SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis examines the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 as a desktop build combination. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The combined percentile rank of this pairing is 91, placing it in the top tier of all possible configurations, with the CPU achieving a 93rd percentile rank and the GPU an 88th percentile rank.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation and operates within a 65 W TDP envelope, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The chip features a hybrid configuration with 192 KB L1 cache per core, 3 MB L2 cache per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. This is a desktop-class processor with a locked multiplier, indicating it is not intended for overclocking.

Benchmark results reveal a strong multi-threaded performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 is substantial, while the single-core score of 5926 demonstrates excellent per-thread efficiency. The Cinebench R20 results show 17631 multi-core and 2488 single-core, and the older R15 test yields 4231 multi-core and 597 single-core. These figures indicate the 265F can handle heavily threaded workloads like video rendering and scientific computing with ease, while the high single-core scores ensure responsive everyday use and strong gaming performance where per-core speed matters.

The PassMark suite paints a detailed picture of specialized capabilities. The multi-thread score of 49410 and single-thread score of 4750 align with the Cinebench data, confirming balanced performance across different benchmarking methodologies. More interesting are the specialized tests: data compression scores 507018, while floating-point math reaches 173855 and integer math hits 138078. The extended instructions score of 39235 and data encryption score of 39468 suggest strong cryptographic and SIMD throughput. However, the find prime numbers score of 416 is notably lower, indicating this workload may not be a strength of the architecture.

The average benchmark score of 64438 places the 265F in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the picture is tight. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64640, a 0.3% difference, making the two effectively identical. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202, putting it 0.4% behind, while the AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64823, 0.6% ahead. The Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64051, trailing by 0.6%. These deltas are within noise level, suggesting the 265F competes directly with these enterprise and high-end consumer parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 7 265F and the RTX 4090 presents an interesting dynamic. The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads provide substantial compute throughput, but the GPU's raw compute capabilities are massive. The RTX 4090's FP32 performance is 82.58 TFLOPS, which dwarfs the CPU's floating-point output. In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost certainly be the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions, while the CPU may become a limiting factor at 1080p or in CPU-intensive simulations.

The percentile data supports this interpretation. The CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 88th percentile. This close ranking suggests neither component dramatically overshadows the other in overall capability, but the architecture of workloads determines which resource is taxed. For tasks like 3D rendering or machine learning, the GPU's 512 tensor cores and 128 RT cores will be the dominant compute resource, potentially leaving the CPU underutilized. Conversely, in physics simulations or compilation tasks, the CPU's 20 threads will be the primary engine.

The lack of measured FPS data makes precise bottleneck quantification impossible, but the benchmark scores offer clues. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3172 is modest, which could limit performance in physics-heavy games. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 38194 is exceptional, suggesting the graphics pipeline will rarely be the constraint. The combined percentile of 91 indicates a well-matched pair, but the data implies that GPU-bound scenarios at high resolutions will be where this system shines most.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the Core Ultra 7 265F and RTX 4090. The data should be interpreted as directional guidance rather than definitive measurements.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9223 is a strong indicator of DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 271631 and OpenCL score of 255416 further suggest excellent API-level performance. The RTX 4090's memory configuration of 24 GB GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures that texture-heavy games at 4K resolution will have ample headroom. The pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s indicate the GPU can push high resolutions with dense geometry and effects without stalling.

The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 5926, will support high frame rates in games that are not heavily multi-threaded. The 20-core configuration provides headroom for modern games that utilize multiple threads for physics, AI, and streaming. The L3 cache of 30 MB is adequate for gaming workloads, though not exceptional compared to some rivals.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU may be the limiting factor in esports titles where frame rates exceed 200 FPS, but the GPU will still deliver excellent performance. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, and the RTX 4090's massive compute resources will drive high frame rates with ultra settings. Ray tracing workloads will benefit from the 128 RT cores, and DLSS-capable games can leverage the 512 tensor cores for enhanced performance.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who demand maximum performance across both productivity and gaming. The 93rd percentile CPU and 88th percentile GPU make this a top-tier desktop configuration suitable for several distinct user profiles.

Gamers at 4K resolution with ultra settings will find the RTX 4090's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth sufficient for current and near-future titles. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures that even at lower resolutions where CPU load is higher, the system remains responsive. Content creators working with 4K or 8K video will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads for encoding and the GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS for effects and rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980. Data scientists and researchers running machine learning workloads can leverage the GPU's tensor cores, though the 24 GB VRAM may be a constraint for very large models. Students and small business users building a workstation for mixed productivity tasks will find the 65 W CPU TDP allows for efficient operation, while the GPU handles any graphics-accelerated workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system at the 91st percentile overall. The CPU's average benchmark score of 64438 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 60347 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. These figures indicate a high-performance pairing with the CPU slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 is the standout result, representing strong multi-threaded capability. The single-core score of 5926 is equally impressive for per-thread performance. The PassMark data compression score of 507018 suggests excellent throughput for file archiving and data processing tasks. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 9223 and PassMark G3D score of 38194 confirm its position as a top-tier graphics processor.

When compared to nearest rivals, the CPU's 0.3% deficit to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and 0.6% advantage over the Intel Core i9-13900KS indicate the 265F sits at the boundary between mainstream and enthusiast performance. The GPU's nearest rivals show a 0% delta to the Intel Arc Pro A60 and a 2.9% advantage over the AMD Radeon PRO V710, though these comparisons are misleading given the RTX 4090's much higher absolute performance in gaming-specific benchmarks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm TSMC process, featuring 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The AD102 chip contains 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 render output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2235 MHz with a boost clock of 2520 MHz. Memory runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed, delivering 1.01 TB/s bandwidth across a 384-bit bus with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory.

The RT and tensor core counts are substantial: 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores. These enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The FP32 performance of 82.58 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1) represent massive compute throughput for both gaming and professional workloads. The pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s ensure the GPU can sustain high-resolution rendering without bottlenecking.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU's position. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9223 is a strong indicator of modern gaming performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 271631 and OpenCL score of 255416 show excellent compute capability across different APIs. PassMark G3D score of 38194 is exceptional, while the GPU compute score of 26613 reflects strong general-purpose compute. The DirectX 11 score of 326 and DirectX 12 score of 150 from PassMark are less informative but still indicate solid legacy API support.

The GPU's 88th percentile rank and average benchmark score of 60347 place it among the top graphics cards available. The 2.5% deficit to the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and 2.9% advantage over the AMD Radeon PRO V710 in average score suggest strong competition, though the RTX 4090's gaming-specific capabilities likely exceed those of these workstation-oriented rivals.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4090's compute resources enable high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The CPU's single-core score of 5926 in Cinebench R23 ensures minimal bottleneck in less threaded game engines, though the PassMark physics score of 3172 may limit performance in physics-intensive titles.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU can handle encoding workloads while the GPU's tensor cores accelerate AI-based encoding enhancements. The 24 GB VRAM provides ample buffer for streaming software overlays and scene compositing. The combined 91st percentile rank suggests a capable streaming rig.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 accelerates rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance speeds up effects processing and color grading. The 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth ensures smooth timeline scrubbing with high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The GPU's 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced and AI-denoised renders. The CPU's multi-threaded performance handles scene preparation and physics simulation. The 24 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes and textures without swapping.

Software development: The CPU's multi-thread score of 49410 in PassMark supports parallel compilation. The extended instructions score of 39235 indicates strong SIMD performance useful for scientific computing. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in large codebases.

Student and office work: The 65 W CPU TDP enables efficient operation in standard workstations. The CPU's single-thread score of 4750 ensures responsive application performance. The GPU's compute capabilities provide headroom for any graphics-accelerated coursework or productivity tools.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, creating a system with a combined percentile rank of 91. The CPU, launched at a $379 MSRP, offers 20 cores and 20 threads at a 65 W TDP, ranking in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, launched at 1,599 USD, provides 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and ranks in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This is a high-end desktop configuration where the CPU slightly outperforms the GPU relative to their respective peer groups, resulting in a balanced system with exceptional overall capability.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance rank of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 91, placing this configuration in the top tier of all possible CPU-GPU pairings.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The 265F has an average benchmark score of 64438, which is 0.6% higher than the i9-13900KS's score of 64051.

Q: What memory configuration does the RTX 4090 use?

A: The GPU uses 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 7 265F support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, indicating the processor is not designed for overclocking.

Q: What is the CPU's power consumption specification?

A: The 265F has a 65 W TDP, and the RTX 4090 has a 450 W TDP, with a suggested power supply of 850 W.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The multi-core score is 41980 and the single-core score is 5926.

Q: How does the RTX 4090 compare to the AMD Radeon PRO V710 in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4090 scores 60347, which is 2.9% higher than the Radeon PRO V710's score of 58657.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The system does not support ECC memory, which may be a consideration for workstation users. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 450 W TDP combine for a total thermal load that is manageable with the suggested 850 W power supply.

Upgrade options within this platform are limited by the socket's current generation. The CPU's locked multiplier restricts overclocking, but the 5.30 GHz boost clock provides high stock performance. The GPU is marked as end-of-life with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, meaning future GPU upgrades would require a new graphics card but could reuse the existing PCIe 4.0 infrastructure. The system's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide headroom for adding fast NVMe storage devices, while the dual-channel DDR5 memory support allows for memory capacity expansion. The RTX 4090's triple-slot width and 304 mm length require a spacious case, and the 1x 16-pin power connector needs a compatible power supply.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds