SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

97%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a desktop combination that produces a 72nd-percentile combined score. This places the build above the majority of systems in the database, though the pairing of a high-end 20-core CPU with a mid-tier mobile-derived GPU creates distinct performance characteristics. The CPU is the dominant component, with a 94th-percentile standing among all processors, while the GPU sits exactly at the 50th percentile. This asymmetry defines the system’s behavior across workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier part, while the GPU is firmly mid-pack. The Core Ultra 7 265K’s 94th-percentile rank among all CPUs indicates exceptional processing capability, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2’s 50th-percentile rank among all GPUs shows it is an average performer. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, and multithreaded rendering, the processor will be the limiting factor only in the sense that it sets a very high ceiling; the GPU will rarely influence these workloads. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios such as gaming at high resolutions, the RTX 5000 will be the bottleneck, as its rasterization and ray tracing throughput cannot match the CPU’s ability to feed it frames.

The CPU’s benchmark results underscore its strength. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35,850 in multi-core and 2,020 in single-core. The multi-core figure is 93% higher than the single-core score in terms of raw output, but the single-core score of 2,020 is strong in absolute terms, indicating responsive everyday performance and solid gaming framerates in CPU-limited scenarios. The Passmark multithread score of 58,594 is nearly 12 times the single-thread score of 4,928, confirming that the 20-core, 20-thread design excels at parallel workloads. However, the GPU’s modest 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth mean that any workload relying heavily on graphics compute will see performance capped at roughly the 50th percentile mark.

In gaming, the bottleneck will shift depending on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (2,020 in Cinebench R23 single-core) can push high framerates, but the GPU’s 50th-percentile rank will limit maximum output. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, as pixel throughput and memory bandwidth (576.0 GB/s) dictate performance. The data shows no measured FPS figures for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores. The CPU’s 94th-percentile rank suggests it can handle any game’s physics and AI logic, but the GPU’s mid-pack standing means visual fidelity settings will need to be adjusted to maintain target framerates.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFps entries, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,020 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,928 indicate strong per-thread performance, which is critical for gaming framerates. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for modern titles at high settings, but its 50th-percentile rank among all GPUs suggests it performs at the median level.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated framerates would be moderate to high in most titles, driven by the CPU’s ability to process game logic quickly. The GPU’s 9,728 shading units and 112 ROPs can handle 1080p rendering, but the 50th-percentile standing means it will not deliver top-tier frame rates. Expect playable performance in most games, with esports titles easily exceeding 60 FPS due to the CPU’s strong single-core scores, but AAA games with heavy graphics demands may struggle to maintain 60 FPS at ultra settings. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the bottleneck more noticeably. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are sufficient for medium-to-high settings, but ultra presets will likely push the GPU to its limits, resulting in estimated framerates in the 40-60 FPS range depending on the title. At 4K, the GPU’s mid-pack rank becomes a serious limitation. The 16 GB memory capacity is sufficient, but the raw compute power is not, so ultra settings at 4K would likely yield framerates below 30 FPS in demanding titles. The CPU would remain underutilized in this scenario, as the GPU cannot keep pace with its frame-generation capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4,928 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,020 provide the per-core performance needed for high-refresh gaming at 1080p. However, the GPU’s 50th-percentile rank means that achieving 144 FPS or higher in modern titles will require reduced settings, as the graphics card cannot sustain such output at high detail levels.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 20 threads, combined with a Passmark multithread score of 58,594, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,850 indicates that simultaneous game and stream encoding workloads will not saturate the CPU, allowing for smooth streaming with minimal frame drops.

Video Editing: The CPU’s strong multi-core performance, evidenced by the Geekbench multicore score of 23,085 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20,918, accelerates video rendering and export times. The GPU’s 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores can assist with effects and AI-accelerated tasks, but its 50th-percentile rank means GPU-accelerated rendering will be modest compared to higher-tier graphics cards.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,850 and Passmark floating-point math score of 189,629. These numbers indicate that CPU-based rendering will be fast. The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance can handle real-time viewport rendering, but final-frame renders using GPU acceleration will be limited by its mid-pack standing.

Software Development: The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 665,554 and integer math score of 143,242 show strong performance in compilation and code processing tasks. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the single-thread score of 4,928 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, making this an excellent system for developers.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 2,020) ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The 20 cores handle spreadsheet, document, and browser workloads effortlessly, while the GPU’s 16 GB memory is overkill but harmless for such tasks. The system’s 72nd-percentile combined rank means it exceeds the requirements of all typical office software.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over gaming graphics. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit most from the Core Ultra 7 265K’s 94th-percentile CPU rank and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,850. Gamers at 1080p who play esports or older titles will find the CPU’s single-thread performance (2,020 in Cinebench R23) sufficient for high framerates, but those seeking 1440p or 4K ultra gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 50th-percentile rank will be a limiting factor. Students and small business users running office applications, browsing, and light multitasking will find this system far more powerful than needed, though the GPU’s 16 GB memory could support moderate graphics work or multiple displays. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the Passmark data compression score of 665,554 and the 20 threads, which reduce build times significantly. The system is not ideal for high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated machine learning training, as the RTX 5000’s 304 tensor cores and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 are average rather than exceptional.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 70,879, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6511P (average score 71,051, delta -0.2%), the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (average score 71,370, delta -0.7%), the Intel Core i7-14700KF (average score 70,163, delta +1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (average score 69,996, delta +1.3%). This means the Core Ultra 7 265K is within 1.3% of its closest competitors, trading blows with server-grade Xeons and beating the i7-14700KF by 1%. The GPU has no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals, as its average benchmark score is 0 and its percentile rank is 50. The combined percentile of the build is 72, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 72% of all configurations in the database. The CPU-specific benchmarks show exceptional multi-threaded capability: Cinebench R15 multicore scores 5,020, R20 multicore scores 20,918, and R23 multicore scores 35,850. Single-core scores are also strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,020 and Geekbench single-core at 2,713. The Passmark suite reveals specialized strengths: data compression at 665,554, integer math at 143,242, and floating-point math at 189,629. The GPU’s lack of benchmark data means its 50th-percentile rank is derived from its specifications rather than tested scores, but this places it exactly at the median of all GPUs, confirming its mid-tier status.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile rank among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70,879.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265K scores 1.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, with the Intel part averaging 70,879 versus the Ryzen’s 69,996.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K supports ECC memory, and it uses dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined CPU and GPU pairing is in the 72nd percentile of all systems in the database.

Q: What architecture does the GPU use?

A: The GPU is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, specifically the AD103 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and high-bandwidth expansion cards. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe 5.0 slots, ensuring full bandwidth availability. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 150 W, with no suggested PSU listed in the data. This means a power supply must accommodate at least 275 W for these components alone, plus overhead for other system parts. The GPU is an IGP form factor with no power connectors, meaning it draws power directly from the motherboard slot, simplifying installation. The most sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as its 50th-percentile rank is the system’s weakest point. Replacing it with a higher-tier graphics card would better balance the system, as the CPU’s 94th-percentile rank has significant headroom. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking to extract more performance, though the 125 W TDP limits headroom without adequate cooling. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means future GPUs and storage devices will not be bottlenecked by the interface. The motherboard must support Socket 1851 and DDR5 to use this CPU, and the GPU’s IGP form factor requires a case with sufficient clearance for its compact size.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, a 20-core Arrow Lake-S processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, a mobile-derived GPU on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The CPU is a top-tier desktop part, ranking in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range performer at the 50th percentile. The combined system ranks in the 72nd percentile of all builds, indicating a configuration that is above average but not exceptional. The CPU’s 20 cores and 20 threads, with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, make it a powerhouse for multithreaded tasks, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,850. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 9,728 shading units provide solid 1080p gaming capability, but its 50th-percentile rank means it will not compete with high-end desktop GPUs. This build is best characterized as a CPU-centric workstation with moderate gaming capability, suitable for users who prioritize processing power over graphics fidelity.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The CPU features 30 MB of shared L3 cache, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 192 KB of L1 cache per core. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and includes ECC memory support for error-correcting workloads. The processor has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, providing basic display output without a discrete GPU. Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 35,850, while single-core scores 2,020. Geekbench scores are 23,085 for multicore and 2,713 for single-core. Passmark tests reveal strengths in data compression (665,554), integer math (143,242), and floating-point math (189,629), while the multithread score of 58,594 confirms its parallel processing capability. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 70,879 places it in the 94th percentile, just 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6511P and 0.7% behind the Xeon Platinum 8270, but 1% ahead of the Core i7-14700KF and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F. For real workloads, this translates to rapid video rendering, fast compilation times, and smooth multitasking, making it an excellent choice for content creators and developers. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the 125 W TDP and 3 nm process node suggest thermal management will be critical for sustained high clocks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds