SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation represents a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count Arrow Lake processor with a professional-grade mobile GPU. The data set for this pairing contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimated from standalone benchmark scores rather than direct testing. The CPU’s 94th percentile standing among all processors contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 50th percentile placement, creating a system whose overall combined percentile sits at 72.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance distribution between these two components is heavily skewed toward the processor. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF posts an average benchmark score of 71,910, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation carries no benchmark entries and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This 44-percentage-point gap in percentile rankings indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in most workloads, particularly those that scale with graphics processing rather than general computation.

The CPU’s benchmark results reveal consistent strength across single-threaded and multi-threaded tests, with Cinebench R23 scores of 7,021 single-core and 49,736 multi-core. The multi-core result is roughly seven times the single-core figure, which aligns with the 20-core/20-thread configuration and suggests strong scaling in heavily parallel tasks. The Geekbench scores of 2,759 single-core and 22,913 multi-core follow a similar pattern, with the multi-core result approximately 8.3 times higher than the single-core figure.

For gaming workloads, the bottleneck analysis depends on resolution and settings. At 1080p or 1440p with lower graphical demands, the CPU’s high single-thread performance of 7,021 in Cinebench R23 and 4,928 in Passmark single-thread tests would allow it to feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, making the GPU the limiting factor. At 4K or with ultra settings, the GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth become the primary constraint, though the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means even moderate resolutions will likely see the GPU capping performance well before the CPU reaches its limits.

The Passmark data compression score of 666,589 and encryption score of 48,198 indicate strong integer performance, which benefits productivity workloads but does little to alleviate GPU-bound gaming scenarios. The floating-point math score of 189,431 and extended instructions score of 54,513 further confirm the CPU’s computational headroom, but these capabilities remain underutilized when the GPU is the constraining factor. The system’s combined percentile of 72 reflects this imbalance, sitting between the CPU’s 94th and the GPU’s 50th percentile.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers a comprehensive set of benchmark results across multiple testing suites. In Cinebench R15, the processor scores 5,013 multi-core and 707 single-core. The R20 iteration shows 20,889 multi-core and 2,948 single-core. The R23 version, which is widely used for comparing modern processors, produces 49,736 multi-core and 7,021 single-core. Geekbench results show 22,913 multi-core and 2,759 single-core.

Passmark testing reveals specialized strengths: data compression scores 666,589, data encryption scores 48,198, extended instructions score 54,513, and prime number finding scores 486. The floating-point math result of 189,431 and integer math result of 143,351 demonstrate the CPU’s arithmetic capabilities. Multi-threaded Passmark performance is 58,518, while single-thread performance is 4,928. Physics simulation scores 3,633, and random string sorting scores 79,735.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 71,910 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Comparing to nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX averages 71,797, which is 0.2 percent lower. The Intel Xeon 6517P averages 72,350, which is 0.6 percent higher. The Intel Xeon 6724P averages 72,396, which is 0.7 percent higher. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 averages 71,370, which is 0.8 percent lower. These margins are narrow, with the 265KF sitting effectively in the middle of its closest competitors, trading blows within a one-percent band.

The GPU presents a different story entirely. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has no benchmark scores in the data, making direct performance comparisons impossible. Its 50th percentile standing among all GPUs, combined with the lack of nearest rival data, means the GPU’s performance must be inferred from its architecture and specifications rather than measured results. The combined system percentile of 72 reflects the CPU’s strong contribution tempered by the GPU’s mid-pack positioning.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process node from TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The processor features 20 cores and 20 threads, with no hyper-threading, running at a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking for users who want to push beyond stock frequencies.

Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported, which may matter for professionals requiring error correction. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast attachment for storage and graphics devices.

The benchmark results indicate a processor that excels at both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7,021 is strong for a 20-core part, suggesting the boost clock of 5.50 GHz is being utilized effectively. The multi-core score of 49,736 demonstrates that all 20 cores scale well under load, with no obvious thermal or power throttling issues apparent from the data. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,928 and multi-thread score of 58,518 reinforce this dual strength.

For real-world workloads, the 265KF’s performance profile suits tasks that mix single-threaded responsiveness with multi-threaded throughput. The high boost clock benefits interactive applications, while the 20 cores handle parallel rendering, compilation, or data processing. The 125 W TDP is modest for a 20-core part, and the unlocked multiplier provides headroom for enthusiasts, though the data does not specify how much additional performance is available through overclocking.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination. All gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The absence of measured FPS rows means the data set does not confirm how this pairing performs in actual game titles.

The CPU’s single-thread performance of 7,021 in Cinebench R23 and 4,928 in Passmark suggests it can handle high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, where frame rates often depend on processor speed. The GPU, however, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which places it in the middle of the performance range. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit bus providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the GPU has sufficient memory capacity for modern titles at high settings.

Estimated gaming performance would likely see the GPU as the limiting factor in most scenarios. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s mid-pack performance might deliver playable frame rates in esports titles, but demanding AAA games could see lower frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute would be stretched further, and 4K gaming would likely require reduced settings to maintain playable performance.

The CPU’s high single-thread scores mean that frame pacing and minimum frame rates in CPU-limited scenes would benefit, but the GPU’s rendering throughput would cap maximum FPS. For users targeting high-refresh displays at 1080p, this pairing might deliver acceptable results in less demanding games, but the GPU’s 50th percentile standing suggests it is not designed for maximum frame rates at higher resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake desktop processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU enables high-speed connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage. The socket and platform are current in the data, with the CPU marked as an active production part.

The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 120 W. The suggested PSU field is null, so the data does not specify a recommended power supply capacity. With two components each drawing over 100 W, plus other system components, a power supply with adequate capacity would be necessary, though the exact figure is not provided. The GPU uses no power connectors and is listed as an IGP slot width, which is unusual for a discrete-class GPU and suggests it is designed for embedded or mobile integration rather than a standard desktop slot.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, given the 44-point percentile gap between the CPU’s 94th and the GPU’s 50th percentile. The CPU has substantial headroom to drive a more powerful graphics card, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure the platform can support modern GPUs without bottlenecking the connection. The DDR5 memory support and dual-channel bus provide adequate bandwidth for current and near-future workloads.

The platform’s lack of ECC memory support may limit its appeal for certain server or workstation use cases, but for gaming and general productivity, the platform is well-suited. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU allows overclocking, though the data does not specify the extent of overclocking headroom. The active production status for both components suggests ongoing availability and driver support.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF?

A: The processor has 20 cores and 20 threads, with no hyper-threading enabled.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX?

A: The 265KF averages 71,910 in benchmark scores, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Ryzen 7 8840HX’s average of 71,797.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported by the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.50 GHz, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The 94th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for content creators, software developers, and professionals running multi-threaded workloads who occasionally game or use GPU-accelerated applications. The 20 cores and 20 threads handle video editing, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks efficiently, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,736 and Passmark multi-thread score of 58,518.

Gamers at 1080p resolution who favor CPU-intensive titles or esports games might find this configuration acceptable, given the processor’s strong single-thread scores of 7,021 in Cinebench R23. However, gamers targeting 1440p or 4K with high settings would likely be disappointed by the GPU’s 50th percentile performance. Students and small business users running office applications, web development tools, or data analysis software would benefit from the CPU’s responsiveness and multi-core throughput.

The desktop class and combined percentile of 72 indicate a system that is above average but not top-tier. Users building a workstation for CPU-heavy tasks like scientific computing, financial modeling, or software engineering would find the 265KF well-suited, but they should pair it with a stronger GPU if graphics performance matters.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF processor with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPU. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake part on a 3 nm process, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace mobile-embedded chip on a 5 nm process. The combined percentile of 72 places this system in the upper three-quarters of all configurations, though the imbalance between the CPU’s 94th percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile defines its character.

The CPU is clearly the dominant component, with an average benchmark score of 71,910 and nearest rivals within a one-percent band. The GPU has no benchmark scores, making its performance less certain, but its 50th percentile standing suggests mid-pack capability. This is a CPU-first build where the processor’s capabilities outpace the graphics solution.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread scores of 7,021 in Cinebench R23 and 4,928 in Passmark would drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenes, but the GPU’s 50th percentile and 32.69 TFLOPS compute would limit overall frame rates, making this a mixed experience for competitive gamers.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with multi-thread scores of 49,736 in Cinebench R23 supporting simultaneous game and stream workloads, though the GPU’s mid-pack performance would cap game quality settings.

Video editing: The CPU’s strong multi-thread performance, evidenced by the Passmark multi-thread score of 58,518, handles timeline rendering and export efficiently, while the GPU’s 16 GB of memory supports effects and previews, though its compute strength is limited compared to higher-tier GPUs.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 20 cores excel at CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 49,736 providing solid performance, but GPU-accelerated renderers would be constrained by the GPU’s 50th percentile and 32.69 TFLOPS.

Software development: The CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores, including Passmark integer math of 143,351, support fast compilation and code analysis, and the 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth handles large datasets, making this a strong development workstation.

Student and office work: The CPU’s responsiveness and 20-core throughput handle document processing, spreadsheets, and multitasking effortlessly, though the GPU’s capabilities are largely unused in these workloads, making this configuration over-provisioned for basic office tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process from TSMC, containing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die with a transistor density of 121.1 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration includes 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU features 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 76 RT cores, and AI acceleration by 304 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. Compute capabilities include 32.69 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a 1:1 ratio.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and has a TDP of 120 W with no power connectors, consistent with its embedded or IGP slot width designation. Display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, indicating this is not a standard desktop graphics card but rather a mobile or embedded solution adapted into this desktop build.

With no benchmark scores available, the GPU’s performance must be assessed from its specifications. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for a mid-range GPU, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and large datasets. The 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 compute places it in a mid-range category, consistent with its 50th percentile ranking. For rendering workloads, the 76 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, and the 304 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-accelerated features, but the overall compute throughput is not competitive with higher-tier desktop GPUs.