SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D: A Flagship Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 20-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell GPU, placing the system in the 93rd percentile overall among all benchmarked builds. The data shows a desktop-class configuration with a CPU that scores 94th percentile among all CPUs and a GPU at 92nd percentile among all GPUs, making this one of the most capable combinations in the database. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture at TSMC's 3 nm process node. With a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, this chip is designed for high sustained throughput. The absence of hyperthreading — 20 cores and 20 threads — is a notable design choice, prioritizing physical cores over logical threads. The processor carries a 125 W TDP, a 30 MB shared L3 cache, and per-core L2 caches of 3 MB, with 192 KB of L1 per core. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the chip uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49,736 places it in the upper echelon of desktop CPUs, while the single-core score of 7,021 indicates strong per-thread performance. Geekbench results corroborate this: 22,913 multicore and 2,759 single-core. The Passmark multithread score of 58,518 shows substantial parallel capability, and the integer math score of 143,351 suggests strong general-purpose compute. Floating-point math reaches 189,431, indicating solid performance for scientific and engineering applications that rely on FPU throughput.

The nearest rival data puts the 265KF in tight competition with server-class Xeon parts. The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX scores an average of 71,797 — just 0.2% below the Intel chip's 71,910 average. The Intel Xeon 6517P is 0.6% behind, and the Xeon 6724P trails by 0.7%. Only the Xeon Platinum 8270 comes close from below at 0.8% behind. This clustering suggests the 265KF delivers performance comparable to enterprise processors while targeting the desktop segment. The Passmark data encryption score of 48,198 and data compression score of 666,589 indicate that the chip handles cryptography and archival workloads with ease, making it suitable for database servers and backup systems.

Single-threaded performance is equally compelling. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,928 and Cinebench R15 single-core score of 707 reflect strong IPC for Arrow Lake. Extended instruction score of 54,513 on Passmark shows robust SIMD and vector processing support. The find prime numbers score of 486 is modest, suggesting that pure integer prime-finding — a workload sensitive to branch prediction and cache latency — is not this chip's strongest suit, but this is a niche test rather than a representative workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has 20 cores and 20 threads. It does not use hyperthreading, so each core corresponds to exactly one thread, running at a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 265KF's average benchmark score of 71,910 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, 0.6% higher than the Intel Xeon 6517P, and 0.7% higher than the Intel Xeon 6724P. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 trails by 0.8%.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does the platform offer?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked. The 265KF supports overclocking, allowing users to push the 5.50 GHz boost clock higher, subject to cooling and power delivery limits.

Q: What process node and die size does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 5090 D is built on TSMC's 5 nm process with a die size of 750 mm², containing 92,200 million transistors. The CPU uses a 3 nm process with a 243 mm² die and 17,800 million transistors.

Q: What is the overall system percentile?

A: The combined build ranks in the 93rd percentile among all configurations in the database, with the CPU at 94th percentile and GPU at 92nd percentile.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data indicates a well-balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in their respective percentile positions — 94th for the CPU and 92nd for the GPU. This near-parity suggests that neither component will consistently dominate as the limiting factor across a broad range of workloads, though specific applications may favor one side.

For CPU-bound tasks, the 265KF's multicore throughput is the primary driver. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49,736 and Passmark multithread score of 58,518 indicate that rendering, compilation, and scientific simulation will be limited by CPU performance only in the most extreme parallel scenarios. The GPU, with its Passmark G3D score of 44,065, will not bottleneck these workloads since they rely on CPU cores rather than graphics hardware.

In GPU-bound scenarios — such as high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering with ray tracing — the RTX 5090 D becomes the critical component. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,915 demonstrate exceptional graphics throughput. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,928 on Passmark ensures that it can feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations without stalling, but at 4K resolution, the GPU's pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s is likely the constraining factor.

The data shows a system that avoids severe imbalance. In mixed workloads like video editing — which uses both CPU for encoding and GPU for effects — the 20-core CPU and 32 GB GPU memory work in tandem. The Passmark GPU compute score of 28,396 indicates strong general-purpose compute on the GPU, while the CPU's floating-point score of 189,431 handles CPU-side physics and filter calculations. The 575 W GPU TDP and 125 W CPU TDP together suggest a power envelope that requires robust cooling, but the component performance tiers align well.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets power users who demand maximum throughput in both CPU- and GPU-intensive applications. Gamers at 4K resolution will find the RTX 5090 D's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth sufficient for ultra-high-detail textures and ray tracing, while the 265KF's single-thread score of 4,928 ensures high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound titles. Esports players at 1080p or 1440p with high-refresh displays will benefit from the CPU's boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which helps maintain frame rates above the 240 Hz ceiling on competitive monitors.

Content creators working with 8K video or complex After Effects compositions will leverage the 20 cores for encoding and the 32 GB GPU memory for previewing large timelines. The Cinebench R23 score of 49,736 indicates that 4K video exports complete significantly faster than mainstream 8-core processors, while the GPU's 32 GB capacity allows for multi-layer compositing without spilling to system RAM.

Software developers building large C++ projects or running virtual machines will appreciate the 20 threads and 30 MB L3 cache. The Passmark data compression score of 666,589 accelerates build artifact archiving, and the dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s supports heavy compilation workloads. Data scientists running machine learning training will use the GPU's 680 tensor cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance for model training, while the CPU's 48,198 encryption score handles data preprocessing.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find this system overkill for coursework but capable of handling final-year projects involving CAD, finite element analysis, or deep learning. Small business workstations running database servers or financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's server-comparable scores — within 0.7% of Xeon 6724P — without requiring a full server platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 71,910, placing it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs. This is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, 0.6% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6517P, 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6724P, and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49,736 is the standout result, while the single-core score of 7,021 confirms strong per-thread performance. Passmark results show a balanced profile: 58,518 multithread, 143,351 integer math, 189,431 floating-point math, and 666,589 data compression.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 77,712, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. This is 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT, 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 2.1% behind the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, and 2.4% behind the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,915 are the strongest indicators of gaming performance. Passmark G3D score of 44,065 and GPU compute score of 28,396 round out the picture.

Combined, the system ranks in the 93rd percentile overall. The data shows a CPU that wins its head-to-heads against AMD and Intel rivals and a GPU that trades blows with high-end data-center accelerators — the Tesla P100 models are 2.1% and 2.4% ahead, but those parts lack modern gaming features. The absence of measured FPS data means these scores serve as the primary performance proxy, with the 3DMark and Geekbench results being the most direct indicators of real-world gaming capability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU built on TSMC's 5 nm process with a massive 750 mm² die containing 92,200 million transistors. The chip, designated GB202, operates at a base clock of 2017 MHz and boosts to 2407 MHz. Memory is 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth — a figure that enables high-resolution texture streaming and large dataset processing without capacity constraints.

The GPU contains 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 170 dedicated RT cores, while 680 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. Compute throughput reaches 104.8 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with the pixel rate at 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate at 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The 575 W TDP requires a 950 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector. The card is dual-slot with dimensions of 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 48 mm width.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs best in modern APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,915 shows excellent Vulkan throughput. The OpenCL score of 310,674 confirms compute capability. Passmark scores are mixed: DirectX 9 at 434, DirectX 10 at 231, DirectX 11 at 371, and DirectX 12 at 219. These lower DirectX 10 and 12 Passmark numbers are typical for modern GPUs that prioritize newer API paths, and the G3D score of 44,065 provides a holistic measure.

In rendering workloads, the 32 GB VRAM is the defining feature. It allows for 8K texture sets, massive scene graphs, and GPU-accelerated machine learning models that exceed 24 GB. The 1.79 TB/s bandwidth ensures that memory-intensive effects like depth-of-field and motion blur do not stall. The 170 RT cores deliver hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 680 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI denoising. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance is particularly relevant for AI inference, where half-precision arithmetic is preferred.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K is the primary scenario for this build. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 and Vulkan score of 376,915 indicate that the GPU can sustain high frame rates in demanding titles, while the CPU's single-thread score of 4,928 prevents bottlenecking in CPU-heavy scenes. At 4K, the 32 GB VRAM ensures that ultra texture packs and ray tracing are viable simultaneously.

Streaming and content production benefit from the 20-core CPU and GPU's NVENC-class encoding. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49,736 allows simultaneous game capture and encoding, while the GPU's 32 GB memory handles multiple OBS scenes and browser sources without framerate drops. The Passmark multithread score of 58,518 supports concurrent rendering and streaming workloads.

Video editing in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve leverages both components. The CPU's 189,431 floating-point score accelerates effects processing, and the GPU's 32 GB VRAM allows for real-time playback of 8K timelines with color grading. Export times benefit from the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20,889, which indicates fast h.264/h.265 encoding.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya uses the GPU's 21,760 shading units and 680 tensor cores for OptiX acceleration. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance dramatically reduces render times compared to CPU-only rendering, and the 32 GB VRAM permits scenes with millions of polygons. The CPU's 20 cores handle scene preparation and physics simulation.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 20 threads for parallel compilation and the 30 MB L3 cache for hot code paths. The Passmark integer math score of 143,351 accelerates build tools, and the 666,589 data compression score speeds up repository operations. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large in-memory databases.

Student and office workloads are served easily by this hardware. The CPU's 4,928 single-thread score handles spreadsheet calculations and document rendering, while the GPU's Passmark G2D score of 1,487 ensures smooth 2D desktop compositing. The 32 GB VRAM is excessive for office tasks, but the headroom allows for future-proofing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's Core Ultra 7 265KF with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5090 D. The CPU is an Arrow Lake-S part with 20 cores and 20 threads, released in October 2024 with a launch MSRP of $379. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 flagship with 32 GB GDDR7 memory, released in January 2025 with a launch MSRP of $2,299 USD. The system sits in the 93rd combined percentile, with the CPU at 94th and GPU at 92nd.

The pairing represents a top-tier desktop configuration. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking places it among the fastest processors ever benchmarked, and the GPU's 92nd percentile places it in the upper range of graphics hardware. The 20-core CPU provides ample parallel throughput for productivity, while the 32 GB GPU handles the most demanding graphics and compute workloads. The data shows no obvious weak link: both components are within 2 percentile points of each other, indicating a balanced system.

The build class is desktop, confirming that this is a stationary, high-performance workstation or gaming rig. The CPU's unlocked multiplier and the GPU's dual-slot design with a 304 mm length suggest a full-tower case with robust cooling. The 575 W GPU TDP and 125 W CPU TDP imply a total system draw that requires a high-capacity PSU, as reflected in the 950 W suggested PSU rating.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1851, which supports the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The 265KF is an unlocked multiplier part, allowing overclocking of the 5.50 GHz boost clock. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s; upgrading to higher-speed DDR5 modules would improve memory-bound workloads, though the current configuration already provides solid bandwidth.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This supports the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and leaves additional lanes for Gen 5 NVMe storage. The RTX 5090 D's 950 W suggested PSU provides headroom for the 575 W GPU and 125 W CPU, and a sensible next upgrade would be adding a second NVMe drive for storage expansion. The platform's 3 nm CPU and 5 nm GPU are both current-generation, so no immediate architectural upgrade is necessary.

The data suggests that the most meaningful upgrade path is in the CPU or GPU generation, not within the current platform. The 265KF sits at the 94th CPU percentile, meaning higher-tier Arrow Lake parts (if they exist) would offer marginal gains. The GPU's 92nd percentile indicates that only the fastest competing GPUs — such as the Tesla P100 variants that are 2.1-2.4% ahead — would provide a measurable uplift, and those are data-center parts not designed for gaming. Within this build, adding more system RAM beyond the current dual-channel configuration would be the only practical enhancement, as the 32 GB GPU memory and 20 CPU cores are unlikely to be exhausted by mainstream workloads.