SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080: A High-Performance Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 20-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's Blackwell-architecture RTX 5080, creating a desktop build that sits at the 90th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU alone holds the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU commands the 87th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a system positioned firmly in the high-end tier of desktop computing. The Core Ultra 7 265F delivers strong multi-threaded throughput with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980, while the RTX 5080 brings 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute to the table. This analysis draws exclusively from benchmark data, comparing the pair against nearest rivals in both CPU and GPU spaces to understand where this system excels and where it may fall short.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is exceptionally well-suited. The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,750, provides the per-core responsiveness that modern game engines demand. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 places it in the upper echelon of graphics hardware, suggesting it can drive high frame rates at demanding resolutions. The combination of strong single-core CPU performance and top-tier GPU compute means that frame rate ceilings will rarely be CPU-limited in most gaming scenarios.

Streaming workloads benefit from both components' capabilities. The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads, combined with a Passmark multi-thread score of 49,410, provide ample headroom for encoding video while simultaneously running a game. The GPU's tensor cores and dedicated RT hardware (84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores) can offload AI-driven encoding tasks, though the CPU's multithreaded muscle alone can handle software encoding. Data compression scores of 507,018 in Passmark indicate strong throughput for processing and packaging stream data.

Video editing represents a mixed workload that this system handles with ease. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,631 and R15 multi-core score of 4,231 demonstrate sustained multi-threaded performance crucial for rendering timelines and applying effects. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide the capacity and speed needed for handling high-resolution video frames and GPU-accelerated effects. Passmark GPU compute score of 21,789 suggests the GPU can accelerate rendering tasks significantly.

3D rendering workloads lean heavily on the GPU's compute capabilities. The RTX 5080's FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s indicate substantial raw compute for ray tracing and rasterization tasks. The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 20 threads ensure that scene preparation and geometry processing keep pace with the GPU's rendering speed. For CPU-based rendering, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 puts this processor in the 93rd percentile, meaning it outpaces most CPUs for multi-threaded render tasks.

Software development benefits from the CPU's balanced profile. Compilation tasks are heavily multi-threaded, and the Passmark integer math score of 138,078 and extended instructions score of 39,235 reflect strong performance in compute-heavy code compilation. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, while the single-thread score of 4,750 ensures snappy response in IDEs and text editors. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate memory throughput for large codebases and virtual machines.

Student and office workloads are more than adequately served, though this system is arguably over-specified for such tasks. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4,750 ensures smooth operation in productivity applications, while the 20 cores handle any occasional multi-threaded burst tasks like spreadsheet calculations or database queries. The GPU's 2D performance, measured at 1,415 in Passmark G2D, indicates solid desktop rendering for multiple displays, supported by display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process node, packing 45,600 million transistors onto a 378 mm² die. The memory subsystem comprises 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that supports high-resolution textures and complex scene data without bandwidth starvation. Memory clocks run at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective speed, providing fast data transfer for both gaming and compute workloads.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. These translate to a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rendering. The FP32 compute of 56.28 TFLOPS (with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio of 56.28 TFLOPS) provides substantial throughput for both traditional graphics and compute-accelerated workloads.

Ray tracing and AI acceleration are handled by dedicated hardware: 84 RT cores for ray tracing and 336 tensor cores for AI and deep learning tasks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 reflects strong DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench Vulkan score of 255,450 and OpenCL score of 235,901 demonstrate cross-API competence. Passmark G3D score of 36,565 places this GPU in the 87th percentile among all graphics cards, confirming its high-end positioning.

The GPU's power requirements are substantial, with a TDP of 360 W and a suggested PSU of 750 W. The dual-slot cooler design and 1x 16-pin power connector are standard for this performance class. PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures adequate bandwidth for data transfer between CPU and GPU. The nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (2.2% ahead), AMD Radeon 8060S (0.6% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (0.7% behind), showing the RTX 5080 sits in a competitive performance band.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 64,438 places it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (0.3% behind), AMD EPYC 7343 (0.4% ahead), AMD EPYC 4464P (0.6% behind), and Intel Core i9-13900KS (0.6% ahead). This clustering indicates the Core Ultra 7 265F performs competitively with both enterprise and enthusiast processors. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 and single-core score of 5,926 demonstrate strong performance in both parallel and single-threaded workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 56,083 places it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE leads by 2.2%, while AMD Radeon 8060S trails by 0.6%, and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB trails by 0.7%. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 and Passmark G3D score of 36,565 confirm the GPU's high-end positioning, though the percentile ranking indicates some GPUs outperform it.

The combined percentile of 90 for this CPU+GPU pairing reflects a well-matched system where both components perform in the upper tier of their respective categories. The CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 87th percentile combine to place this build firmly in high-performance territory, though the GPU is slightly less exceptional relative to its peers than the CPU. This suggests the CPU has slightly more headroom relative to the GPU in terms of raw performance percentile.

Passmark sub-scores provide additional context: the CPU achieves 507,018 in data compression, 39,468 in data encryption, 39,235 in extended instructions, 173,855 in floating point math, and 138,078 in integer math. The GPU's Passmark compute score of 21,789 and DirectX scores (389 in DX9, 324 in DX11, 151 in DX12, 208 in DX10) show varying performance across API generations, with newer APIs not necessarily translating to higher Passmark scores due to workload characteristics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU slightly outranks the GPU in percentile terms: 93rd versus 87th. This 6-point gap suggests the CPU has marginally more performance headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (507,018 Passmark score) and multi-threaded rendering (Cinebench R23 multi-core 41,980), the processor is unlikely to be the limiting factor. The GPU's 87th percentile means there are graphics cards that outperform it, potentially creating GPU-bound scenarios in graphics-intensive tasks.

For gaming workloads, the CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark 4,750, Cinebench R23 single-core 5,926) provides strong per-core throughput that minimizes CPU-induced frame rate caps. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,637 and Passmark G3D score of 36,565 indicate the graphics card can produce high frame rates, but its 87th percentile suggests it is the more likely bottleneck in GPU-heavy scenes. In games that favor Nvidia hardware, the RTX 5080's 84 RT cores for ray tracing and 336 tensor cores for DLSS could shift the balance toward GPU-accelerated features.

Memory bandwidth presents a potential consideration: the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 support provides 102.4 GB/s, while the GPU has 960.0 GB/s of GDDR7 bandwidth. This 9.4x difference means the GPU can process far more data per second than the CPU can feed it, though this is typical for discrete GPU architectures. The 20 CPU lanes of PCIe Gen 5 provide high-bandwidth connectivity (the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16), reducing interface bottlenecks.

In compute-heavy workloads like Passmark GPU compute (21,789) versus CPU floating point math (173,855), the CPU outperforms the GPU in raw Passmark scores, though these tests measure different workloads. For physics calculations, the CPU's Passmark physics score of 3,172 indicates adequate performance for simulation tasks. The system balance favors CPU-heavy workloads slightly, while GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming with ray tracing will stress the graphics card more.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolution with ultra settings will find this system well-suited, given the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth for high-resolution textures. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures smooth frame pacing, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,637 indicates strong DirectX 12 gaming performance. Enthusiasts who prioritize high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions will also benefit from the CPU's strong single-core scores.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or motion graphics will appreciate the CPU's 20 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache, which accelerate multi-threaded tasks like timeline rendering and effect processing. The GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 16 GB VRAM support GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that leverage CUDA or DirectX 12 Ultimate. The Passmark data compression score of 507,018 also benefits content workflows involving large file transfers and archiving.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance (Passmark multi-thread 49,410) and integer math score of 138,078. The 20 threads allow parallel compilation, while the strong single-thread score keeps interactive tools responsive. Students in engineering, data science, or computer science programs will find this system handles coursework, simulations, and development environments without issue, though it exceeds typical student requirements.

Small business workstations requiring consistent multi-threaded performance for tasks like database management, financial modeling, or scientific computing will find the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking reassuring. The ECC memory support is absent (eccMemory: false), which may be a consideration for mission-critical workloads, but the 65W TDP keeps power draw manageable for office environments. The GPU's compute capabilities also support professional visualization tasks, though workstation-specific drivers are not indicated in the data.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses Socket 1851, the platform for Intel's Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The lack of integrated graphics (iGPU: N/A) means a discrete GPU is required for display output, which this build provides. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, limiting overclocking potential, but its boost clock of 5.30 GHz provides strong out-of-box performance.

The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, matching the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support for maximum bandwidth. The RTX 5080's suggested PSU of 750 W and 65W CPU TDP suggest a total system power draw that a quality 750W power supply can handle. The GPU requires a 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor. Memory support is limited to DDR5, so users upgrading from older DDR4 platforms will need new memory modules.

For future upgrades, the socket 1851 platform may support newer Intel processors within the Core Ultra Series 2 family, though the data does not specify compatibility beyond the current CPU. The GPU's 16-pin connector and 360W TDP mean upgrading to a more power-hungry GPU would require checking PSU headroom against the 750W suggested rating. Additional PCIe Gen 5 lanes (20 total) provide bandwidth for fast NVMe storage or other expansion cards, though the CPU has no integrated graphics for multi-display setups without a GPU.

The 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB L2 per core suggest a cache hierarchy optimized for both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is modest compared to the GPU's 960.0 GB/s, but this is typical for dual-channel desktop platforms. Users considering higher-capacity memory should note the dual-channel bus width limits theoretical bandwidth regardless of module count.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S) using TSMC's 3 nm process node. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The 65W TDP indicates efficient power consumption for the performance level, particularly compared to higher-TDP rivals. The 3 nm process node contributes to this efficiency while enabling high transistor density.

Cache configuration includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The 20 threads equal the core count (no hyperthreading), which is a notable architectural choice — each core handles one thread, potentially simplifying scheduling and reducing contention. The lack of integrated graphics (iGPU: N/A) means this CPU is strictly for systems with discrete GPUs, which aligns with the RTX 5080 pairing.

Benchmark performance is strong across the board. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 and single-core score of 5,926 demonstrate excellent scaling between single and multi-threaded workloads. Passmark scores reinforce this: multi-thread 49,410, single-thread 4,750, floating point math 173,855, and integer math 138,078. The 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs places it above most desktop and many server processors, with nearest rivals including enterprise EPYC chips and the high-end Core i9-13900KS.

The base clock of 2.40 GHz is modest, but the 5.30 GHz boost clock provides substantial headroom for burst workloads. The 65W TDP is notably low for a 20-core processor, suggesting efficient power management. The data compression score of 507,018 and encryption score of 39,468 indicate strong throughput for data-intensive tasks. The production status is Active, with a release date of January 6, 2025, and the launch MSRP is $379. The part number SRQCV identifies this specific SKU.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, creating a high-performance system that ranks at the 90th percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 87th percentile combine for a system that excels in both processor-intensive and graphics-intensive workloads. The desktop class designation (buildClass: "desktop") confirms this is a stationary system, not a laptop or mobile configuration.

The overall tier is high-end, driven by the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 41,980) and the GPU's substantial compute resources (56.28 TFLOPS FP32, 16 GB GDDR7). The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,637 and Passmark G3D score of 36,565 place the GPU in competitive territory with other high-end graphics cards. The system's combined percentile of 90 indicates it outperforms 90% of all CPU+GPU pairs in the benchmark database.

The build's balance between CPU and GPU performance is notable: the CPU slightly outperforms the GPU in percentile terms, but both components are in the top 13% of their respective categories. For users requiring both strong multi-threaded computation and high-end graphics, this pairing delivers without significant compromise in either area. The 65W CPU TDP and 360W GPU TDP represent a system that is power-hungry under load but manageable with a 750W suggested PSU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 90, meaning this system outperforms 90% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 64,438, placing it 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7343, 0.6% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P, and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900KS.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5080 have and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5080 is 750 W, which accounts for the GPU's 360 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Core Ultra 7 265F has no integrated graphics (iGPU: N/A), so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and transistor count?

A: The CPU is built on TSMC's 3 nm process node, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The data indicates this system should deliver high performance in gaming workloads, but specific FPS figures cannot be stated as measured results.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 and Passmark G3D score of 36,565 suggest strong DirectX 12 gaming performance. The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures and complex scene data. The 84 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while 336 tensor cores support DLSS and other AI-enhanced rendering features. The 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute delivers substantial raw shading power.

The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 5,926, Passmark single-thread 4,750) indicates it can drive high frame rates without becoming a bottleneck in most games. The 20 cores provide headroom for background tasks and streaming while gaming. The 30 MB of L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed game data. The 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures responsive per-core performance.

For 1440p and 4K gaming, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth are particularly beneficial, as these resolutions demand large texture pools and high memory throughput. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking suggests it will handle most titles at high settings, though the most demanding games may require settings adjustments. The system's 90th combined percentile indicates it should outperform the majority of gaming systems in the database.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds