SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

This desktop pairing combines Intel's Arrow Lake architecture with NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 GPU, creating a system that sits at the 76th percentile overall among all benchmarked CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded throughput with a 93rd percentile ranking against all CPUs, while the GPU's single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score places it at the 59th percentile — a curious split that shapes the entire performance profile of this build. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion that follows is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay results.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Arrow Lake-S architecture with a 3 nm process node from TSMC. It packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier part (no overclocking) with an active production status, and it launched with a $379 MSRP.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in sustained multi-threaded work. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 is the standout figure, while the single-core score of 5,926 indicates strong per-thread performance for everyday responsiveness. The Cinebench R20 results — 17,631 multi-core and 2,488 single-core — and R15 results — 4,231 multi-core and 597 single-core — follow the same pattern, confirming consistent scaling across test versions.

PassMark results add texture to the performance picture. The multi-thread score of 49,410 and single-thread score of 4,750 show a processor that balances both extremes well. Integer math (138,078) and floating-point math (173,855) scores are both substantial, while the extended instructions score of 39,235 indicates solid SIMD throughput. Data compression (507,018) and data encryption (39,468) scores suggest capable content-production and security workloads. The physics score of 3,172 and prime number finding score of 416 are more modest, hinting that certain latency-sensitive or branch-heavy workloads won't scale as impressively.

The average benchmark score of 64,438 places this CPU at the 93rd percentile among all processors. Relative to its nearest rivals, the performance deltas are tight: it trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 by a mere 0.3%, sits 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7343, comes in 0.6% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P, and edges out the Intel Core i9-13900KS by 0.6%. These are negligible real-world differences — the 265F is essentially performance-pegged with its closest competitors, meaning workload characteristics and platform features will matter more than raw benchmark deltas when choosing between them.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread score of 5,926 in Cinebench R23 pair well with the GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute for driving high frame rates, though the absence of measured FPS data means actual gaming results remain estimates.

Streaming: The 20-core, 20-thread configuration provides ample headroom for encoding alongside gameplay, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 49,410 indicates the CPU can handle concurrent workloads without becoming the limiting factor in most scenarios.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core performance of 41,980 and the floating-point math score of 173,855 point to strong rendering and effects-processing capability, with the GPU's 24 GB of GDDR7 memory providing substantial scratch space for timeline previews and exports.

3D rendering: The combination of a 93rd-percentile CPU and the RTX 5090 D V2's 170 RT cores (from the fact pack's GPU specifications) suggests a capable ray-tracing and rasterization workstation, though the GPU's modest 59th-percentile ranking tempers expectations for top-tier rendering performance.

Software development: The data encryption score of 39,468 and extended instructions score of 39,235 indicate solid performance for compilation and cryptographic workloads, while the 30 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases that exhibit spatial locality.

Student and office work: Single-thread performance of 4,750 on PassMark ensures snappy UI responsiveness and quick spreadsheet recalculations, while the 65 W TDP keeps power demands modest for dorm-room or cubicle environments where thermal and electrical budgets are limited.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses Intel Socket 1851, which anchors this build to the current Arrow Lake generation. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth — no ECC support is available, so error-correcting memory workloads are out of scope. PCIe connectivity comes from Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, which is sufficient for the RTX 5090 D V2's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and leaves a few lanes for NVMe storage.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, while the GPU's TDP is 575 W with a suggested power supply of 950 W. This is a meaningful gap that shapes the platform requirements: the PSU must be sized for the GPU's appetite, not the CPU's modest draw. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, so the chosen power supply must include that connector or an appropriate adapter. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so the discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output — there is no fallback for troubleshooting or power-saving idle modes.

A sensible next upgrade would involve adding more of what this system already has: more PCIe Gen 5 storage devices for faster data access, or additional DDR5 memory capacity (the dual-channel bus supports two DIMMs efficiently). The locked multiplier on the CPU limits overclocking headroom, so future performance gains would come from platform-level upgrades — a newer Arrow Lake refresh or a shift to a different socket generation — rather than pushing the existing silicon harder.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance split between CPU and GPU creates an interesting balance dynamic. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at just the 59th percentile based on its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504. This suggests the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing, and in CPU-bound workloads — compilation, data compression, physics simulation — the processor will carry the load while the GPU idles.

In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 5,926) will likely drive frame rates, and the GPU's lower percentile ranking may prevent it from fully exploiting the CPU's headroom. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor more often, as pixel throughput and memory bandwidth (1.34 TB/s) take precedence over CPU compute. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking relative to its 50-series peers is notable — it sits within 0.9% of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT in the Steel Nomad benchmark, which is a much older and lower-tier card. This suggests either the benchmark is not capturing the GPU's strengths or the D V2 variant has a performance profile that diverges from expectations.

The combined percentile of 76 reflects this tension: the CPU pulls the system up, the GPU pulls it down, and the result is a mid-to-high-tier pairing that excels at multi-threaded productivity but may underperform in GPU-heavy tasks relative to what the RTX 5090 D V2 name implies. For workloads that exercise both components — like 3D rendering with GPU acceleration — the balance is reasonable, but for pure rasterization gaming, the GPU's benchmark standing is a concern.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no game-specific frame rates, so all gaming performance discussed here is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate rather than observed results.

Based on the CPU's single-thread strength and the GPU's compute capabilities, this system should handle esports and competitive titles at high frame rates, particularly at 1080p where CPU performance dominates. The 5.30 GHz boost clock and 4,750 PassMark single-thread score suggest frame pacing will be consistent in CPU-light scenarios. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth provide ample capacity for high-resolution textures, but the GPU's 59th percentile ranking implies performance may trail other 50-series cards in GPU-bound scenes.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504 — nearly identical to the NVIDIA T400 (0% delta) and AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (0.5% ahead) — is a red flag for gaming expectations. Those rivals are entry-level workstation cards, not gaming powerhouses. The RTX 5090 D V2 also slots just 0.6% behind the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and 0.9% ahead of the RX 5700 XT, which is a 2019-era gaming card. If this benchmark accurately reflects real-world gaming performance, this GPU will underdeliver for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, and the CPU's headroom will go largely unused in GPU-bound scenes.

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU may cap them below what the CPU could deliver. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and frame rates will likely fall short of what a top-tier 50-series card should achieve. This is a pairing that makes more sense for compute-heavy productivity than for competitive gaming.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU throughput for multi-threaded workloads but do not require top-tier GPU gaming performance. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the 93rd-percentile CPU, which delivers Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 41,980 and PassMark multi-thread scores of 49,410 — figures that indicate fast exports and responsive timeline scrubbing. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 138,078 and the 30 MB of L3 cache.

Gamers at 1080p with moderate refresh rates (60-144 Hz) will find this system sufficient, but those targeting 1440p or 4K at high refresh rates should temper expectations given the GPU's 59th percentile ranking. Students and office workers will experience snappy single-thread performance, though the discrete GPU requirement (no integrated graphics) adds cost and power draw that a simpler system might avoid. Small business workstations running productivity suites, data analysis, or light virtualization will find the 20 threads and 65 W TDP a solid fit.

The 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on the GPU makes this pairing viable for machine learning inference and large dataset visualization, even if raw gaming frame rates underwhelm. Users in industries that rely on CUDA acceleration — financial modeling, scientific computing, video transcoding — will get substantial compute throughput from the 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance, even if the GPU's benchmark percentile suggests it is not class-leading.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 64,438, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, scores 64,640 — a 0.3% advantage that is effectively a statistical tie. The AMD EPYC 7343 (64,202) trails by 0.4%, the AMD EPYC 4464P (64,823) leads by 0.6%, and the Intel Core i9-13900KS (64,051) trails by 0.6%. All four rivals are within a 0.6% band, confirming that the 265F is competitively positioned but not a standout.

The GPU's benchmark picture is more unusual. Its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 16,504, placing it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA T400 (16,508, 0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415, 0.5% behind), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408, 0.6% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, 0.9% behind). The GPU's average benchmark score matches its Steel Nomad score at 16,504, since only one benchmark is present.

The combined picture is a system at the 76th percentile overall. The CPU is a top-tier performer, but the GPU's benchmark score drags the pairing down. This suggests the RTX 5090 D V2 may be a specialized variant that trades raw gaming performance for other attributes — possibly compute-focused or power-limited — and users should verify workload-specific performance before committing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake-S part on Intel Socket 1851 with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory, a 575 W TDP, and a suggested 950 W power supply. The system requires a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot for the GPU and a 16-pin power connector.

The overall tier is mid-to-high, with a combined percentile of 76. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking makes it a strong foundation for productivity workloads, while the GPU's 59th percentile ranking keeps gaming performance expectations in check. This is not a balanced pairing — the CPU clearly outclasses the GPU in relative benchmark standing — but for users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound with occasional GPU acceleration, it offers a coherent if lopsided profile. The build class is desktop, and the system is best suited for stationary workstations where the 950 W PSU requirement and dual-slot GPU footprint are acceptable constraints.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 64,438, which is 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7343, 0.6% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P, and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900KS.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does this platform offer?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing. All gaming performance discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and benchmark score?

A: The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 16,504, placing it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is also 16,504, as only one benchmark is available.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 950 W, driven primarily by the GPU's 575 W TDP. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and the GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as N/A, so the discrete GPU is required for any display output.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds