SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Usage Scenarios

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a desktop configuration that targets professional workloads first and gaming second. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outclasses the vast majority of processors available for multi-threaded tasks. For high-refresh gaming, the combination is workable but not ideal: the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 sits at the 67th percentile, and its nearest rivals include the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which is within 1% in average benchmark score. This suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, especially at higher resolutions where the Quadro RTX 5000's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may help with textures but not with raw frame throughput.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 58518 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 22913. The lack of integrated graphics means the CPU cannot offload encoding tasks to an iGPU, so streamers must rely entirely on the discrete GPU's capabilities. The Quadro RTX 5000 has 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores, which can accelerate AI-enhanced streaming features and ray-traced effects, but its FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS is modest by modern standards. For video editing, the CPU's single-core performance is strong—Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021 and Geekbench single-core score of 2759—which helps with timeline scrubbing and effects that rely on single-threaded performance. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is ample for 4K video projects, and its 348.5 GTexel/s texture rate suggests it can handle multiple high-resolution streams in real-time preview.

3D rendering is where this pairing shows its strengths and weaknesses. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20889 and R15 multi-core score of 5013 indicate it can handle complex scene construction and physics simulations efficiently. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 6525 is comparatively low, meaning GPU-accelerated rendering will not be as fast as dedicated render workstations. However, the 48 RT cores can accelerate ray-traced renders in supported applications, and the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is sufficient for interactive viewport rendering. Software development benefits from the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 143351 and extended instructions score of 54513, which help with compilation and code analysis. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data, which is crucial for large codebases.

Student and office work is overkill for this configuration. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4928 is more than adequate for productivity applications, and the 20 cores ensure smooth multitasking across dozens of browser tabs, document editors, and communication tools. The GPU's 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and 1x USB Type-C allow for multi-monitor setups common in research and data analysis. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for memory-intensive spreadsheet operations and virtual machines, though the lack of ECC memory support may be a concern for long-running scientific computations.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking across all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU's 67th percentile, creating a clear bottleneck in graphics-bound tasks. The nearest CPU rivals—AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX at 0.2% higher average score, Intel Xeon 6517P at 0.6% lower, Intel Xeon 6724P at 0.7% lower, and Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 at 0.8% higher—are all server or high-end mobile parts, confirming the CPU is in elite territory. Meanwhile, the GPU's nearest rivals include the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (1% lower) and RTX A4000 Mobile (1.2% higher), which are mid-range or mobile parts, showing the GPU is solidly mainstream.

In gaming workloads, the GPU will limit frame rates in virtually every scenario. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3633 and data compression score of 666589 indicate it can feed frames to the GPU faster than the GPU can render them. The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that at 1080p, the GPU's PassMark DirectX 11 score of 140 and DirectX 12 score of 59 would produce playable but not high-refresh results in modern titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 16 GB memory capacity helps with texture streaming, but the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput become the limiting factors.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data encryption (PassMark score of 48198), and prime number finding (PassMark score of 486), the CPU is the clear workhorse. The GPU's compute capabilities are secondary, and its PassMark GPU compute score of 6525 is only about 11% of the CPU's average benchmark score of 71910. The combined percentile of 81 for this pairing reflects the CPU pulling the overall score up while the GPU drags it down. In professional applications that can use both processors—such as video encoding with CPU-based x264 and GPU-based NVENC—the balance is more favorable, but the GPU's age (released 2018-08-12, now end-of-life) means it lacks modern hardware features.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is built on the Arrow Lake architecture with a 3 nm process node from TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It features 20 cores and 20 threads, indicating no hyperthreading, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The 125 W TDP is reasonable for the performance class, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking for users who need extra performance. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a total of 60 MB of L2 across all cores plus the L3.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 places this CPU in the 94th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 71910 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (0.2% difference). The single-core performance is equally impressive: Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021 and Geekbench single-core score of 2759. These scores translate to snappy application launches and responsive single-threaded workloads. The PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: floating-point math score of 189431, integer math score of 143351, and random string sorting score of 79735, all indicating strong general-purpose computation.

The memory support for DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the CPU's capabilities, though not exceptional. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes (CPU only) provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern NVMe SSDs and GPUs. However, the lack of integrated graphics means the "KF" designation requires a discrete GPU for any display output. The architecture's 3 nm process from TSMC is high-end, contributing to the CPU's high performance-per-watt. For real workloads, the 20 cores handle heavily threaded tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific simulations with ease, while the high boost clock ensures single-threaded tasks like gaming and legacy software run smoothly.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets professionals who need extreme CPU performance but have modest GPU requirements. Gamers at 1080p with esports titles will find the CPU more than capable—its PassMark single-thread score of 4928 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021 ensure high frame rates in CPU-bound games—but the GPU will cap performance in graphically demanding titles. Content creators working with 4K video editing will benefit from the CPU's multi-core power for rendering timelines and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM for previewing effects. The PassMark data compression score of 666589 and encryption score of 48198 make this suitable for data-heavy workflows like database management and file archiving.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 143351 and the 30 MB L3 cache, which reduces recompilation times. The lack of ECC memory is a drawback for mission-critical development environments, but for most development work, the dual-channel DDR5 support is sufficient. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU overkill for their needs but capable of handling any academic workload, including machine learning projects that can use the GPU's 384 tensor cores. Small business workstations running virtual machines, accounting software, and moderate CAD applications will perform well, with the GPU's 4x DisplayPort outputs supporting multi-monitor setups for increased productivity.

The GPU's workstation heritage—the Quadro RTX 5000 with 16 GB GDDR6 and 256-bit memory bus—makes this build suitable for entry-level 3D modeling and architectural visualization, though the 67th percentile GPU ranking means it is not competitive with modern workstation GPUs. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking ensures that this system will not become CPU-bound for years, making it a sensible choice for users who plan to upgrade the GPU later. The release date of 2024-10-23 for the CPU and 2018-08-12 for the GPU highlights the generational gap: this is a modern CPU paired with an older GPU, which is a sensible strategy for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads and plan to upgrade the GPU when budgets allow.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA 1851 platform for Arrow Lake processors. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is essential for high-speed NVMe storage and future GPUs that can utilize PCIe 5.0 bandwidth. The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, but the older interface will limit data transfer rates between the CPU and GPU in bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 230 W TDP suggest a total system power draw that is manageable with a quality power supply. The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, which is sufficient for this pairing given the CPU's modest TDP. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector, and its dual-slot form factor with 267 mm length and 111 mm height should fit in most mid-tower cases. A sensible next upgrade would be a modern GPU with higher performance, as the CPU has headroom to support much faster graphics cards. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes can accommodate a single high-end GPU and multiple NVMe drives without bottlenecking.

The platform's production status is active for the CPU, meaning long-term availability and BIOS updates are likely. The GPU is end-of-life, so users should not expect driver optimizations for new games or applications. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz are already high, leaving limited headroom. The 30 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, and the 3 MB L2 per core provides fast local storage for frequently accessed data. For users considering an upgrade, the most impactful change would be replacing the Quadro RTX 5000 with a GPU that has a higher PassMark G3D score, as the current GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616, DirectX 11 score of 140, and DirectX 12 score of 59 provide a basis for estimating gaming performance. The DirectX 12 score of 59 is particularly telling, as modern games increasingly rely on DX12 features. The GPU's nearest rival, the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, has an average score only 1% higher, which historically delivers 60+ FPS at 1080p in most games with medium-to-high settings. Therefore, the Quadro RTX 5000 should achieve similar frame rates at 1080p, with the 16 GB VRAM providing headroom for high-resolution textures.

The CPU's gaming potential is strong: its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021 and PassMark single-thread score of 4928 are in the top tier for gaming CPUs. At 1080p, the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck, allowing the GPU to reach its maximum frame rate. At 1440p, the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 will limit performance to roughly 40-60 FPS in demanding titles, depending on optimization. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern games, though less demanding esports titles may reach 60 FPS. The GPU's 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores enable ray tracing and DLSS-like features, but the older Turing architecture's implementation is less efficient than newer generations.

The PassMark DirectX 9 score of 195 and DirectX 10 score of 113 indicate strong legacy DirectX performance, which is relevant for older games that rely on these APIs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309 and OpenCL score of 78999 suggest the GPU can handle Vulkan-based games and compute workloads, but the DirectX 12 score of 59 is the most relevant for current titles. Overall, this pairing is not ideal for high-refresh gaming (144Hz+), as the GPU's performance is below that threshold in most games. For 60Hz gaming at 1080p or 1440p with adjusted settings, the system is adequate, but users should temper expectations for 4K gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81, indicating it outperforms 81% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has an average benchmark score of 71910, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71797) and 0.6% higher than the Intel Xeon 6517P (72350).

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and TDP?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 3.90 GHz, a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and a TDP of 125 W.

Q: What is the GPU's suggested power supply wattage?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W, with power delivered via 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin connectors.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX A4000 Mobile?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21629, which is 1.2% lower than the RTX A4000 Mobile's score of 21379.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, a 20-core Arrow Lake processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a Turing-architecture workstation GPU. The CPU is a top-tier part, ranking in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 67th percentile, creating a configuration that is CPU-dominant. The combined percentile of 81 places this build in the upper quintile of all desktop systems, making it a high-performance workstation rather than a gaming rig. The CPU's release date of 2024-10-23 and active production status contrast with the GPU's 2018-08-12 release and end-of-life status, highlighting the generational mismatch.

The build class is desktop, and the architecture is designed for productivity. The CPU's 17,800 million transistors on a 3 nm process from TSMC represent the latest manufacturing technology, while the GPU's 13,600 million transistors on a 12 nm process from TSMC are from an older node. The system's overall tier is high for CPU-bound tasks, with the GPU dragging down performance in graphics-intensive workloads. Users should view this as a CPU-first build with a capable but aging GPU, suitable for professional applications that leverage multi-core processing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are exceptional: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736, Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20889, Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5013, Geekbench multi-core score of 22913, and PassMark multi-thread score of 58518. The single-core scores are equally strong: Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021, Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2948, Cinebench R15 single-core score of 707, Geekbench single-core score of 2759, and PassMark single-thread score of 4928. These scores place the CPU in the 94th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 71910.

The GPU's benchmark scores are more modest: PassMark G3D score of 15616, PassMark GPU compute score of 6525, Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309. The DirectX scores are mixed: DirectX 9 score of 195, DirectX 10 score of 113, DirectX 11 score of 140, DirectX 12 score of 59. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU contributes disproportionately to the overall performance, with the GPU providing adequate but not outstanding graphics capabilities. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 1% in average score, while the GPU's nearest rivals include the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which is 1% lower, and the RTX A4000 Mobile, which is 1.2% higher.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is built on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process from TSMC with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. The GPU has a base clock of 1620 MHz and a boost clock of 1815 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for workstation tasks but not exceptional by modern standards.

The FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1) indicate the GPU can handle compute workloads, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 6525 is modest compared to modern GPUs. The 48 RT cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 384 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features like DLSS, though the Turing implementation is less efficient than Ampere or Ada Lovelace. The pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s are sufficient for 4K rendering at moderate settings. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current software. The dual-slot design with 267 mm length and 111 mm height fits most cases, and the display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. The 230 W TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU is reasonable, and the power connectors (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin) are standard. For rendering workloads, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature, allowing large scenes and high-resolution textures to fit in memory, but the compute performance limits its usefulness for GPU-accelerated rendering compared to newer workstation GPUs.