SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 — Database Analysis

This pairing combines Intel’s 20-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with AMD’s RDNA 3.0-based Radeon RX 7700 graphics card, targeting a 1440p-class gaming and productivity desktop. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussions that follow are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay captures. The combined percentile places this build at the 76th mark across all tracked CPU+GPU pairings, indicating a solidly above-average configuration with clear strengths in multi-threaded workloads and balanced 1440p rasterization.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, the following gaming expectations are framed as estimates based solely on the benchmark scores in the FACT PACK. The Radeon RX 7700’s PassMark G3D score of 20974 places it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs, which is modest but respectable for 1080p and 1440p gaming. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (avg score 16129, deltaPct -1.7), meaning the RX 7700 sits roughly 30% above that card in this aggregate metric, and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (avg score 16014, deltaPct -1), placing the 7700 about 31% higher. For ultra settings at 1080p, the RX 7700’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for modern titles, and the 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests strong rasterization performance. Expect 100+ FPS in esports titles and 60-90 FPS in AAA games at 1080p ultra, with 1440p ultra likely landing in the 50-80 FPS range depending on title optimization.

At 1440p, the RX 7700’s 58th percentile GPU standing becomes the primary limiter, as the CPU’s 93rd percentile position ensures it will rarely bottleneck the graphics card. The GPU’s 40 ray accelerators and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable ray-traced effects, but the 2865 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 suggests that heavy RT workloads will cut frame rates substantially. For 4K gaming, the RX 7700 would likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS at ultra settings in demanding titles, though the 16 GB VRAM prevents capacity-related stuttering. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4750 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5926 ensure that even CPU-bound titles at high refresh rates (144Hz+) will have sufficient per-thread performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 64438 places it at the 93rd percentile of all tracked processors, a top-tier result that reflects its 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake architecture. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (avg score 64640, deltaPct -0.3), meaning the 265F trails by a negligible 0.3% — effectively identical performance. Against the AMD EPYC 7343 (avg score 64202, deltaPct 0.4), the 265F leads by 0.4%, and versus the Intel Core i9-13900KS (avg score 64051, deltaPct 0.6), it holds a 0.6% advantage. This places the 265F in the same performance tier as high-end server and enthusiast desktop chips, an impressive result for a 65 W TDP processor.

In Cinebench R23, the 265F scores 41980 multi-core and 5926 single-core. The multi-core figure represents roughly 7.1 times the single-core score, indicating excellent multi-threading scalability across the 20 physical cores. The PassMark multi-thread score of 49410 corroborates this, as does the floating-point math score of 173855. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 15852 at the 58th percentile is far more modest, with its nearest rival the AMD Radeon R9 370X (avg score 15862, deltaPct -0.1) — a legacy card from a different era, which underscores how the RX 7700’s aggregate score is dragged down by older DirectX 9/10 tests. The PassMark DirectX 9 score of 261 and DirectX 10 score of 92 are legacy numbers; the DirectX 12 score of 96 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2865 are more representative of modern workloads. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 106028 in Geekbench indicates strong compute capability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is exclusive to Arrow Lake processors. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU (the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16), which means storage and other expansion cards can leverage the newest interconnect standard. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory — the RX 7700 fulfills this requirement. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low for a 20-core part, and the GPU’s 200 W TDP, combined with the suggested 550 W PSU, leaves reasonable headroom for additional drives and peripherals. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot form factor, measuring 267 mm in length, which fits most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 93rd percentile standing vastly exceeds the GPU’s 58th percentile, meaning the RX 7700 is the current bottleneck in gaming scenarios. Swapping to a GPU in the 75th-85th percentile range would better balance the system without changing the platform. The Socket 1851 platform also supports other Arrow Lake parts, so a future CPU upgrade within the same generation is possible if more cores or higher clocks are needed, though the 265F’s 20 cores already cover most multi-threaded workloads. The lack of ECC memory support rules out certain workstation error-correction scenarios, but for gaming and content creation this is irrelevant. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU ensure that a future Gen 5 GPU or NVMe SSD will not be bottlenecked by the interconnect.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 5926, PassMark single-thread 4750) is sufficient to drive 144Hz+ frame rates in most titles, and the GPU’s 20974 PassMark G3D score supports 1080p ultra at 100+ FPS. At 1440p, expect 60-90 FPS, making this a solid 1440p high-refresh pairing, though not a 4K powerhouse.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU has ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, given its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980. The GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores (null in the FACT PACK) means no DLSS-style AI upscaling, but AMD’s RDNA 3.0 architecture handles standard encoding tasks; the 16 GB VRAM ensures game and encoder buffers do not compete for memory.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 507018 and integer math score of 138078 indicate strong performance in codec-heavy tasks. The GPU’s 10963 PassMark GPU compute score provides acceleration for effects and rendering, though the 58th percentile GPU standing means export times will be CPU-bound. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large timeline scrubbing without spillover.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core 41980 places this CPU in the top 7% of all processors, making it excellent for CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar. GPU rendering via the RX 7700 will be moderate — the 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is respectable, but the 58th percentile score suggests it lags dedicated render cards like the Radeon Pro W5500 (deltaPct 1.1).

Software development: The PassMark find prime numbers score of 416 is low, but the integer math score of 138078 and multi-thread score of 49410 support fast compilation. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache reduce latency in large codebases. DDR5 dual-channel memory at 102.4 GB/s provides adequate bandwidth for build servers.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP CPU and 550 W suggested PSU keep power requirements modest. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ensures snappy responsiveness in office suites, while the GPU’s 1206 PassMark G2D score handles 2D desktop composition easily. The 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks but future-proofs for any GPU-accelerated productivity apps.

FAQ

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the FACT PACK (eccMemory: false). This limits its use in error-critical workstation scenarios.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and how does it affect gaming?

A: The CPU boosts to 5.30 GHz from a 2.40 GHz base. This high boost clock contributes to its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5926, which is essential for gaming frame rates that depend on per-thread performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7700 have and why does it matter?

A: The RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. This capacity is sufficient for 1440p ultra textures and even 4K texture packs without exceeding memory limits, as modern AAA titles typically use 8-12 GB at these settings.

Q: Is the power supply requirement of 550 W sufficient for this build?

A: Yes, the suggested PSU is 550 W, which covers the CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 200 W TDP, leaving headroom for drives, fans, and motherboard components. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Can this CPU handle PCIe Gen 5 devices?

A: Yes, the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). The GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, but storage or other expansion cards can use Gen 5 bandwidth if available on the motherboard.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The 265F trails the Core Ultra 7 265 by only 0.3% in average benchmark score (64438 vs 64640), which is within run-to-run variance. They are effectively identical in performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing performance based on the data?

A: The RX 7700 has 40 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 suggests moderate RT capability, but the 58th percentile GPU standing implies RT workloads will see significant frame rate drops compared to rasterization.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize 1440p ultra settings at 60-90 FPS and are willing to accept the RX 7700’s mid-tier GPU position (58th percentile) in exchange for a top-tier CPU (93rd percentile). It suits content creators who render on the CPU — the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 makes video exports and 3D scene renders fast — while using the GPU for preview and light effects work. Software developers benefit from the 20-core/20-thread configuration for parallel builds, and the 30 MB L3 cache aids in large repository operations. Students and office workers who occasionally game will find the 65 W TDP CPU efficient for daily tasks, though the 550 W PSU and dual-slot GPU are overkill for pure productivity. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database workloads will appreciate the PassMark multi-thread score of 49410, but the lack of ECC memory and the gaming-oriented GPU make this a better fit for mixed-use rather than dedicated server roles. The build is less suitable for 4K gamers or those seeking maximum ray tracing, as the GPU’s 58th percentile and the absence of tensor cores (null in the FACT PACK) limit those scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in gaming workloads. The CPU’s 93rd percentile versus the GPU’s 58th percentile creates a 35-point gap, meaning the RX 7700 will saturate before the 265F breaks a sweat in most titles. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as 1080p low settings or simulation-heavy games — the 265F’s single-thread score of 5926 (Cinebench R23) ensures frame rates remain high, but the GPU will still cap maximum FPS. For productivity, the balance flips: the CPU’s 41980 multi-core score drives rendering, while the GPU’s 10963 PassMark GPU compute score accelerates only specific tasks, making the CPU the primary engine for most non-gaming workloads. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p will be nearly linear with GPU load, as the CPU has no trouble feeding the GPU at either resolution. In 4K, the GPU becomes the sole bottleneck, with the CPU’s advantage effectively irrelevant. The 16 GB VRAM prevents memory-related bottlenecks at high resolutions, but the 624.1 GB/s bandwidth and 25.18 TFLOPS are the hard limits. A GPU upgrade to a card in the 80th+ percentile would rebalance the system; a CPU upgrade would yield negligible gaming gains but could help in multi-threaded productivity if the workload scales beyond 20 threads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing of Intel’s Core Ultra 7 265F (Arrow Lake, Socket 1851) and AMD’s Radeon RX 7700 (RDNA 3.0, Navi 32). The combined percentile of 76 places it above the majority of tracked builds, but the internal imbalance is stark: the CPU sits at the 93rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 58th. This makes the system a CPU-first build — one that excels in multi-threaded productivity and pairs it with a competent but not exceptional 1440p gaming GPU. The CPU’s 20 cores, 30 MB L3 cache, and 5.30 GHz boost clock deliver server-class compute in a 65 W envelope, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus provide a solid foundation for modern games. The overall tier is “upper-midrange” — not a flagship gaming rig, but a versatile workstation-class desktop that handles most workloads competently. The lack of integrated graphics on the CPU means the RX 7700 is mandatory, and the 550 W PSU suggestion indicates modest overall power draw. For users who value CPU throughput over GPU rasterization, this build offers exceptional processing power at a reasonable system cost.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake architecture at TSMC’s 3 nm process node. It integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory at 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, with no ECC support. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, and the multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not officially supported. The TDP is rated at 65 W, a remarkably low figure for 20 cores, reflecting the efficiency of the 3 nm process. The launch MSRP is $379.

Benchmark scores position this CPU at the 93rd percentile. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 41980 and single-core of 5926 indicate a 7.1:1 multi-to-single-thread ratio, showing excellent scaling across the 20 physical cores. PassMark multi-thread of 49410 and floating-point math of 173855 confirm strong FPU performance for scientific and rendering tasks. The data compression score of 507018 and integer math of 138078 suggest robust performance in archiving, database, and general productivity workloads. The single-thread score of 4750 (PassMark) is sufficient for high-refresh gaming, as most games rely on 1-4 threads. The nearest rival, the Core Ultra 7 265, is 0.3% faster, making the 265F essentially identical. Against the Core i9-13900KS, the 265F leads by 0.6%, demonstrating that Arrow Lake’s efficiency does not compromise performance. The 30 MB shared L3 cache is moderate for a 20-core part, but the per-core L2 of 3 MB helps mitigate latency. This CPU is a multi-threaded powerhouse that also delivers competitive single-thread results, making it ideal for mixed-use desktops.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is a desktop graphics card from the Radeon RX 7000 series, based on the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed “Wheat Nas.” It is fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process, integrating 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 1900 MHz, boost clock is 2459 MHz, and game clock is 2041 MHz, with memory clocked at 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective). The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, and 40 ray accelerators. Tensor cores are not listed (null in the FACT PACK), meaning no dedicated AI acceleration hardware is present. The FP32 and FP16 throughput are both 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), and the pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s. The TDP is 200 W, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU and two 8-pin power connectors. The card is dual-slot, measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width, with outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark scores place this GPU at the 58th percentile, with an average score of 15852. The PassMark G3D score of 20974 is the most representative of gaming performance, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 indicates modern API efficiency. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028 shows strong compute capability, and the PassMark GPU compute score of 10963 supports hardware acceleration in productivity apps. The nearest rivals include the Radeon R9 370X (deltaPct -0.1), RX 9060 (deltaPct -1), Radeon Pro W5500 (deltaPct 1.1), and RTX 3060 Ti (deltaPct -1.7). The RX 7700 leads the RTX 3060 Ti by 1.7% in aggregate score, making it a modest upgrade over that popular card. The 16 GB VRAM is a standout feature at this tier, providing capacity that rivals cards in higher performance brackets. The 40 ray accelerators enable ray tracing, but the lack of tensor cores means no DLSS-style upscaling; AMD’s FSR would need to be used instead. For 1440p rasterization, the 25.18 TFLOPS and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth deliver solid performance, but the 58th percentile indicates it sits below the top 40% of GPUs, limiting ultra-high-refresh or 4K ambitions. The 5 nm process keeps power at 200 W, which is reasonable for the performance offered.