SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing represents a desktop configuration where a top-tier 20-core processor is coupled with a mainstream 1080p-class graphics card. Data indicates the CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU is at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined system percentile of 77. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F perform relative to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has an average benchmark score of 64438, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7343, and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900KS, while being 0.6% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P.

Q: What is the GPU's standing compared to other graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639 and sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which is 0.2% faster, while the AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% slower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 is 0.5% slower.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has an integrated graphics specification of "N/A", meaning it lacks a built-in GPU and requires a discrete graphics card for display output, which this build provides with the RTX 4060.

Q: What is the memory and expansion capability of this platform?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Q: What are the physical characteristics of the graphics card?

A: The RTX 4060 is a dual-slot card measuring 240 mm (9.4 inches) in length, 111 mm (4.4 inches) in height, and 40 mm (1.6 inches) in width. It requires a single 12-pin power connector.

Q: What is the production status of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is currently listed with an "Active" production status, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is marked as "End-of-life", having been succeeded by the GeForce 50 series.

Q: What is the thermal and power design of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has a TDP of 65 watts. It is based on a 3 nm process node from TSMC and contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the relative benchmark scores of each component. The RTX 4060's PassMark G3D score of 19545 and its 61st percentile ranking indicate it is a capable 1080p gaming card, but its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth suggests it will be the limiting factor in gaming workloads.

At 1080p resolution, this pair is estimated to deliver high frame rates in most titles, leveraging the CPU's strong single-thread performance. The Core Ultra 7 265F scores 5926 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which places it in the top tier for gaming responsiveness. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest it can handle esports and competitive titles well above 60 FPS at high settings.

At 1440p resolution, the estimated frame rates will drop as the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The RTX 4060's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS capabilities, but the 8 GB memory capacity may constrain texture-heavy games at this resolution. The 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is modest for 1440p, so users should expect settings adjustments to maintain smooth performance.

For 4K gaming, this configuration is not recommended based on the data. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking and its position relative to rivals like the AMD Radeon HD 7790 and Radeon 780M indicate it is a mainstream part, not a high-end 4K solution. The CPU, however, would not be the limiting factor at this resolution; the 20 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache provide ample headroom for game logic and streaming overhead.

Frame pacing estimates from the benchmark scores suggest that the 265F's 5.30 GHz boost clock will keep frame times consistent, while the RTX 4060's 2460 MHz boost clock provides adequate rasterization throughput for 1080p. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility indicate modern game support, but the performance class remains firmly in the 1080p segment.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41980 and a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 17631. The PassMark multithread score of 49410 and the 93rd percentile ranking confirm that this is a high-end productivity processor, matching or exceeding server-class chips like the AMD EPYC 7343 in average benchmark score.

Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5926 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4750. The 2.40 GHz base clock combined with the 5.30 GHz boost clock allows the processor to excel in lightly-threaded applications, where the high clock speed matters more than the core count.

The processor's specialized workload scores reveal its strengths: PassMark data compression scores 507018, data encryption scores 39468, and floating-point math scores 173855. These numbers indicate strong performance in scientific computing, financial modeling, and data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 39235 and integer math score of 138078 further support its capability in diverse compute environments.

Architecturally, the 265F uses the Arrow Lake-S codename and is manufactured on a 3 nm node with 17.8 billion transistors. The lack of a multiplier unlock option suggests it is not designed for enthusiast overclocking, but its stock performance already places it at the 93rd percentile. The 20 threads equal the core count, meaning no hyperthreading, which is a design choice that favors power efficiency over additional thread throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck

The configuration presents a clear imbalance: the CPU at the 93rd percentile vastly outperforms the GPU at the 61st percentile. In gaming scenarios, the RTX 4060 will be the limiting factor, as its 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus cannot fully utilize the 265F's processing power. The CPU's high single-core score of 5926 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not hold back frame generation, but the GPU's 19545 PassMark G3D score caps the overall gaming ceiling.

In productivity and compute workloads, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU serves as an accelerator for specific tasks. The RTX 4060's OpenCL score of 95057 and compute score of 9213 in PassMark provide some parallel processing capability, but the CPU's 49410 multithread score and 41980 Cinebench R23 multicore score indicate that most non-graphics workloads will be CPU-bound.

The FPS scaling estimates follow a predictable pattern: as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced. At 1080p, the CPU can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate limits output. At 4K, the GPU's 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes the critical constraint, and the CPU's advantage is largely irrelevant.

For mixed workloads like game streaming, the 20-core CPU handles encoding and game logic simultaneously without contention, while the GPU focuses on rendering. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means it leaves thermal headroom in a system, but the GPU's 115 W TDP and suggested 300 W PSU provide adequate power for the whole build. The bottleneck analysis indicates that upgrading the GPU would yield the largest gaming performance gains, while the CPU is already sufficient for nearly any workload.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F achieves an average benchmark score of 64438, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, scores 64640, a marginal 0.3% difference. The 265F also edges out the AMD EPYC 7343 (64202, 0.4% faster) and the Intel Core i9-13900KS (64051, 0.6% faster), while trailing the AMD EPYC 4464P (64823, 0.6% slower).

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores an average benchmark of 17639, at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its performance is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, 0.2% faster), and it leads the AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 0.3% faster), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 0.5% faster), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, 0.7% faster).

The combined percentile for this desktop build is 77, indicating that the system sits above the median but below the top quartile of all configurations. The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong across Cinebench R15 (4231 multicore, 597 single-core), R20 (17631 multicore, 2488 single-core), and R23 (41980 multicore, 5926 single-core). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302, and its PassMark DirectX 11 score is 175, reflecting its mainstream positioning.

The CPU's PassMark sub-scores show a balanced profile: physics at 3172, random string sorting at 62439, and find prime numbers at 416. The GPU's DirectX 10 score of 103 and DirectX 9 score of 236 indicate legacy API support, while its DirectX 12 score of 76 and G2D score of 1037 round out the picture. Together, the CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 61st percentile create a system that excels in processing but remains modest in graphics, with the combined 77th percentile reflecting this asymmetry.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are sufficient for a high-end GPU and NVMe storage.

The RTX 4060 connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes but operates at the older standard. The GPU's power requirements are modest at 115 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 300 W, meaning most existing power supplies can handle this configuration without an upgrade. The 1x 12-pin power connector is the only special requirement.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier model, since the CPU has substantial headroom remaining. The 265F's 20 cores and 30 MB L3 cache can support much faster graphics cards without bottlenecking, as evidenced by its 93rd percentile ranking. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means future GPUs using this interface will be fully compatible.

Memory expansion is limited to dual-channel DDR5, which is standard for this class. The 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the CPU's 20 cores, though higher-speed kits could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP leaves thermal and power headroom for additional drives or peripherals, and the platform does not require a high-end motherboard for stable operation.

The GPU's End-of-life status suggests that users may want to consider a newer model when upgrading, while the CPU's Active status indicates long-term availability. The 240 mm GPU length fits in most mid-tower cases, and the dual-slot design is compatible with standard ATX builds. Overall, the platform is future-proof on the CPU side but limited by the current GPU choice.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need exceptional CPU performance for productivity tasks but game primarily at 1080p resolution. The 265F's 93rd percentile ranking makes it ideal for content creators, software developers, and data analysts who run multi-threaded applications, while the RTX 4060 provides adequate graphics for mainstream gaming.

Gamers at 1080p will find this configuration sufficient for high-refresh-rate play in esports titles, given the CPU's 5926 single-core Cinebench R23 score and the GPU's 19545 PassMark G3D score. The 61st percentile GPU ranking means users should not expect maximum settings at higher resolutions, but the system handles 1080p with ease.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 41980 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 173855 floating-point math score. The GPU's CUDA cores (3072 shading units) and 96 tensor cores accelerate effects and AI workloads, though the 8 GB memory may limit large project sizes.

Software developers and students running virtual machines, compiling code, or using IDEs will appreciate the 20 threads and 30 MB L3 cache. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 39468 and data compression score of 507018 support secure and efficient data handling, making this a strong workstation for technical fields.

Small business workstations that require heavy multitasking, such as running databases or financial models, will benefit from the CPU's 49410 multithread score. The GPU's modest performance is sufficient for office applications and 2D acceleration, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps operational costs low.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 graphics card. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 115 W TDP. The combined system percentile is 77, indicating an above-average configuration.

The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking places it among the top processors available, rivaling server-class parts like the AMD EPYC 7343 and Intel Core i9-13900KS. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking places it in the mainstream segment, comparable to integrated graphics solutions like the AMD Radeon 780M in benchmark scores.

The overall tier of this build is a high-CPU, mid-GPU system. It is a desktop class configuration designed for users who prioritize processing power over graphics performance. The 20 cores and 20 threads provide exceptional multi-threaded throughput, while the RTX 4060 offers competent 1080p gaming and general GPU acceleration.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $379, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 299 USD. The CPU has a 3 nm process node with 17,800 million transistors, while the GPU uses a 5 nm process with 18,900 million transistors. The build is well-balanced for productivity-first users who occasionally game at 1080p.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this system is estimated to support high frame rates in competitive titles, driven by the CPU's 5926 single-core Cinebench R23 score. The GPU's 2460 MHz boost clock and 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate handle fast-paced action, though the 8 GB memory may limit texture quality in newer games.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU with a 41980 Cinebench R23 multicore score can encode video and run games simultaneously without frame drops. The GPU's 96 tensor cores support AI-based encoding enhancements, making this a capable streaming setup at 1080p output.

Video Editing: The CPU's 49410 PassMark multithread score and 173855 floating-point math score accelerate rendering and effects. The GPU's 95057 OpenCL score assists with GPU-accelerated previews and exports, though the 8 GB memory may struggle with 4K timelines.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will perform exceptionally well, given the 20 cores and 30 MB L3 cache. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 and 236.2 GTexel/s texture rate provide additional acceleration for viewport and final-frame rendering in supported applications.

Software Development: The 265F's 20 threads and 4750 PassMark single-thread score reduce compile times and improve IDE responsiveness. The CPU's 507018 data compression score and 39468 encryption score support efficient handling of large codebases and secure communication.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's high single-thread performance (4750 PassMark single-thread) handles document processing and web browsing with ease. The GPU's 1037 PassMark G2D score ensures smooth 2D desktop acceleration, while the 65 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP keep the system quiet and cool for shared workspaces.