and 1,871 single-core. The R15 results are 3,180 multi-core and 449 single-core, which is consistent with a chip that scales well across its 20 physical cores but does not lead the pack in lightly threaded work.

PassMark results reinforce this profile. The CPU achieves 37,084 in multithreaded tests, 4,338 in single-thread, and 129,817 in floating-point math. Integer math comes in at 104,943, while data compression hits 370,158 and data encryption reaches 29,687. The extended instructions score of 28,609 and find prime numbers score of 322 round out a suite that shows strong throughput in data-heavy tasks. The average benchmark score of 47,697 places the 265T within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47,527), 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47,908 is 0.4% higher), and 0.5% below the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47,918). It also edges out the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H by 0.5% (47,468).

For real workloads, this means the 265T is a capable multi-threaded workhorse that can handle compilation, rendering, and data processing with ease, but it will not set records in single-threaded responsiveness. The 35 W TDP is the defining characteristic here — it delivers near-top-tier multi-core performance at a fraction of the power draw expected from a chip with this core count. The 3 nm process node and 5.30 GHz boost clock give it enough single-thread headroom for everyday tasks, but the data clearly shows its strength is in parallel workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 20 threads, with no hyper-threading, running at a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How does the 265T compare to its nearest rival in multi-core performance?

A: The 265T scores 31,558 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47,527 average) and 0.4% below the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47,908 average) in overall average benchmark score.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth with an effective memory clock of 19.5 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the 265T does not support ECC memory. It uses dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits in the 82nd combined percentile, with the CPU in the 90th percentile and the GPU in the 73rd percentile of all respective components.

Q: What is the power draw of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 350 W, leading to a suggested PSU of 750 W for the system.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and tensor operations?

A: Yes, the RTX 3090 includes 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores, with support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks place the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47,697. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, scores 47,527, a 0.4% difference, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 47,908, also a 0.4% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47,918, 0.5% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47,468, 0.5% lower. These tight margins show the 265T is positioned in a dense performance cluster where a few percentage points separate it from several established desktop and mobile processors.

The GPU benchmarks show the RTX 3090 in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27,565. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile at 27,435, a 0.5% difference, followed by the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT at 27,425, also 0.5% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27,839, which is 1% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M scores 27,883, 1.1% higher. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,118, while Geekbench OpenCL reaches 172,758 and Vulkan hits 53,927. PassMark results include a G3D score of 26,645 and a GPU compute score of 15,356.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a top-decile performer while the GPU sits in the upper quarter of all graphics cards. The 82nd combined percentile reflects this imbalance — the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU, though powerful, faces stiffer competition from newer and more power-efficient designs. In Cinebench R23, the CPU’s 31,558 multi-core score indicates strong rendering capability, while the GPU’s 3DMark score of 5,118 suggests it can handle modern DX12 titles at high settings, but the 73rd percentile shows it is not at the very top of the GPU hierarchy anymore. The data indicates a system that excels in CPU-bound productivity but is less exceptional in pure graphics performance compared to the current landscape.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Arrow Lake-S generation. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and a fast NVMe drive, though the RTX 3090 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it will run at Gen 4 speeds without bottlenecking. The platform does not support ECC memory, which limits its appeal for certain workstation use cases that require error correction.

The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output and basic compute capability even without a discrete GPU. The CPU’s 35 W TDP is exceptionally low for this core count, meaning cooling requirements are modest and power delivery is not a constraint for most motherboards. The GPU, however, has a 350 W TDP and requires a 750 W suggested PSU, so the power supply must be sized for the graphics card, not the CPU. The RTX 3090 uses a single 12-pin power connector and is a triple-slot card measuring 336 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, so case clearance is a consideration.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has headroom in the 90th percentile while the GPU sits at the 73rd. Replacing the RTX 3090 with a newer, higher-percentile GPU would balance the system better, since the CPU’s multi-threaded performance is unlikely to bottleneck a faster graphics card. The platform itself is current with PCIe Gen 5 support, so a Gen 5 GPU would be fully utilized, though the RTX 3090’s PCIe 4.0 interface will not be a bottleneck in most workloads. Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 kits are straightforward, and the dual-channel controller supports up to the standard DDR5 speeds without overclocking. The 35 W CPU TDP means a modest air cooler is sufficient, freeing case space for the GPU’s substantial footprint.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates this pairing is CPU-heavy in relative terms. The CPU’s 90th percentile versus the GPU’s 73rd percentile means the processor is the stronger component when compared to its peers. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression, encryption, and physics calculations, the 265T will not be the limiting factor — its multi-threaded scores (37,084 in PassMark multithread, 31,558 in Cinebench R23) are far above what most applications require. The bottleneck will appear in GPU-bound scenarios, particularly at high resolutions and in ray-traced workloads, where the RTX 3090’s 73rd percentile position becomes the constraint.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, but the percentile gap suggests that in gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4,455 in Cinebench R23 would keep frame rates high, while the GPU’s 26,645 PassMark G3D score would dictate the ceiling at 4K. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth are massive assets, but the 73rd percentile indicates that newer GPUs outperform it in raw compute, so resolution increases will expose the GPU as the limiting factor. In productivity, the CPU’s 129,817 floating-point math score and 370,158 data compression score suggest it will handle spreadsheet, database, and scientific workloads without issue, while the GPU’s 15,356 compute score will be the ceiling for GPU-accelerated tasks like rendering.

The combined 82nd percentile reflects a system that is well-matched for mixed workloads but leans toward CPU-heavy tasks. The 35 W CPU TDP means the processor runs cool and quiet, which can offset the GPU’s thermal output in a balanced build. The data suggests that for users who prioritize multi-threaded productivity, this is a well-balanced system, but for pure gaming at high refresh rates, the GPU will be the bottleneck once resolution or detail settings increase.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. It has 10,496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores. The base clock is 1,395 MHz with a boost clock of 1,695 MHz, and the memory runs at 1,219 MHz with an effective data rate of 19.5 Gbps. The 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus provides 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for large datasets and high-resolution textures.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are strong, with FP32 throughput of 35.58 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 556.0 GTexel/s. Benchmark scores show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 5,118, Geekbench OpenCL of 172,758, and Vulkan of 53,927. PassMark results include DirectX 10 at 182, DirectX 11 at 220, DirectX 12 at 110, and DirectX 9 at 268. The G2D score is 1,063 and the G3D score is 26,645, with a GPU compute score of 15,356.

The 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads, making this GPU capable of real-time ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling, though the 73rd percentile shows it has been surpassed by newer generations. The 24 GB VRAM is a standout feature — it exceeds the memory capacity of most contemporary GPUs and is well-suited for 3D rendering, machine learning training, and video editing with large timelines. The 936.2 GB/s bandwidth ensures data can be fed to the 10,496 shading units without stalling, which is critical for high-resolution rendering. The GPU’s power draw of 350 W and triple-slot design require a robust PSU and case, but the performance per watt is acceptable for the era it launched in. The data indicates a GPU that remains relevant for memory-intensive tasks but is no longer a top-tier performer for raw gaming frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3090’s 26,645 PassMark G3D score and 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance can drive high frame rates at 1440p, but the 73rd percentile suggests it will struggle to maintain max refresh rates at 4K on the latest titles. The CPU’s 4,455 Cinebench R23 single-core score is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions, making this a solid 1440p high-refresh system with 4K capability at reduced settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 35 W TDP, provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming overlays while gaming. The GPU’s tensor cores can handle NVENC-style encoding, though the 73rd percentile means the encode quality is not class-leading. The 24 GB VRAM prevents memory pressure when running games and streaming software simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU’s 31,558 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 370,158 data compression score make short work of video encoding and timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and color grading, though the 73rd percentile means render times are longer than with newer GPUs.

3D rendering: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU’s 129,817 floating-point math score and the GPU’s 15,356 compute score combine to handle both CPU-based and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 24 GB VRAM is a major advantage for large scenes, and the 82 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing in renderers that support it.

Software development: The CPU’s 20 cores and 37,084 PassMark multithread score accelerate compilation and testing, while the 35 W TDP keeps power costs low during long build sessions. The GPU’s compute capability is useful for CUDA-based development, though the 73rd percentile means it is not the fastest for training large models.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU’s 4,338 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity apps. The 35 W TDP is efficient for a desktop system, and the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM can handle occasional CAD or data visualization work without issue.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake-S processor on the 3 nm node with a 35 W TDP, while the GPU is a 350 W Ampere flagship with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile is 82, placing this system above the majority of tracked builds, with the CPU in the 90th percentile and the GPU in the 73rd. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 47,697 is within 0.5% of its nearest rivals, while the GPU’s average score of 27,565 is within 1.1% of its peers.

The system is characterized by a high-core-count, low-power CPU that excels in multi-threaded productivity, paired with a high-memory, high-bandwidth GPU that is strong in memory-intensive tasks but not at the top of current graphics performance. The 35 W CPU TDP is a defining feature, allowing for quiet and cool operation, while the GPU’s 350 W TDP requires a 750 W PSU. The build is well-suited for users who need strong CPU throughput and large VRAM capacity, making it a compelling choice for content creation and professional workloads rather than pure gaming. The 82nd combined percentile indicates a system that is above average overall, with the CPU carrying more of the performance weight relative to the GPU.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need heavy multi-threaded CPU performance and substantial GPU memory. Gamers at 1440p will get high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU’s strong single-thread score preventing bottlenecks, but 4K gaming will be limited by the GPU’s 73rd percentile position. Content creators working with large video files or 3D scenes will benefit from the 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth, which exceed what most GPUs offer, while the CPU’s 20 cores accelerate rendering and encoding. Developers compiling large codebases will see fast build times from the 31,558 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, and the 35 W TDP keeps power draw low during long compile sessions.

Students in engineering or data science fields will find the CPU’s floating-point and integer math scores useful for simulations and analysis, while the GPU’s tensor cores can handle machine learning experiments, though not at the scale of newer cards. Small business workstations that run databases or heavy spreadsheets will benefit from the CPU’s 370,158 data compression score and 29,687 encryption score, ensuring smooth operation on complex datasets. The system is less ideal for users who prioritize maximum gaming frame rates at 4K, as the GPU’s 73rd percentile means newer and more powerful options exist. The build is best suited for those who value CPU throughput and memory capacity over raw graphics performance, making it a balanced choice for professional and semi-professional workloads.