SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 presents a distinct imbalance that shapes every workload. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards. That spread of 33 percentile points tells the story: this system is heavily CPU-dominant, and the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-bound tasks.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF’s benchmark scores reinforce this. Its average benchmark score of 71,910 places it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, effectively a statistical tie. The CPU can feed a far more powerful GPU than the Quadro RTX 4000 in most scenarios. The 20-core, 20-thread configuration with a 5.50 GHz boost clock gives it substantial headroom for compute-heavy workloads that never touch the GPU at all.

For gaming, the bottleneck will almost always be the Quadro RTX 4000. The GPU’s 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are modest by modern standards, and its 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM will constrain texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions. The CPU, meanwhile, can handle frame generation and physics calculations without breaking a sweat. In CPU-bound titles at lower resolutions, the GPU will still cap framerates well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

Content creation workloads show a more balanced picture. The CPU’s 49,736 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 7,021 single-core score provide strong rendering and encoding performance, while the GPU’s 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced previews and AI-assisted tasks. However, the GPU’s 12 nm Turing architecture is older than the CPU’s 3 nm Arrow Lake process, so the GPU will bottleneck in GPU-accelerated rendering pipelines.

The Passmark data compression score of 666,589 and encryption score of 48,198 indicate the CPU handles data-intensive tasks with ease, meaning storage and memory compression workloads will not be CPU-limited. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate but not exceptional, so memory bandwidth could become a secondary bottleneck in highly parallel workloads.

# Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers exceptional raw compute. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,736 and single-core score of 7,021 place it firmly in high-end desktop territory. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22,913 and single-core score of 2,759 corroborate this positioning. The Passmark multithread score of 58,518 and floating point math score of 189,431 show strong sustained throughput for scientific and financial workloads.

The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking means it outperforms roughly 94% of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 71,910 is just 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX and 0.8% above the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270, while trailing the Intel Xeon 6517P by 0.6% and the Intel Xeon 6724P by 0.7%. These are tight margins, indicating the 265KF competes directly with enterprise-class Xeon parts despite being a desktop chip.

The Quadro RTX 4000 tells a different story. Its average benchmark score of 17,789 places it at the 61st percentile, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,873 showing modest modern gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,540 and Vulkan score of 78,844 indicate the GPU handles compute APIs reasonably well for its class. The Passmark G3D score of 15,117 and GPU compute score of 6,176 reflect its workstation-oriented design.

The GPU’s nearest rivals reveal its competitive position. It sits just 0.7% above the AMD Radeon HD 7790, 0.9% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, and 1.1% above the AMD Radeon 780M, while trailing the AMD Radeon Pro 560 by 1.4%. The near-tie with the RTX 4060 is notable, as that consumer card has a similar performance class but lacks the Quadro’s workstation features.

The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-range GPU. The 78th combined percentile reflects this duality. The CPU will excel in multi-threaded productivity, compilation, and simulation tasks, while the GPU handles professional visualization and light-to-moderate rendering workloads. For tasks that scale well across both components, the CPU will frequently wait on the GPU.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has 20 cores and 20 threads, meaning no hyperthreading. It runs at a 3.90 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.50 GHz, with a 125 W TDP.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 265KF’s average benchmark score of 71,910 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, 0.8% higher than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270, 0.6% lower than the Intel Xeon 6517P, and 0.7% lower than the Intel Xeon 6724P.

Q: What memory and storage does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and there is no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory speed is 1625 MHz with 13 Gbps effective transfer rate.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and AI acceleration?

A: Yes. The Quadro RTX 4000 includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, with FP32 performance of 7.119 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Q: What is the GPU’s power requirement?

A: The GPU has a 160 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested PSU. It uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a single slot, measuring 241 mm in length.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000’s average benchmark score of 17,789 is 0.9% higher than the RTX 4060’s 17,639, making them nearly identical in raw performance.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need serious CPU horsepower but only moderate GPU acceleration. The 94th percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent fit for software developers compiling large codebases, engineers running simulation software, and researchers processing data-heavy workloads. The Passmark integer math score of 143,351 and extended instructions score of 54,513 indicate strong performance for encryption, compression, and scientific computing.

Content creators working with 8K video encoding or complex 3D scene rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 49,736 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, while the GPU’s 36 RT cores accelerate ray-traced previews in DCC applications. The Quadro branding ensures certified drivers for professional software, which matters for stability in production environments. However, the 8 GB VRAM limits texture-heavy scenes and large batch renders.

Gamers at 1080p will find the system capable, but the GPU will cap performance in demanding titles. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and the CPU’s power goes underutilized. This is not a gaming-first build; it is a workstation build that can handle gaming as a secondary activity.

Small business workstations handling financial modeling, database management, or CAD work will benefit from the CPU’s 666,589 Passmark data compression score and 48,198 encryption score. The 20 cores handle parallel workloads efficiently, and the single-core boost of 5.50 GHz ensures responsive interactive use. The lack of ECC memory support is a consideration for mission-critical data integrity, but the DDR5 platform offers adequate performance.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU handles their workloads well, from compiling assignments to running simulations. The GPU’s 61st percentile ranking means it can handle standard graphics tasks and light CUDA compute, though students pursuing heavy GPU compute research would need a more powerful card.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This is a current-generation socket, so future Arrow Lake refreshes may be compatible, but the platform is not as mature as older LGA 1700 or AM5 options. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, so upgrading memory capacity is straightforward, though bandwidth is capped at 102.4 GB/s.

The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and high-end GPUs. The CPU’s 125 W TDP is modest for a 20-core part, meaning most quality air coolers or 240mm-class liquid coolers can handle it. The multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is possible, but the 5.50 GHz boost already approaches the architecture’s practical limits.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU. The CPU has enough headroom to feed a GPU with significantly higher performance than the Quadro RTX 4000. The 450 W suggested PSU for the current GPU leaves room for a card with a higher TDP, but users should check total system power requirements before upgrading. The single 8-pin power connector on the current GPU means the PSU likely has additional connectors available.

The GPU’s PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is a limitation for future upgrades. While it works with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes through backward compatibility, a modern GPU on a Gen 5 slot would benefit from higher bandwidth. The GPU’s end-of-life production status means it is not a long-term platform component, and its 12 nm process is outdated compared to the CPU’s 3 nm node.

For users who need more GPU compute, upgrading to a modern workstation card with larger VRAM would be the priority. The CPU’s 20 threads handle multi-threaded workloads well, and the 30 MB L3 cache provides solid data locality. The memory system is dual-channel, so adding more DDR5 capacity is easy, but the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth may become a bottleneck in memory-intensive workloads.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,873 and Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 suggest modest gaming capability, while the CPU’s strong single-core performance ensures it will not be a limiting factor in most titles.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this system should handle esports titles and older games well, with the CPU’s 7,021 Cinebench R23 single-core score providing solid frame pacing. The GPU’s 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is sufficient for mid-range gaming, but the 8 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in newer AAA titles. The GPU’s 61st percentile ranking places it below most dedicated gaming GPUs from the last few generations.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle with modern titles at ultra settings. The 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 1440p, but the 36 RT cores, while present, are first-generation Turing RT cores and will not deliver playable ray-traced framerates in most games. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 10 score of 108 indicate the GPU handles older APIs better than modern ones.

At 4K, the system is not viable for gaming at high settings. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM will be exceeded by many titles, and the 256-bit memory bus, while decent, cannot sustain the bandwidth needed for 4K textures. The CPU would sit largely idle, with its 94th percentile performance wasted on frame generation tasks that the GPU cannot keep pace with.

The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 78,844 suggests it handles Vulkan-based games relatively well, which could benefit titles using that API. However, the overall gaming picture is that this is a workstation GPU, not a gaming GPU. Users who prioritize gaming should look elsewhere, while those who game occasionally at 1080p will find acceptable performance in less demanding titles.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake-S architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process. It features 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The lack of hyperthreading means 20 threads can only be handled by 20 physical cores, which is unusual for a high-end desktop chip but reflects the architecture’s focus on efficiency.

The 3.90 GHz base clock and 5.50 GHz boost clock give it strong single-thread performance, confirmed by the 7,021 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 2,759 Geekbench single-core score. The 94th percentile ranking places it among the top desktop CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 71,910 rivals enterprise Xeon parts. The 49,736 Cinebench R23 multi-core score demonstrates substantial parallel capability, making it suitable for rendering, compilation, and scientific workloads.

The Passmark suite reveals specific strengths: integer math at 143,351, floating point math at 189,431, and extended instructions at 54,513. The data compression score of 666,589 and encryption score of 48,198 indicate strong performance in data-heavy tasks. The random string sorting score of 79,735 and find prime numbers score of 486 show the CPU handles algorithmically diverse workloads well.

The CPU’s 3 nm process node and 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die give it excellent power efficiency relative to its performance. The 125 W TDP is low for a 20-core part, meaning cooling requirements are manageable. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is a potential limitation, as higher-end platforms offer quad-channel memory.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, which it matches within 0.2%, and several Intel Xeon parts. The Xeon 6517P and 6724P outperform it by 0.6% and 0.7% respectively, while the Xeon Platinum 8270 trails by 0.8%. This places the 265KF in a competitive position against both consumer and enterprise processors, though it lacks ECC memory support.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, creating a system with a combined percentile of 78. The CPU is a current-generation Arrow Lake part with a 94th percentile ranking, while the GPU is an end-of-life Turing workstation card at the 61st percentile. This is a workstation-oriented configuration where CPU performance dominates.

The build class is desktop, with a single-slot GPU that measures 241 mm in length and requires a 450 W PSU. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so the Quadro RTX 4000 is the only display output, providing 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. The system supports PCIe Gen 5 for storage and expansion, though the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16.

The 78th combined percentile indicates this system outperforms most desktop configurations, but the gap between CPU and GPU performance creates an unbalanced profile. For CPU-intensive workloads, this is a high-end system; for GPU-intensive workloads, it is mid-range. Users should understand this split before committing to the build.

The CPU’s launch MSRP is $379, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 899 USD. The GPU’s end-of-life status means it may be available at reduced prices, but the performance gap to newer cards is significant. The CPU’s active production status ensures ongoing availability and platform support.

This build is best suited for professionals who need serious CPU compute but only moderate GPU acceleration. It is not a gaming system, nor is it a high-end rendering workstation. It occupies a middle ground that few other configurations fill, and its success depends on matching the workload to the CPU’s strengths.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm TSMC process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It has 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores. The GPU runs at a 1005 MHz base clock and 1545 MHz boost clock, with memory at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective).

The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for professional workloads but limiting for large datasets. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 7.119 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) place it in the mid-range of workstation cards. The pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s are modest by modern standards.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 17,789 places it at the 61st percentile, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,873 showing limited gaming capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,540 and Vulkan score of 78,844 indicate it handles compute workloads reasonably well. The Passmark G3D score of 15,117 and GPU compute score of 6,176 reflect its workstation orientation.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which it beats by 0.7%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, which it beats by 0.9%. The AMD Radeon 780M trails by 1.1%, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560 is 1.4% ahead. The near-tie with the RTX 4060 is notable, but the Quadro’s workstation drivers and RT/tensor cores differentiate it for professional use.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern APIs. The 160 W TDP and single-slot design make it easy to integrate into workstation builds, and the 450 W suggested PSU is modest. The GPU’s end-of-life production status means it is not a forward-looking investment, but its 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores still accelerate professional workloads like ray-traced rendering and AI inference.