SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX

63,173 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the AMD Radeon 780M is a laptop platform that places a heavy emphasis on multi-threaded CPU throughput while relying on a capable, but not top-tier, integrated GPU. The benchmark data shows a processor that performs at the 93rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile. This is a combination engineered for productivity and content creation, where the CPU can flex its 20 cores, rather than for high-end gaming, where the IGP will be the limiting factor. The data indicates this is a balanced system for professional workloads, with gaming being a secondary, more modest capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and can boost up to 5.30 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. This configuration is clearly designed for heavy parallel workloads, and the benchmark scores confirm this design intent.

In multi-threaded benchmarks, the processor is exceptionally strong. It scores 40,642 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 17,069 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. These are high scores that indicate the CPU can handle demanding rendering, compilation, and scientific computing tasks with ease. The PassMark multi-thread score of 47,985 and the floating-point math score of 161,605 reinforce this narrative, suggesting strong performance in applications that leverage SIMD instructions and parallel processing.

Single-thread performance is also solid, though not as dominant. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,737 and the PassMark single-thread score of 4,500 indicate a processor that is responsive for everyday tasks and applications that are not heavily threaded. The 5.30 GHz boost clock is put to good use in these scenarios.

The processor's average benchmark score is 63,173, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This puts it in a tight grouping with rivals. It is essentially neck-and-neck with the Intel Core i7-13790F, which scores 63,080 (a 0.1% difference). It also edges out the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G (63,331, -0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (62,839, 0.5%), while being 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (62,738). This data shows the 265HX is a leading mobile processor, trading blows with the best of the previous and current generations.

The data also shows strong performance in specific tasks. The PassMark data encryption score of 39,472 and the extended instructions score of 40,741 suggest the CPU is well-suited for security-related tasks and complex instruction sets. The integer math score of 126,954 is also high, indicating robust general-purpose processing power. Overall, the CPU analysis points to a top-tier mobile processor that excels in multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks, making it a versatile choice for power users.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from empirical testing. The data must be interpreted with this caveat in mind.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, gaming capability is moderate. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 480 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 testcars, which is a modern, demanding benchmark. Its Geekbench scores are more robust: 18,602 in OpenCL and 33,683 in Vulkan. These scores put the GPU at the 61st percentile of all GPUs, making it an average performer.

The GPU is most closely matched with the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17,551 avg score, 0.2% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17,639, -0.3%), and the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666, -0.4%). This is a significant spread in performance class; the RTX 4060 is a dedicated desktop card, while the 780M is an IGP. The similarity in average scores, however, suggests that in certain, likely compute-bound scenarios, the 780M can keep pace with these older discrete cards, but this is not an indication of parity in modern gaming.

For high-refresh gaming (144Hz+), the data suggests this platform will struggle. The low 3DMark Steel Nomad score indicates that at high resolutions and detail settings, frame rates will be low. Expect to play at 1080p with reduced graphical settings to achieve playable, but not high, frame rates. Esports titles and older games should run well, but modern AAA games will likely require significant compromises. This is an estimate based on the GPU's percentile and benchmark scores, and actual performance will vary by title and driver optimization.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not recommended based on the data. The Radeon 780M's GPU scores, particularly the 480 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, indicate it lacks the raw throughput to consistently feed a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor in modern titles. Frame rates will be more suitable for 60Hz displays, and even then, settings will need to be lowered.

Streaming: The CPU is an asset here. The 20 cores and high multi-threaded scores (40,642 in R23) can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant performance loss. The GPU, however, will limit the game's graphical fidelity, which could reduce the visual quality of the stream, but the CPU's headroom should ensure a smooth stream from a performance standpoint.

Video editing: This is a strong suit. The high multi-core scores (47,985 in PassMark multi-thread) translate directly to faster rendering times in video editing software. The large L3 cache and fast memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s) will also help with scrubbing timelines and applying effects. The 780M can provide basic hardware acceleration for effects, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse.

3D rendering: Excellent. The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4,096 and R23 score of 40,642 are indicative of a processor that can handle complex 3D scenes. Tasks like ray tracing in CPU-based renderers will be fast. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering and final output in compatible software, but its 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is not a substitute for a dedicated high-end render card.

Software development: The processor is well-equipped for compilation. The 20 threads and high integer math score (126,954) will speed up code compilation, while the strong single-thread score (5,737 in R23) ensures responsive IDE performance. The PassMark data compression score of 511,817 is also useful for handling large code repositories.

Student and office work: This platform is overkill for basic tasks. The single-thread performance (4,500 in PassMark) makes everyday applications feel snappy, and the multi-core power means that any heavy lifting, like compiling a project or processing a large spreadsheet, will be handled with ease. The 55 W TDP is reasonable for a laptop, though battery life will depend on the specific chassis.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 61st percentile. This 32-point gap indicates that the CPU is the dominant component. In gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck, as the CPU will likely be able to feed frames much faster than the 780M can render them assets.

This is evident in the benchmarks. For example, in a CPU-intensive game, the 265HX could theoretically push hundreds of frames per second, but the 780M will cap the output at a much lower number. The data suggests that in any graphics-intensive workload, the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's potential is largely untapped in these scenarios.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the CPU is the star. The GPU will be underutilized, acting as a simple display output. The PassMark physics score of 2,978 and the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking are testament to its ability to handle these tasks without breaking a sweat.

The FPS scaling, or lack thereof, further illustrates this point. Without measured FPS data, we can infer that increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p or 4K will heavily tax the GPU, leading to a disproportionate drop in frame rates. The CPU's performance will remain constant, but the GPU's output will fall, confirming that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming. For all other tasks, the CPU is the star performer, and the GPU is merely a peripheral.

Benchmark Performance

The combined platform benchmark picture is one of a powerful CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, resulting in a 77th percentile combined score. The CPU's average benchmark score is 63,173, which is at the 93rd percentile against all CPUs. This is a top-tier result, placing it just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13790F and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX. It also narrowly outperforms the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G by 0.2%.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,588, which is at the 61st percentile. This is a solid, mid-pack result. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 460angs, but it trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 by 0.3% and the AMD Radeon HD 7790 by 0.4%. These comparisons show that while the 780M is a capable integrated GPU, it is in the same performance bracket as older, lower-tier discrete desktop cards.

The individual benchmark scores tell a consistent story. The CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks, with a Cinebench R23 score of 40,642 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 47,985. The GPU shows moderate performance, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 33,683. The combination of these scores indicates a system that is optimized for productivity and content creation, not for high-end gaming. The combined percentile of 77 reflects this dual nature: the CPU pulls the average up, while the GPU keeps it from being a top-tier gaming machine.

Who Should Build It

This platform is for users who need serious CPU horsepower in a laptop form factor. The target audience is primarily professionals and power users who rely on multi-threaded applications.

Content creators are a primary audience. Video editors will benefit from the 20 cores and high Cinebench scores, which will accelerate rendering and effects processing. 3D artists and animators will find the CPU performance essential for viewport manipulation and final frame rendering. The GPU is sufficient for basic GPU-accelerated effects but is not a replacement for a dedicated workstation GPU.

Software developers are another key group. The fast multi-threaded performance (PassMark multi-thread score of 47,985) will drastically reduce build times, while the strong single-thread score (5,737 in R23) ensures a responsive development environment. Data scientists and researchers working with large datasets will also benefit from the high integer math score (126,954) and data compression score (511,817).

Students in STEM fields, particularly those studying computer science, engineering, or data analysis, will find this platform more than capable. It can handle everything from compiling code to running simulations. However, for general student use, the power is overkill.

Small business workstations that need to run heavy productivity software, like enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems or advanced spreadsheet analysis, will be well-served. The CPU's multi-threaded performance ensures smooth operation. The GPU is adequate for standard business applications and multi-monitor setups.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations are a secondary audience. The Radeon 780M can handle esports titles and older games at playable frame rates, but it is not suitable for high-refresh gaming or modern AAA titles at high settings. The data suggests that gamers should look elsewhere for a dedicated GPU, but the platform is a fine choice for a work laptop that can also handle light gaming.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. The GPU has 12 dedicated ray tracing cores, which is a notable inclusion for an IGP, allowing for some hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects in supported games. It operates at a base clock of 800 MHz and can boost up to 2900 MHz.

Memory is system-shared, meaning the GPU uses the same DDR5 memory as the CPU. The bandwidth is system-dependent, but the CPU's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is the theoretical limit. This shared memory architecture is a common bottleneck for integrated graphics, as it competes with the CPU for memory access.

The GPU's compute performance is rated at 8.909 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, with a 1:1 ratio for FP16. This is a modest amount of compute power, placing it in the lower mid-range of graphics cards. The pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 139.2 GTexel/s, which are adequate for 1080p gaming at moderate settings.

In benchmarks, the 780M scores 480 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is a demanding test and indicates limited high-end gaming capability. Its Geekbench scores are better, with 18,602 in OpenCL and 33,683 in Vulkan, showing that it can handle compute workloads reasonably well. The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,588, placing it at the 61st percentile. This puts it in the same bracket as the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, based on average scores, though the RTX 4060 is a much more powerful card in practice. The data suggests the 780M is a solid IGP for everyday tasks and light gaming, but it is not designed for heavy rendering workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a mobile socket, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. The memory support is DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a high-speed interface for connecting storage and other devices.

The GPU is an IGP, so it cannot be upgraded. This is a significant limitation for gaming, as the user is stuck with the 780M's performance. The GPU's TDP is 15 W, and it has no dedicated power connectors, relying entirely on the system's power delivery.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and there is no suggested PSU listed in the data. This indicates a laptop platform where the power supply is integrated and not user-serviceable. The lack of a suggested PSU field means we cannot comment on power supply headroom.

Given the soldered nature of the CPU and the integrated GPU, the upgrade path is essentially non-existent for the core components. The only sensible upgrades are memory and storage. Upgrading to faster DDR5 memory could improve the iGPU's performance, as it shares system memory. Adding a faster NVMe SSD via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes would improve load times and system responsiveness. For users needing more graphics power, the only path is to choose a different platform with a discrete GPU, as this platform's IGP cannot be replaced.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX?

A: Based on average benchmark scores, the 265HX is 0.7% faster than the 255HX. The 265HX has an average score of 63,173, while the 255HX has an average score of 62,738.

Q: Can this laptop play modern games at high settings?

A: The data suggests no. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 480 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, indicating limited high-end gaming capability. Users should expect to play at 1080p with reduced settings, and the GPU is a bottleneck compared to the CPU.

Q: How does the Radeon 780M compare to a discrete GPU like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The average benchmark scores are very close, with the RTX 4060 at 17,639 and the 780M at 17,588, a 0.3% difference. However, this is based on average scores across various tests and does not indicate parity in gaming performance.

Q: Is the CPU good for video editing and 3D rendering?

A: Yes. The CPU scores 40,642 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 47,985 in PassMark multi-thread, which are excellent scores for these workloads. The 20-core, 20-thread configuration is well-suited for parallel processing tasks.

Q: What is the memory type supported by this platform?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. The memory bandwidth is rated at 102.4 GB/sikuha.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: The multiplier is listed as unlocked, which indicates that the CPU is capable of being overclocked, provided the laptop's BIOS and cooling solution support it.

Q: What is the socket type for this CPU?

A: It uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a mobile socket. This means the CPU is soldered onto the motherboard and is not upgradeable.