SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture and the 3 nm TSMC process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, backed by a 125 W TDP. The chip features a hybrid layout with 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 CPU lanes. The absence of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory. This processor sits in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance for demanding workloads. Its average benchmark score of 71910 places it in direct competition with server-class parts, as evidenced by its nearest rivals: the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71797, 0.2% faster), the Intel Xeon 6517P (72350, 0.6% slower), the Intel Xeon 6724P (72396, 0.7% slower), and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71370, 0.8% faster). The data shows a tightly clustered group where the 265KF trades blows with enterprise silicon, making it a formidable desktop option.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded scenarios. In Cinebench R23, the 265KF scores 49736 points in multi-core and 7021 points in single-core tests. The multi-core figure is roughly 7 times higher than the single-core result, reflecting the scaling efficiency of its 20 physical cores. Geekbench scores of 22913 (multi-core) and 2759 (single-core) corroborate this balance. PassMark results further detail its capabilities: data compression hits 666589, data encryption reaches 48198, extended instructions score 54513, and floating-point math achieves 189431. Integer math scores 143351, while multi-thread performance is 58518. The physics test yields 3633, random string sorting hits 79735, and single-thread performance is 4928. The find prime numbers test is notably lower at 486, indicating that the architecture prioritizes throughput over certain integer-heavy algorithms. For real workloads, this translates to rapid code compilation, smooth video encoding, and responsive application multitasking. The single-core score of 7021 in Cinebench R23 suggests strong per-thread performance, which is critical for gaming and lightly threaded productivity apps. The 265KF’s architecture is designed for high frequency and efficient execution, making it a versatile choice for both creative professionals and enthusiasts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 presents a significant imbalance in processing power versus graphics capability. The CPU ranks in the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 18th percentile among all graphics cards. This means the CPU is capable of feeding frames at a rate far exceeding what the GPU can render. In gaming scenarios, the RTX 4010 will be the primary bottleneck, capping frame rates well below what the 265KF could theoretically support. The CPU’s high multi-core score of 49736 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle complex physics, AI, and simulation tasks without breaking a sweat, but the GPU’s limited 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will constrain resolution and texture quality. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s is a fraction of the CPU’s 102.4 GB/s, highlighting a stark contrast in data throughput capabilities.

The performance percentiles reinforce this bottleneck analysis. The CPU’s 94th percentile position means it outperforms the vast majority of processors, while the GPU’s 18th percentile position means it lags behind most modern graphics cards. In a balanced system, these components would be closer in percentile ranking. Here, the delta is 76 percentile points, indicating that the GPU will starve the CPU in graphics-bound workloads. For non-gaming tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU can operate at full capacity, but any GPU-accelerated effects or rendering passes will be limited by the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893 for the GPU, compared to rivals like the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, 0.5% faster) and the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913, 0.7% faster), shows it performs near those cards in this specific test, but that is a synthetic metric. In real-world gaming, the 4 GB VRAM will cause texture thrashing at higher settings, making the CPU’s headroom irrelevant. The data clearly indicates that the RTX 4010 is the limiting factor for any frame-rate-sensitive application.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4010’s 18th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM make it unsuitable for high-refresh gaming at 1080p with modern titles. The GPU’s 96.00 GB/s bandwidth and 64-bit bus will struggle with high-texture settings, and the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits pixel fill rates. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 7021 in Cinebench R23 ensures it won’t bottleneck, but the GPU will cap FPS well below what a 144 Hz display demands. This pairing is better suited for esports titles at low settings, where the CPU’s physics and AI processing can shine.

Streaming: The 265KF’s 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 58518 indicates it can handle x264 encoding at high presets without impacting frame rates. However, the RTX 4010 lacks the VRAM and bandwidth to run modern games at high settings while simultaneously outputting a stream. The GPU’s lack of a dedicated NVENC performance metric in the data suggests relying on CPU encoding, which the 265KF can handle effectively. Streamers should expect to play at reduced graphical settings to maintain smooth output.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this workload, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 and PassMark data compression score of 666589. Timeline scrubbing, effect stacking, and export rendering will be fast. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus limit its role in GPU-accelerated effects like optical flow or complex color grading. The RTX 4010’s 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores provide some acceleration for AI-based tools, but the 2.706 TFLOPS FP16 performance is modest. Editors working with 4K footage will see CPU-bound exports complete quickly, but GPU-accelerated previews may lag.

3D rendering: The 265KF is a rendering powerhouse, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20889 and a PassMark floating-point math score of 189431. CPU-based renderers will utilize all 20 cores efficiently. The GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM limit its utility for GPU rendering, as scenes with high polygon counts will exceed the VRAM capacity. The RTX 4010’s RT cores provide ray-tracing acceleration, but the 4 GB frame buffer is restrictive. Artists should rely primarily on the CPU for final renders, using the GPU for viewport previews.

Software development: The 265KF’s 20 cores and high single-thread performance (4928 in PassMark single-thread) make it ideal for compiling large codebases. The PassMark integer math score of 143351 indicates strong performance in integer-heavy workloads like code compilation and static analysis. The GPU is irrelevant for this task, so the RTX 4010’s low 18th percentile ranking does not hinder development workflows. Developers will benefit from fast build times and responsive IDE performance.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical student tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking, but the GPU provides no benefit for these workloads. The RTX 4010’s 4 GB VRAM and 50 W TDP make it a low-power addition, but the system’s overall cost is driven by the high-end CPU. For office work, the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 58518 ensures rapid data sorting and encryption, but the GPU sits idle. This configuration is best suited for students in engineering or data science fields who need CPU horsepower for simulations, not general coursework.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a professional who prioritizes CPU performance above all else and has a secondary need for basic graphics output. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the 265KF’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736, which is 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX and 0.6% slower than the Intel Xeon 6517P. The GPU, while weak, provides enough acceleration for basic effects and display output. Gamers at 1080p with low graphical settings will find the CPU’s single-core performance (7021 in Cinebench R23) sufficient, but the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking limits frame rates. A better match would be a mid-range GPU like the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907 in 3DMark Steel Nomad), which scores 0.5% higher than the RTX 4010 but offers 16 GB VRAM.

Software developers and data scientists will find this build ideal, as the CPU’s 20 cores and 20 threads accelerate compilation and data processing. The PassMark data encryption score of 48198 indicates strong security performance, while the extended instructions score of 54513 supports modern SIMD workloads. Students in STEM fields working with simulations or machine learning will benefit from the CPU’s multi-thread score of 58518 in PassMark. Small business workstations running virtual machines or database servers will see the 265KF’s 94th percentile ranking as a boon, though the GPU is unnecessary for such tasks. The RTX 4010’s 50 W TDP and single-slot design make it a low-profile addition, but its 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for modern CAD or GIS applications. This build targets users who need server-like CPU performance in a desktop form factor and are willing to accept minimal graphics capability.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers exceptional benchmark results across the board. In Cinebench R15, it scores 5013 in multi-core and 707 in single-core. Moving to Cinebench R20, the scores jump to 20889 multi-core and 2948 single-core, showing strong scaling with the workload. Cinebench R23 results are even more impressive: 49736 multi-core and 7021 single-core. Geekbench scores of 22913 multi-core and 2759 single-core confirm its position in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The PassMark suite provides granular insights: data compression hits 666589, data encryption reaches 48198, extended instructions score 54513, find prime numbers scores 486, floating-point math hits 189431, integer math scores 143351, multi-thread reaches 58518, physics scores 3633, random string sorting hits 79735, and single-thread performance is 4928. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 71910, placing it in a tight race with rival chips. It is 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71797) and 0.8% faster than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71370). It trails the Intel Xeon 6517P (72350) by 0.6% and the Intel Xeon 6724P (72396) by 0.7%.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has a single benchmark result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893. This places it in the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 2893. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, 0.5% faster), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910, 0.6% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913, 0.7% faster), and the NVIDIA Quadro P600 (2923, 1% faster). The data shows the RTX 4010 is marginally slower than these cards, but the 4 GB VRAM is the critical weakness. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 56, reflecting the vast gap between the processor’s 94th percentile and the GPU’s 18th percentile. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from these benchmark scores. The CPU is a top-tier performer, but the GPU is entry-level, creating a lopsided system.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU perform compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The 265KF has an average benchmark score of 71910, making it 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71797) and 0.8% faster than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71370). It is 0.6% slower than the Intel Xeon 6517P (72350) and 0.7% slower than the Intel Xeon 6724P (72396).

Q: Does the RTX 4010 have enough VRAM for modern gaming?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. This is likely insufficient for high-texture settings in modern games, as the GPU ranks in the 18th percentile among all graphics cards.

Q: What is the memory support for this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: Is the RTX 4010 suitable for ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, but its FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS. While it can accelerate ray-traced workloads, the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 50 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W.

Q: What is the release date of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF was released on 2024-10-23, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 was released on 2024-04-15.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high bandwidth for the latest SSDs and GPUs. The platform does not support ECC memory, which limits its use in mission-critical servers but is fine for enthusiast desktops. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking to push the 5.50 GHz boost clock further. The RTX 4010 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 250 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP, so a quality 500 W PSU would suffice for the current build. The RTX 4010 has no power connectors, drawing all its power from the slot, which simplifies cabling.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The RTX 4010’s 18th percentile ranking is the system’s bottleneck, and upgrading to a card with more VRAM and bandwidth would unlock the CPU’s full potential. The nearest rival, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, scores 0.5% higher in 3DMark Steel Nomad but offers 16 GB VRAM, which would eliminate memory constraints. The CPU has headroom for such an upgrade, as its 94th percentile ranking ensures it won’t bottleneck a higher-end GPU. For users needing more CPU performance, the 265KF is already near the top of the desktop stack, with rivals like the Xeon 6517P (0.6% faster) being server parts. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so future GPUs and NVMe drives will operate at full speed. The 125 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for overclocking, provided an adequate cooler is used. The upgrade path is clear: replace the GPU first, as the CPU is already a high-end performer.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, a 20-core desktop processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, a 4 GB entry-level GPU. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 56, reflecting a system that is above average overall but severely imbalanced. The CPU is a top-tier part in the 94th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 18th percentile. This configuration is best described as a workstation CPU with a basic display adapter. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 and PassMark multi-thread score of 58518 make it ideal for CPU-intensive tasks like rendering, compilation, and data analysis. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 is adequate for 2D desktop work and light gaming but will struggle with modern 3D titles. The system’s overall tier is mid-range due to the GPU dragging down the combined percentile, despite the CPU’s excellence. Users should view this as a CPU-first build, where the GPU is merely a placeholder for future upgrades. The 125 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP keep power consumption modest, and the single-slot GPU allows for compact builds. This pairing is not a balanced gaming rig but rather a high-performance workstation with minimal graphics capability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is based on the GA107 chip, built on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It features 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. The GPU is equipped with 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The base clock is 1417 MHz, boosting to 1762 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory is on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU has a TDP of 50 W, is single-slot, and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The card measures 163 mm in length and 69 mm in height.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 4010 scores 2893, placing it in the 18th percentile among all GPUs. This score is 0.5% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907), 0.6% lower than the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910), 0.7% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913), and 1% lower than the Quadro P600 (2923). The performance is tightly clustered, but the 4 GB VRAM is the defining weakness. For rendering, the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, and the 64-bit memory bus severely limits bandwidth for large textures. The 6 RT cores provide some ray-tracing capability, but the 4 GB frame buffer will cause out-of-memory errors in complex scenes. The tensor cores can accelerate DLSS, but the low pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s limits overall throughput. The GPU is best suited for basic display output, media playback, and light productivity tasks. For gaming, it will handle esports titles at low settings, but the 18th percentile ranking indicates it is far below the performance of mainstream gaming GPUs.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds