SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 form a desktop pairing that is defined by a stark contrast in generational capability. The CPU is a modern, high-core-count powerhouse built on a leading-edge process, while the GPU is a professional workstation card from an older architecture. The benchmark data reveals a system where the processor holds a clear advantage in raw compute potential, positioning it as the foundation for a workstation that may be held back by its graphics component in specific tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. This is a desktop-class chip that supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It features 30 MB of shared L3 cache and an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, making it a versatile part for systems that may not immediately require a discrete GPU for basic display output. The unlocked multiplier and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz provide significant headroom for performance tuning, while the 125 W TDP indicates a high-power part designed for sustained multi-core workloads.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 35,850 in multi-core and 2,020 in single-core. The multi-core score is particularly strong, suggesting excellent capability in rendering, video encoding, and complex simulations. The single-core score of 2,020 is also competitive, ensuring responsive performance in everyday applications and games that rely on fewer threads. The Geekbench results reinforce this: a multi-core score of 23,085 and a single-core score of 2,713 show a balanced architecture that doesn't sacrifice single-thread speed for multi-core might.

PassMark's suite of tests provides further granularity on specific workloads. The floating-point math score of 189,629 is exceptionally high, which is a strong indicator of performance in scientific computing and 3D rendering. The data compression score of 665,554 is another standout, suggesting that file archiving and data-heavy tasks will be handled with ease. The integer math score of 143,242 and extended instructions score of 54,333 round out a profile that is robust for general productivity and development work. With an average benchmark score of 70,879, the CPU sits in the 94th percentile of all processors, a figure that confirms its high-end status.

Comparing it to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tight race at the top. The Intel Xeon 6511P scores an average of 71,051, a mere 0.2% higher than the Core Ultra 7 265K. Similarly, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 is only 0.7% ahead. However, the Core Ultra 7 265K pulls ahead of common desktop rivals: it is 1% faster than the Intel Core i7-14700KF and 1.3% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F. This places the 265K in a position where it trades blows with enterprise-grade Xeon parts while clearly leading mainstream desktop alternatives in average benchmark performance.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance profile of this build is heavily skewed by the CPU. The processor's average benchmark score of 70,879 places it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, a dominant position. In contrast, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has an average benchmark score of 17,789 and sits in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This significant gap in percentile ranking indicates that the CPU is the far more capable component in this pairing, relative to its respective market.

The GPU's scores show a mixed bag. In Geekbench, it scores 74,540 in OpenCL and 78,844 in Vulkan, which are moderate figures for a workstation card. However, its PassMark scores are more revealing of its age. The G3D score is 15,117, but the DirectX 12 score is a very low 52, while DirectX 11 is 128 and DirectX 9 is 205. The extremely low DirectX 12 score suggests that this GPU, based on the Turing architecture, is not well optimized for modern graphics APIs, which could severely impact performance in newer games and applications.

The GPU's nearest rivals in the database illustrate its mid-range standing. It is 0.7% faster than the AMD Radeon HD 7790, 0.9% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, and 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon 780M, while being 1.4% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 560. The fact that it only slightly edges out the RTX 4060, a mainstream consumer card, is telling. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 78, which reflects a system where the processor's high standing is somewhat diluted by the graphics card's more modest performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and offers PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. This provides a modern, high-bandwidth foundation for fast storage and future expansion cards. The processor also supports ECC memory, a feature that is critical for workstations where data integrity is paramount.

Given the 125 W TDP of the CPU and the 160 W TDP of the GPU, the system's total power draw is substantial. The suggested PSU for this configuration is 450 W, which provides a baseline for a stable system. A sensible next upgrade would focus on the graphics card, as the CPU has significant headroom. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 means a modern GPU could be installed without bottlenecking the interface. The current GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, so upgrading to a newer card with a PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 interface would fully leverage the platform's capabilities. The CPU's 20 cores and high multi-core scores suggest it can handle a more powerful GPU without becoming a limiting factor in most workloads.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for professionals and enthusiasts whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive but who also require professional-grade graphics features. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's 20 cores and high multi-core scores make it an excellent choice for content creators working with 3D rendering, video encoding, and complex simulations. The high floating-point math score of 189,629 in PassMark indicates strong performance in scientific and engineering applications. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking ensures that it will handle heavy multi-tasking and development workloads, such as compiling large codebases, with ease.

The presence of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 makes this a viable option for small business workstations that need certified drivers for professional applications like CAD or DCC software. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and support for RT cores and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI inference, though its overall compute performance is modest. The build is less ideal for high-end gaming due to the GPU's low DirectX 12 score, but it could handle less demanding titles at lower settings. For students or professionals on a budget, this pairing offers a strong CPU foundation that can be upgraded with a better GPU later, without needing to change the motherboard or memory.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is the limiting factor in this build for graphics-intensive tasks. The GPU's average benchmark score of 17,789 is in the 61st percentile, while the CPU's score is in the 94th percentile. This substantial gap means that in gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. The GPU's low PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52, compared to its DirectX 11 score of 128, suggests that it will particularly struggle with modern games that rely on DirectX 12 or Vulkan.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads such as data compression, code compilation, or physics simulations, the CPU will be the dominant component. The PassMark physics score of 3,731 and the multi-thread score of 58,594 indicate that the CPU can process complex calculations far faster than the GPU can render them. This imbalance means that while the system is well-balanced for general productivity, it is not balanced for gaming. The performance of the system in a specific task will depend entirely on whether that task is more reliant on the CPU's compute power or the GPU's rendering capabilities, and the frame pacing in games will be dictated by the GPU's limitations.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 78.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F in average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has an average score of 70,879, which is 1.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F's score of 69,996.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and what is the suggested PSU for this build?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 160 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 450 W.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has 36 RT cores, which provide hardware support for ray tracing.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What is the single-core score of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 2,020 in the Cinebench R23 single-core test.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores. The gaming performance of this system will be primarily limited by the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The GPU's low PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 and its 61st percentile ranking suggest it is not well-suited for modern gaming titles that leverage DirectX 12.

While the CPU is highly capable, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The GPU's moderate Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,540 indicates it has some compute power, but its older Turing architecture and 8 GB of memory may be insufficient for high-resolution textures and modern effects. Gamers should expect playable frame rates in less demanding or older titles, but performance in recent AAA games will likely be poor, especially at higher settings and resolutions. The CPU's high single-core score of 2,713 in Geekbench ensures that it will not hold back the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's limitations will cap the overall gaming experience.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a top-tier modern CPU with a professional, end-of-life GPU. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a high-performance processor, evidenced by its 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, while a capable workstation card, is in the 61st percentile of all GPUs and is based on an older architecture. The combined percentile of this pairing is 78, indicating an overall system that is solid but not top-tier. This is a build that prioritizes CPU compute power for professional workloads, with the GPU serving as a secondary component for specific tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a professional workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process. It features 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s. It also includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI processing. The card's boost clock is 1545 MHz, and it has a TDP of 160 W, requiring a single 8-pin power connector.

In terms of raw compute, the GPU offers 7.119 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 14.24 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. While these numbers are respectable, the benchmark scores tell a more nuanced story. The GPU's passmark G3D score of 15,117 is moderate, but its performance in modern APIs is a major weakness. The DirectX 12 score of 52 is exceptionally low, and the Vulkan score of 78,844 in Geekbench does not align with the poor DirectX performance. This suggests that the GPU is not optimized for modern graphics pipelines. For rendering and compute tasks that rely on its RT and tensor cores, the GPU can still provide useful acceleration, but its overall performance is limited by its age and architecture. The 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for its class, but the 8 GB capacity may be a constraint for large datasets in professional applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds