SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. The combined benchmark percentile is 77, with the CPU at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 61st percentile. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming figures are estimated from the benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is far stronger than the GPU relative to their respective pools. The Core Ultra 7 265F sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 3070 sits at the 61st percentile among GPUs. That gap means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-bound workloads, especially at higher resolutions. In CPU-heavy tasks such as video encoding, compilation, or 3D rendering, the processor’s high multi-core throughput will dominate, and the GPU becomes secondary.

Benchmark evidence supports this split. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41,980 and single-core score of 5,926 indicate a strong all-rounder. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 22,214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,162 place it in the upper mid-range. When the two are paired, the GPU will saturate first in gaming and real-time graphics, while the CPU will handle compute and productivity tasks without breaking a sweat. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 49,410 and data compression score of 507,018 further confirm that heavy multi-threaded workloads will run well, but the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates in modern games.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and 20 cores/20 threads make it a low-power high-core-count part, but the GPU draws 220 W and requires a 550 W PSU. In practice, the system will be GPU-bound in gaming, but CPU-bound in productivity tasks like video editing or software compilation where the RTX 3070’s compute capabilities are less relevant.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F posts an average benchmark score of 64,438, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, scores 64,640, a 0.3% difference. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202 (0.4% slower), the AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823 (0.6% slower), and the Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051 (0.6% slower). These deltas are negligible; the 265F sits within 0.6% of four other high-end processors, indicating it is effectively at parity with those parts.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17,208, placing it at the 61st percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, scores 17,083 (0.7% faster), the NVIDIA GTX 690 scores 17,037 (1% faster), and the HD 7970M scores 17,019 (1.1% faster). The NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17,468 (1.5% slower). The GPU’s percentile of 61 shows it is a mid-range part; it is not near the top of the GPU hierarchy, but it is comfortably above the median.

The combined picture is a system that is CPU-bottlenecked in compute, GPU-bottlenecked in gaming. The CPU’s 93rd percentile means it can drive almost any application, while the GPU’s 61st percentile means it will hold back frame rates in demanding titles. For non-gaming tasks, the CPU will shine; for gaming, the GPU is the limit.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 5,926, Passmark single-thread 4,750) suggests it will not bottleneck modern games, which typically rely on one or two cores. The GPU’s 61st percentile, combined with its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus, suggests 1080p high-refresh gaming is feasible, but 1440p ultra settings will strain the memory capacity and bandwidth.

At 1080p, the RTX 3070’s 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 448 GB/s bandwidth should deliver high frame rates in most titles, though the exact numbers are not available. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM becomes a limiting factor in textures and geometry, and the GPU’s 46 RT cores are not enough for ray tracing at high settings. At 4K, the GPU is likely to struggle, given its 61st percentile standing and the CPU’s 93rd percentile does not compensate for GPU throughput.

The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is far lower than the GPU’s, but that is not a direct bottleneck in gaming. The system memory interface is dual-channel DDR5, which is typical for a desktop. The GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is sufficient for this card.

Who Should Build It

This build suits users who prioritize CPU compute over GPU graphics. The Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor with a boost clock of 5.3 GHz, making it ideal for content creators who render video, compile code, or run virtual machines. The GPU, while mid-range, is still capable of 1080p gaming, so a gamer who plays at 1080p and also does productivity work will find a balanced system. The 61st GPU percentile means that 1440p and 4K gamers will need to lower settings or upgrade the GPU.

Students and small business workstations will benefit from the CPU’s high single-core and multi-core scores, but the GPU’s performance is more than enough for office tasks, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The lack of integrated graphics on the CPU means the RTX 3070 is mandatory for any display output, so the system is not a CPU-only machine.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture at a 3 nm process node. It has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, and it fits the Intel Socket 1851. It uses DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a peak bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. There is no ECC support, and no integrated graphics. The processor has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

In Cinebench R23, the 265F scores 41,980 in multi-core and 5,926 in single-core. The R20 scores are 17,631 and 2,488 respectively; R15 scores 4,231 multi-core and 597 single-core. Passmark results include a multithread score of 49,410, single-thread 4,750, integer math 138,078, floating point math 173,855, and data encryption 39,468. These numbers place it in the top 7% of all CPUs (93rd percentile) and within 0.6% of four rival processors, including the i9-13900KS and EPYC parts. The 20-thread configuration is unusual because there is no hyper-threading, so each core is a single thread. This makes the CPU efficient in power, but it still delivers high multi-thread performance.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F have integrated graphics?

A: No. The CPU has no integrated graphics; the system requires a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: What is the memory support for this CPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing a peak bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC is not supported.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Core Ultra 7 265F?

A: The launch MSRP is $379.

Q: What is the TDP of the RTX 3070?

A: The RTX 3070 has a TDP of 220 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: How many RT cores does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 3070 has 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 77, with the CPU at 93 and the GPU at 61.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is an Ampere-architecture GPU built on an 8 nm process by Samsung. It contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4 million per mm². The base clock is 1500 MHz and the boost clock is 1725 MHz. The memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, providing 448 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. It includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, and delivers 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute (and the same FP16 rate).

In benchmarks, the GPU scores 3,162 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, 22,214 in Passmark G3D, and 11,195 in Passmark GPU Compute. Geekbench OpenCL scores 112,821 and Vulkan 21,022. The Passmark DirectX 12 score is 85, DirectX 11 is 182, and DirectX 9 is 247. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17,208, placing it at the 61st percentile. Its nearest rivals are the RX 7600 XT (0.7% faster), GTX 690 (1% faster), and HD 7970M (1.1% faster), while the Tesla K40c is 1.5% slower. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for modern 4K textures, but the GPU's high bandwidth and 5888 shaders make it a capable 1080p performer.

The GPU has 184 tensor cores, enabling DLSS and AI-accelerated workloads, and 46 RT cores for ray tracing. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The card is dual-slot, 242 mm long, and requires a 550 W PSU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining a 93rd-percentile CPU with a 61st-percentile GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 77. The CPU is a high-end 20-core part with a 65 W TDP, designed for heavy multi-threaded productivity. The GPU is a mid-range 8 GB card, launched in 2020 and now end-of-life. The pairing is typical of a system that prioritizes CPU compute over gaming, but it can still handle 1080p gaming at high settings. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so the GPU is mandatory. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $379, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is $499. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the CPU near the top and the GPU in the middle of the performance distribution.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 5.3 GHz boost and single-core score of 5,926 will not hold back a GPU, but the RTX 3070’s 61st percentile means that 1080p is the sweet spot. At 1080p, the GPU’s 448 GB/s bandwidth and 20.31 TFLOPS should deliver high frame rates, but at 1440p the 8 GB VRAM may force lower textures. The lack of measured FPS data makes exact figures uncertain.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 20 threads can handle encoding while gaming, and its Passmark multithread score of 49,410 supports multiple simultaneous tasks. The GPU also supports NVENC (not in the fact pack, but not to mention) — we must stick to facts. So we say the CPU’s strong multi-thread score allows for simultaneous encoding and gaming without major CPU bottleneck.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 indicates fast export times. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM can handle 1080p timelines, but 4K previews may be limited by VRAM. The CPU’s data compression score of 507,018 suggests efficient codec processing.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 20 cores and 30 MB L3 cache will render scenes quickly, while the GPU’s 5888 shading units and 20.31 TFLOPS provide hardware acceleration. The CPU’s 93rd percentile makes it a strong choice for CPU-based render engines.

Software development: The CPU’s high single-core and multi-core scores (Passmark single-thread 4,750, multithread 49,410) will speed up compilation and virtual machine workloads. The GPU is not a primary factor here, but its 8 GB memory is sufficient for GPU-accelerated compute.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for typical office tasks, but its 65 W TDP keeps power low. The GPU is necessary because the CPU has no iGPU, so the RTX 3070 will provide display output. The combined percentile of 77 indicates a system that will handle any productivity software without issue, though the GPU is far more than needed for spreadsheets and word processing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds