SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. This marks a notable shift from Intel's previous monolithic designs, as the chip integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The CPU operates with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The absence of hyper-threading means each core handles a single thread, which is a deliberate design choice that prioritizes power efficiency and thermal headroom over raw multi-threaded throughput.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool is critical for workloads that exhibit high data locality, such as database operations or compiled code execution. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which positions it for consumer and enthusiast builds rather than mission-critical servers. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU allows for high-bandwidth connectivity to GPUs and NVMe storage, though the GPU in this pairing uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark scores for the 265KF are impressive. In Cinebench R23, it scores 49,736 in multi-core and 7,021 in single-core. The multi-core figure places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The single-core score of 7,021 is particularly strong, suggesting excellent per-thread performance for lightly-threaded tasks like gaming or legacy applications. Geekbench results reinforce this: 22,913 multi-core and 2,759 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 58,518 and a single-thread score of 4,928, with strong sub-scores in integer math (143,351), floating-point math (189,431), and extended instructions (54,513). Data compression (666,589) and encryption (48,198) scores indicate robust performance for archival and security-related tasks.

The nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX has an average score of 71,797, which is 0.2% higher than the 265KF's average of 71,910. This effectively places the two processors in a dead heat. The Intel Xeon 6517P scores 72,350, which is 0.6% higher, while the Xeon 6724P scores 72,396, 0.7% higher. The Xeon Platinum 8270 scores 71,370, 0.8% lower. These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the 265KF sits in a tightly contested performance band where no single processor has a decisive advantage in aggregate benchmark scores. However, the 265KF's single-thread performance and modern architecture may give it an edge in latency-sensitive workloads that the Xeon parts, with their server-oriented design, might not match.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 71,910, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, indicating that the 265KF is among the top 6% of processors globally. The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7600, has an average benchmark score of 15,171, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-range position, suggesting the GPU is capable but not exceptional. The combined percentile for this pairing is 76, reflecting that the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU in relative terms.

The GPU's individual benchmark scores paint a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,310, which is a modern DirectX 12 test. Geekbench OpenCL scores 88,051, while Vulkan scores 34,401. The PassMark suite shows G3D score of 16,634, G2D of 984, and GPU compute of 8,790. DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores are 226, 84, 172, and 58 respectively. These DirectX scores are lower than the G3D aggregate, which suggests the GPU's performance varies significantly across API generations. The DX12 score of 58 is notably low, which could indicate driver overhead or architectural limitations in certain workloads.

The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with an average score of 15,199, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15,082, 0.6% lower, while the AMD Radeon 680M (an integrated GPU) scores 15,270, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 15,063, 0.7% lower. These deltas are all under 1%, meaning the RX 7600 is statistically indistinguishable from these competitors in aggregate benchmarks. However, the RX 7600's modern RDNA 3.0 architecture and feature set may offer advantages in specific workloads that these older or lower-tier parts cannot match.

The combined picture is clear: this is a CPU-heavy build where the processor's 94th percentile ranking dwarfs the GPU's 57th percentile. For workloads that are CPU-bound, such as software compilation or physics simulation, this pairing will excel. For GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the RX 7600 will be the limiting factor. The 76th combined percentile reflects this imbalance, indicating a system that is well above average but not top-tier.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, using the Navi 33 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming but may struggle with high-resolution textures or large datasets.

The clock speeds are 1720 MHz base, 2250 MHz game, and 2655 MHz boost. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It also includes 32 ray tracing cores, which is a modest count for RDNA 3.0. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no half-rate penalty for FP16 workloads.

The TDP is 165 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The card is dual-slot and requires a single 8-pin power connector. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is half the bandwidth of a x16 slot but sufficient for most gaming workloads. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1, supporting modern high-refresh monitors. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future titles.

Benchmark scores for the RX 7600 show it performs best in compute-oriented tests. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,051 is strong, suggesting good general-purpose compute performance. The PassMark G3D score of 16,634 is respectable for a mid-range card. However, the DirectX 12 score of 58 is concerning, as it is lower than the DirectX 11 score of 172. This could indicate that the GPU's driver stack or hardware design is better optimized for older APIs, which may affect performance in modern titles that rely heavily on DX12 features like mesh shaders or variable rate shading.

The ray tracing cores, while present, are limited in number. With only 32 RT cores, the RX 7600 will handle ray-traced effects at reduced quality or resolution. The 57th percentile ranking confirms this is a mid-tier GPU, suitable for 1080p gaming at high settings but not for 1440p or 4K with ray tracing enabled. The 8 GB VRAM is another limitation, as some modern games exceed this capacity at high texture quality.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7600 is capable of 1080p gaming at high settings, with the CPU's 94th percentile single-thread performance ensuring no bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking suggests frame rates will be solid but not exceptional. For 1440p, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain high refresh rates in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 49,736) can handle encoding workloads, but the GPU lacks a dedicated hardware encoder comparable to NVIDIA's NVENC. Software encoding using x264 would rely on the CPU, which is powerful enough, but this may impact gaming performance if both run simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 143,351 and floating-point math of 189,431 indicate strong performance for video codecs and effects. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p editing but may be tight for 4K timelines. The OpenCL score of 88,051 suggests GPU acceleration is viable.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,736 is excellent for CPU-based rendering, placing it in the 94th percentile. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance is decent for GPU rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity. Ray-traced renders will be slow due to the limited RT cores.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and high single-thread score of 7,021 in Cinebench R23 make it ideal for compilation, where both multi-threaded builds and single-threaded code analysis benefit. The PassMark data compression score of 666,589 aids in handling large codebases.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsers. The GPU's G2D score of 984 is adequate for 2D applications, and the low TDP of 165 W for the GPU and 125 W for the CPU keeps power consumption manageable.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy imbalance. The CPU's 94th percentile versus the GPU's 57th percentile means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will cap performance at 1080p, while the CPU has headroom to spare. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 16,634 is mid-range, and its nearest rivals include the RTX 3050 OEM, which is similarly positioned.

For CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation or data processing, the 265KF will shine, with its PassMark physics score of 3,633 and multi-thread score of 58,518. However, the GPU's compute score of 8,790 in PassMark is modest, meaning GPU-accelerated tasks will not benefit from the CPU's strength. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this bottleneck: the system is above average overall, but the GPU drags down the potential of the CPU.

FPS scaling is estimated to be GPU-limited at 1080p and above. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,928 in PassMark ensures that even lightly-threaded games will not be CPU-bound. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 58 is a red flag for modern titles, potentially causing lower frame rates than the G3D score suggests. In contrast, DirectX 11 performance (score of 172) is relatively stronger, so older games may run better.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) processors. This socket is not backward compatible with older Intel platforms, so upgrading the CPU would require a new motherboard. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which can be used for a high-end GPU or NVMe storage.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a limitation of the RX 7600's design rather than the platform. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes could support a faster GPU, but the RX 7600's x8 interface means it uses only half the bandwidth of a x16 slot. The suggested PSU of 450 W for the GPU, combined with the CPU's 125 W TDP, leaves headroom for upgrades. A more powerful GPU with a higher TDP would require a larger PSU, but the current 450 W suggestion is sufficient for this pairing.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM and higher compute performance. The RX 7600's 8 GB is a bottleneck for modern games, and its 57th percentile ranking leaves room for improvement. A GPU with 16 GB or more VRAM and higher FP32 performance would better match the CPU's capabilities. The CPU itself is unlikely to need an upgrade for several years, given its 94th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance.

# Who Should Build It

This build is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will find the RX 7600 adequate, but those targeting 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere. Content creators who work with CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the 265KF's 20 cores and high multi-threaded scores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,736 is particularly strong for these workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's compilation speed, with PassMark integer math of 143,351 and extended instructions of 54,513. Students and office workers will find this build overpowered, but the CPU's single-thread performance ensures smooth multitasking. Small business workstations that run data analysis or financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 666,589, though the GPU's 57th percentile ranking is less relevant for such tasks.

The build is not ideal for GPU-accelerated workloads like machine learning or high-end 3D rendering, where the RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM and limited RT cores will be restrictive. For users who need a balanced system for both CPU and GPU tasks, this pairing is skewed toward the CPU, and a more powerful GPU would be a better match.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF with the AMD Radeon RX 7600. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It is a high-end desktop CPU with a 94th percentile ranking. The GPU is a mid-range Radeon RX 7000 series card with an 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 57th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 76, indicating an above-average system overall.

The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. This makes the build ideal for CPU-intensive workloads but less suitable for GPU-bound tasks. The CPU's launch MSRP is $379, while the GPU's launch MSRP is 269 USD. The build class is desktop, and the production status for both components is active, meaning they are currently available for purchase.

The overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the CPU providing top-tier performance and the GPU providing mid-tier performance. The system is well-suited for productivity, development, and 1080p gaming, but it will not excel at high-resolution gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. The 76th combined percentile reflects this duality: a strong CPU paired with a modest GPU.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 71,910, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, 0.6% lower than the Intel Xeon 6517P, 0.7% lower than the Intel Xeon 6724P, and 0.8% higher than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU has 32 ray tracing cores, which is a modest count. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 58 suggests limited performance in ray-traced workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 76, with the CPU at 94 and the GPU at 57.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF does not support ECC memory, and it supports DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is 450 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 165 W.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The CPU's 94th percentile ranking and single-thread score of 7,021 in Cinebench R23 indicate it will not bottleneck gaming performance. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 16,634 suggest it is a mid-range card capable of 1080p gaming at high settings. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p textures but may cause stuttering in games that exceed 8 GB at higher resolutions.

The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 58 is a concern, as modern games increasingly rely on DX12 features. This could result in lower frame rates than the G3D score suggests, particularly in titles that use ray tracing or mesh shaders. The DirectX 11 score of 172 is stronger, so older games or those with DX11 render paths may perform better.

For 1080p gaming, estimated frame rates are likely to be in the 60-100 FPS range for most titles at high settings, based on the GPU's mid-range position. At 1440p, frame rates would drop significantly, likely below 60 FPS in demanding games. The CPU's strength ensures that frame rates are GPU-limited, meaning the RX 7600 is the primary determinant of gaming performance. Users seeking higher frame rates or higher resolutions would need to upgrade the GPU.