SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop build anchored by a high-core-count CPU and a mid-range GPU. The data shows a strong processor that leads its class in multi-threaded workloads, paired with a graphics card that delivers solid 1080p-class performance. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming analysis is estimated from the component benchmark scores and relative performance tiers.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and fabricated on a 3 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps power demands modest for a desktop chip. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. It has 30 MB of shared L3 cache, with 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core. The processor does not include integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

Benchmark results position this CPU at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. In Cinebench R23, it scores 41980 in multi-core and 5926 in single-core. The multi-core figure is the standout: it places the chip within 0.6% of the Intel Core i9-13900KS in average benchmark score, a chip that historically commands a premium for extreme multi-threaded performance. The single-core score of 5926 indicates strong per-thread performance for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded workloads, though the gap between the multi-core and single-core results suggests the 20 physical cores are the primary driver of its high placement.

In Passmark tests, the CPU scores 49410 in multithread, 4750 in single-thread, and 173855 in floating point math. The floating point score is particularly strong, indicating solid number-crunching capability for scientific or engineering simulations. Integer math scores 138078, and data compression reaches 507018, the latter suggesting good throughput for archiving, database operations, or file server tasks. The extended instructions score of 39235 points to competent AVX-512-class performance for modern workloads that leverage vectorized code. The CPU's nearest rival on average score is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, which is only 0.3% faster; the AMD EPYC 7343 is 0.4% slower, and the EPYC 4464P is 0.6% faster. This tight clustering means the 265F trades blows with both workstation-class EPYC chips and the top consumer i9, making it a versatile choice for mixed-use desktops.

The 20 threads with no hyper-threading mean the CPU relies on physical core count for parallelism. For real workloads, this translates to exceptional performance in video rendering, code compilation, and batch photo processing — tasks that scale linearly with core count. The single-thread score of 5926 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the chip does not feel sluggish in everyday use, though it is not the absolute fastest in single-core terms. The 65 W TDP is notable: it delivers near-flagship multi-core results without requiring a high-end cooling solution, which keeps the overall system simpler and quieter.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of both components. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 59th percentile ranking suggest a pairing where the processor will rarely be the limiting factor in games, but the GPU will define the playable resolution and settings.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 16014, which places it within 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, the RX 9060 should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high or ultra settings in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures but may require reduced texture quality at 1440p in VRAM-heavy games. At 1080p, the estimated frame rates would be in the 60-100 FPS range for demanding AAA titles, with lighter esports titles pushing well beyond that. At 1440p, expect 40-70 FPS depending on the game's optimization, and the card will struggle to maintain 60 FPS at 4K in anything beyond older or less demanding titles.

The CPU's 20 cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock provide ample headroom for gaming workloads, including background tasks like streaming or Discord, without impacting frame pacing. The single-thread score of 5926 in Cinebench R23 is competitive for gaming, where most engines rely on a few fast cores. The data indicates that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as large multiplayer battles or open-world cities with many NPCs, the 265F will hold frame rates steady. The GPU, however, will be the bottleneck in visually intense scenes, particularly with ray tracing enabled, where the RX 9060's 28 RT cores are a mid-range offering.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this build is 76, which positions the system as a whole above average but not at the top tier. The CPU's 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 59th percentile creates a clear imbalance: the processor is capable of driving significantly more powerful graphics cards, while the GPU limits the system's gaming performance. In CPU-bound workloads — such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation — the RX 9060 is not a factor, and the system performs at the level of a high-end workstation CPU. In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at 1440p or higher, the RX 9060 becomes the limiting component, and the CPU sits partially idle.

The benchmark data supports this: the CPU's multithread score of 49410 and the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 17631 indicate that the CPU can feed frames to the GPU faster than the GPU can render them in most scenarios. For a balanced gaming build, a user would typically pair the 265F with a GPU in the 80th percentile or higher to avoid leaving performance on the table. The RX 9060's 59th percentile means that in games at 1080p, the CPU will often wait for the GPU to finish rendering, which is not a problem for smooth gameplay but does mean the CPU's full potential is not utilized.

FPS scaling estimates from the benchmark scores suggest that upgrading the GPU would yield a near-linear improvement in gaming frame rates, while upgrading the CPU would provide minimal gaming benefit. The CPU's nearest rivals — the Core Ultra 7 265, EPYC 7343, and i9-13900KS — are all within 0.6% in average score, so the 265F is already at the top of its performance band. The GPU's nearest rivals — RTX 3060 Ti and RX 7700 — are within 1% of its score, confirming that the RX 9060 is a fixed ceiling for gaming performance in this build.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the CPU cannot be overclocked. It runs at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz out of the box.

Q: What memory type does this build use?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 9060 have, and is it enough for 1440p gaming?

A: The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. For 1440p gaming, this is sufficient for current titles at medium-to-high settings, but future games may exceed 8 GB for ultra textures.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, and it uses a single 8-pin power connector. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so a 300 W PSU is sufficient for the components listed.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as "N/A," so a discrete GPU is required for display output. The RX 9060 in this build fulfills that role.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti's 16129. The performance difference is negligible in practice.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The RX 9060 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, and the CPU provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes. This ensures the GPU has full bandwidth available.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 64438, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 at 64640, a 0.3% difference, which puts the 265F within a hair of its direct sibling. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202, making the 265F 0.4% faster, and the EPYC 4464P scores 64823, making the 265F 0.6% slower. The Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64051, with the 265F 0.6% faster. This cluster of rivals spans both consumer and server platforms, confirming that the 265F delivers workstation-grade multi-threaded performance in a desktop package.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 16014, placing it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129, a 0.7% difference, placing the RX 9060 slightly behind. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862, making the RX 9060 1% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15852, also making the RX 9060 1% faster. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15679, with the RX 9060 2.1% faster. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3322, and in Geekbench OpenCL it scores 88183. The Passmark G3D score of 17631 and GPU compute score of 9919 indicate that the card is competent for both rasterization and compute tasks.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer — within 1% of the fastest consumer and server chips in its class — while the GPU is a solid mid-range part that sits just below the RTX 3060 Ti. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this split: the system ranks above average overall, but the GPU drags the gaming performance down from what the CPU alone could achieve. For non-gaming workloads, the system performs like a high-end workstation; for gaming, it performs like a mid-range desktop.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The chip contains 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.43 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio.

The GPU's 59th percentile ranking places it in the middle of the pack. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench Vulkan scores 39476, showing respectable API utilization. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 182 and DirectX 12 score of 44 are lower, but these are synthetic tests that do not fully reflect real-world gaming. The GPU compute score of 9919 suggests the card can handle compute workloads like video encoding or Blender rendering, though not at the level of higher-tier GPUs.

The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are the defining constraints. For 1080p gaming, this capacity is sufficient for current titles at high or ultra settings. For 1440p, the card will require texture quality reductions in some games to stay within VRAM limits. The 128-bit bus width limits memory bandwidth, which becomes a bottleneck in memory-intensive scenes at higher resolutions. The 28 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the mid-range positioning means ray-traced effects should be used sparingly or at lower quality settings. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a, supporting modern monitors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake processors. The memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, so the current configuration operates at full bandwidth. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 132 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 300 W. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card.

The most sensible next upgrade for this build is the GPU. The CPU is at the 93rd percentile and within 0.6% of the fastest rivals, so upgrading the processor would yield negligible gains. Swapping the RX 9060 for a higher-tier GPU would directly improve gaming performance, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed a more powerful card. The 300 W PSU recommendation leaves little headroom for a significantly more power-hungry GPU, so any upgrade would likely require a PSU upgrade as well. The PCIe 5.0 x16 slot ensures that future GPUs will not be bandwidth-limited.

Memory is another potential upgrade path. The CPU supports DDR5, but the dual-channel configuration caps bandwidth at 102.4 GB/s. Users could increase memory capacity for content creation or virtual machine workloads, though the bandwidth is fixed by the platform. The lack of ECC memory support means this is not ideal for mission-critical server applications, but it is fine for a workstation or high-end desktop. The 20 CPU lanes for PCIe Gen 5 are sufficient for a single high-speed GPU and a couple of NVMe drives, though users with multiple Gen 5 devices may need to share bandwidth.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a 93rd percentile ranking, placing it among the top processors in the database. The GPU is an RDNA 4.0 part with a 59th percentile ranking, placing it in the mid-range of graphics cards. The combined percentile is 76, indicating an above-average system overall.

The class is desktop, and the tier is best described as a workstation-class CPU with a mainstream gaming GPU. The CPU's performance rivals server chips like the AMD EPYC 7343 and the Intel Core i9-13900KS, making this build exceptional for multi-threaded productivity tasks. The GPU's performance is comparable to the RTX 3060 Ti, making it suitable for 1080p gaming and light 1440p. The system is not a balanced gaming rig, but it is a highly capable productivity machine that can also play games at mainstream settings.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 132 W GPU TDP keep power consumption reasonable, and the 300 W PSU recommendation confirms that this is not a power-hungry build. The lack of integrated graphics on the CPU means the RX 9060 is essential, but the pairing works because the GPU is sufficient for the intended workloads. The build occupies a niche: it is overkill for pure gaming, but underpowered for high-end gaming at 1440p or 4K. It is better suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive work and play games as a secondary activity.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound and who need gaming capability as a secondary function. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or large codebases will benefit from the 20-core CPU, which delivers near-server-class performance in multi-threaded tasks. The Passmark data compression score of 507018 and floating point score of 173855 indicate strong performance for data processing and scientific computing. Software developers compiling large projects will see significant speedups from the high core count, and the 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded builds.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this build adequate, with the RX 9060 providing frame rates comparable to the RTX 3060 Ti. Esports titles will run at high frame rates, and demanding AAA games will run at high settings with acceptable performance. Gamers at 1440p should consider this build only if they are willing to lower settings, as the 8 GB VRAM and mid-range GPU will struggle with ultra settings at that resolution. Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance for simulation software, and the system can handle gaming during downtime.

Small business workstations that run database applications, virtualization, or heavy spreadsheet workloads will see strong performance from the CPU. The lack of ECC memory support is a limitation for certain server-class applications, but for general office and productivity tasks, the 265F is more than sufficient. Users who plan to upgrade the GPU in the future will find this build a solid foundation, as the CPU will not bottleneck a higher-tier graphics card. Users who prioritize gaming above all else should choose a different GPU, as the RX 9060 is the limiting factor in this pairing.