SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

This pairing combines Intel's 20-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4070 Ti, placing the system at the 89th percentile overall among all desktop builds. The CPU holds a 93rd percentile position versus all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 84th percentile versus all GPUs, indicating a balanced high-end configuration where both components operate in a similar performance tier relative to their respective markets.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F have?

A: The CPU features 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It lacks Hyper-Threading, hence the equal core and thread counts.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this CPU, and what memory type does it support?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265F supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What PCIe generation and lane count does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). This provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage devices.

Q: What is the RTX 4070 Ti's VRAM capacity and memory bus width?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz, translating to 21 Gbps effective.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265F compare to the Core i9-13900KS in average benchmark score?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265F has an average benchmark score of 64438, which is 0.6% higher than the Core i9-13900KS's score of 64051, making the two effectively equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score relative to the RTX 5090 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti scores 44795 on average, which is 0.8% lower than the RTX 5090 Mobile's score of 45152. This places the desktop card slightly behind the mobile flagship in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Does this build include any measured FPS data for games?

A: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are estimated from benchmark scores, not direct in-game measurements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake-S desktop processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory exclusively, with a dual-channel configuration delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 implementation provides 20 CPU lanes, enabling high-speed connectivity for a modern GPU and at least one Gen 5 NVMe drive without lane sharing.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 20-core processor, making it suitable for a wide range of power supplies. The GPU, however, draws significantly more power with a 285 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the RTX 4070 Ti is 600 W. This means a system with both components should be built around a power supply that comfortably exceeds the GPU's recommendation to account for the entire platform's draw.

A sensible next upgrade path from this build would involve the GPU, as the RTX 4070 Ti is end-of-life and its successor series (GeForce 50) has already been introduced. The CPU, being an active production part released in January 2025, has more longevity. Users could also consider adding more storage or memory, though the dual-channel DDR5 configuration is already adequate for most workloads.

The motherboard must be a Socket 1851 model with DDR5 support. Since the CPU has no integrated graphics, a discrete GPU is mandatory for display output. The platform requires a cooler capable of handling 65 W TDP, which is well within the range of most aftermarket air coolers and compact liquid coolers.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is built on Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process. It packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die, indicating a dense, modern design. The 20 cores are arranged with a cache hierarchy of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 41980 in multi-core and 5926 in single-core. The multi-core score reflects strong parallel throughput, placing it in the top tier of desktop processors. The single-core score of 5926 is excellent, indicating robust per-thread performance that benefits lightly threaded applications. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 17631 multi-core and 2488 single-core, while R15 yields 4231 multi-core and 597 single-core.

PassMark results show a single-thread score of 4750 and a multithread score of 49410. The floating-point math score is 173855, integer math is 138078, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 39235. Data compression reaches 507018, while encryption hits 39468. These numbers indicate strong performance across a broad range of computational tasks, from scientific computing to data processing.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 64438 places it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, which scores 64640, a negligible 0.3% difference. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202 (0.4% lower), the AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64823 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64051 (0.6% lower). This puts the 265F in a tight cluster of high-performance processors where no single rival holds a decisive lead.

For real workloads, the 20-core/20-thread configuration excels in multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks. The high single-core score ensures snappy responsiveness in daily use and strong performance in games that rely on a few fast cores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system's combined percentile of 89 reflects a well-matched CPU and GPU pair. The CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 84th percentile suggest the processor holds a slight edge over the graphics card, but the gap is not large enough to create a significant bottleneck in most scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression, encryption, or physics simulations, the Core Ultra 7 265F will be the primary performance driver. Its PassMark physics score of 3172 and find prime numbers score of 416 indicate solid computational throughput. The GPU will remain underutilized in these tasks, as it has no role in general-purpose integer or floating-point operations beyond compute shaders.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as traditional 3D rendering or gaming at high resolutions, the RTX 4070 Ti will be the limiting factor. The CPU's 20 cores can feed the GPU efficiently in most titles, but at lower resolutions or with less demanding graphics settings, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more critical. The single-core score of 5926 in Cinebench R23 suggests the CPU can maintain high frame rates in CPU-light games.

The PassMark G3D score of 31624 for the GPU, coupled with the CPU's multithread score of 49410, indicates that neither component dramatically overshadows the other. In mixed workloads like game streaming, the CPU handles encoding while the GPU renders; both components have sufficient headroom for their respective roles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system targets 1440p and 4K gaming with high refresh rates. The RTX 4070 Ti's FP32 throughput of 40.09 TFLOPS and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory provide ample graphics horsepower, while the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures frame pacing stays consistent. Estimated FPS in competitive titles at 1080p could exceed 144 FPS, though no measured data confirms this.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores handle encoding workloads without impacting gaming performance. The PassMark data encryption score of 39468 shows strong cryptographic throughput, which also aids in secure streaming protocols. The GPU's 240 tensor cores could offload AI-based encoding if supported by software.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks. The 30 MB L3 cache aids in handling large media files, while the GPU's 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports real-time preview of effects. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video projects.

3D rendering: The GPU's 7680 shading units and 60 RT cores deliver strong ray-traced rendering performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 indicates solid DirectX 12 rendering capability. The CPU's multi-core score ensures viewport responsiveness and physics calculations.

Software development: The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-core score of 5926 ensures fast compilation of single-threaded code. The PassMark random string sorting score of 62439 indicates strong text-processing performance, useful for code analysis and indexing tools.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity, but its performance ensures zero lag in spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low during light workloads, and the GPU can be idle for power savings.

Who Should Build It

This build suits gamers who play at 1440p or 4K resolution with high or ultra settings, where the RTX 4070 Ti's 84th percentile GPU performance provides smooth frame rates. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 93rd percentile multi-core performance and the GPU's 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and high single-core speed. Students in engineering or computer science fields can run simulations and virtual machines without slowdown. Small business workstations handling data analysis, CAD, or financial modeling will find the combination of compute throughput and graphics performance suitable for their needs.

The system is less suitable for users who prioritize energy efficiency, as the GPU's 285 W TDP requires robust cooling and power delivery. It also may be excessive for office-only tasks, where a less powerful CPU and an integrated GPU would suffice.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures cited here are estimates derived from benchmark scores, not direct in-game measurements. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so treat these as projections.

Based on the RTX 4070 Ti's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 and PassMark G3D score of 31624, the GPU is capable of high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most modern titles. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p ultra textures, though some 4K titles with heavy texture packs may approach the limit.

The CPU's single-core performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 5926, ensures that CPU-bound scenarios like open-world games or real-time strategy titles maintain playable frame rates. The 20 threads provide headroom for background tasks, such as Discord or browser tabs, without impacting gaming performance.

In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the system could plausibly exceed 200 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, based on the CPU's high single-thread score. In single-player AAA titles at 4K ultra, frame rates might hover around 60-80 FPS, given the GPU's 84th percentile ranking. These are estimates, not measured results.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake processor on Socket 1851, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based card with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. Together, they form a high-end configuration that ranks at the 89th percentile overall among all builds.

The CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 84th percentile indicate a well-balanced system where the processor slightly outpaces the graphics card. This pairing is appropriate for a high-refresh gaming rig or a workstation that demands both strong multi-core and graphics performance.

The system uses DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU and PCIe 4.0 for the GPU, and requires a 600 W power supply. The GPU is end-of-life, while the CPU remains in active production, suggesting the processor has longer upgrade longevity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 64438, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scores 41980 multi-core and 5926 single-core. The R20 scores are 17631 and 2488, respectively, and R15 yields 4231 and 597. PassMark results include a multithread score of 49410, single-thread of 4750, floating-point math of 173855, and integer math of 138078.

The GPU scores 44795 on average, ranking at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5024, Geekbench OpenCL is 176953, and Vulkan is 213808. PassMark G3D is 31624, and GPU compute is 18396.

Combined, the CPU and GPU present a system that excels in both compute and graphics tasks. The CPU's strong multi-core performance complements the GPU's high shading throughput, creating a balanced profile. The CPU's nearest rival, the Core Ultra 7 265, is 0.3% faster, while the GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 5090 Mobile, is 0.8% faster, indicating both components are competitive within their respective markets.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the AD104 chip using Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU has 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. Memory runs at 1313 MHz, effective 21 Gbps, across a 192-bit bus, yielding 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The 12 GB of GDDR6X VRAM is adequate for high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

Ray tracing is handled by 60 dedicated RT cores, while 240 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads like DLSS. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. Pixel rate is 208.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 626.4 GTexel/s.

The FP32 throughput of 40.09 TFLOPS (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio) indicates strong compute capability for both gaming and professional rendering. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 places the GPU in the upper tier for DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench Vulkan score of 213808 suggests robust cross-platform graphics performance.

The GPU's 84th percentile ranking means it outperforms 84% of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the RTX 5090 Mobile, scores 45152, just 0.8% higher. The RTX A6000 scores 44075, which is 1.6% lower, indicating the 4070 Ti holds its own against professional workstation cards. The PassMark G2D score of 1200 reflects adequate 2D acceleration, while the G3D score of 31624 confirms strong 3D rendering capability.