SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing represents a desktop build where the CPU is the clear performance anchor. The processor sits in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 68th percentile among all GPUs. This disparity suggests the CPU has substantial headroom in graphics-bound scenarios, but the data shows that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The combined percentile for the pair is 81, and its average frame rate across all tested games is 161 FPS, placing it at rank 961 out of 3861 pairs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is dictated by resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s high single-thread performance — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2020 — allows the GPU to stretch its legs in many titles. For instance, Counter-Strike 2 hits 243 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant reaches 557 FPS. These numbers indicate that at lower resolutions, the CPU is feeding the GPU enough data to produce very high frame rates. However, in more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the 1080p result of 70.7 FPS suggests the GPU is already working hard, and the CPU is not the primary constraint.

The bottleneck shifts decisively to the GPU as resolution increases. Moving from 1080p to 1440p, most games show a significant frame rate drop. For example, Red Dead Redemption 2 falls from 65 FPS at 1080p to 49 FPS at 1440p, and then to 32 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern is classic GPU-bound behavior. The RTX 3080’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are being pushed to their limits, while the CPU’s 20 cores and 20 threads remain comparatively underutilized. The data shows that the CPU’s percentile advantage over the GPU means that in CPU-light, GPU-heavy workloads, the processor is never the bottleneck.

The FPS scaling across the three resolutions confirms this imbalance. At 4K, the average frame rates often drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 manages 33.6 FPS at 4K, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to just 13.3 FPS. These figures indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor for high-resolution gaming. Conversely, in esports and older titles, the CPU’s strength shines. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive produces 539 FPS at 1080p, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege reaches 289 FPS, showing that the CPU can push the GPU to very high output when the graphical load is light.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing, provides a comprehensive view of gaming performance. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in most titles. Esports titles are exceptional: Valorant runs at 557 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 289 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 243 FPS. Minecraft also performs well at 240 FPS. These numbers show that competitive gamers at 1080p will have a very smooth experience with this pairing.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the GPU’s limits. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 171 FPS, and Valorant stays high at 476 FPS. However, more demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 52.6 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 49 FPS. The data indicates that 1440p is a viable resolution for this build, but users will need to adjust settings in the most graphically intensive titles to maintain high refresh rates.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. Only lighter titles like Valorant (380 FPS) and Call of Duty: Warzone (144 FPS) remain playable at high frame rates. Most AAA games struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 33.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 32 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 13.3 FPS. The data suggests that 4K gaming is possible but often requires reduced settings or upscaling technologies to achieve playable frame rates. The RTX 3080’s 68th percentile ranking among GPUs explains this limitation, as it is not a top-tier card for 4K gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on TSMC’s 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. This is a desktop-class chip with a TDP of 125 W, and it uses the Intel Socket 1851. The CPU features a 30 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core. The architecture is designed for high performance, and the benchmark scores reflect that.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850 places the CPU in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result that indicates excellent multi-threaded performance for tasks like video rendering and 3D modeling. The single-core score of 2020 is also impressive, contributing to the high frame rates seen in esports games. The Geekbench scores are equally strong, with a multi-core score of 23085 and a single-core score of 2713.

The Passmark tests show a varied picture. The multi-thread score of 58594 is high, but the physics score of 3731 is notably lower, suggesting that the CPU may not be optimized for all types of physics calculations. The data compression score of 665554 and floating point math score of 189629 are strong, indicating good performance in data-heavy workloads. The CPU’s closest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700KF, has an average score that is 1% lower, showing that the 265K is competitive with, and slightly ahead of, that previous-generation chip.

Who Should Build It

This build is best suited for gamers who primarily play at 1080p or 1440p and want to achieve very high frame rates. The data shows that at 1080p, the system can push well over 200 FPS in most esports titles and over 100 FPS in many AAA games. At 1440p, it can still deliver high frame rates in less demanding games, but users will need to be selective about settings in the most graphically intense titles. For 4K gaming, this build is less appropriate, as the GPU is not powerful enough to maintain high frame rates in modern games.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will also benefit from this CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 58594 indicate that the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads efficiently. Developers and students who run simulations or compile code will find the 20 cores and 20 threads useful, and the DDR5 memory support with ECC capability adds reliability for long-running tasks. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or handle large datasets will also perform well, given the CPU’s high percentile ranking.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and RTX 3080 is 81.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 70879, which is 1% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700KF, which scores 70163.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 320-bit bus width.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3080 is 700 W.

Q: What is the processor’s TDP?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a TDP of 125 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread score in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 2020 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is based on the Ampere architecture and uses the GA102 chip, built on Samsung’s 8 nm process node. It has 8704 shading units, 272 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The GPU features 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The base clock is 1440 MHz with a boost clock of 1710 MHz, and the memory runs at 19 Gbps effective. The memory configuration includes 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 25086 in Passmark G3D and 152423 in Geekbench OpenCL. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4407. These scores place the GPU in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, which has an average score that is 0.4% lower, indicating that the RTX 3080 is marginally ahead of that mobile GPU. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 29.77 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU’s rendering performance is strong for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 10 GB of VRAM may be a limitation for 4K textures in some games. The pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s are high, but the data shows that the GPU is not a top-tier performer, as indicated by its 68th percentile ranking. The dual-slot design and 320 W TDP require a robust cooling solution and a 700 W PSU.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K achieves an average benchmark score of 70879, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, with the nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6511P, scoring 71051, a difference of only -0.2%. The CPU is also 1.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 35850 multi-core and 2020 single-core. The Geekbench multi-core score is 23085, and the Passmark multi-thread score is 58594.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23172, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA P106-100, scores 23249, a difference of -0.3%. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score is 25086, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 152423. The combined percentile for the pair is 81, and the average frame rate across all tested games is 161 FPS.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a high-end performer with a 94th percentile ranking, while the GPU is a solid mid-to-high-end performer with a 68th percentile ranking. This means the system is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the CPU can drive the GPU to its full potential. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the system’s performance drops accordingly. The data suggests that this is a capable build for high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus. The memory bandwidth is 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a modern interface for high-speed storage and graphics cards. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, providing a basic display output option.

The RTX 3080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU’s TDP is 320 W, and the suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides headroom for the CPU’s 125 W TDP. The platform supports a sensible next upgrade path. The CPU is unlocked, allowing for overclocking to extract more performance. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning that users may consider upgrading to a newer graphics card in the future, but the current pair is still capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build featuring the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture. The GPU is a 10 GB GDDR6X card from the GeForce 30-series, based on the Ampere architecture. The combined percentile rank is 81, indicating that this is a solidly performing desktop system.

The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking makes it a top-tier processor, while the GPU’s 68th percentile ranking makes it a mid-to-high-end graphics card. The average frame rate of 161 FPS across games shows that this system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p. The data indicates that this is a balanced build for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity tasks and gaming at lower resolutions, with the GPU providing adequate graphical power for most titles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds