SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

98 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F sits at the heart of this desktop build, and the data reveals a processor engineered for high-throughput parallel workloads rather than raw single-thread bragging rights. At its core, this is a 20-core, 20-thread part based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC with a transistor count of 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die. The absence of hyperthreading is notable: 20 cores and 20 threads means every physical core does the work, and the benchmark scores suggest this design choice does not handicap it.

Clock speeds range from a 2.40 GHz base to a 5.30 GHz boost, a spread that indicates significant frequency headroom when thermal and power conditions permit. The 65 W TDP is remarkably modest for a 20-core processor, which hints at strong power efficiency per thread — a trait that becomes more meaningful when paired with a high-end workstation GPU. The cache hierarchy is generous: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 pool. This layered cache design is critical for workloads that repeatedly access moderate-sized datasets, allowing the CPU to avoid memory stalls.

Looking at the benchmark results, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 is the headline number. This places the chip in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 93% of the processors in the database. The single-core score of 5,926 in Cinebench R23 is equally telling — it confirms that while the chip is a multi-threaded monster, it does not sacrifice single-thread responsiveness. The Cinebench R20 results reinforce this: 17,631 multi-core and 2,488 single-core. The R15 scores (4,231 multi-core, 597 single-core) follow the same pattern.

PassMark data adds another dimension. The multi-thread score of 49,410 and single-thread score of 4,750 show strong all-round capability. Data compression scores 507,018, while encryption hits 39,468 — the latter being modest, suggesting some cryptographic workloads may not fully exploit the architecture. Floating-point math scores 173,855, integer math 138,078, and extended instructions 39,235. Physics simulation scores 3,172, which is solid for gaming-related physics but not class-leading. Random string sorting at 62,439 indicates good memory subsystem performance during pointer-chasing operations.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the picture becomes clearer. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores an average of 64,640, which is just 0.3% higher than the 265F's 64,438 average — the two are essentially identical in overall performance, differing by less than a rounding error. The AMD EPYC 7343 (64,202 average) trails by 0.4%, while the AMD EPYC 4464P (64,823) leads by 0.6%. More interestingly, the Intel Core i9-13900KS (64,051) sits 0.6% behind despite being a flagship consumer part from a previous generation. The data suggests the Ultra 7 265F holds its own against server-class silicon and outperforms a renowned enthusiast CPU, all while maintaining a 65 W TDP.

# Benchmark Performance

The overall benchmark picture for this CPU+GPU combination is exceptional. The CPU's average benchmark score is 64,438, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, an NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, posts an average benchmark score of 184,664, which puts it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. When combined, this pairing achieves a 96th percentile rank among all desktop builds in the database — a figure that underscores how rare this level of performance is.

The GPU's Geekbench results are particularly strong: OpenCL scores 175,286 and Vulkan scores 194,041. These numbers indicate that the GPU excels at both compute-oriented tasks (OpenCL) and graphics-heavy workloads (Vulkan). The Vulkan score being higher than OpenCL suggests the architecture responds well to modern graphics APIs that offer lower overhead and better multi-threaded CPU command submission.

Comparing the GPU to its nearest rivals reveals its positioning. The NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183,725, which is 0.5% lower than the RTX 5000 Ada's 184,664 average. The A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187,147, leading by 1.3%. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182,109) trails by 1.4%, and the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050) is 3.7% behind. This places the RTX 5000 Ada Generation squarely in the company of data-center accelerators and the absolute top-tier of consumer GPUs — with a 32 GB memory buffer that neither rival matches.

The combined picture is one of a workstation-class machine that can handle both CPU-bound and GPU-bound workloads without compromise. The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 98th percentile combine to produce a system that is in the top 4% of all builds tracked. For users coming from mainstream hardware, the uplift is substantial, though the exact magnitude depends on whether the workload scales with CPU cores, GPU compute, or both.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the centerpiece of this build's graphics and compute capabilities. Built on the AD102 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, this GPU packs 76,300 million transistors onto a 609 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 125.3 million per square millimeter. The Ada Lovelace architecture brings with it 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, alongside 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. This hardware configuration is tailored for ray tracing, AI-accelerated workloads, and high-resolution rendering.

Memory capacity is a defining feature: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. This is not just a large frame buffer; it is enough capacity to hold massive 3D scenes, large language model weights, or multi-layer compositing projects in GPU memory without spilling to system RAM. The bandwidth, while not the fastest in the database, is sufficient to feed the GPU's compute units at high utilization.

Clock speeds are conservative relative to gaming GPUs: a base of 1155 MHz and a boost of 2550 MHz. The pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s indicate strong fill rates for high-resolution rendering. The FP32 performance of 65.28 TFLOPS is the same as the FP16 figure (65.28 TFLOPS with 1:1 ratio), which means the GPU does not double throughput for half-precision — a design choice that favors precision over raw speed in compute workloads.

The Geekbench scores tell the performance story. OpenCL at 175,286 and Vulkan at 194,041 place this GPU in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. In real terms, this means the RTX 5000 Ada can handle GPU-accelerated rendering (Blender, Octane, V-Ray), AI inference (TensorFlow, PyTorch), and video encoding workloads with headroom to spare. The 100 RT cores make ray-traced rendering viable for professional projects, while the 400 tensor cores accelerate denoising and AI-assisted workflows.

The GPU requires a 250 W TDP and a 600 W suggested PSU, with a single 16-pin power connector. It occupies a dual-slot form factor, measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height. Display output is handled by 4x DisplayPort 1.4a ports, which support high-resolution monitors but lack the newer DisplayPort 2.1 standard — a minor limitation for users with the latest ultra-high-refresh monitors. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is sufficient for this GPU's bandwidth needs; PCIe 5.0 would not meaningfully improve performance given the current data transfer requirements.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform choices here define the upgrade path. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA 1851 socket designed for Arrow Lake processors. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is a modern platform that supports the latest memory technology, though ECC memory is not supported — a consideration for users who require error-correcting memory for mission-critical compute tasks.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU with Gen 5 support across 20 lanes. This is crucial for future expansion: NVMe storage devices using PCIe Gen 5 can achieve significantly higher sequential read/write speeds, and the bandwidth is also available for other add-in cards. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is more than adequate for the RTX 5000 Ada's requirements. Users upgrading from older platforms will notice the jump in storage performance potential.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is low, which means most mid-range to high-end air coolers or 120mm-class liquid coolers can handle it — the data does not specify a required cooler, but the power draw is modest. The GPU's 250 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU rating mean a quality 650 W or 750 W power supply provides comfortable headroom. For a new build, a 600 W PSU is the minimum recommendation; users planning to add multiple storage drives or other peripherals should consider a slightly larger unit.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on workload. For users who need more CPU throughput, the socket supports other Arrow Lake parts, and the 20-lane Gen 5 PCIe connection allows for future GPUs that may use the newer interface. For memory, upgrading from 32 GB to 64 GB or 128 GB of DDR5 could benefit large dataset workloads, though the dual-channel architecture limits bandwidth scaling. The GPU, being in the 98th percentile, is unlikely to be the bottleneck for most users; the CPU's 93rd percentile is slightly lower, so a future CPU upgrade within the same socket could rebalance the system.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is generally well-matched, but the data reveals where each component takes the lead. The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 98th percentile suggest that, in purely compute-bound workloads, the GPU is the stronger component. However, the 96th combined percentile indicates that, for most mixed workloads, the system performs as a cohesive unit.

In CPU-bound scenarios — such as software compilation, physics simulation, or data compression — the 20-core processor with its 41,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will be the limiting factor only if the workload cannot scale beyond 20 threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 49,410 confirms strong scaling, but workloads that require more than 20 threads will see diminishing returns. The single-core score of 4,750 in PassMark means lightly threaded tasks like spreadsheet calculations or web browsing will be snappy, but not the fastest in the database.

In GPU-bound scenarios — such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or AI inference — the RTX 5000 Ada's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 32 GB memory buffer dominate. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking means it outperforms 98% of all GPUs, so the CPU will rarely bottleneck GPU compute. The 5.30 GHz boost clock on the CPU ensures that even single-threaded GPU driver overhead is handled quickly.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data — no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, the benchmark scores imply that in gaming at 1440p or 4K, the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates, and the CPU's strong single-thread performance (5,926 in Cinebench R23 single-core) prevents it from being a bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 1080p with lower graphical settings, the CPU becomes more relevant, and its 20 cores are more than sufficient for modern game engines that utilize multiple threads.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has 20 cores and 20 threads, with no hyperthreading. This is a 20-core, 20-thread configuration based on the Arrow Lake architecture.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The Ultra 7 265F has an average benchmark score of 64,438, which is 0.6% higher than the Core i9-13900KS's 64,051. The data shows the Ultra 7 265F slightly outperforms the i9-13900KS in overall average score.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184,664.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 600 W. The GPU has a 250 W TDP and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). A discrete GPU is required for display output.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of a 93rd-percentile CPU and 98th-percentile GPU suggests excellent frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The CPU's single-core score of 5,926 in Cinebench R23 ensures game logic and physics are handled without stutter, while the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS can push high frame rates in demanding titles. At 1080p, the CPU may occasionally limit frame rates in less GPU-intensive scenes, but the 5.30 GHz boost clock mitigates this risk.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU provides ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The PassMark multi-thread score of 49,410 indicates that x264 encoding at high bitrates will not interfere with gameplay performance. Alternatively, the GPU's tensor cores can accelerate NVENC-based encoding, offloading the CPU entirely.

Video editing: The 32 GB GPU memory is a standout feature here. It can hold multi-layer 4K or even 8K timelines in GPU memory, reducing the need to constantly transfer data between GPU and system RAM. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates effects rendering, and the CPU's 30 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and codec operations.

3D rendering: The RTX 5000 Ada's 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores are built for ray-traced rendering and AI denoising. The 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates viewport interactions, while the 32 GB memory allows for complex scenes with high-resolution textures. The CPU's multi-threaded performance (41,980 in Cinebench R23) ensures that CPU-based physics or simulation tasks do not become a bottleneck.

Software development: The 20-core CPU with a 93rd-percentile ranking is well-suited for parallel compilation. The PassMark data compression score of 507,018 indicates fast build artifact compression, and the 30 MB L3 cache speeds up repeated access to source files. The GPU's compute power is available for local AI model training or testing GPU-accelerated algorithms.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the data supports it if the user also does media creation. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,750 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches, and the 65 W TDP means low power draw during light usage. The GPU's quiet operation is not specified, but the dual-slot cooler design is standard for workstation cards.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation in a desktop form factor. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake processor based on a 3 nm TSMC process, with a 65 W TDP and a 93rd-percentile performance ranking. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace workstation card with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 250 W TDP, and a 98th-percentile performance ranking. Combined, the system achieves a 96th percentile among all desktop builds in the database.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 64,438 places it alongside server-class processors like the AMD EPYC 7343 and EPYC 4464P, while slightly edging out the Intel Core i9-13900KS. The GPU's average score of 184,664 puts it in the company of data-center accelerators like the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 variants, and it leads the GeForce RTX 4090 D by 3.7%. This is a workstation-class computing platform that happens to be housed in a desktop chassis.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $379. The GPU has no listed launch MSRP in the data. This pairing is intended for users who need professional-grade GPU compute (32 GB memory, 100 RT cores, 400 tensor cores) alongside a high-core-count CPU that does not draw excessive power. The 65 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP mean a 600 W PSU is sufficient, keeping the system power-efficient relative to its performance class.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who require professional-grade GPU compute without sacrificing CPU throughput. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU's 98th-percentile performance, which ensures high frame rates in demanding titles, while the CPU's 93rd percentile prevents bottlenecking at these resolutions. The 32 GB of GPU memory is particularly valuable for texture-heavy modded games or future titles that demand more VRAM.

Content creators in video editing, 3D rendering, and motion graphics will find the 32 GB memory buffer transformative. The GPU's 100 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders, and the 400 tensor cores speed up AI denoising. The CPU's 20 cores handle multi-layer timelines and effects processing without breaking a sweat, as evidenced by the 41,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score.

Developers working on machine learning models or codebases that require heavy compilation will appreciate the balance. The CPU's 20 threads speed up parallel builds, while the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput enables local model training and inference. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data, and the 576.0 GB/s GPU bandwidth moves training data efficiently.

Students in engineering, computer science, or digital arts programs can leverage this build for both coursework and personal projects. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps electricity costs low during long compile sessions, and the GPU's compute capabilities support simulation and rendering assignments. Small business workstations that handle CAD, financial modeling, or data analysis will also benefit, though the lack of ECC memory support is a consideration for mission-critical data integrity.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile rankings, not from direct testing.

Based on the CPU's 93rd-percentile ranking and the GPU's 98th-percentile ranking, gaming performance should be exceptional at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for high-refresh gaming at these resolutions, and the 32 GB memory buffer eliminates any concerns about VRAM limits in current or near-future titles.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 5,926 in Cinebench R23 becomes more relevant. While the GPU is overkill for 1080p, the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited in most games. The 20 cores provide ample headroom for background tasks, streaming, or recording software running alongside the game.

For competitive esports titles, the system will easily achieve high frame rates at 1080p or 1440p, though the GPU's workstation focus means it is not optimized for the highest possible frame rates in the same way as a dedicated gaming GPU. For AAA single-player titles at 4K with ray tracing enabled, the 100 RT cores will accelerate ray-traced effects, and the 400 tensor cores can enable DLSS-style upscaling if the game supports it. The estimated performance is in the top tier of gaming systems, but without measured FPS data, exact figures cannot be provided.