SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 20-core Arrow Lake flagship-class CPU with NVIDIA's Ampere-based RTX 3070 GPU, landing at the 78th percentile overall among all benchmarked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 61st percentile position, creating a configuration where processor performance substantially outpaces graphics capability in most workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3070's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 GB GDDR6 memory provide adequate headroom for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though the CPU's 94th percentile standing means processor-limited scenarios will be rare. The 61st GPU percentile indicates mid-pack graphics performance, so achieving consistently high frame rates at maximum settings in demanding titles will depend heavily on resolution and game optimization.

Streaming: The RTX 3070 includes 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores, which support hardware-accelerated encoding and real-time ray tracing workloads. The CPU's 20 threads and strong multi-threaded scores (49,736 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) ensure that simultaneous encoding, rendering, and gameplay tasks have ample processing headroom without introducing significant frame-time penalties.

Video editing: The Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20,889 and an R15 multi-core score of 5,013, indicating robust performance for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM handle effects processing and preview rendering competently, though the 61st GPU percentile suggests effects-heavy projects may feel less responsive than with higher-tier graphics cards.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering workloads benefit substantially from the 20-core/20-thread configuration, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 49,736 placing this processor near the top quartile of all CPUs. GPU-accelerated rendering via CUDA or OptiX will utilize the RTX 3070's 5,888 shading units and 184 tensor cores, though the graphics card's mid-pack percentile ranking means render times will trail those of higher-end GPUs.

Software development: The PassMark multi-thread score of 58,518 and integer math score of 143,351 indicate strong compilation and build performance. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth support large codebases and parallel build processes, while the single-thread PassMark score of 4,928 handles interactive IDE responsiveness adequately.

Student and office work: The CPU's 94th percentile ranking ensures snappy multitasking across productivity suites, web browsing, and document processing. The PassMark data compression score of 666,589 and random string sorting score of 79,735 indicate efficient handling of file operations and database tasks, making this configuration more powerful than necessary for typical academic or office workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 71,910, placing it at the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71,797 average score, 0.2% slower), Intel Xeon 6517P (72,350, 0.6% faster), Intel Xeon 6724P (72,396, 0.7% faster), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71,370, 0.8% slower). These tight margins indicate the Core Ultra 7 265KF sits in a highly competitive performance band, trading places with enterprise Xeon processors and premium laptop CPUs.

The GPU posts an average benchmark score of 17,208, placing it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17,083, 0.7% slower), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17,037, 1% slower), AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17,019, 1.1% slower), and NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17,468, 1.5% faster). The RTX 3070 sits in a tight cluster of mid-range graphics cards, with less than 2% separating it from its closest competitors.

The combined percentile of 78 reflects a configuration where the CPU's top-decile performance pulls the overall ranking upward, while the GPU's solidly mid-pack showing tempers the aggregate position. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 provides a modern gaming workload reference, while PassMark G3D at 22,214 and Geekbench OpenCL at 112,821 confirm the GPU's general-purpose compute capability.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm TSMC process, packing 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. It features 20 cores and 20 threads — notably without hyper-threading — with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The unlocked multiplier allows enthusiast overclocking, though the factory configuration already delivers strong performance.

Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. The dual-channel DDR5 memory interface provides 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which supports the memory-intensive workloads common in content creation and scientific computing. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes offers high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards.

Benchmark results show balanced performance across workloads. Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 49,736, while single-core achieves 7,021. Geekbench multi-core scores 22,913 and single-core 2,759. PassMark results reveal specialized strengths: data compression at 666,589, extended instructions at 54,513, floating point math at 189,431, and integer math at 143,351. The multi-thread score of 58,518 confirms strong parallel scaling, while the physics score of 3,633 and prime number finding at 486 show expected performance in specific computational patterns.

The 94th percentile CPU ranking places this processor ahead of the vast majority of installed CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, trails by just 0.2%, indicating near-parity with a high-end laptop processor. The Xeon competitors that edge ahead by 0.6-0.7% are dual-socket enterprise parts, so the Core Ultra 7 265KF's single-socket performance is effectively top-tier for desktop platforms.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU is substantial: the processor's 94th percentile ranking towers over the graphics card's 61st percentile position. In CPU-bound workloads — software compilation, data compression, multi-threaded rendering — the RTX 3070 will rarely be the limiting factor. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming or GPU-accelerated compute, the graphics card will cap performance well below what the CPU could otherwise support.

Multi-threaded CPU workloads show exceptional headroom. The PassMark multi-thread score of 58,518 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 49,736 indicate the processor can handle heavy parallel loads without breaking a sweat. The GPU's 61st percentile means it trails more than a third of all graphics cards, creating a scenario where 1080p gaming at high frame rates will likely hit GPU limits first in most titles.

The RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth represent the primary constraint for modern gaming at higher resolutions and texture quality settings. The CPU's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is more than sufficient for processor workloads, but the GPU's memory subsystem will determine texture streaming and frame buffer performance. For gaming at 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck; at 1080p with lower settings, the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 4,928) can drive very high frame rates, potentially exposing the GPU as the limiting factor even at lower resolutions.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component percentiles. The RTX 3070's PassMark G3D score of 22,214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162, combined with the CPU's 94th percentile ranking, suggest 1080p gaming at high settings will generally deliver smooth frame rates in most titles, with 1440p being playable but requiring settings adjustments in demanding games. At 4K resolution, the 61st GPU percentile and 8 GB VRAM will likely produce playable but not consistently high frame rates across modern AAA releases.

The RTX 3070's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 165.6 GPixel/s pixel rate provide a reasonable foundation for rasterized gaming. The 46 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, though the mid-pack GPU percentile suggests ray-traced workloads at high settings may struggle to maintain high frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions. The 184 tensor cores support DLSS upscaling, which can substantially improve effective frame rates in supported titles.

For competitive gaming at 1080p with reduced settings, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 7,021) can drive very high frame rates, potentially exceeding 200 FPS in lightly threaded esports titles. The GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB GDDR6 memory are sufficient for these workloads, making the combination well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p. At 1440p, frame rates will be more constrained by GPU performance, with estimates suggesting 60-100 FPS in moderately demanding titles at high settings.

Who Should Build It

Enthusiast gamers at 1080p — The combination of the 94th percentile CPU and 61st percentile GPU supports high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, particularly with DLSS enabled. The CPU's headroom ensures frame times remain consistent even in CPU-heavy scenes.

Content creators prioritizing CPU workloads — Video editors, 3D artists, and software developers who spend most of their time in CPU-bound tasks will benefit from the Core Ultra 7 265KF's exceptional multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 49,736), while the RTX 3070 provides competent GPU acceleration when needed.

Developers and data professionals — The PassMark data compression score of 666,589 and integer math score of 143,351 indicate strong performance for compilation, data processing, and analysis workloads. The 20 cores handle parallel build systems and scientific computing tasks effectively.

Students and office users seeking future-proofing — The 94th CPU percentile ensures this system will remain responsive for years of academic work, document processing, and multitasking. The GPU's 61st percentile is more than adequate for standard productivity applications.

Small business workstations — The combination of high multi-threaded CPU performance and competent GPU compute (Geekbench OpenCL 112,821) supports CAD, financial modeling, and data visualization workloads without requiring a dedicated workstation GPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GA104 chip contains 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, delivering 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance and matching FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio. The 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), with base GPU clock of 1,500 MHz and boost clock of 1,725 MHz. The card draws 220 W TDP with a suggested 550 W power supply, uses a dual-slot cooler, and requires a single 12-pin power connector. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs well in its class but sits firmly in the mid-range of the current GPU landscape. PassMark G3D scores 22,214, while DirectX 10, 11, and 12 tests score 150, 182, and 85 respectively. The DirectX 9 score of 247 and G2D score of 1,001 indicate strong legacy compatibility. Geekbench Vulkan scores 21,022, while OpenCL reaches 112,821, demonstrating capable compute performance for GPU-accelerated applications.

The 61st percentile ranking places this GPU among the majority of installed graphics cards, but its nearest rivals — all within 1.5% in either direction — include older dual-GPU cards and professional compute parts, indicating the RTX 3070's performance class has been matched by subsequent generations. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is increasingly a constraint for modern games at high resolutions and texture quality settings.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs Intel's Core Ultra 7 265KF — a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake-S processor on the Intel Socket 1851 platform — with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3070, an Ampere-architecture GPU featuring 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 78 reflects a system that excels in CPU-heavy workloads while providing respectable but not class-leading graphics performance.

The processor's 94th percentile ranking makes this one of the strongest desktop CPUs available, while the GPU's 61st percentile creates a noticeable performance gap between the two components. This is a configuration optimized for productivity, development, and content creation, with gaming capability that is solid but not exceptional by current standards. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU, combined with the 125 W TDP, offers overclocking headroom for users seeking additional performance.

The platform supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, and lacks integrated graphics, requiring the discrete GPU for display output. The CPU's release date of October 23, 2024, and active production status indicate a current-generation platform, while the GPU's end-of-life status and October 2020 release date place it as a previous-generation component.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265KF compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265KF has an average benchmark score of 71,910, placing it 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71,797), 0.6% behind the Intel Xeon 6517P (72,350), 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon 6724P (72,396), and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71,370).

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and how does it compare to nearby cards?

A: The RTX 3070 sits at the 61st percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 17,208. It is 0.7% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17,083), 1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17,037), 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17,019), and 1.5% slower than the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17,468).

Q: What memory does the CPU support and what is the bandwidth?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265KF supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: Is this a good pairing for high-refresh-rate gaming?

A: The CPU's 94th percentile ranking and single-thread PassMark score of 4,928 indicate it can drive very high frame rates, but the GPU's 61st percentile and 8 GB VRAM will limit performance in demanding titles, particularly at higher resolutions. No measured FPS data exists for this combination, so gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What are the CPU's power requirements and socket?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W and uses Intel Socket 1851. The GPU has a TDP of 220 W with a suggested 550 W power supply for the overall system.

Q: What is the CPU's cache configuration?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265KF features 192 KB L1 cache per core, 3 MB L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and DLSS?

A: Yes, the RTX 3070 includes 46 RT cores for hardware ray tracing and 184 tensor cores that support DLSS upscaling technology.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds