SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 presents a striking study in component imbalance. The CPU is a 20-thread powerhouse ranking in the 93rd percentile of all processors, while the GPU is a modest entry-level part sitting in the 18th percentile of all graphics cards. This creates a system where the processor is capable of far more than the graphics solution can feed, a dynamic that defines every workload discussed below. The data shows a clear delineation: the CPU is the dominant component in compute-heavy tasks, while the GPU will be the limiting factor in any visually intensive application.

Balance and Bottleneck

The fundamental characteristic of this build is a severe CPU-to-GPU performance disparity. The processor’s average benchmark score of 64,438 places it ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900KS by 0.6%, while the graphics card’s score of 2,893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad puts it just 0.5% behind the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB. This contrast is stark. In any workload that relies on rendering, rasterization, or ray tracing, the RTX 4010 will be the bottleneck, capping frame rates and limiting visual fidelity.

The CPU’s single-threaded performance, evidenced by a 5,926 score in Cinebench R23, ensures that it will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. However, the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking means that at any resolution above 1080p, the graphics card will almost certainly be the primary constraint. The system is not balanced; it is a high-performance compute engine paired with an entry-level visual output stage. This means that productivity tasks will fly, but gaming performance will be heavily restricted by the GPU.

The data implies that the CPU has significant headroom in gaming workloads. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,750 is strong, suggesting the processor can handle game logic and physics calculations with ease. The GPU, with only 768 shading units and a 64-bit memory bus, will struggle to maintain high frame rates in modern titles, especially with ray tracing enabled. The bottleneck is not a question of if, but where it resides: the CPU will be idle or underutilized waiting for the GPU to finish its frame.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is counterproductive. The CPU’s strong single-core performance (5,926 in Cinebench R23) can push high frame rates, but the RTX 4010’s 18th percentile ranking and limited 4 GB VRAM will prevent the system from achieving the visual quality and frame rates expected from a high-refresh monitor. The GPU will be the limiting factor in almost all cases.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s 20 threads and high multi-core score of 41,980 in Cinebench R23 provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. However, the GPU’s lack of performance means the game itself will run poorly, making the stream quality moot. The encoding will be smooth, but the gameplay will not be.

Video editing benefits heavily from the CPU. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4,231 and the Passmark multithread score of 49,410 indicate rapid rendering and export times. The GPU can assist with effects and previews, but its low compute power (2.706 TFLOPS FP32) means it will offer limited acceleration for heavy effects. The workflow will be CPU-driven and efficient.

3D rendering is where this CPU shines. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,631 and R23 score of 41,980 show exceptional performance for CPU-based renderers. The GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance is minimal for GPU rendering, so users will rely on the CPU for the heavy lifting, which it does exceptionally well.

Software development is a strong suit. The Passmark data compression score of 507,018 and integer math score of 138,078 indicate fast compilation times and responsive code builds. The 20 threads handle parallel tasks like testing and virtualization efficiently. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a solid workstation.

Student and office work is overkill on the CPU side but adequate. The processor’s high single-thread score of 4,750 ensures snappy application launches and responsive spreadsheets. The GPU is more than sufficient for document editing and web browsing. The system will handle these tasks with extreme ease, though the power is largely wasted on such light workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 64,438, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This score is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, 0.4% higher than the AMD EPYC 7343, and 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i9-13900KS. The processor achieves a single-core score of 5,926 in Cinebench R23 and a multi-core score of 41,980, demonstrating excellent performance in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded tasks. In Passmark, the CPU scores 49,410 in multithread tests and 4,750 in single-thread tests.

The GPU’s only listed benchmark is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This score is 0.5% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, 0.6% lower than the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, and 0.7% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB. The combined percentile for this pairing is 56, reflecting the vast difference between the components. The CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is an entry-level part, making the combined picture one of extreme asymmetry.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize CPU-bound productivity over gaming. It is an excellent choice for software developers who need fast compilation times, as indicated by the Passmark integer math score of 138,078 and data compression score of 507,018. It is also ideal for video editors and 3D renderers who rely on CPU rendering, given the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980.

For gamers, this is not a suitable build. The GPU’s 18th percentile ranking means that even at 1080p, modern titles will require significant settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates. The 4 GB VRAM will also limit texture quality. This is a workstation first, and a gaming machine a distant second.

Students and small business users will find the system capable, but overpowered for their needs. The CPU’s high performance ensures no lag in office applications, but the cost of the processor is not justified by these tasks. The system is best suited for professionals who can leverage the CPU’s 20 threads and high multi-core performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F features 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The processor has a 30 MB shared L3 cache and a 3 MB L2 cache per core. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

The benchmark scores indicate a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926 is excellent, suggesting strong per-core performance for tasks like gaming and general responsiveness. The multi-core score of 41,980 is equally impressive, showing that the 20 threads scale well in rendering and encoding tasks. The Passmark physics score of 3,172 and floating-point math score of 173,855 further confirm its computational strength.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, which is low for its performance level, indicating high efficiency. It uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The processor does not have integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required. It has a launch MSRP of $379. The benchmark data shows it rivals the AMD EPYC 7343 and Intel Core i9-13900KS, placing it in a high-performance tier suitable for demanding professional workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 56, reflecting the high CPU score and low GPU score.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265F has an average benchmark score of 64,438, which is 0.6% higher than the i9-13900KS.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4010 has a memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s, using 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is listed as N/A, requiring a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scored 41,980 points in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test.

Q: What is the GPU’s score in 3DMark Steel Nomad?

A: The GPU scored 2,893 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth storage and future GPU upgrades. The lack of integrated graphics means the current GPU is mandatory, but it also means that upgrading the GPU will not require any changes to the CPU or platform.

The system’s TDP is 65 W for the CPU and 50 W for the GPU, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. This leaves significant headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 4010 with a higher-tier graphics card, as the CPU’s 93rd percentile performance will not bottleneck even a much faster GPU. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the current GPU is adequate, but a newer GPU would benefit from the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The motherboard and memory are future-proof, but the GPU is the clear weak point and the primary upgrade target.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier 20-core Intel processor with an entry-level NVIDIA graphics card. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This results in a combined percentile of 56, indicating a system that is far more powerful for compute tasks than for graphics tasks.

The build is essentially a professional workstation with a placeholder GPU. The CPU’s performance is exceptional, rivaling server-class processors like the AMD EPYC 7343. The GPU, however, is only capable of basic display output and light gaming. This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a compute-focused system that happens to have a GPU. The overall tier is mid-range, dragged down significantly by the graphics card.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is based on the GA107 chip using the Ampere architecture, built on an 8 nm process from Samsung. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. The card has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores. Its boost clock is 1762 MHz, yielding a pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s.

The GPU’s FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS, which is very low for modern standards. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,893 places it in the 18th percentile, just behind the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern games and rendering workloads, as it will quickly fill up with textures and geometry. The tensor cores and RT cores are present, but their performance will be constrained by the low overall compute power and memory bandwidth.

For rendering, this GPU offers only basic acceleration. The 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 is insufficient for complex 3D scenes, and the 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity. The card is better suited for office work and light media consumption than for any serious graphics workload. Its single-slot design and lack of power connectors make it easy to install, but its performance is strictly entry-level.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all FPS figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-threaded performance (5,926 in Cinebench R23) indicates it can handle game logic and physics well, but the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking and 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 will severely limit frame rates.

At 1080p, this system might achieve playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, but modern AAA games will likely require low or medium settings to stay above 30 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM will cause texture pop-in and stuttering in games that require more memory. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be overwhelmed, and frame rates will drop to unplayable levels. The RTX 4010 is simply not designed for high-performance gaming, and the CPU’s power cannot compensate for the GPU’s lack of rendering capability. The gaming experience will be limited by the graphics card in every scenario.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds