SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S), manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 family and operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The chip has a 65 W TDP, which classifies it as a power-efficient mainstream desktop part rather than a high-wattage enthusiast chip. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option; performance tuning would rely on platform-level adjustments.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement supports the 20 threads effectively, especially in workloads that benefit from large shared pools of fast memory. The memory controller supports DDR5 in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a modern discrete GPU and a high-speed NVMe drive directly attached to the processor. There is no integrated graphics on this die, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, which signals top-tier performance relative to the broader market. The average benchmark score is 64,438. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 41,980 and the single-core score is 5,926. The R20 results show 17,631 multi-core and 2,488 single-core. R15 scores are 4,231 multi-core and 597 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 49,410, a single-thread score of 4,750, and a floating-point math score of 173,855. Integer math scores 138,078, data compression scores 507,018, data encryption scores 39,468, extended instructions score 39,235, and prime number finding scores 416. Physics performance in PassMark is 3,172, and random string sorting is 62,439.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F sits within a tight cluster. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has an average score of 64,640, which is 0.3% higher than the 265F, placing the 265F slightly behind its non-F sibling. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202, which is 0.4% lower, meaning the 265F edges out that server chip. The AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823, 0.6% higher than the 265F. The Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051, 0.6% lower than the 265F. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the 265F delivers performance nearly identical to these established high-end parts despite its lower 65 W TDP. For real workloads, this means the 265F can handle multi-threaded productivity tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation at a level comparable to some of the fastest consumer and entry-server chips of previous generations, while doing so at a much lower power envelope.

Benchmark Performance

The combined CPU+GPU pairing achieves a 75th percentile ranking among all desktop builds. The CPU's 93rd percentile position is the dominant contributor, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. This creates a lopsided performance profile where the processor is exceptionally strong and the graphics card is merely mid-pack.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7600 based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture (Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish), is manufactured on a 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. Its average benchmark score is 15,171. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,310. Geekbench OpenCL scores 88,051 and Vulkan scores 34,401. PassMark results show a G3D score of 16,634, a G2D score of 984, and a GPU compute score of 8,790. DirectX 11 performance in PassMark is 172, DirectX 12 is 58, DirectX 10 is 84, and DirectX 9 is 226.

The GPU's nearest rivals show it is closely matched with several very different parts. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15,199, which is 0.2% higher than the RX 7600. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15,082, 0.6% lower. The AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics scores 15,270, 0.7% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 15,063, 0.7% lower. The fact that a modern integrated GPU like the Radeon 680M is within 0.7% of the RX 7600 in average benchmark score is notable; it suggests that the RX 7600's raw compute score is not dramatically ahead of capable iGPUs, though real gaming performance typically diverges more due to memory bandwidth and driver optimization. The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray-tracing cores. It boosts to 2,655 MHz with a game clock of 2,250 MHz, and its FP32 throughput is 21.75 TFLOPS.

The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a high-end part that will not bottleneck most workloads, while the GPU is a mainstream component. In CPU-bound tasks, this build will feel exceptionally fast. In GPU-bound tasks, particularly at higher resolutions, the RX 7600 will define the performance ceiling. The 75th percentile combined rank reflects a build that is well above average overall but not a top-tier gaming rig.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64,640, which is 0.3% higher than the 265F's average score of 64,438. The difference is negligible, so the 265F performs essentially identically to the non-F variant in most workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to its closest competitors?

A: The RX 7600's average benchmark score of 15,171 places it 0.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560X, 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon 680M, and 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti. It sits in the 57th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so the 265F cannot be overclocked. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz is the maximum achievable frequency, and performance tuning would be limited to adjusting platform-level settings like memory speeds and power limits within the 65 W TDP envelope.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported, so this is not a platform for error-correcting memory workloads.

Q: Is the integrated graphics available on this CPU?

A: No. The 265F has no integrated graphics (marked as N/A). A discrete GPU is required for any display output, so the RX 7600 is not just an optional addition but a necessary component for this build.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded versus multi-threaded tasks?

A: In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 5,926 and the multi-core score is 41,980, giving a multi-core to single-core ratio of roughly 7.1x. PassMark single-thread is 4,750 and multithread is 49,410, a ratio of about 10.4x. This indicates strong scaling across its 20 threads, making it well-suited for heavily parallel workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The CPU is in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 93% of all processors in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score of 64,438 puts it in the same performance class as the AMD EPYC 7343 and Intel Core i9-13900KS, both within 0.6% of its score.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking dwarfs the GPU's 57th percentile. In any workload that is primarily CPU-bound, such as data compression (507,018 PassMark score), encryption (39,468), or multi-threaded rendering, this build will perform at a very high level, comparable to server-class chips like the AMD EPYC 7343 (within 0.4%). However, in GPU-bound tasks, particularly gaming at high resolutions or with demanding graphical settings, the RX 7600 will be the limiting factor.

The combined percentile of 75 reflects this imbalance. The GPU's nearest rivals include the Radeon 680M integrated graphics, which scores 0.7% higher in average benchmarks. This is a striking data point: the RX 7600's raw compute score is barely ahead of an iGPU, though the RX 7600's dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a substantial real-world advantage in gaming, where memory bandwidth and latency matter more than raw compute. Still, the GPU is not a high-end part, and it will bottleneck the CPU in most gaming scenarios.

For FPS scaling, the data indicates that the CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them. In a 1080p gaming scenario, the CPU's single-thread score of 4,750 in PassMark suggests it can handle high frame rates, but the GPU's 57th percentile position will cap the output. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced, as the RX 7600's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus will struggle with higher-resolution textures and effects. The CPU will often be idle waiting on the GPU, meaning the system's overall gaming performance will track the GPU's capabilities, not the CPU's.

Conversely, in non-gaming workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the GPU plays a smaller role. The CPU's 41,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will dominate these tasks, and the GPU's compute capabilities (21.75 TFLOPS FP32) can assist in GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU is the primary driver. This is a build where the processor is overqualified for the graphics card; users will get exceptional CPU performance and merely adequate GPU performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (5,926 Cinebench R23 single-core) is sufficient to drive high frame rates, but the RX 7600's 57th percentile ranking will limit how high those rates go. For esports titles at low-to-medium settings, this pairing can deliver smooth gameplay, but for AAA titles at high settings, expect frame rates closer to the GPU's mid-pack capability. The 8 GB VRAM may also constrain texture quality in newer titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads are well-suited for software encoding while gaming. With a PassMark multithread score of 49,410, the 265F can handle the encoding workload without severely impacting game performance, though the GPU's gaming performance is still the bottleneck. Alternatively, the GPU's hardware encoders can offload this task, but the CPU is more than capable of handling it alone.

Video editing: The 41,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 173,855 PassMark floating-point score indicate strong performance in rendering and effects processing. The GPU can accelerate certain effects via OpenCL (88,051 Geekbench score), but the CPU will carry the bulk of the workload. Export times will be short, and timeline scrubbing with effects will be responsive.

3D rendering: This is where the CPU shines. The 93rd percentile ranking and scores comparable to the AMD EPYC 7343 (0.4% difference) mean that CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray will be fast. The GPU's compute score of 8,790 in PassMark is modest, so GPU-based renderers will not see the same level of performance, but the CPU will handle most rendering tasks efficiently.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 20 threads and high cache bandwidth. The 138,078 PassMark integer math score and 507,018 data compression score indicate strong performance in code compilation, data processing, and build automation. Single-threaded tasks like code analysis in IDEs will also be responsive, given the 4,750 PassMark single-thread score.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic productivity tasks like word processing and spreadsheets. The CPU's performance is far beyond what office software requires, and the GPU is more than adequate for general desktop use, dual-monitor setups, and light photo editing. The 65 W TDP also means it runs cool and quiet, which is beneficial in a shared or small workspace.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is current for the Core Ultra Series 2 family. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC is not supported. The platform provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which is enough for a modern GPU and a Gen 5 NVMe SSD. The GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so it will not saturate the CPU's Gen 5 lanes; there is headroom for a faster GPU without changing the motherboard.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and the GPU's TDP is 165 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This leaves significant power headroom for future upgrades. The nearest rival data shows the CPU is already competitive with the Intel Core i9-13900KS (0.6% difference), so a CPU upgrade would not yield meaningful gains unless moving to a higher-tier Arrow Lake part. The more sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The RX 7600's 57th percentile is the system's weak point, and upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would immediately improve gaming performance and raise the combined percentile above 75. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support and 450 W PSU headroom mean a GPU with a higher TDP could be installed without a PSU change, though the exact wattage of a new GPU is not in the data.

The memory controller's 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is a potential bottleneck for the CPU in memory-heavy workloads, but this is a platform limitation, not a fixable one within the current socket. For most users, the upgrade path is clear: keep the CPU, upgrade the GPU when budget allows, and potentially add more DDR5 memory if 8 GB of VRAM becomes a limitation in gaming.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need exceptional CPU performance for productivity tasks but have a modest GPU budget. Gamers playing at 1080p will find the RX 7600 adequate for most titles, though they will need to lower settings in demanding AAA games. The 93rd percentile CPU ensures that frame rates will not be CPU-limited, so any performance issues will stem from the GPU. Content creators working in video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit most from this pairing, as those workloads are CPU-bound and the 265F delivers performance comparable to server-class chips like the AMD EPYC 7343 (within 0.4%).

Students and small business users building a workstation for general productivity, data analysis, or light creative work will find this system more than sufficient. The 65 W CPU TDP means the system runs efficiently, which is a plus for prolonged use. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are enough for 1080p gaming and GPU-accelerated effects, but not for high-end 1440p or 4K gaming. The combined 75th percentile rank indicates this is an above-average build, suitable for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks over gaming performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F processor with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 graphics card. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake part with a 65 W TDP, placed in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a Radeon RX 7000 series part with 8 GB GDDR6 memory, placed in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 75, indicating an above-average desktop system. The CPU is the dominant component, offering top-tier performance for productivity and compute workloads, while the GPU is a mainstream part that provides solid 1080p gaming capability but will bottleneck the CPU in GPU-intensive tasks. This is a productivity-first build with gaming as a secondary consideration.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's 57th percentile ranking and the CPU's 93rd percentile, the gaming performance of this build at 1080p ultra settings will be dictated almost entirely by the RX 7600. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 16,634 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,310 suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will limit performance in memory-heavy games. At 1440p, frame rates will drop noticeably because the GPU's bandwidth and VRAM capacity are inadequate for high-resolution textures. At 4K, this GPU is not suitable for smooth gameplay in demanding titles.

The CPU's high single-thread score (5,926 in Cinebench R23) means it will not hold the GPU back at any resolution; any frame rate caps will come from the GPU. In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the RX 7600's performance is likely sufficient for high refresh rates at 1080p with competitive settings, but at ultra settings, the GPU's mid-pack position will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can feed. In AAA titles, expect playable but not high-refresh performance at 1080p ultra, with settings adjustments needed to maintain smooth frame rates. Given the lack of measured data, these are estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores and percentile position, and actual FPS will vary by title and settings.