SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070: A High-Performance Desktop Pairing

This desktop build combines Intel's 20-core Core Ultra 7 265F processor with NVIDIA's RTX 5070 graphics card, landing in the 88th combined percentile for all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU holds a 93rd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all graphics cards, making this a top-tier configuration for demanding workloads and high-refresh gaming alike. The data shows a strong balance between multi-threaded compute capability and modern GPU rendering features, though the absence of measured frame rates means all gaming projections are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5070's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 places it in the 82nd GPU percentile, indicating strong raw rasterization performance capable of driving high refresh rate displays at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5926 and PassMark single-thread score of 4750 ensure that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound scenarios, though exact FPS figures cannot be stated without measured data.

Streaming: The GPU's 192 tensor cores support hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding workloads, while the CPU's 20 threads provide headroom for simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding. The PassMark data compression score of 507018 and encryption score of 39468 indicate that the CPU handles background tasks efficiently without compromising foreground performance, making this build suitable for single-PC streaming setups.

Video Editing: The combination of the CPU's 41980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 172660 Geekbench OpenCL score creates a potent environment for video editing. Timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks benefit from the CPU's 20 physical cores, while the GPU's 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. The 12 GB GDDR7 memory with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient capacity for 4K video timelines.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and PassMark multithread score of 49410 indicate strong CPU-based rendering performance for applications that rely on ray-traced or scanline renderers. The GPU's 48 RT cores and 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 throughput enable real-time viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated final frame rendering in compatible engines. The 17,800 million transistors on the CPU and 31,100 million on the GPU represent substantial compute resources for complex scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 138078 and floating point math score of 173855 provide rapid compilation times and responsive IDE performance. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth support large codebases and virtualized development environments. The 20 threads handle parallel build systems effectively, while the GPU's compute capabilities accelerate testing and simulation workloads.

Student and Office Work: While this configuration exceeds the requirements for typical productivity tasks, the CPU's 4750 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy application launches and document processing. The 65W TDP of the CPU means efficient operation during light workloads, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory support provides adequate bandwidth for multitasking across office applications, web browsers, and communication tools.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 64438 places it in the 93rd percentile of all processors, with Cinebench R23 multi-core reaching 41980 and single-core reaching 5926. The PassMark multithread score of 49410 and single-thread score of 4750 confirm balanced performance across both multi-threaded and latency-sensitive workloads. The GPU's average benchmark score of 40377 places it in the 82nd percentile of all graphics cards, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 serving as the primary gaming performance indicator.

The combined percentile of 88 indicates that this pairing sits above the vast majority of desktop configurations. The CPU's nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with an average score of 64640, a mere 0.3% difference, while the AMD EPYC 7343 trails by 0.4% with a score of 64202. On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon Pro 580 matches within 0.1% at 40318, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 comes within 0.8% at 40063. These tight margins suggest that the 265F offers performance statistically equivalent to its immediate competitors, with the RTX 5070 similarly positioned among its closest rivals.

The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 39468 and extended instructions score of 39235 indicate robust security and cryptography performance, while the find prime numbers score of 416 suggests moderate integer-heavy workload capability. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 29137 and compute score of 15787 provide additional evidence of strong graphics and compute performance, with the DirectX 12 score of 108 and DirectX 11 score of 277 reflecting modern API efficiency.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F features 20 cores and 20 threads based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock of 2.40 GHz boosts up to 5.30 GHz, providing substantial single-thread performance as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5926. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and per-core L2 cache of 3 MB support data-intensive workloads, while the dual-channel DDR5 memory interface delivers 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

The CPU's benchmark results paint a picture of a well-rounded desktop processor. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4231 and R20 multi-core score of 17631 show consistent scaling across benchmark generations, while the PassMark physics score of 3172 indicates strong simulation performance. The random string sorting score of 62439 demonstrates solid data organization capabilities, useful for database and sorting operations. The 93rd percentile ranking confirms this is a high-end desktop processor, though the locked multiplier prevents overclocking.

The 65W TDP and 3 nm process node indicate excellent power efficiency, making this processor suitable for systems where thermal management is a consideration. The absence of integrated graphics (N/A) means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build provides. The Intel Socket 1851 compatibility and PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes ensure modern connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The release date of January 2025 places this in the current generation of Intel desktop processors, with the Core Ultra Series 2 branding reflecting the architectural shift to Arrow Lake.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 82nd percentile creates a configuration where the processor has slightly more relative headroom than the graphics card. In gaming workloads, the GPU is likely to be the primary performance limiter, particularly at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the bottleneck. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 5926 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at lower resolutions, maintain high frame rates without the processor becoming the limiting factor.

The PassMark multithread score of 49410 versus the GPU's compute score of 15787 indicates that for compute-heavy workloads like rendering or scientific simulation, the CPU offers substantially higher relative throughput. However, for graphics-accelerated tasks such as ray tracing, the GPU's 48 RT cores and 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance become the decisive factor. The balance shifts depending on the workload: productivity and compilation tasks lean on the CPU, while gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering depend on the RTX 5070.

The memory configuration further supports balance, with the CPU's 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and the GPU's 672.0 GB/s bandwidth providing appropriate data throughput for their respective workloads. The 12 GB VRAM capacity may become a limiting factor in extreme 4K texture-heavy scenarios, but for the majority of gaming and content creation tasks, the pairing demonstrates complementary strengths. The tight deltaPct values against rival CPUs (0.6% versus the Core i9-13900KS) confirm that the 265F does not introduce a meaningful bottleneck relative to alternative processors in this class.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 and PassMark G3D score of 29137 indicate strong rasterization performance, while the CPU's 4750 PassMark single-thread score ensures minimal frame time inconsistency.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU's high single-thread performance becomes the dominant factor, and the 5926 Cinebench R23 single-core score suggests excellent frame pacing in CPU-bound titles. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, with the RTX 5070's 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth providing sufficient throughput for high refresh rate gaming. At 4K resolution, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and the 12 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in the most demanding titles.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and 48 RT cores enable modern ray-traced gaming, though the 5077 Steel Nomad score suggests that enabling full ray tracing at 4K will require compromises in other settings. The 192 tensor cores support DLSS and other AI-based upscaling technologies, which can extend playable frame rates in supported titles. The PassMark DirectX scores (108 for DX12, 277 for DX11, 320 for DX9) indicate strong backwards compatibility with older game engines.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh displays represent the primary audience for this configuration. The GPU's 82nd percentile ranking and CPU's 93rd percentile ranking combine to deliver smooth performance across most modern titles, with the RTX 5070's features supporting ray tracing and AI upscaling. Enthusiasts seeking 4K gaming will find the GPU adequate for many titles, though VRAM limitations may require texture quality adjustments in the most demanding games.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or graphic design will benefit from the CPU's 20 cores and the GPU's compute capabilities. The combination of 41980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 172660 Geekbench OpenCL score provides strong performance for Adobe Creative Suite, Blender, and similar applications. Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times and responsive multitasking enabled by the 20 threads and 30 MB L3 cache.

Students and professionals requiring a capable workstation for data analysis, scientific computing, or engineering simulation will find the CPU's 93rd percentile performance sufficient for their needs. The ECC memory support is absent, which may be a consideration for mission-critical workloads, but the overall performance profile suits academic and professional environments. Small business workstations running database, virtualization, or financial applications will benefit from the PassMark data compression and encryption scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 utilizes the GB205 chip based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, with base clock of 2325 MHz and boost clock of 2512 MHz. The 12 GB GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, a substantial figure for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration, supporting features like DLSS and real-time path tracing. The FP32 performance of 30.87 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 1:1 ratio) enables heavy compute workloads, while the pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s support high-resolution rendering. The 250W TDP and 600W suggested PSU indicate moderate power requirements for this performance class.

Benchmark results show the RTX 5070 achieving a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077, placing it in the 82nd GPU percentile. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 178923 is slightly higher than the OpenCL score of 172660, suggesting strong driver optimization for Vulkan-based applications. The PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 indicates solid general-purpose compute performance. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (within 0.1%) and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (within 0.8%), though these are professional workstation cards rather than gaming-focused alternatives.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and RTX 5070 combination ranks in the 88th combined percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings, with the CPU at the 93rd CPU percentile and the GPU at the 82nd GPU percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F compare to its closest rival?

A: The 265F scores 64438 on average benchmarks, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (64640) and 0.4% higher than the AMD EPYC 7343 (64202). It trails the AMD EPYC 4464P (64823) by 0.6% and leads the Intel Core i9-13900KS (64051) by 0.6%.

Q: What memory specifications does the CPU support?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265F supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the system uses standard DDR5 modules.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5070 features 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GPU has 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores.

Q: Does this build support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the RTX 5070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU also features PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this configuration?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5070 is 600 W, and the GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector. The CPU has a 65W TDP, so the overall system power requirements are moderate for this performance class.

Q: Is measured gaming FPS data available for this specific combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores, and the data is not measured but rather projected from component-level performance.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, a 20-core Arrow Lake processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU from the GeForce 50-series. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 82nd percentile ranking combine for an 88th overall percentile, placing this build in the upper tier of desktop systems. The CPU's 41980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 5077 3DMark Steel Nomad score indicate strong performance across both productivity and gaming workloads.

The 65W TDP of the CPU and 250W TDP of the GPU make this a manageable configuration for standard desktop cases, with the GPU's dual-slot design and 245 mm length fitting most mid-tower chassis. The Intel Socket 1851 platform provides PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes, while the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures full bandwidth availability. This pairing represents a balanced, high-performance desktop system suitable for gaming at high resolutions, content creation, and demanding professional workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds