SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pairing presents a clear asymmetry in compute capability. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 75th percentile among all graphics cards. This 18-point gap indicates that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing, capable of feeding the GPU far more data than it can render.

The combined percentile of this build is 84, which sits between the two individual scores. This suggests that in most gaming workloads, the RTX 3070 Ti will be the limiting factor, particularly at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the primary constraint. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s define its ceiling for rasterization, and the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4750 indicates it can keep pace with the GPU's demands in most scenarios.

The bottleneck dynamics shift depending on workload type. In multi-threaded productivity tasks, the CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads allow it to pull far ahead of the GPU's compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41980 demonstrates exceptional parallel processing ability, while the GPU's PassMark compute score of 11601 reveals a more modest compute ceiling. For gaming, however, the GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6X memory and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth become the constraining factors, especially in texture-heavy titles at 1440p or 4K.

The memory subsystem further informs the balance. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, while the GPU accesses 608.3 GB/s. This 6:1 ratio means the GPU's memory bandwidth is rarely starved by the CPU's memory controller, but the GPU's 8 GB capacity limit will trigger texture streaming bottlenecks in VRAM-hungry titles. The CPU's L3 cache of 30 MB shared across 20 cores provides ample temporary storage for frequently accessed data, reducing the frequency of main memory accesses.

In practical terms, the data suggests this is a CPU-forward build. The processor's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 75th percentile means that in CPU-bound scenarios—such as esports titles at 1080p with low graphics settings—the GPU will be the performance limiter. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming with ultra settings, the CPU will have significant headroom, allowing for background tasks like streaming or recording without impacting frame rates. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means these conclusions derive from benchmark score analysis rather than direct testing.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component, not direct measurements. The data contains no measuredFps entries for any game or resolution, so the following analysis uses the CPU and GPU benchmark results to project expected performance.

The RTX 3070 Ti's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 places it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. This indicates strong 1440p gaming capability and acceptable 4K performance for less demanding titles. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 23356 and DirectX 12 score of 91 suggest it handles modern API workloads efficiently. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800, scores 30095 average with a delta of -0.5%, placing the RTX 3070 Ti essentially at parity with that card.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU's single-core strength becomes the dominant factor. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5926 and PassMark single-thread score of 4750 indicate the Ultra 7 265F can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 339.8 GTexel/s texture rate should sustain high refresh rates at this resolution in most titles, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit ultra texture settings in newer releases.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The RTX 3070 Ti's 608.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate become more critical, and the GPU's 75th percentile ranking suggests it can handle most titles at high settings. The CPU's 93rd percentile ensures it will not bottleneck at this resolution, even in physics-heavy scenes. The GPU's ray tracing capability, with 48 RT cores, allows for hardware-accelerated ray tracing at playable frame rates in titles that support DLSS.

For 4K gaming, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. The 8 GB VRAM capacity and the GPU's 75th percentile ranking indicate that ultra settings at 4K will strain the memory subsystem in many titles. The CPU's 20 cores and high boost clock of 5.30 GHz provide ample headroom, but the GPU's pixel throughput will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can deliver. The data suggests this pairing is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for less demanding or well-optimized titles.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on TSMC's 3 nm process node. This marks a significant manufacturing advantage, with the 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die. The processor operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts to 5.30 GHz, though it lacks an unlocked multiplier, preventing manual overclocking.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement provides each core with rapid access to frequently used data, reducing latency and improving single-threaded responsiveness. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth ensures the cores have adequate data throughput for multi-threaded workloads, though this is modest compared to the GPU's memory bandwidth.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41980 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the single-core score of 5926 demonstrates strong per-core performance. The PassMark multithread score of 49410 and single-thread score of 4750 corroborate this balanced profile. The processor's nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, scores 64640 average with a delta of -0.3%, indicating near-identical performance to this 265F variant.

In real-world workloads, the processor's capabilities translate to specific outcomes. The PassMark data compression score of 507018 suggests fast file archiving and decompression, while the encryption score of 39468 indicates strong security-related processing. The floating-point math score of 173855 and integer math score of 138078 point to robust scientific and financial computing performance. The extended instructions score of 39235 confirms the processor supports modern SIMD instruction sets, benefiting media encoding and scientific simulations.

The 65 W TDP is notably efficient for a 20-core processor, making it suitable for air-cooled builds in standard desktop chassis. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build provides. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes allows for high-bandwidth connectivity to modern GPUs and NVMe storage, though the RTX 3070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0. The processor's production status is Active, with a release date of January 6, 2025, indicating it is a current-generation part.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 84, reflecting the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 75th percentile ranking among their respective categories.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as "N/A," meaning this processor requires a discrete GPU for display output, which the RTX 3070 Ti provides.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support, and what is the bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 29945, while the RX 6800 scores 30095, a delta of -0.5%, indicating near-identical performance between the two GPUs.

Q: What is the VRAM capacity and type of the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 256-bit bus width and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU, and is it overclockable?

A: The CPU boosts to 5.30 GHz, but the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), preventing manual overclocking.

Q: When was the GPU released, and what is its production status?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti was released on May 30, 2021, and its production status is listed as "End-of-life."

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 64438, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64640 (-0.3%), the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202 (+0.4%), the AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64823 (-0.6%), and the Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64051 (+0.6%). This grouping indicates the Ultra 7 265F sits in a highly competitive performance band, with all four rivals within 0.6% of its score.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29945, placing it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile at 29928 (+0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30095 (-0.5%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti at 29783 (+0.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 at 30433 (-1.6%). The GPU's performance is tightly clustered with these rivals, none of which deviate more than 1.6% from its score.

The combined picture reveals a system where the CPU significantly outpaces the GPU in relative performance. The CPU's 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 75th percentile creates a 18-point gap, which is substantial. In CPU-intensive benchmarks, the processor demonstrates exceptional capability: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41980 and PassMark multithread score of 49410 are strong indicators of high-end desktop performance. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3478 and PassMark G3D score of 23356 indicate solid mainstream gaming performance, but not top-tier.

The CPU's individual benchmark scores show consistency across tests. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4231 and single-core score of 597, while lower in absolute terms due to the older test version, maintain the same performance pattern as newer benchmarks. The PassMark physics score of 3172 and random string sorting score of 62439 demonstrate the processor's versatility across different workload types. The find prime numbers score of 416 is notably lower, indicating that this specific workload does not leverage the processor's architecture as effectively.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build excels at 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and single-core score of 5926 in Cinebench R23 ensure it can drive frame rates above 144 Hz in esports titles, while the GPU's 75th percentile and 21.75 TFLOPS compute provide sufficient rendering power for competitive settings. The 8 GB VRAM may limit ultra texture settings, but high settings should sustain high frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41980 indicates the processor can handle game logic, physics, and encode workloads concurrently without significant frame rate drops. The GPU's NVENC encoder, part of the Ampere architecture, offloads video encoding entirely from the CPU, further reducing strain.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's multi-threaded performance and the GPU's compute capabilities supports smooth 4K video editing. The PassMark floating-point score of 173855 and the GPU's PassMark compute score of 11601 accelerate effects, transitions, and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timelines, though 8K or complex multi-layer projects may exceed this capacity.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering benefits from the 20 cores, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41980. GPU-accelerated rendering using the RTX 3070 Ti's 6144 shading units and 48 RT cores provides fast ray-traced output for applications that support CUDA or OptiX. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for most scenes but may limit extremely high-polygon or large-texture workloads.

Software development: The CPU's high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4750) accelerates compilation of single-file changes, while the 20 cores speed up full builds and test suites. Data compression score of 507018 indicates fast repository operations and artifact handling. The 65 W TDP makes this a power-efficient development workstation.

Student and office work: This build is significantly overqualified for document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The CPU's 93rd percentile ensures instant responsiveness, while the GPU's capabilities are largely unused in these workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP and the GPU's 290 W TDP mean the system draws more power than necessary for basic office tasks, but performance headroom ensures years of future-proofing.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is based on the GA104 chip using the Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. The chip contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1575 MHz and boosts to 1770 MHz, while the GDDR6X memory runs at 1188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 608.3 GB/s bandwidth. This bandwidth is substantial for the GPU's performance class, but the 8 GB capacity is becoming a limitation for modern games at high resolutions and texture quality settings. The GPU's pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s indicate balanced rasterization capabilities for its tier.

Compute resources include 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The 48 RT cores provide dedicated ray tracing acceleration, while 192 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-accelerated workloads. FP32 performance is rated at 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating equal throughput for both precision levels.

The GPU's benchmark results show it performs in the 75th percentile of all graphics cards. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 reflects modern API performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 119718 and Vulkan score of 139541 demonstrate strong compute capabilities. PassMark G3D score of 23356 and GPU compute score of 11601 provide additional context, with the DirectX 10 (155), DirectX 11 (192), and DirectX 12 (91) scores showing scaling across API generations.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth support real-time viewport rendering in DCC applications, though large scenes may require texture streaming. The RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering in compatible software, while the tensor cores enable AI denoising and upscaling. The GPU's power draw of 290 W TDP requires a 600 W power supply and uses a single 12-pin power connector.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti graphics card. The CPU represents a current-generation Arrow Lake design, released on January 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of $379. The GPU is a previous-generation Ampere part, released on May 30, 2021, with a launch MSRP of 599 USD, and is now end-of-life.

The combined percentile of 84 places this build in the upper tier of desktop systems, though it is not a top-tier enthusiast configuration. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking places it among the strongest processors available, while the GPU's 75th percentile indicates solid mainstream-to-upper-midrange graphics performance. This asymmetry creates a system that is CPU-limited in some scenarios and GPU-limited in others, but never severely bottlenecked in either direction.

The build class is explicitly desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use in a tower or desktop chassis. The CPU's 65 W TDP and socket 1851 compatibility require a modern motherboard, while the GPU's dual-slot design and 267 mm length need adequate case clearance. The 600 W suggested power supply provides sufficient headroom for both components under full load.

This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads—such as video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation—while still wanting capable gaming performance. The 18-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles means the processor will not bottleneck the graphics card in most gaming scenarios, and the GPU will not limit the CPU in most productivity tasks. The result is a well-rounded system that handles both types of workloads competently.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions are the primary target audience for this build. The CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 75th percentile combine to deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth supporting high settings at these resolutions. Competitive gamers seeking high refresh rates in esports titles will find the CPU's single-thread performance particularly beneficial, while those playing AAA titles at 1440p ultra settings may need to adjust texture quality to stay within VRAM limits.

Content creators working with video, 3D rendering, or graphic design will benefit from the CPU's 20 cores and the GPU's compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41980 accelerates video exports and 3D scene renders, while the GPU's 48 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible applications. The combined compute performance supports complex effects and multi-layer compositions without excessive render times.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's balance of single-thread and multi-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 4750 provides responsive IDE interaction, while the multithread score of 49410 speeds up builds and test execution. The data compression score of 507018 indicates efficient handling of large code repositories and build artifacts.

Students and professionals in STEM fields—engineering, scientific computing, data analysis—will find the CPU's floating-point performance (PassMark FPU score of 173855) and extended instructions score of 39235 valuable for simulations and numerical analysis. The GPU's compute capabilities further accelerate CUDA-accelerated workloads in research applications.

Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance for office productivity, financial modeling, or database management will benefit from the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs manageable in always-on environments, while the 20 cores handle concurrent virtual machines or containerized workloads efficiently. The GPU, while powerful, is more than sufficient for standard business applications, providing headroom for occasional GPU-accelerated tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds