SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
83%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + AMD Radeon RX 6400: A Study in Extreme Asymmetry

This pairing combines a 20-core desktop processor with an entry-level discrete GPU, creating one of the most lopsided CPU-to-GPU ratios in the benchmark database. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 35th percentile among all graphics cards. The combined system percentile is 64, which reflects the CPU's dominance pulling the overall score upward despite the GPU's modest standing. This analysis examines the data for this desktop build, noting from the outset that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which places it in the Core Ultra Series 2 lineup with the Arrow Lake architecture built on a 3 nm process from TSMC. The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported, which narrows the platform's appeal for certain workstation scenarios that require error-correcting memory. The processor connects to the system via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU itself, offering substantial bandwidth for storage and expansion devices.

The GPU in this build uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 bus interface, which is narrower than the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability. This creates an interface mismatch where the GPU's bandwidth ceiling is well below what the CPU could theoretically provide. The RX 6400's 128.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is actually higher than the CPU's system memory bandwidth, which is unusual for a GPU of this class but reflects the CPU's efficient dual-channel DDR5 design.

Power requirements for this pairing are remarkably modest. The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 53 watts and draws power entirely from the motherboard slot — it requires no external power connectors. The suggested PSU rating is 250 watts, which is exceptionally low for a system with a 20-core processor. This makes the platform attractive for compact builds where power delivery and cooling are constrained. The CPU's 65-watt TDP means a capable air cooler should suffice, though the GPU's single-slot design with no power connectors suggests a low-profile installation is feasible.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points clearly toward replacing the GPU rather than the CPU. The processor's 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it has substantial headroom for more demanding graphics hardware. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU would accommodate future GPUs that leverage that bandwidth, though the current GPU only uses PCIe 4.0 x4. A user could keep the Core Ultra 7 265F motherboard and memory intact while swapping the RX 6400 for a higher-tier GPU, which would likely move the combined system percentile well beyond its current 64th position.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores demonstrate strong multi-threaded performance across several rendering and compute workloads. In Cinebench, the processor scores 4,231 in R15 multi-core, 17,631 in R20 multi-core, and 41,980 in R23 multi-core. Single-core scores are 597 in R15, 2,488 in R20, and 5,926 in R23. These figures place the CPU at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64,438.

The nearest rivals bracket this CPU closely. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is 0.3% ahead, the AMD EPYC 7343 is 0.4% behind, the AMD EPYC 4464P is 0.6% ahead, and the Intel Core i9-13900KS is 0.6% behind. This clustering within a 1.2% band shows the 265F sits in a highly competitive performance tier where the differences between comparable processors are negligible in real-world terms.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded strength. The CPU scores 49,410 in multithread tests, 173,855 in floating point math, 138,078 in integer math, and 507,018 in data compression. Single-thread performance is 4,750, which is respectable for a 20-core processor. The 416 score in find prime numbers is notably low, suggesting this workload does not align well with the CPU's architecture.

The GPU's benchmark scores tell a very different story. The RX 6400 achieves 7,673 in PassMark G3D, 2,812 in GPU compute, and 32,011 in Geekbench OpenCL. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 176, which is a demanding modern test that the GPU handles poorly. The GPU's average benchmark score is 6,001, putting it at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 0% delta, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server at 0.1% ahead, the AMD FirePro W4100 at 0.2% ahead, and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M at 0.3% ahead. These are all older or lower-tier products, confirming the RX 6400's entry-level positioning.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is 58 percentile points higher than the GPU. This gap is substantial and will dominate every workload that touches the GPU. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data processing, or physics simulations, the system performs near the top of the desktop market. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming or rendering, the system performs near the bottom of the discrete GPU market.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 and PassMark G3D score of 7,673 provide the basis for these estimates.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 6400 would likely deliver playable frame rates only in older or less demanding titles. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM capacity and 128.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are limiting factors for modern games that increasingly require more video memory and higher bandwidth. The 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 74.27 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest the GPU can handle basic rasterization but will struggle with complex shaders and high-resolution textures.

At 1440p or 4K, the estimates become more pessimistic. The GPU's RDNA 2.0 architecture with 768 shading units and 32 ROPs is simply not equipped for high-resolution gaming at high settings. Even at 1080p, the 12 RT cores would provide minimal ray tracing performance given the GPU's overall throughput constraints. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30 is particularly low, indicating poor performance in modern graphics APIs that most current games rely on.

The CPU would not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario. With a 93rd percentile ranking and single-thread score of 4,750, the Core Ultra 7 265F provides ample processing headroom for game logic, physics, and AI. The bottleneck in gaming would be entirely GPU-side, with the RX 6400 unable to feed frames quickly enough to utilize the CPU's capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The imbalance between CPU and GPU performance is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 35th percentile create a 58-point gap that shapes every workload. In CPU-bound tasks, the system performs at a high level — PassMark multithread score of 49,410 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 41,980 place it among the strongest desktop processors available. The GPU's low percentile means it cannot keep pace in any GPU-accelerated workload.

The FPS scaling evidence reinforces this imbalance. Since no measured FPS data exists, the estimates from benchmark scores show the GPU as the clear bottleneck in gaming. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,750 and multithread score of 49,410 would support high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios, but the GPU's 7,673 G3D score and 176 Steel Nomad score cap the actual frame output well below what the CPU could theoretically enable.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 507,018 data compression score and 173,855 floating point math score indicate strong performance for data-intensive tasks that do not rely on the GPU. The GPU's 2,812 compute score is low, so any workload that offloads to the GPU will suffer. The system is best suited for CPU-centric workflows where the GPU is used for basic display output rather than acceleration.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 24 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process from TSMC. The GPU contains 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, with a transistor density of 50.5 million per mm². The chip has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 RT cores. Base clock is 1,923 MHz with a boost clock of 2,321 MHz and a game clock of 2,039 MHz.

Memory configuration is a significant limitation. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory runs at 2,000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. This 4 GB capacity is the primary constraint for modern workloads, as many current games and rendering applications require more than 4 GB even at 1080p. The 64-bit bus width limits bandwidth scalability regardless of memory speed.

Compute capabilities are modest. The GPU delivers 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.130 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 74.27 GPixel/s and texture rate is 111.4 GTexel/s. The 12 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but with only 3.565 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, ray tracing workloads will be severely limited. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring API compatibility with modern software.

The benchmark scores place this GPU in the 35th percentile, with a PassMark G3D score of 7,673 and average score of 6,001. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 is particularly low, indicating the GPU struggles with modern DirectX 12 workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 32,011 is more respectable but still far below what a mid-range GPU would achieve. For rendering workloads, the GPU's 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly one-tenth of what a high-end GPU provides, making it unsuitable for serious 3D rendering or GPU-accelerated compute.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users whose workloads are predominantly CPU-bound and who need GPU output only for basic display. The Core Ultra 7 265F's 93rd percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for developers compiling large codebases, students running simulations, or small business users running complex spreadsheets and databases. The CPU's 49,410 multithread score and 507,018 data compression score indicate strong performance for these tasks.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations might consider this build for older or indie titles, but the GPU's 35th percentile and 4 GB VRAM would frustrate users wanting to play modern AAA games at high settings. Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering — such as video encoding or software 3D rendering — would benefit from the CPU's performance, but GPU-accelerated workflows in applications like Blender or After Effects would suffer from the RX 6400's limitations.

The low power requirements make this build suitable for office workstations where noise and heat are concerns. The 65-watt CPU TDP and 53-watt GPU TDP, together with the 250-watt suggested PSU, mean the system runs cool and quiet. The single-slot GPU with no power connectors simplifies installation in small form factor cases. However, the GPU's End-of-life production status means this is not a forward-looking choice for GPU-bound workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture with the codename Arrow Lake-S. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Base clock is 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 65 watts, which is notably efficient for a 20-core processor.

Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. The processor has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, and no integrated graphics. It was released on January 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of $379.

The benchmark scores show strong multi-threaded performance with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 41,980 and PassMark multithread at 49,410. Single-thread performance is also solid with 5,926 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4,750 in PassMark. The PassMark physics score of 3,172 and extended instructions score of 39,235 indicate good computational breadth. The low find prime numbers score of 416 suggests this particular workload does not map well to the architecture, but this is unlikely to affect real-world productivity.

The 93rd percentile ranking places this CPU in the top 7% of all processors in the database. Its nearest rivals — the Core Ultra 7 265, EPYC 7343, EPYC 4464P, and Core i9-13900KS — all score within 0.6% of the 265F, demonstrating that this processor competes effectively with both desktop and server parts. The 20 cores with 20 threads (no hyperthreading) provide strong parallelism for multi-threaded workloads, while the 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded performance.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the AMD Radeon RX 6400, creating a system where the CPU is in the 93rd percentile and the GPU is in the 35th percentile. The combined system percentile of 64 reflects the CPU's dominance in determining overall performance. This is a desktop-class build, and the CPU's market segment is explicitly desktop, while the GPU is designed for desktop use as well.

The CPU is a current-generation part with active production status, while the GPU is end-of-life. The CPU was released in January 2025 with a launch MSRP of $379, and the GPU was released in January 2022 with a launch MSRP of $159. The architecture mismatch — Arrow Lake for the CPU and RDNA 2.0 for the GPU — does not affect compatibility, but the performance gap between the two components is the key characteristic of this build.

The overall tier from the percentiles is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but falls short in GPU-bound workloads. The 64th combined percentile places it in the upper-middle range of all systems, but this is misleading because the CPU pulls the average up while the GPU drags it down. Users should understand that the system's real-world performance will vary dramatically depending on whether the workload is CPU-bound or GPU-bound.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F ranks in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64,438.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6400 ranks in the 35th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6,001.

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory, which limits its suitability for certain error-sensitive workstation applications.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this combination?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 watts, which is low because the CPU has a 65-watt TDP and the GPU has a 53-watt TDP with no external power connectors.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 128.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined system percentile is 64, reflecting the CPU's high percentile (93) partially offset by the GPU's low percentile (35).

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suitable for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 35th percentile and 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 performance would struggle to maintain high frame rates even at 1080p, and the 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for modern titles. The CPU's high performance is wasted in this scenario because the GPU cannot feed frames quickly enough.

Streaming: CPU-based streaming is viable given the 20-core processor's strong multi-threaded performance, with a 41,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. However, GPU-accelerated encoding would be limited by the RX 6400's modest compute capabilities and low G3D score of 7,673.

Video editing: CPU-based video editing would perform well, with the processor's 49,410 multithread score handling timelines and effects. GPU-accelerated rendering and effects would be severely limited by the GPU's 2,812 compute score, making this a poor choice for GPU-accelerated workflows.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in applications that use the processor would benefit from the 20 cores and 30 MB L3 cache. GPU-based rendering would be nearly unusable given the RX 6400's 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM.

Software development: This is a strong scenario for the build. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking, 507,018 data compression score, and 138,078 integer math score indicate fast compilation and data processing. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The low power requirements (65-watt CPU, 53-watt GPU, 250-watt suggested PSU) make this an efficient system for productivity tasks. The CPU's 4,750 single-thread score ensures responsive application performance, and the GPU's basic display output is sufficient for documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing.