SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a study in stark contrast. The CPU is a high-end, 20-core desktop processor that sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a low-power entry-level card that ranks in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. This combination creates a system where the processor is capable of handling the most demanding professional workloads, but the graphics card fundamentally limits the experience for modern gaming. The benchmark data indicates a massive imbalance, making it crucial to understand exactly where this build excels and where it falls short before committing to it.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct gameplay testing. The data shows a severe bottleneck in the graphics department.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400's benchmark scores paint a clear picture of its gaming capability. Its PassMark G3D score is 11897, which places it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very low position, indicating that it struggles against a vast majority of the graphics cards on the market. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 reinforces this, showing modest DirectX 12 performance. For context, this performance is extremely close to the AMD Radeon 8040S, which scores 2440 on average with a 1.1% delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, which scores 2433 on average with a 1.4% delta. These are not modern gaming powerhouses; they are low-tier or legacy components.

With such GPU scores, the estimated FPS for modern AAA games at 1080p with Ultra settings would be very low, likely in the 20-40 FPS range, and possibly lower in more demanding titles. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is a positive point, as it meets the baseline for modern game installs, but the raw processing power is simply not there. At 1440p, the performance would degrade further, making the experience unplayable for smooth, high-refresh gaming. The CPU, on the other hand, is a non-factor in this limitation; its massive processing power is not the constraint, so the GPU will be pegged at 100% utilization in almost all gaming scenarios.

The data suggests this is not a gaming-oriented build. The RX 7400 is a capable card for older titles, esports games at lower settings, or indie games with light graphical requirements, but it will not deliver a satisfying experience for modern, graphically intensive games. The "Ultra" settings in the section heading are aspirational; the hardware cannot support them in a playable manner for most current releases. If gaming is the primary purpose, the data strongly indicates that this specific pairing is a poor choice due to the GPU's low percentile rank and low benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is entirely unsupported by the data. High-refresh gaming requires high FPS, which the RX 7400 cannot deliver given its 17th percentile ranking and low 3DMark and PassMark G3D scores. The CPU is capable of high FPS, but the GPU will bottleneck it, preventing the system from driving a high-refresh monitor in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped to handle the encoding workload for streaming. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core processor with a PassMark Multithread score of 49410, which is in the 93rd percentile. This provides more than enough headroom to encode a stream while playing a game. However, the RX 7400's low gaming performance will limit the quality of the gameplay being streamed. The hardware can handle the act of streaming, but the source content will suffer from low FPS and graphical compromises.

Video Editing: This is a strong use case for the CPU. The Core Ultra 7 265F's performance in Cinebench R23 (41980 multi-core) and PassMark tests like Floating Point Math (173855) and Integer Math (138078) indicates it can handle rendering and exporting timelines efficiently. Video editing software that can leverage the GPU for effects and scrubbing will see some benefit from the RX 7400, but the GPU is not fast enough to be considered an accelerator for heavy effects work. The CPU will do the heavy lifting, making this a viable, if unbalanced, system for video editing.

3D Rendering: This is the core strength of this build, entirely driven by the CPU. The multi-core performance of the 265F is exceptional, with Cinebench R20 and R23 scores of 17631 and 41980, respectively. These scores show that it can significantly reduce render times in CPU-based render engines like those in Blender or 3ds Max. The GPU's compute performance (PassMark GPU Compute score of 5152) is too low to be a primary render device, but the CPU's performance makes this a highly capable workstation for 3D work.

Software Development: The CPU's robust multi-threading and single-core performance makes this an excellent development machine. The 93rd percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5926 ensure fast compilation times and a snappy IDE. The GPU is sufficient for standard desktop use and running multiple monitors, but it is not meant for GPU-accelerated compute tasks like local machine learning model training. For general coding, web development, and backend engineering, this is a powerful and responsive platform.

Student and Office Work: This build is wildly overpowered for this scenario. The CPU's immense processing power is wasted on spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing. The RX 7400's low power draw and quiet operation would be a benefit in a shared space, but the cost of the CPU is not justified by the workload. A less powerful and cheaper CPU would be a more logical choice for basic office tasks, as the 265F's capabilities will go largely unused.

FAQ

Q: Is this system good for 4K gaming?

A: No. The AMD Radeon RX 7400's low benchmark scores, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 and a 17th percentile ranking, indicate it lacks the processing power to handle 4K resolution in modern games. The estimated FPS would be far too low for a playable experience.

Q: What is the main performance bottleneck in this build?

A: The GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the RX 7400 is in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. In any graphics-intensive task, the RX 7400 will be at 100% utilization, limiting the system's output to its own capabilities, regardless of the CPU's headroom.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The benchmark data shows they are extremely close. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64640, while the 265F has an average score of 64438. The deltaPct is -0.3, meaning the 265F is 0.3% slower than the 265, a negligible difference in real-world performance.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance like?

A: The CPU has strong multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 41980, and its PassMark Multithread score is 49410. This places it in the 93rd percentile and makes it well-suited for demanding tasks like 3D rendering and video encoding.

Q: Does the GPU support modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 7400 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. While it supports these APIs, its low performance means it will not be able to utilize their advanced features at high frame rates in modern games.

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance?

A: The CPU has excellent single-core performance. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 5926, and its PassMark Single Thread score is 4750. This is beneficial for tasks like gaming physics, older software, and general system responsiveness.

Q: Can this system be used for GPU-accelerated rendering?

A: While the GPU has compute capabilities (PassMark GPU Compute score of 5152), its performance is quite low. In a rendering context, it would be far more efficient to rely on the CPU's 20 cores, which deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980, for rendering tasks.

Who Should Build It

This is a workstation-oriented build for a very specific user. The primary target is a professional or enthusiast who needs immense CPU processing power for productivity but has minimal to no need for high-end 3D gaming or GPU compute. The data clearly shows the CPU is the star of the show, making this ideal for 3D modelers and animators who use CPU-based render engines, video editors working with high-resolution timelines, and software developers compiling large codebases.

The CPU's performance in Cinebench R23 (41980 multi-core) and PassMark tests like Data Compression (507018) and Data Encryption (39468) makes it a workhorse for these tasks. The RX 7400 is adequate for displaying the user interface and basic 2D work, but it is not a factor in the CPU-heavy professional workloads. This build is not for gamers, as the GPU cannot deliver the performance required for modern titles at 1080p Ultra settings, as indicated by its 17th percentile ranking. It is also a poor choice for students on a budget, as the high-end CPU is overkill for typical academic work. The ideal user is someone who maxes out CPU cores daily and treats the GPU as a display adapter rather than a computing resource.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system is severely unbalanced, and the bottleneck is unambiguous. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, with a 93rd percentile ranking, is a top-tier CPU. The AMD Radeon RX 7400, with a 17th percentile ranking, is a bottom-tier GPU. The combined percentile for the system is 55, which is dragged down entirely by the GPU's low performance.

In gaming, the bottleneck is 100% the GPU. The CPU has more than enough headroom to process game logic and physics, but the RX 7400 will be unable to render frames fast enough to keep up. Lowering in-game settings will only help to a point, as the GPU's raw processing power is the limiting factor. In professional workloads, the bottleneck shifts. For tasks like 3D rendering that are primarily CPU-bound, the RX 7400's low compute performance (PassMark GPU Compute score of 5152) is irrelevant, and the CPU's multi-core power (Cinebench R23 score of 41980) is fully utilized. The system's performance is dictated by which component is being tasked. For graphics, it is the GPU. For compute, it is the CPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is an entry-level graphics card based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. Its 1792 shading units and boost clock of 2300 MHz provide a theoretical FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS. It also has 28 ray accelerators (RT Cores) for hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Despite these specifications, its benchmark performance is very low. The PassMark G3D score of 11897 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 demonstrate that it is not suited for modern gaming. Its performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon 8040S (avg score 2440) and the NVIDIA GeForce 710M (avg score 2433). The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is its most modern feature, and while it is sufficient for most game assets, it cannot compensate for the lack of raw processing power. For rendering, the GPU's compute score of 5152 is far too low to be a primary renderer, meaning it is effectively a display adapter. The card's low 43 W TDP means it is power-efficient, but this efficiency comes at the cost of performance.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a performance chasm between the two components. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F achieves an average benchmark score of 64438, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. It edges out the AMD EPYC 7343 (avg score 64202, deltaPct 0.4%) and is just 0.6% faster than the Intel Core i9-13900KS (avg score 64051). The CPU's peak performance in Cinebench R23 is 41980 points in multi-core and 5926 points in single-core, showcasing its balanced high performance.

In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 7400 has an average benchmark score of 2467, placing it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. It is a hair faster than the AMD Radeon 8040S (avg score 2440, deltaPct 1.1%) but slower than the NVIDIA GeForce 710M (avg score 2433, deltaPct 1.4%). Its highest scores come in PassMark G3D (11897) and G2D (1209), with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-7% performer, and the GPU is a bottom-17% performer. This creates a system that is a high-end workstation CPU with an entry-level display adapter, resulting in a combined percentile of just 55 due to the GPU's poor showing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop (buildClass) system pairing a high-end Intel Core Ultra 7 265F processor with a low-end AMD Radeon RX 7400 graphics card. The combined percentile of 55 reflects a system that is average overall, but this is misleading. The 93rd percentile CPU is a high-end part, while the 17th percentile GPU is a budget part. The pairing is akin to installing a racing engine in a compact economy car. The CPU is a top-tier component for professional work, while the GPU is an afterthought, only suitable for basic display output or very light gaming. This is not a balanced gaming machine; it is a professional workstation with a minimal graphics solution.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture on a 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It features a large 30 MB shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU is built for the Intel Socket 1851 and has a TDP of 65 W.

The benchmark scores confirm its high-end status. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 and single-core score of 5926 are both strong, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The PassMark data further reinforces its capabilities: a Multithread score of 49410, Single Thread score of 4750, and impressive scores in Data Compression (507018), Data Encryption (39468), and Floating Point Math (173855). These numbers indicate a processor that can handle the most demanding multi-threaded workloads with ease, while also offering snappy single-thread performance for responsiveness. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and AMD EPYC 7343, are within a 0.6% margin, showing it is a top-tier performer in its class.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds