SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation and uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform. With a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, this chip is designed to deliver both high single-thread responsiveness and substantial multi-threaded throughput. The processor carries a 65 W TDP, which positions it as a power-efficient option within the high-performance desktop segment.

The cache hierarchy is notable for its size and distribution. Each core has 192 KB of L1 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache, while the shared L3 cache totals 30 MB. This arrangement supports high-bandwidth access to frequently used data, which is critical for workloads that exhibit temporal locality. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a total memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity to modern GPUs and NVMe storage devices.

Benchmark results place this processor firmly in the upper tier of desktop CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 indicates strong parallel performance, while the single-core score of 5,926 shows excellent per-thread efficiency. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 17,631 and single-core is 2,488. The older Cinebench R15 test yields 4,231 multi-core and 597 single-core. These scores collectively suggest that the 265F can handle both lightly threaded tasks, such as everyday application use, and heavily threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering without significant compromise.

PassMark results reinforce this picture. The multi-thread score of 49,410 and single-thread score of 4,750 demonstrate balanced performance across the spectrum. Data compression scores 507,018, and floating-point math reaches 173,855, indicating strong number-crunching capability. Integer math scores 138,078, while extended instructions score 39,235. The processor also handles encryption at 39,468 and random string sorting at 62,439. These figures suggest robust performance in varied computational tasks, from database operations to scientific simulations.

The 265F achieves a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Its average benchmark score is 64,438. Comparing to nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64,640, a 0.3% difference, placing the 265F marginally behind. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202, which is 0.4% lower than the 265F. The AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823, 0.6% higher. The Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051, 0.6% lower. These narrow deltas indicate that the 265F sits at the very top of its performance class, trading places with server-grade and enthusiast processors within a fraction of a percent. The architecture clearly delivers competitive performance across a wide range of applications.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark suite shows a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded scenarios. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 places the 265F in the top tier for rendering and CPU-intensive workloads. The single-core score of 5,926 in the same test indicates that the chip does not sacrifice responsiveness for core count. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,750 corroborates this, while the multi-thread score of 49,410 shows strong scaling across all 20 cores.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, has no benchmark scores listed in the data pack. Its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 50th, placing it exactly at the median of the GPU performance distribution. The GPU architecture is Ampere, built on an 8 nm process by Samsung, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It features 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The core clock runs at 915 MHz base and 1410 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory operates on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 72, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 72% of all tested configurations. This places it above the median but below the top quartile. The CPU is clearly the dominant component in this pairing, as its 93rd percentile ranking far exceeds the GPU's 50th percentile. This imbalance suggests that the system is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound tasks, while GPU performance is more modest relative to the broader market.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that gaming performance must be estimated from the component scores. The CPU's high single-thread performance and the GPU's mid-tier ranking together suggest a system capable of handling modern titles at reasonable settings, but the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in graphically intensive scenarios. The data indicates a system that is exceptionally strong for productivity and creative workloads, with gaming performance that is adequate but not class-leading.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU is stark. The 265F sits at the 93rd percentile among CPUs, while the RTX 3070 TiM sits at the 50th percentile among GPUs. This 43-point gap indicates that the processor vastly outclasses the graphics card in relative terms. In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics calculations, data compression, and software compilation, the system will perform exceptionally well. The PassMark physics score of 3,172 and the find prime numbers score of 416 reflect strong computational throughput.

In GPU-bound workloads, however, the system will not reach the same heights. The RTX 3070 TiM's mid-tier GPU percentile means that graphical performance will be average relative to other systems. The GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are respectable but not exceptional for a modern desktop. When gaming at high resolutions with ultra settings, the GPU will likely become the limiting factor, capping frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

FPS scaling evidence is not available from measured data, but the benchmark scores provide a clear indication. The CPU's high single-thread score of 5,926 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can feed frames to the GPU quickly in most games. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means that at higher resolutions, the pixel fill rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s will constrain performance. The 8 GB VRAM capacity, while adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, may prove limiting in 4K or with high-resolution texture packs.

The memory bandwidth of the GPU at 448.0 GB/s is moderate, which could impact performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios like ray tracing or high-detail rendering. The system is best described as CPU-overprovisioned and GPU-adequate. For users prioritizing gaming, the GPU represents a bottleneck; for users prioritizing CPU-intensive tasks, the system is well-balanced.

# FAQ

Q: What is the processor's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 265F has an average benchmark score of 64,438. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64,640 (0.3% higher), the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202 (0.4% lower), the AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051 (0.6% lower).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 14 Gbps.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 72, meaning the system outperforms 72% of all tested configurations. The CPU alone is at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU only.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU is based on the Ampere architecture, built on an 8 nm process by Samsung. It has 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this system?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

# Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is limited by the GPU's 50th percentile ranking. The CPU's exceptional single-thread score of 5,926 in Cinebench R23 can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound esports titles, but the GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 GB VRAM will constrain maximum settings at higher resolutions. Expect solid performance at 1080p, with diminishing returns at 1440p and above.

For streaming, the CPU's 20 cores and strong multi-thread score of 41,980 in Cinebench R23 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The 65 W TDP means thermal management is less demanding, allowing sustained workloads. The absence of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, but the system handles simultaneous gaming and encoding without CPU bottleneck.

For video editing, the processor excels. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,631 and PassMark floating-point math score of 173,855 indicate rapid rendering and effect processing. The GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth assists with GPU-accelerated effects, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit complex compositions.

For 3D rendering, the CPU is the star. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 places it among top-tier processors, rivaling server-class chips. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it can handle real-time viewports but will lag behind higher-end cards in final frame rendering. The 5,888 shading units provide moderate CUDA acceleration.

For software development, the CPU's high single-thread performance and 20 threads support fast compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 138,078 and data compression score of 507,018 indicate strong performance in code compilation and version control operations. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases.

For student and office work, this system is overkill. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking vastly exceeds the requirements of document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks. The GPU's mid-tier performance is more than adequate for productivity applications. The 65 W CPU TDP ensures low power draw during light use.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The CPU's single-core performance is exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,750. This ensures that the processor can keep up with game logic and physics in most titles. The GPU, however, holds the system back in graphically intensive scenarios. With a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, the RTX 3070 TiM is a mid-range performer by modern standards.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though not at the highest refresh rates. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 135.4 GPixel/s pixel rate will cause frame rates to drop significantly, particularly in open-world games with high texture detail. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain smooth frame rates, and users should expect to lower settings or rely on upscaling technologies.

The GPU's 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects and DLSS. These features can help mitigate the GPU's mid-tier performance by allowing lower internal resolutions while maintaining visual quality. However, the 8 GB VRAM may cause issues with ray tracing at higher resolutions, where memory demands increase substantially.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is built on the Ampere architecture, fabricated on an 8 nm process by Samsung. The GA104 chip contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. It also includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated features.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Memory operates at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The core clock runs at 915 MHz base and 1410 MHz boost. These specifications yield a pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 16.60 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it at the median of the performance distribution. This means it outperforms half of all graphics cards but lags behind the other half. The lack of benchmark scores for the GPU prevents direct comparisons to specific rivals, but the percentile ranking provides context. In real-world rendering workloads, the GPU can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming with high settings, but will struggle with 4K or extreme detail presets.

The 220 W TDP requires adequate cooling and a power supply with sufficient headroom. The suggested PSU is 550 W, which is reasonable for a system with this CPU and GPU combination. The GPU uses a triple-slot cooler design and measures 270 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 55 mm in width. It requires a single 8-pin power connector and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

For rendering tasks, the GPU's 5,888 shading units and 184 tensor cores provide solid performance for GPU-accelerated effects in applications like video editors and 3D modeling software. The 8 GB VRAM, however, may limit the complexity of scenes that can be rendered without spilling to system memory. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most tasks but not exceptional, particularly when compared to higher-end cards with larger memory buses.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, running on the Intel Socket 1851 platform. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile ranking of 72 indicates that this system outperforms 72% of all tested configurations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of desktop systems.

The CPU is clearly the stronger component, with a 93rd percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 64,438. It competes directly with server-class processors like the AMD EPYC 7343 and enthusiast chips like the Intel Core i9-13900KS, trading positions within a fraction of a percent. The GPU, at the 50th percentile, is a mid-range component that provides adequate but not exceptional graphical performance.

This pairing creates a system that is heavily weighted toward CPU-intensive tasks. For users who prioritize productivity, content creation, or scientific computing, this build offers exceptional value in terms of raw processing power. For users who prioritize gaming, the system will perform adequately but will not compete with higher-end GPU configurations. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 220 W TDP of the GPU result in a total system power draw that is manageable with a 550 W power supply.

The build class is desktop, and the combination of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU is a common configuration for workstations that occasionally handle gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. The system is well-suited for professional environments where CPU performance is paramount, such as software development, data analysis, or engineering simulation.

# Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for users who demand exceptional CPU performance and are willing to accept mid-range GPU capability. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for professionals in fields like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where the 20 cores and strong single-thread performance directly translate to faster render times, quicker compilation, and smoother multitasking.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU's 50th percentile performance adequate for most titles, particularly with the CPU's high single-thread scores enabling high frame rates in CPU-bound games. At 1440p, the GPU will still provide playable performance in most games, though settings may need adjustment. Gamers at 4K should look elsewhere, as the 8 GB VRAM and mid-tier GPU performance will struggle.

Content creators working with video will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980, which accelerates encoding and rendering. The GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance assists with GPU-accelerated effects, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit complex compositions. Software developers will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 138,078 and data compression score of 507,018, which speed up compilation and version control operations.

Students and office workers will find this system overprovisioned for their needs, but the CPU's efficiency at 65 W TDP means it can handle long-duration workloads without excessive power consumption. Small business workstations requiring multi-threaded performance for data analysis or simulation will benefit from the CPU's strong showing in PassMark floating-point and integer math tests.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is provided by the CPU, and the platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The processor has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 220 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. This leaves headroom for upgrades that do not significantly increase total power draw.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, which limits overclocking potential. However, the high boost clock of 5.30 GHz means the processor already operates near the top of its frequency range. The memory support is DDR5 only, so any upgrade to the memory subsystem must use this standard. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs and NVMe drives can operate at full bandwidth.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a higher-end graphics card. A GPU with more VRAM and higher performance would balance the system, moving the combined percentile closer to the CPU's level. The 550 W PSU may need to be upgraded if a more power-hungry GPU is installed, as the current 220 W GPU already consumes a significant portion of the available power budget.

The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for future software demands, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with data-intensive workloads. The lack of ECC memory support may be a consideration for mission-critical applications, but for most desktop workloads, non-ECC DDR5 is sufficient. The platform is actively in production, ensuring continued availability of compatible components.