SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop build that combines a high-end 20-core processor with a mid-range Ampere graphics card. This configuration lands in the 78th percentile overall, with the CPU significantly outclassing the GPU in raw computational power. The data indicates a system where the graphics card is the primary limiter in modern gaming scenarios, while the processor provides exceptional headroom for productivity and multi-threaded workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear performance hierarchy in this pairing. The Core Ultra 7 265K sits in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 3070 is in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This 33-percentile gap establishes the GPU as the definitive bottleneck for graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, this manifests as frame rates that scale predictably with resolution, with the CPU rarely being the limiting factor. The FPS data shows that at 1920x1080, games like Counter-Strike 2 reach 207.3 FPS, but this drops to 136 FPS at 2560x1440 and 75.4 FPS at 3840x2160, demonstrating that the RTX 3070’s rendering pipeline is saturated long before the 265K’s processing capacity is challenged.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850 and single-core score of 2020 indicate exceptional headroom for high-refresh gaming. The single-core performance is sufficient to drive frame rates well above 200 FPS in esports titles, as evidenced by Valorant’s 475.3 FPS at 1080p. However, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become the constraining factor in more demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 62 FPS at 1080p, 46 FPS at 1440p, and 30 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU’s limits with ray tracing and high-fidelity assets.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 58594 and Geekbench multi-core score of 23085 show it can handle heavy compilation, rendering, and data processing tasks without breaking a sweat. The GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 11195 is respectable but represents only a fraction of the computational power available from the CPU. In mixed workloads like video editing with GPU acceleration, the system will be GPU-limited during effects rendering but CPU-bound during encoding and timeline scrubbing.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture is one of asymmetric capability. The Core Ultra 7 265K achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850, placing it just 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6511P (71051 avg) and 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71370 avg) in the average benchmark score comparison. It outperforms the Intel Core i7-14700KF by 1% and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F by 1.3% in average score. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 70879 puts it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, a top-tier position for desktop processors.

The RTX 3070’s performance is more modest. Its average benchmark score of 17208 places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. It edges out the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT by 0.7% (17083 avg) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 by 1% (17037 avg), while trailing the NVIDIA Tesla K40c by 1.5% (17468 avg). In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3162, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 112821 and 21022, respectively. The Passmark G3D score of 22214 indicates solid DirectX 11 performance, but the DirectX 12 score of 85 shows significant architectural limitations in modern APIs.

The pair’s combined percentile of 78 reflects the overall system capability, with the pair ranking 1523 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across games. The average FPS across the tested games is 135.9, which is respectable but not exceptional for a desktop build. The gaming data shows that the system delivers playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p for most titles, but struggles with 4K ultra settings, particularly in VRAM-intensive games.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The chip features a 30 MB shared L3 cache, with 192 KB L1 and 3 MB L2 per core. This is a desktop-class processor on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, released on 2024-10-23 with a launch MSRP of $394.

The architecture is notable for its efficiency. The 3 nm process and 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die deliver strong performance per watt. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5020 and single-core score of 708 show excellent scaling from single to multi-threaded workloads. The Geekbench single-core score of 2713 and multi-core score of 23085 indicate strong performance in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded applications.

The Passmark results are particularly revealing for real-world workloads. The floating-point math score of 189629 and integer math score of 143242 show strong computational throughput for scientific and financial applications. The data compression score of 665554 and encryption score of 48246 indicate excellent performance for archival and security tasks. The extended instructions score of 54333 demonstrates strong SIMD and vector processing capabilities, which benefit media encoding and scientific simulation. The single-thread score of 4928 confirms the CPU’s ability to handle legacy and lightly-threaded applications effectively.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connections for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. ECC memory support is included, which is beneficial for workstation and server applications where data integrity is critical.

The RTX 3070 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU has a TDP of 220 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W, leaving significant headroom for the 125 W CPU and other components. The GPU uses a 1x 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design measuring 242 mm in length, suitable for most mid-tower cases.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom for more powerful graphics hardware. The 265K’s 94th percentile CPU performance means it could comfortably drive a GPU in the 90th percentile or higher without becoming a bottleneck. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support and DDR5 memory ensure that future GPU upgrades will not be limited by the motherboard or CPU interface.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who require significant CPU horsepower but have budget constraints on the graphics front. Gamers at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 resolutions will find the system capable of high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU ensuring consistent performance in CPU-bound games like Counter-Strike 2 (207.3 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (475.3 FPS at 1080p). Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core prowess, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850 ensuring fast render times.

Students and professionals in engineering, data science, and financial modeling will appreciate the ECC memory support and strong integer and floating-point performance. The Passmark data encryption score of 48246 and data compression score of 665554 make this suitable for secure data handling and archival tasks. Small business workstations running virtualization, database management, or complex spreadsheets will find the 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallelism for concurrent workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, placing it above 78% of all desktop pairings in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 70879, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon 6511P and 0.7% lower than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270, but 1% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700KF and 1.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The pair achieves an average of 135.9 FPS across the tested games at various resolutions.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, based on the GPU’s 220 W TDP and the CPU’s 125 W TDP.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is a strong suit for this build. In esports titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system achieves 475.3 FPS and 463.8 FPS respectively at 1080p, well above the refresh rates of most gaming monitors. At 1440p, these titles still deliver 406.2 FPS and 318.9 FPS, ensuring smooth competitive play.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU’s 20 cores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850 allows for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and streaming without significant CPU strain. The Passmark floating-point math score of 189629 supports real-time video filters and effects.

Video editing workflows will see the CPU handle timelines and rendering efficiently, while the GPU accelerates effects and color grading. The Geekbench multi-core score of 23085 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3162 indicate a balanced system for 1080p and 1440p editing, though 4K projects may require a more powerful GPU.

3D rendering and simulation tasks are CPU-bound, and the 265K’s multi-thread performance shines here. The Passmark multi-thread score of 58594 and integer math score of 143242 enable rapid iteration in CAD, architectural visualization, and physics simulation. The GPU can handle viewport rendering and final frame output for moderate complexity scenes.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s compilation speed. The Passmark extended instructions score of 54333 accelerates build processes, while the 20 threads handle multiple parallel compilation jobs efficiently. The data compression score of 665554 speeds up version control operations and package management.

Student and office workloads are easily handled. The single-thread score of 4928 ensures responsive application launches and smooth multitasking, while the 20 cores handle background tasks like antivirus scans, indexing, and cloud sync without impacting foreground performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K from the Core Ultra Series 2 lineup with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 from the GeForce 30-series. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range card in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The overall build lands in the 78th percentile, making it a capable system for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as well as CPU-intensive professional workloads.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows a system that excels at 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K performance being acceptable for less demanding titles. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in most games: Call of Duty: Warzone hits 192 FPS, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X reaches 249.6 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 207.3 FPS. Even demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 62 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 56 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong for competitive gaming. Valorant hits 406.2 FPS, CS:GO reaches 318.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 171 FPS. However, AAA titles begin to show strain: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 46 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 42 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 18.9 FPS.

4K gaming at 3840x2160 is possible but limited. Valorant achieves 325.7 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone 144 FPS, and Roblox 103.1 FPS. However, demanding titles struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 30 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 10.1 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors at this resolution, particularly for games with high-resolution textures.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is based on the GA104 chip with the Ampere architecture, manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung. It has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The GPU is equipped with 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU achieves a pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 performance both rated at 20.31 TFLOPS.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 3162 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 112821 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 21022 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score of 22214 shows strong DirectX 11 performance, but the DirectX 12 score of 85 and DirectX 10 score of 150 indicate that the architecture is better suited for older APIs. The GPU compute score of 11195 demonstrates moderate compute capability, which is sufficient for basic rendering tasks but not for heavy GPGPU workloads.

The RTX 3070’s 61st percentile ranking places it above the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (0.7% higher score) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (1% higher), but below the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (1.5% lower score). This positioning makes it a solid mid-range option for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though its 8 GB VRAM is becoming a limitation for modern AAA titles at higher resolutions and settings.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds