SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

98 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 20-core Arrow Lake flagship with NVIDIA's top-tier workstation GPU, landing in the 96th percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU holds the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 98th percentile among all graphics cards — a pairing that is clearly positioned at the high end of desktop computing, though the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K shows a slight edge over its closest rivals in average benchmark scores while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation trades blows with enterprise-class accelerators. The data here is derived entirely from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all FPS discussions in this analysis are estimated from those benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die. It features 20 cores and 20 threads — meaning no hyperthreading — with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and the CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, plus ECC memory support for workstation reliability. Integrated graphics come in the form of Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output even without the discrete GPU.

Cache configuration is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. This large cache hierarchy directly supports the benchmark results, particularly in multi-threaded workloads where data locality matters. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,850 points and single-core score of 2,020 points reveal a processor that is strong in both parallel and single-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R20 results (20,918 multicore, 2,953 single-core) and R15 results (5,020 multicore, 708 single-core) follow the same pattern, indicating consistent scaling across benchmark generations.

Geekbench scores of 23,085 multicore and 2,713 single-core place the 265K in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 70,879 sits nearly even with the Intel Xeon 6511P (71,051, -0.2% delta) and Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71,370, -0.7% delta), while edging ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70,163, 1.0% delta) and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69,996, 1.3% delta). The tiny margins — all within 1.3% — mean the 265K is effectively trading blows with those rivals in aggregate performance, but the 20-core/20-thread configuration gives it a distinct character: it relies on raw core count and high clocks rather than simultaneous multithreading.

PassMark results provide granular insight into specific workload strengths. Integer math scores 143,242, floating-point math scores 189,629, and extended instructions score 54,333 — all strong figures. Data compression hits 665,554, while data encryption scores 48,246. The multithread score of 58,594 and single-thread score of 4,928 confirm the dual nature: this CPU is a monster for heavily threaded tasks and still competitive in light-threaded ones. Physics simulation scores 3,731, and random string sorting hits 79,752, while find prime numbers scores a relatively modest 491, suggesting that certain integer-heavy algorithms do not scale as well as others on this architecture.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU-side benchmark picture is one of consistent high-tier performance across every tested suite. Cinebench R23 multicore at 35,850 points places the 265K in the upper echelon of desktop processors, and the single-core score of 2,020 shows that the 5.50 GHz boost clock delivers real single-threaded muscle. Geekbench multicore of 23,085 and single-core of 2,713 reinforce this — the 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs is earned through a combination of parallel throughput and per-thread speed.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Vulkan score of 194,041, with an average benchmark score of 184,664. That places it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs — a remarkably high position. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183,725, 0.5% delta), the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147, -1.3% delta), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182,109, 1.4% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050, 3.7% delta). The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is essentially at parity with the A100 variants, slightly ahead of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, and clearly ahead of the RTX 4090 D by a 3.7% margin.

The combined picture is a system sitting in the 96th percentile of all CPU+GPU pairings. Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, the practical gaming performance must be inferred from these benchmark scores. The CPU's 94th percentile and GPU's 98th percentile suggest that in gaming workloads, the GPU will typically be the primary driver of frame rates at higher resolutions, while the CPU's strong single-thread scores (2,020 Cinebench R23, 2,713 Geekbench) ensure it will not hold back the GPU in most scenarios.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF in average benchmark score?

A: The 265K has an average benchmark score of 70,879, which is 1.0% higher than the Core i7-14700KF's 70,163. This is a very narrow margin, meaning the two processors are effectively equivalent in aggregate performance, though the 265K uses 20 cores with no hyperthreading while the i7-14700KF uses a different core configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and total bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This is a high-capacity, high-bandwidth configuration suited for large datasets and high-resolution rendering.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has an unlocked multiplier, which means it is designed for overclocking. It also has a 125 W TDP, providing thermal headroom for enthusiasts to push clocks beyond the 5.50 GHz boost.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU itself. This is the current generation standard, providing high bandwidth for the latest GPUs and NVMe storage devices.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation compare to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB in OpenCL/Vulkan benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 184,664, which is 0.5% higher than the A100 SXM4 80 GB's 183,725. The two are effectively at parity, though the A100 has 80 GB of memory versus 32 GB on the RTX 5000 Ada.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and who manufactures it?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses a 3 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. This is a leading-edge process that contributes to the CPU's power efficiency and performance density.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern gaming APIs and advanced rendering features.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing with a slight lean toward GPU-heavy workloads. The CPU's 94th percentile and GPU's 98th percentile mean that, in most scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rates — but that is not a negative, as the GPU is exceptionally fast. The CPU's single-thread performance (2,020 Cinebench R23, 2,713 Geekbench) is strong enough to drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games, while its 20 cores handle background tasks and streaming without stealing cycles from the game.

For gaming specifically, the lack of measured FPS data means estimates must rely on the benchmark scores. The GPU's Vulkan score of 194,041 and OpenCL score of 175,286 suggest it can handle demanding rendering workloads at high resolutions, while the CPU's multithread score of 58,594 on PassMark indicates it will not bottleneck the GPU in most game engines. The bottleneck dynamic shifts by workload: in light-threaded games at 1080p, the CPU's single-core speed becomes relatively more important, and its 2,020 Cinebench R23 single-core score is competitive; in heavily threaded games or at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiter.

In productivity tasks, the balance flips. The CPU's 35,850 Cinebench R23 multicore score will drive 3D rendering and video encoding, while the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate handle GPU-accelerated compute. The combined 96th percentile of the pairing indicates that neither component is drastically underpowered relative to the other — they complement each other across the full range of desktop workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread scores (2,020 Cinebench R23, 4,928 PassMark single-thread) suggest this system can drive high-refresh monitors at 1440p or 4K, though exact frame rates cannot be stated without measured FPS data. The CPU's 20 cores provide headroom for background tasks while gaming.

Streaming: The 20-core/20-thread CPU can handle encoding and streaming overhead simultaneously with gaming, while the GPU's 400 tensor cores and 100 RT cores accelerate AI-based encoding and rendering features. The CPU's 58,594 PassMark multithread score indicates strong parallel processing capability for streaming workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's 35,850 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 provide a powerful combination for timeline editing, effects rendering, and export. The GPU's 32 GB of VRAM allows working with large 4K or 8K projects without memory constraints.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 cores deliver strong CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 100 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering. The pair sits at the 96th combined percentile, indicating top-tier rendering capability.

Software development: The CPU's 20 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache support fast compilation of large codebases, while the GPU's compute capabilities (12800 shading units, 400 tensor cores) accelerate machine learning training and inference tasks. The 94th CPU percentile ensures responsive development workflows.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU's 4,928 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provide a backup display output. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running academic computations.

Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals and enthusiasts who need both high-end CPU throughput and top-tier GPU compute. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the GPU's 98th percentile ranking, while the CPU's 94th percentile ensures no bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will leverage the CPU's 20 cores and the GPU's 32 GB of VRAM for large project files. Software developers, particularly those working on machine learning or large codebases, will find the combination of 400 tensor cores and 20 CPU threads valuable. Students in engineering or data science fields who run simulations or train models can use the ECC memory support for data integrity. Small business workstations serving as render farms or compute nodes would benefit from the CPU's 94th percentile and GPU's 98th percentile, though the 125 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP require adequate cooling.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — meaning the GPU is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe slots, and there is headroom for future Gen 5 GPUs. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 600 W, leave room for additional storage or expansion cards without requiring a PSU upgrade in most cases.

A sensible next upgrade path would be adding more DDR5 memory for capacity-hungry workloads, or installing a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive to take advantage of the CPU's 20 Gen 5 lanes. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract more performance from the existing hardware. The GPU's 1x 16-pin power connector and dual-slot design are standard, so upgrading to a newer workstation GPU would not require a case or power supply change in most setups. The socket 1851 platform is current-generation, so future Arrow Lake refresh CPUs may be compatible without a motherboard swap.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake chip with a 3.90 GHz base clock and 5.50 GHz boost, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace workstation card with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile ranking of 96th places this system in the top 4% of all CPU+GPU pairings, making it a high-end workstation or enthusiast gaming rig. The CPU's 94th percentile and GPU's 98th percentile indicate that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, but the CPU is by no means a weak link. This pairing is designed for users who need maximum performance in both CPU-bound productivity and GPU-accelerated workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die — a transistor density of 125.3 million per mm². It has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1155 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz, with a TDP of 250 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W. It uses a dual-slot design with a 1x 16-pin power connector and measures 267 mm in length, 112 mm in height, with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

The chip contains 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output pipelines. For ray tracing, it has 100 RT cores, and for AI workloads, it has 400 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). These specifications translate into benchmark scores of 175,286 in Geekbench OpenCL and 194,041 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 184,664.

In rendering workloads, the 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth allow large scenes and high-resolution textures to reside entirely in GPU memory, avoiding PCIe transfers. The 100 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering in applications that support it, while the 400 tensor cores speed up AI denoising and DLSS-style upscaling. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking places it alongside enterprise accelerators like the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 (both 80 GB and 40 GB variants, with deltas of 0.5% and -1.3% respectively), and ahead of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (1.4%) and RTX 4090 D (3.7%). This is a GPU that sits at the top of the desktop/workstation tier, with performance competitive with data-center-class hardware in synthetic benchmarks.