SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 represents a high-end desktop configuration that balances a 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a 12 GB Ada Lovelace GPU. This combination places in the 87th percentile overall, indicating a system that is well above average for both productivity and gaming tasks, though the data provided contains no measured frame rates for this specific pairing, meaning all gaming performance analysis must be treated as estimated from synthetic benchmarks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves an 87th percentile ranking across all desktop systems, placing it firmly in the upper tier of performance.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The 265F scores an average benchmark of 64,438, which is a negligible 0.3% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265’s average score of 64,640. The two processors are effectively identical in performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070, and what memory type does it use?

A: The RTX 4070 has a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, utilizing 12 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 192-bit bus.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 7 265F include integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is listed as "N/A," meaning a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has a TDP of 65 W, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has a TDP of 200 W and requires a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for the GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, housing 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has a launch MSRP of $379.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F demonstrates strong multi-threaded capabilities with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980, placing it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its single-core performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926, indicating excellent responsiveness for lightly-threaded tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 64,438 places it in a tight battle with its nearest rivals: it is a mere 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7343, 0.6% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P, and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900KS. This clustering suggests the 265F is at the very top of consumer desktop performance, trading blows with server-class chips.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 achieves an average benchmark score of 37,648, which lands it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,854 highlights its DirectX 12 Ultimate capabilities, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 174,152 shows strong cross-API performance. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (0.1% behind), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (0.4% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (1.3% ahead), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (1.3% ahead). This indicates the RTX 4070 sits at a competitive midpoint, outperforming older high-end cards but trailing the mobile variant of the higher-tier RTX 4080.

The combined picture is one of exceptional balance. The CPU’s 93rd percentile and the GPU’s 81st percentile together yield an 87th percentile system, suggesting that neither component drastically outclasses the other in a way that would create a severe mismatch. The data indicates a configuration that can handle both compute-heavy workloads and modern graphics APIs with confidence.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With a CPU that achieves a PassMark single-thread score of 4,750 and a GPU that scores 26,927 in PassMark G3D, this system is well-positioned for high-refresh gaming at 1440p. The CPU’s strong single-core performance ensures frame pacing is not CPU-limited in most titles, while the GPU’s 12 GB memory buffer and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth support high texture detail settings.

Streaming: The RTX 4070’s 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-driven features, which can offload streaming workloads from the CPU. Meanwhile, the 20-core/20-thread CPU can handle game logic and streaming software simultaneously, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 indicating ample headroom for concurrent tasks.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 39,468 and floating-point math score of 173,855 suggest strong performance in codec encoding and filter processing. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute accelerates effects, rendering, and export timelines, making this a capable dual-accelerated workstation for 4K video projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,631 indicates solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 154,858 shows significant compute capability for GPU-accelerated renderers. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for complex scenes, though very large assets may require optimization.

Software development: With 20 threads and a PassMark multi-thread score of 49,410, the CPU excels at parallel compilation tasks. The fast single-core performance (Cinebench R15 single-core score of 597) ensures quick IDE responsiveness, while the GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support with a score of 103 in PassMark DirectX 12 provides a stable foundation for graphics debugging.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP of the CPU makes this an energy-efficient option for long study sessions, while the GPU’s 200 W TDP is modest for its performance class. The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 138,078 and random string sorting score of 62,439 indicate rapid spreadsheet and database operations, making it overkill for basic tasks but future-proof for more demanding academic software.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a nuanced balance between the CPU and GPU, with each component limiting different workloads. In multi-threaded productivity tasks, the CPU is the clear driver, with its 93rd percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 ensuring that rendering, compilation, and encoding tasks are not held back. However, the GPU’s 81st percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,854 suggest that in pure rasterization at high resolutions, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, especially at 4K where pixel throughput becomes critical.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, points to a system where the CPU provides enough single-core headroom (PassMark single-thread score of 4,750) to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The delta between the CPU’s and GPU’s percentiles—12 points—is moderate, indicating that in CPU-bound games at 1080p, the RTX 4070 may occasionally wait on the processor, while in GPU-bound titles at 1440p or higher, the CPU has spare capacity. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s versus the CPU’s 102.4 GB/s also highlights a potential bottleneck in data-heavy scenes where assets stream from system memory to VRAM.

For compute workloads, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS vastly exceeds the CPU’s floating-point performance, meaning any task that can leverage CUDA or tensor cores will be GPU-limited. Conversely, the CPU’s PassMark prime numbers score of 416 is low, indicating that integer-heavy single-threaded workloads that cannot use the GPU will be CPU-bound, though this is an edge case for most users.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 4070’s PassMark DirectX 11 score of 244 and DirectX 10 score of 139 suggest strong performance in older titles, while the DirectX 12 score of 103 indicates modern API support. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,854 is a strong indicator of DX12 gaming capability.

At 1080p, the combination of a CPU with a 93rd percentile and a GPU with an 81st percentile should deliver very high frame rates in most esports titles, likely exceeding 144 FPS in games like Valorant or CS2, given the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,750. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, but with 12 GB of VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, it should sustain 60-100 FPS in AAA titles on ultra settings. At 4K, the RTX 4070’s 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests playable frame rates, but the 192-bit memory bus may cause dips in VRAM-intensive scenes. The lack of measured data means these are educated projections, not guarantees.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who prioritize 1440p high-refresh gameplay, as the GPU’s 81st percentile and 12 GB VRAM are well-matched to that resolution. Content creators working with 4K video will benefit from the CPU’s 93rd percentile multi-core performance and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 154,858 for accelerated effects. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and PassMark multi-thread score of 49,410, while the 65 W CPU TDP makes it suitable for compact workstation builds.

Students in engineering or data science fields will find the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 507,018 useful for large dataset manipulation, though the system is more powerful than typical student needs. Small business workstations running virtualization or database servers can leverage the 20 cores, while the GPU’s 12 GB memory supports CUDA-accelerated applications like financial modeling or medical imaging. The 87th combined percentile ensures this is a system that will not feel outdated for several years.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 294 mm² containing 35,800 million transistors. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The GPU’s clocks are set at a base of 1920 MHz and a boost of 2475 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz or 21 Gbps effective.

The GPU’s compute resources include 5,888 shading units, 184 tensor cores, and 46 RT cores, which power its FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1). The benchmark scores show a PassMark G3D score of 26,927 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 174,152, indicating strong rasterization and compute capabilities. The texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s suggest efficient fill-rate for high-resolution textures.

For rendering, the 184 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and AI-based denoising, while the 46 RT cores handle ray-traced lighting. The 12 GB VRAM is a practical size for 1440p and most 4K workloads, though the 192-bit bus may limit performance in memory-bound scenes. The GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 14,720 shows it is a capable compute accelerator, but its 81st percentile reveals it is not a top-tier card, making it more suited for mainstream high-end gaming than extreme 8K or heavy AI training.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, a 20-core Arrow Lake-S processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, a 40-series Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The GPU is built on a 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, making it a physically larger and more complex component.

The combined percentile of 87 indicates this system outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations. The CPU’s 93rd percentile places it among the top consumer processors, while the GPU’s 81st percentile is solidly above average. The pairing creates a system that excels in CPU-heavy tasks like rendering and compilation, while providing strong, but not class-leading, gaming performance. The 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP together require a 550 W power supply, making this a relatively power-efficient high-performance build.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F features 20 cores and 20 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It uses the Arrow Lake architecture on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, with a 3 nm process from TSMC. The CPU includes a substantial cache hierarchy: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling significant fast memory for active workloads.

The benchmark data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980, which is a strong result for a 65 W part, and a single-core score of 5,926, indicating excellent per-thread performance. The PassMark tests reveal varied capabilities: a multi-thread score of 49,410 and a single-thread score of 4,750, with floating-point math at 173,855 and integer math at 138,078. The CPU’s 93rd percentile and average score of 64,438 place it in a dead heat with rivals like the Intel Core i9-13900KS (0.6% ahead) and AMD EPYC 7343 (0.4% behind), showing that the 265F delivers server-level multi-threading in a desktop package.

The lack of integrated graphics means this CPU requires a discrete GPU, which is expected in this build. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which is adequate for feeding the 20 cores. The CPU’s transistor count of 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die results in a high density, reflecting the advanced 3 nm process. This CPU is designed for productivity, with benchmark results indicating it can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads without thermal throttling, given its modest 65 W TDP.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Arrow Lake architecture. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-speed connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The platform does not support ECC memory, which limits its appeal for certain server workloads.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The RTX 4070 requires a 550 W power supply, and the CPU’s 65 W TDP leaves significant headroom in a 550 W system, suggesting that a higher-wattage PSU could support future upgrades. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, which is standard for modern cards.

A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-tier GPU, such as a successor in the GeForce 50 series, if the user requires more than 12 GB of VRAM or higher 4K performance. However, the CPU’s 93rd percentile suggests it would not bottleneck a more powerful GPU. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory would benefit memory-intensive workloads, given the dual-channel limitation. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means future storage devices will be fully utilized, and the 20 CPU lanes provide flexibility for multiple high-speed devices. The production status of the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, so the upgrade path is more constrained on the GPU side, with the successor being the GeForce 50 series.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds