SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

98 Score

Top 2% Ranking

98 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation combine a 20-core desktop processor with a workstation-class graphics card. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing — the data pack contains no measuredFps data — so all gaming performance discussion is framed as estimated from benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors in a 243 mm² die. Its base clock is 3.90 GHz and boost clock 5.50 GHz, with a 125W TDP. The cache layout is generous: 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and the chip connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. There is no integrated graphics — the "KF" designation signals a graphics-less part — and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The launch MSRP is $379.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. In Cinebench R23 it scores 49736 multi-core and 7021 single-core; in Geekbench 22913 multi and 2759 single; in Passmark 58518 multi-thread and 4928 single-thread. The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, which averages 71797 against the 265KF’s 71910 — a 0.2% advantage for the Intel. The Intel Xeon 6517P sits 0.6% higher, and the Intel Xeon 6724P 0.7% higher, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 trails by 0.8%. This places the 265KF in a narrow band where no single rival is more than 1% away, suggesting the chip is essentially tied with several high-end Xeons and a mobile HX part in aggregate benchmarks.

Real workloads benefit from the high boost clock for lightly-threaded tasks and the large core count for parallel work. The lack of simultaneous multithreading means 20 threads must come from 20 physical cores, but the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 indicates excellent throughput for rendering, compiling, and simulation. The single-core R23 score of 7021 indicates strong responsiveness in applications that rely on one or two threads, such as office software or legacy code. The PassMark sub-scores show a balanced profile: data compression at 666589, data encryption at 48198, extended instructions at 54513, integer math at 143351, floating point at 189431, physics at 3633, and random string sorting at 79735. The single-thread PassMark of 4928 confirms that the 5.50 GHz boost clock is not just a specification but a measurable asset.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF have?

A: It has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does it support?

A: It supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is marked N/A; this processor requires a discrete GPU.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The 265KF scores 71910 average, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71797) and 0.6% lower than the Intel Xeon 6517P (72350).

Q: What is the process node and foundry?

A: It is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, enabling overclocking.

Q: What is the launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $379.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves a 94th percentile rank among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 71910. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 49736 and single-core is 7021. Cinebench R20 scores are 20889 multi-core and 2948 single-core, while R15 scores are 5013 and 707. Geekbench yields 22913 multi-core and 2759 single-core. PassMark tests show 58518 for multithread, 4928 for single-thread, 666589 for data compression, 48198 for encryption, 54513 for extended instructions, 486 for prime numbers, 189431 for floating point math, 143351 for integer math, 3633 for physics, and 79735 for random string sorting.

The GPU is an NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, scoring 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Vulkan, giving it a 95th percentile rank among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 135218. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 95, meaning the two components sit at a nearly identical tier of performance relative to their own categories. The nearest GPU rivals are the NVIDIA A10M at 135230 (delta 0%), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135396 (delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo at 135774 (delta -0.4%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 at 136472 (delta -0.9%). This indicates the RTX 4000 Ada is essentially tied with the A10M and within 1% of the other workstation cards.

The overall picture is a system that is exceptionally well-rounded: the CPU is 94th percentile and the GPU 95th percentile, with a combined 95th percentile. The data suggests no significant performance gap between the two components — both are top-tier parts, and the bottleneck is likely to be either the workload’s scalability or the platform’s memory bandwidth rather than one component severely outpacing the other.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 7021 and GPU’s 95th percentile rank suggest strong frame generation capability, but with no measured FPS data, exact frame rates are estimates. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance support high-resolution textures, while the CPU’s 5.50 GHz boost clock should keep frame pacing consistent.

Streaming: The CPU’s multi-core score of 49736 in R23 provides ample headroom for encoding software, and the GPU’s 192 tensor cores offer hardware acceleration for AI-based features. The system should handle simultaneous game and encode workloads without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU’s 20 threads and 30 MB L3 cache, combined with the GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS FP16 performance, accelerate timeline scrubbing and export. The 20 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for multi-layer 4K or 8K sequences.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 49736 multi-core score directly translates to shorter render times in CPU-based renderers, while the GPU’s 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing and denoising. The 20 GB GDDR6 memory prevents memory spills on large scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math of 143351 and data compression of 666589 indicate strong compilation and archiving throughput. The single-thread score of 4928 supports fast interactive editing, and the 20 cores enable parallel builds.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core performance and the GPU’s 95th percentile make the system responsive for everyday tasks, but the hardware is far beyond typical office needs. The CPU’s low TDP of 125W and the GPU’s 130W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 300W, mean the system is power-efficient for a desktop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at 94th percentile and the GPU at 95th percentile, a difference of one percentile point, indicating a near-perfect balance. The average benchmark scores tell a similar story: the CPU’s 71910 average is 0.2% higher than the closest rival, while the GPU’s 135218 average is 0.0% different from the NVIDIA A10M. In workloads that rely on a single thread, the CPU’s 5.50 GHz boost clock and R23 single-core 7021 should not bottleneck the GPU. In heavily threaded workloads, the CPU’s 20 cores can feed the GPU’s 6144 shading units without waiting.

The bottleneck is most likely to be the platform’s memory bandwidth: the CPU’s 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 and the GPU’s 360.0 GB/s GDDR6 are both fast, but the CPU’s memory bandwidth is modest relative to its core count. For workloads that stream data from CPU to GPU, the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface of the GPU (with CPU PCIe 5.0 lanes) is sufficient. No measured FPS data exists, so bottleneck analysis relies on percentile gaps: with both at 94-95, the system is balanced enough that the limiting factor will be the specific game or application’s optimization, not a component disparity.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 1500 MHz and boost 2175 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. It delivers 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 and 26.73 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), with a pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s. The TDP is 130W, with a single-slot design and a 1x 16-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 300W.

Geekbench OpenCL score is 146593 and Vulkan score is 123842. The 95th percentile rank places it among the top 5% of GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, has an average score of 135230, a delta of 0%, meaning the two are statistically indistinguishable. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 is 0.1% higher, the W6800X Duo 0.4% higher, and the Radeon PRO V620 0.9% higher. This indicates the RTX 4000 Ada is within 1% of several strong workstation competitors, with the V620 being the fastest of the group.

For rendering, the 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray tracing and AI denoising, while the 26.73 TFLOPS FP16 performance is well-suited for machine learning inference. The 20 GB VRAM is the headline feature for large scenes and datasets. The 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for a 160-bit bus, and the 2.175 GHz boost clock keeps throughput high.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, supporting dual-channel DDR5 memory. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible. The CPU’s TDP is 125W and the GPU’s is 130W, with a suggested PSU of 300W — a headroom of 45W over the sum of the two components, leaving no room for heavy overclocking but sufficient for stock operation.

The CPU is the current top of the Ultra 7 lineup, and the platform supports the same socket for future upgrades, though the data pack does not list any other compatible processors. The GPU is a single-slot card with a 245mm length and 112mm height, fitting in most desktop cases. The next sensible upgrade would be to add more memory or storage, but the CPU and GPU are already at the 94th and 95th percentiles respectively, so a meaningful upgrade would require moving to a higher-tier GPU or CPU, which is not within the scope of the data.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class system combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF (20 cores, 20 threads) and the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation (20 GB GDDR6). The combined percentile is 95, meaning the overall system sits in the top 5% of builds. The CPU is at the 94th percentile and GPU at 95th, so the pairing is evenly matched, with the GPU having a slight edge. The system is best described as a high-end workstation for compute-heavy tasks, with the CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache and the GPU’s 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores making it suitable for both traditional rendering and AI-accelerated workflows.

Who Should Build It

Gamers seeking high-refresh 4K or high-frame-rate 1440p will benefit from the CPU’s single-core boost of 5.50 GHz and the GPU’s 95th percentile performance, though actual FPS is estimated. Content creators editing large videos or doing 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 49736 multi-core R23 score and the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM essential. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 cores and 58518 PassMark multithread score. Students in engineering or data science can leverage the GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 for simulations, and small business workstations can use the system for CAD and design. The 20 GB VRAM is a strong asset for professional workloads such as medical imaging or architecture visualization.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation combination, so all frame rates are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 7021 indicates it can maintain high IPC for frame pacing, and the GPU’s 95th percentile rank suggests it is one of the fastest workstation GPUs. For 4K gaming, the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 should handle high-resolution textures, while the 5.50 GHz CPU boost clock reduces latency. For 1440p, the GPU is likely the limiting factor, but its 95th percentile suggests it can push high frame rates. Without measured data, exact FPS numbers cannot be stated, but the hardware profile places this system in the upper tier of gaming desktops, assuming the workstation driver is optimized for gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds