SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

43,223 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Desktop Build Analysis

This build pairs Intel's 20-core Core Ultra 7 265KF desktop processor with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, landing in the 89th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile against all processors, while the GPU holds the 83rd percentile against all graphics cards, making this a high-end desktop configuration with a clear tilt toward CPU-heavy workloads. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so all game performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

FAQ

Q: What processor is at the heart of this build?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake architecture), built on a 3 nm process by TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 125 W TDP.

Q: What graphics card does this build use?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, based on the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process. It features 7,168 shading units, 56 ray-tracing cores, 224 tensor cores, 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, and a boost clock of 2475 MHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265KF has an average benchmark score of 71,910, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71,797), 0.8% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71,370), and 0.6% behind the Intel Xeon 6517P (72,350) and 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon 6724P (72,396). These are all extremely close scores, within a 1.5% band.

Q: What memory and storage interfaces does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It uses Intel Socket 1851 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory is not supported. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has a 220 W TDP and a suggested PSU rating of 550 W. The card uses a single 16-pin power connector and is dual-slot in width, measuring 267 mm in length.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 7 265KF has an unlocked multiplier, making it overclockable. It does not have integrated graphics (the "F" suffix), so a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

Q: What is the production status of these components?

A: The CPU is listed as Active in production, with a release date of 2024-10-23. The GPU is End-of-life, released on 2024-01-16, with its predecessor being GeForce 30 and successor GeForce 50.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a desktop build at the 89th percentile overall, indicating a well-above-average pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 71,910 places it at the 94th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 43,223 places it at the 83rd percentile against all GPUs. This creates a configuration where the processor is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers.

Looking at raw CPU scores, the Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers 49,736 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7,021 in single-core, alongside 20,889 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 2,948 in single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 22,913 multi-core and 2,759 single-core. These figures show a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads while maintaining respectable single-thread performance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 58,518 and single-thread score of 4,928 reinforce this dual strength.

The GPU side shows the RTX 4070 SUPER scoring 29,995 in Passmark G3D, 17,108 in Passmark GPU Compute, and 172,795 in Geekbench OpenCL, with a Vulkan score of 205,624. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it achieves 4,627. The GPU's 83rd percentile placement means it outperforms roughly 83% of all GPUs in the database, but it is not in the top tier—the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262, within 0.1%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (43,667, 1% higher), which gives context to its positioning.

The delta between CPU and GPU percentiles—94 versus 83—is the defining feature of this build. The data shows a processor that can comfortably feed any modern GPU without bottlenecking, while the GPU, although strong, is the limiting factor in graphics-bound scenarios. For tasks that scale with CPU cores, this pairing punches above its GPU class; for pure rasterization or ray tracing, the GPU's 83rd percentile is the ceiling.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is built on Arrow Lake-S architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process. It packs 20 cores and 20 threads—meaning no hyperthreading—with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The TDP is 125 W, and the processor uses Intel Socket 1851 with DDR5 memory support in dual-channel configuration, delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,736 is the headline number, and it aligns well with the Geekbench multi-core score of 22,913 and Passmark multithread score of 58,518. In Passmark sub-tests, the CPU shows particular strength in integer math (143,351), floating point math (189,431), and data compression (666,589). These are the kinds of scores that indicate strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computation.

Single-thread performance is equally important for everyday responsiveness. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7,021 and Geekbench single-core of 2,759 place it among faster desktop CPUs, which translates to snappy application launches and smooth operation in lightly threaded tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,928 confirms this. The boost clock of 5.50 GHz is the key driver here, and the unlocked multiplier means users can push beyond that if cooling permits.

The CPU's nearest rivals are a mix of AMD and Intel parts—the Ryzen 7 8840HX, Xeon 6517P, Xeon 6724P, and Xeon Platinum 8270. All four are within a 1.5% band of the Core Ultra 7 265KF's average score, which means that in aggregate performance, these chips are effectively interchangeable. The practical difference comes down to platform features, power draw, and price—not raw throughput. At a 125 W TDP with a 3 nm process, this chip is efficient for its class, though the lack of ECC memory support and integrated graphics may matter to specific users.

For real workloads, the 20-core count without hyperthreading is a deliberate design choice. Each core is physical, which can be more predictable for scheduling in some workloads, but the total thread count of 20 is lower than competitors offering 32 threads. The benchmark scores suggest this trade-off works well, as the multi-thread results are competitive with the rival parts listed.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and are willing to pair it with a solid mid-high-end GPU. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators, software developers, and professionals who run CPU-intensive applications daily. Video editors working with 4K or higher footage will see the benefit in the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,736 and the Passmark data compression score of 666,589—both indicate fast rendering and efficient codec handling.

3D artists and architects using rendering engines that scale across cores will find the 20-core processor well-suited to their needs. The Passmark floating point math score of 189,431 and integer math score of 143,351 point to strong computational throughput for simulation and modeling tasks. For software developers, the high single-thread score of 7,021 in Cinebench R23 means fast compilation of smaller projects, while the multi-thread score speeds up larger builds and test suites.

Gamers at high resolutions—1440p or 4K—will find the RTX 4070 SUPER adequate for most titles, though it is not a top-tier GPU. The 83rd percentile placement means it outperforms the majority of GPUs, but users seeking maximum frame rates in esports titles or demanding AAA games at 4K may want more. The build is less suited to those who prioritize pure gaming over productivity, as the CPU's strength is underutilized in most games.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the combination of fast single-threaded performance for everyday tasks and multi-threaded muscle for occasional heavy workloads. The lack of integrated graphics on the CPU is a non-issue here since the discrete GPU handles all display output. The build is also appropriate for researchers running data analysis or machine learning inference workloads, given the CPU's strong Passmark compute scores and the GPU's 224 tensor cores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the RTX 4070 SUPER's 29,995 Passmark G3D score and 4,627 3DMark Steel Nomad score suggest it can drive high frame rates in many titles, though the CPU's 94th percentile ensures it won't hold back the GPU at lower resolutions. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and frame rates will be more modest.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and strong multi-thread scores (49,736 in Cinebench R23) provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU also supports hardware encode via its Ada Lovelace architecture, though the CPU is more than capable of handling both tasks simultaneously.

Video editing: The combination of a 49,736 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 17,108 Passmark GPU Compute score indicates a system that can handle 4K timeline scrubbing, color grading, and export efficiently. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on the GPU helps with effects and preview rendering.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will thrive with the 58,518 Passmark multithread score. GPU-based renderers using CUDA will see solid performance from the 7,168 shading units and 224 tensor cores, though not at the level of a top-tier 90th-percentile GPU.

Software development: Compilation benefits from the multi-thread score of 58,518, while the single-thread score of 4,928 keeps the IDE responsive. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases, and the 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth aids in data-intensive builds.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical productivity, but the high single-thread performance (7,021 in Cinebench R23) ensures smooth operation in spreadsheets, browsers, and office suites. The 125 W CPU TDP and 220 W GPU TDP mean a 550 W PSU is sufficient, keeping the system manageable for a desk setup.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The RTX 4070 SUPER's 83rd percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4,627 provide a baseline for expected performance, but the lack of measured data means these are approximations.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 7,021 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can feed the GPU effectively, and the GPU's 29,995 Passmark G3D score indicates it should handle most titles at high frame rates. In CPU-bound games, the 94th percentile processor will be the stronger partner, potentially pushing frame rates higher than the GPU's percentile would suggest.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is well-suited to this resolution. The 192-bit memory bus may limit performance in memory-heavy titles, but the 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 compute should deliver solid frame rates in most games. At 4K, the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking means it will struggle with the most demanding titles at ultra settings, and users should expect to adjust settings for playable frame rates.

Ray tracing performance is supported by 56 RT cores, and the GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate API support ensures compatibility with the latest titles. The tensor cores (224) enable DLSS, which can meaningfully boost frame rates at higher resolutions. Since the CPU is not the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, the GPU's capabilities define the experience, and the estimates point to a solid 1440p gaming machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU as the limiting factor in graphics-heavy workloads. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile, an 11-point gap that means the processor has more headroom than the graphics card in most scenarios. In CPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the GPU's lower percentile is irrelevant, and the CPU's 49,736 Cinebench R23 score becomes the dominant factor.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's high single-thread performance (7,021 in Cinebench R23) means it can likely keep up with the GPU's output, and the GPU becomes the constraint. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU is unambiguously the limiting component, as the resolution increases the load on the rendering pipeline. The GPU's 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 192-bit bus are adequate but not exceptional for its class, which may become apparent in texture-heavy scenes.

The CPU's 20 threads without hyperthreading is a potential bottleneck in heavily threaded workloads that assume more threads, but the benchmark scores suggest this is not a practical issue. The nearest rival comparisons—all within 1% of average score—indicate that the CPU is well-balanced against its peers, and the bottleneck is not on the CPU side. For a system with a 125 W CPU and 220 W GPU, the 550 W suggested PSU provides reasonable headroom, and the PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes ensure the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface is not a constraint.

The practical bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the component to upgrade first if gaming performance is the priority. For productivity users, the CPU's 94th percentile means upgrades would only matter for the most demanding workloads, and the GPU's compute capabilities (17,108 Passmark GPU Compute) are sufficient for most acceleration tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265KF uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is a baseline that can be improved with faster DDR5 modules, though the memory controller is the limiting factor. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for the next generation of storage and GPUs.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes—the CPU can run the GPU at PCIe 4.0 speeds without issue. The RTX 4070 SUPER is listed as End-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, so users looking to upgrade the GPU will likely move to a newer generation. The 550 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a GPU upgrade, though a higher-wattage PSU may be needed for top-tier cards.

The CPU's TDP of 125 W and the GPU's TDP of 220 W give a combined 345 W, leaving ample room within the 550 W PSU rating for the rest of the system. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU allows overclocking, which would increase power draw but also performance. The motherboard must support Intel Socket 1851 and DDR5 memory; the PCIe Gen 5 lanes are available for M.2 SSDs or other expansion cards.

A sensible next upgrade depends on the use case. For gaming, replacing the RTX 4070 SUPER with a higher-percentile GPU would address the 83rd percentile bottleneck. For productivity, the CPU is already at the 94th percentile, so upgrades would be marginal—more memory or faster storage would likely yield better returns. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means the next GPU generation will be compatible, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory can be expanded or increased in speed. The build has a clear path forward: the CPU is a long-term investment, while the GPU is the component most likely to be replaced.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, with an overall combined percentile of 89. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake part with a 3.90 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 7,168 shading units. The CPU's 94th percentile against all processors and the GPU's 83rd percentile against all GPUs place this build firmly in the upper tier of desktop configurations.

The pairing is unbalanced toward the CPU, which is a deliberate choice for users who prioritize multi-threaded productivity over pure gaming frame rates. The CPU's 49,736 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 58,518 Passmark multithread score are the standout numbers, while the GPU's 29,995 Passmark G3D and 4,627 3DMark Steel Nomad scores are solid but not exceptional. This is a build that excels in rendering, encoding, compilation, and simulation, while still delivering strong 1440p gaming performance.

The data shows a system with a clear identity: a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-high-end GPU. It is not the fastest gaming rig, but it is a versatile desktop that can handle demanding professional workloads and high-refresh gaming at reasonable resolutions. The 89th overall percentile reflects a machine that outperforms the vast majority of builds in the database, with the CPU carrying more weight than the GPU in that ranking. For users who live in CPU-heavy applications and game as a secondary activity, this pairing is well-matched; for those who game first and work second, the GPU would be the first component to revisit.