SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation pairing presents an interesting asymmetry in workload distribution. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU lands in the 50th percentile against all GPUs. This 43-point gap indicates that the processor is the substantially stronger component in this pairing, and for most tasks, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 demonstrates exceptional compute throughput, while the GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance is respectable but not class-leading for its generation. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as data compression, encryption, or physics calculations — the processor will dominate the workload profile. The PassMark data compression score of 507,018 and encryption score of 39,468 show that the CPU can chew through these tasks with ease, meaning any slowdown in those workloads would come from elsewhere in the system.

For gaming and graphics-heavy applications, the balance shifts decisively toward the GPU being the bottleneck. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for modern titles, but its 50th percentile standing means it will constrain frame rates well before the CPU reaches its limits. The processor's boost clock of 5.30 GHz and single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5,926 suggest it can feed frames rapidly, but the GPU's 1680 MHz boost clock and 32.69 TFLOPS will cap output.

The TDP figures reinforce this imbalance. The CPU draws 65 W while the GPU draws 120 W, meaning the graphics card consumes nearly twice the power. This suggests that thermal management in the system will be more critical for the GPU than the CPU, and that sustained GPU workloads will generate proportionally more heat. The CPU's 3 nm process node (TSMC) and the GPU's 5 nm process node (TSMC) both represent modern manufacturing, but the GPU's larger die (379 mm² versus 243 mm²) and higher transistor count (45,900 million versus 17,800 million) indicate where the silicon complexity resides.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 64,438, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, but the nearest rival data shows how tightly contested this segment is. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64,640, which is 0.3% higher than the 265F. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202, which is 0.4% lower. The AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823, which is 0.6% higher. The Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051, which is 0.6% lower. The 265F sits in the middle of this pack, with the largest delta to any rival being just 0.6% — a negligible margin that puts all four processors in the same performance tier.

The GPU has no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals in the data. Its 50th percentile standing against all GPUs is derived from its specifications and architecture generation. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation uses the AD103 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It offers 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores. These specifications place it in the middle of the GPU performance distribution — competent for mainstream gaming and professional visualization, but not at the top tier.

The combined system percentile is 72, which reflects the overall capability of this CPU+GPU pairing. This is lower than the CPU's individual percentile due to the GPU's more modest standing. The data shows a system that excels at processor-intensive work while delivering adequate graphics performance. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that frame rate figures cannot be verified empirically; all FPS discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores and component specifications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S). It uses Intel's Socket 1851 and is manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process node. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The 65 W TDP is notably modest for a 20-core chip, reflecting the efficiency of the 3 nm process.

Cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, though ECC memory is not supported. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which is ample for a high-end GPU and NVMe storage. There is no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. The multiplier is locked, limiting overclocking headroom.

The Cinebench results tell a clear story. The R23 multi-core score of 41,980 is exceptional, placing the chip firmly in the high-end desktop segment. The R23 single-core score of 5,926 indicates strong per-thread performance, and the R20 scores (17,631 multi-core, 2,488 single-core) and R15 scores (4,231 multi-core, 597 single-core) follow the same pattern. The PassMark results reinforce this: multi-thread score of 49,410, single-thread score of 4,750, integer math at 138,078, floating point math at 173,855, and extended instructions at 39,235.

The 93rd percentile ranking against all CPUs means this processor outperforms the vast majority of installed desktop and mobile chips. The nearest rival comparisons show it trading blows with server-class EPYC parts and the flagship Core i9-13900KS, with deltas under 1% in either direction. For real workloads, this translates to rapid compilation times, smooth multi-tasking, and quick content creation renders. The data compression score of 507,018 and random string sorting score of 62,439 indicate strong throughput for data-heavy tasks.

Who Should Build It

The 93rd percentile CPU and 50th percentile GPU combination targets users who prioritize processor performance over graphics muscle. Gamers playing at lower resolutions — where the CPU matters more for frame pacing — would benefit from the 265F's strong single-core and multi-core scores. The 5.30 GHz boost clock and 5,926 single-core R23 score ensure that CPU-bound scenarios in esports titles and simulation games will run smoothly, though the GPU will cap maximum frame rates in graphically demanding games.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 41,980 multi-core R23 score valuable. The 20 cores and 20 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently, and the PassMark physics score of 3,172 suggests solid performance for simulation and physics-based rendering. The GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 510.7 GTexel/s texture rate provide supplementary acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects, though the 50th percentile GPU may become a bottleneck in GPU-heavy renders.

Software developers would appreciate the CPU's compile throughput. The integer math score of 138,078 and extended instructions score of 39,235 indicate strong performance for code compilation and test execution. The 65 W TDP makes this a power-efficient choice for always-on development workstations. Students and small business users running office productivity suites, web applications, and moderate multitasking will find the system more than adequate, with the CPU's 93rd percentile ensuring headroom for future software demands.

The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is notable for professional visualization and AI inference workloads. The 304 tensor cores provide acceleration for machine learning frameworks, and the 12 Ultimate DirectX support ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs. However, the 50th percentile GPU ranking means this is not a top-tier gaming or rendering machine; it is a balanced professional workstation with a strong CPU foundation.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile against all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64,438.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 265F is 0.3% slower than the Core Ultra 7 265, 0.4% faster than the AMD EPYC 7343, 0.6% slower than the AMD EPYC 4464P, and 0.6% faster than the Core i9-13900KS.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, with no individual benchmark scores recorded.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as N/A, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined system percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 72.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this combination?

A: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all FPS figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores and component specifications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) generation. This means any CPU upgrade requires a motherboard with this socket, and there is no cross-compatibility with older Intel sockets. The locked multiplier on the 265F limits tuning, but the platform itself supports the full range of Arrow Lake processors, so a future upgrade to a higher-tier chip in the same family is possible without changing the motherboard.

Memory support is dual-channel DDR5, and the system can be configured with high-capacity DDR5 modules. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared across the 20 cores, which is adequate for most workloads but could become a constraint in memory-bandwidth-intensive applications. The lack of ECC support means this is not ideal for mission-critical error-checking workloads, but for general desktop and professional use, standard DDR5 is sufficient.

PCIe connectivity is provided by 20 Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. This is sufficient for a high-end GPU (typically 16 lanes) and one or two NVMe SSDs (4 lanes each). The GPU in this system uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes and does not bottleneck the 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth of the graphics card. The bus interface supports the full bandwidth available to the device.

The power delivery situation is straightforward. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 120 W TDP, totaling 185 W for the two primary components. The GPU has no external power connectors (it is an IGP form factor), which simplifies cabling. The suggested PSU field is null in the data, but the combined TDP of 185 W suggests that a capable power supply with headroom for other system components (drives, fans, motherboard, RAM) would suffice. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU to balance the system, since the CPU's 93rd percentile vastly exceeds the GPU's 50th percentile.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimated from the benchmark scores and component specifications. The CPU's 93rd percentile and strong single-core performance (5,926 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 4,750 in PassMark single-thread) suggest that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios will be excellent. The GPU's 50th percentile and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput indicate that graphics-bound scenarios will be moderate.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU's high single-core performance should keep frame rates high in esports titles and lighter games, where the processor can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. The GPU's 9,728 shading units and 112 ROPs provide adequate throughput for most games at this resolution, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests that ultra-settings in demanding titles will push the GPU to its limits.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU being the primary limiter. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 16 GB VRAM allows for large texture packs without overflow. However, the GPU's mid-pack standing means that ultra-settings in AAA titles will likely produce playable but not exceptional frame rates. The CPU will have significant headroom, as its single-core and multi-core scores exceed what most games require.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. The 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 are adequate for 4K at moderate settings, but ultra-settings with ray tracing enabled will likely produce frame rates below 60 FPS in demanding titles. The 76 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, but the 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests that 4K ultra gaming is not this system's primary strength. For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p with adjusted settings, this pairing should deliver a solid experience.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a 93rd percentile ranking, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part with a 50th percentile ranking. The combined system percentile is 72, placing this build in the upper-middle tier of overall performance.

The CPU's specifications — 20 cores, 20 threads, 5.30 GHz boost clock, 30 MB L3 cache, and 65 W TDP — make it a high-performance desktop processor with excellent efficiency. The GPU's specifications — 16 GB GDDR6, 9,728 shading units, 32.69 TFLOPS, and 120 W TDP — make it a mid-range graphics solution suitable for mainstream gaming and professional workloads. The 43-point gap in percentiles between CPU and GPU defines the character of this build: it is a processor-centric system with adequate graphics capability.

The architecture pairing is notable: Arrow Lake (CPU) and Ada Lovelace (GPU) are both recent generations from their respective manufacturers. The CPU uses TSMC's 3 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC's 5 nm process, both representing modern manufacturing. The total TDP of 185 W is modest for a desktop build, making this an energy-conscious pairing that does not sacrifice CPU performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's 5,926 single-core R23 score and 5.30 GHz boost clock should maintain high frame rates in esports and lighter titles, with the GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS providing adequate throughput. At 1440p and above, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking will limit frame rates, making this better suited for 1080p high-refresh or 1440p standard-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU with a 41,980 multi-core R23 score can handle game capture, encoding, and streaming overhead simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The GPU's NVENC (via Ada Lovelace architecture) adds dedicated encoding hardware, though specific encoder specifications are not listed in the data.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core strength (41,980 Cinebench R23, 173,855 PassMark floating point) accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth support large project files and GPU-accelerated effects, though the 50th percentile GPU may slow the most demanding effects-heavy workflows.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will excel with the 20 cores and 41,980 multi-core score. GPU-based rendering (using the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32) will be moderate, suitable for smaller scenes or interactive previews but not top-tier for final-frame rendering.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 138,078 and extended instructions score of 39,235 indicate strong compilation performance. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on development machines, and the 93rd percentile CPU ensures fast builds and responsive tooling.

Student and office work: This system is overqualified for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's 93rd percentile ensures smooth multitasking across office suites, web browsers, and communication tools, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM provides headroom for occasional graphics work or light gaming during downtime. The 185 W combined TDP keeps the system quiet and cool in shared spaces.