SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis examines the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation pairing as a desktop build. The data confirms this is a high-end configuration, with the CPU holding a 93rd percentile rank among all processors and the GPU sitting at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all performance expectations are derived from the individual component benchmark scores and percentiles, not from direct game testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is built on the Arrow Lake architecture and fits the Intel Socket 1851 platform. This is a current-generation desktop socket, meaning the motherboard ecosystem supports the latest connectivity standards. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes directly from the processor, which is the primary interface for a modern discrete GPU and the fastest NVMe storage drives. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which is the standard for high-performance desktop builds in this class.

For storage and expansion, the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are significant. This allows for a full-bandwidth graphics card connection and leaves room for at least one Gen 5 NVMe SSD without sharing bandwidth with the GPU. The memory controller does not support ECC, so this platform targets consumers and prosumers rather than mission-critical servers. The 65W TDP of the CPU is notably modest for a 20-core processor, which has direct implications for the rest of the system.

Power supply requirements are dictated by the CPU and GPU combination. The CPU has a 65W TDP, and the GPU has a 120W TDP, giving a combined component TDP of 185W before accounting for the rest of the system. A quality power supply with sufficient headroom for transient spikes from the GPU and the rest of the platform is essential, though the data does not specify a recommended wattage. The GPU uses no external power connectors, drawing its power entirely from the PCIe slot, which simplifies cabling and reduces the strain on the PSU's peripheral connectors.

A sensible next upgrade path from this configuration would focus on the GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and its high multi-core throughput mean it will not be the limiting factor in gaming or content creation workloads for the foreseeable future. Upgrading to a more powerful GPU with a higher performance percentile would be the most effective way to increase frame rates in games and reduce render times in 3D applications. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that any current or near-future GPU will have the bandwidth it needs.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile-class GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5nm process by TSMC. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory operates at 2250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. This memory configuration is substantial and well-suited for high-resolution textures and large 3D scenes.

The GPU's compute capabilities are defined by its 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. It has 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The clock speeds are 930 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s. The raw compute performance is rated at 32.69 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (with a 1:1 ratio), indicating balanced performance for both standard and half-precision workloads.

The benchmark data for this GPU is notably sparse, with no scores recorded. Its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs positions it as a mid-range performer. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring full compatibility with modern game engines and rendering APIs. The presence of 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores means hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling are fully supported.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature. This capacity allows for complex scenes with high-resolution textures without overflowing into system memory. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K workloads, though it is not at the level of the highest-end desktop GPUs. The 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute places it in a range where it can handle real-time rendering and GPU-accelerated effects, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests it will not dominate the most demanding titles at maximum settings. The lack of external power connectors indicates this is a low-power, embedded solution designed for systems where space and thermal constraints are a priority.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 delivers strong benchmark results across multiple tests. In Cinebench, it scores 42,216 in R23 multi-core and 5,960 in R23 single-core. The R20 results are 6,268 multi-core and 884 single-core, and the R15 results are 4,255 multi-core and 600 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks while maintaining competitive single-thread performance.

The PassMark suite reinforces this picture. The multi-thread score is 49,682, with the single-thread score at 4,689. The CPU achieves 522,983 in data compression, 40,456 in data encryption, and 172,776 in floating-point math. Integer math scores 134,773, and extended instructions score 41,478. The physics score is 2,923, and random string sorting is 63,833. The prime numbers test is 418.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 64,640, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD EPYC 4464P with an average score of 64,823 (0.3% slower), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 64,438 (0.3% faster), the AMD EPYC 7343 with 64,202 (0.7% faster), and the AMD EPYC 9124 with 65,104 (0.7% slower). This clustering shows that the Core Ultra 7 265 is positioned in a highly competitive segment, trading blows with enterprise-class server chips.

The GPU has no recorded benchmark scores, so its performance must be inferred from its specifications and its 50th percentile ranking. The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 72, indicating a solid overall system. The CPU is clearly the dominant component in this pairing; the GPU is average, while the CPU is in the top 7% of all processors. The combined picture is a system where the processor provides exceptional responsiveness and compute power, while the graphics card provides adequate but not exceptional visual performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly shows an imbalance in this pairing. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a situation where the processor will frequently be waiting on the graphics card in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU is capable of feeding a much more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

In CPU-intensive workloads like data compression (522,983), integer math (134,773), and multi-threaded rendering (42,216 in Cinebench R23), the system will perform exceptionally well. The 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallel processing power. The 3nm process node and 65W TDP mean this performance comes with high efficiency. The CPU's single-thread score of 5,960 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy response in lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing and office applications.

In GPU-bound scenarios such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU rendering, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation will be the limiting factor. Its 50th percentile ranking means it is an average performer. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32.69 TFLOPS of compute are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the GPU will likely cap performance before the CPU is fully utilized. The lack of measured FPS data prevents a precise quantification of this bottleneck, but the percentile gap is a strong indicator.

The FPS scaling implied by this configuration is straightforward: the GPU dictates the frame rate in games. The CPU has enough headroom to handle the game logic, physics (2,923 PassMark physics score), and AI tasks without creating a CPU-side frame rate cap in most titles. For content creation, the CPU will accelerate tasks like video encoding and 3D scene preparation, while the GPU handles the final render. This division of labor means the system is balanced for productivity workloads but unbalanced for gaming, where the GPU is the clear weak point relative to the CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's socket and architecture?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Intel Socket 1851 and is based on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-S desktop variant, built on a 3nm process by TSMC.

Q: How much memory and bandwidth does the GPU provide?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, offering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU?

A: The combined percentile for this pairing is 72, with the CPU ranking at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 50th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the GPU support modern rendering APIs?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, along with hardware features like 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS expectations are estimated from the individual component benchmark scores and percentiles.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 42,216 in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, which contributes to its 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65W, while the GPU has a TDP of 120W, resulting in a combined component TDP of 185W.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is capable but not ideal. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 5,960 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame rates are possible, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM will likely limit performance at high settings in demanding titles. It is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but 4K high-refresh gaming would require a more powerful GPU. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates based on the component benchmarks.

Streaming and content creation are where this pairing shines. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and 20 cores provide ample power for encoding and multitasking. The PassMark data compression score of 522,983 indicates fast file handling, and the multi-thread score of 49,682 supports simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads. The GPU's NVENC encoder, implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture and tensor cores, can offload encoding tasks from the CPU.

Video editing benefits from the combination of the CPU's multi-core power and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 will accelerate timeline rendering and export processes. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for handling 4K video timelines, though the 50th percentile ranking means effects-heavy timelines may require proxy workflows.

3D rendering is a strong use case for this CPU. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6,268 and R15 score of 4,255 show consistent scaling across generations of the benchmark. The GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute adds GPU-accelerated rendering capability for applications that support it. The 16 GB VRAM allows for complex scenes, but the 50th percentile GPU ranking means this is not a top-tier render machine.

Software development is a clear strength. The CPU's high integer math score of 134,773 and data encryption score of 40,456 indicate fast compilation and secure data handling. The 20 threads support parallel build systems, and the 5,960 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures quick code editing responsiveness. The 65W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet during long compile sessions.

For student and office work, this system is overkill but highly responsive. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,689 ensures instant application launches and smooth multitasking. The 522,983 data compression score means fast file archiving. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is unavailable, and the 65W CPU TDP keeps power costs low for always-on workstations.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find this system capable of high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU ensuring no CPU-side bottlenecks. However, gamers seeking 4K performance or maximum settings in the latest AAA titles should look for a GPU with a higher percentile ranking than 50th.

Content creators working with video, 3D models, and large datasets will benefit most from this pairing. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and 20 cores provide the compute headroom for demanding multi-threaded workloads. The 16 GB GPU memory supports large textures and complex scenes. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, ideal for professionals whose workflow is CPU-bound.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times and responsive system performance. The integer math score of 134,773 and multi-thread score of 49,682 indicate strong parallel processing for build tools. The 65W TDP allows for a compact, quiet build that suits a professional office environment.

Students and small business workstations will find this system reliable and fast for all standard productivity tasks. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking ensures longevity, meaning the system will remain responsive for years. The GPU, while mid-range, is sufficient for general graphics work, CAD viewing, and light video editing. The lack of external power connectors on the GPU and the 65W CPU TDP mean this system can be built in a small form factor with minimal cooling requirements.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake processor on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture mobile-class chip with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile ranking is 72, placing this system in the upper-midrange tier of all benchmarked configurations.

The CPU is the clear performance leader in this pairing. Its 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the top tier of processors, rivaling enterprise EPYC chips like the AMD EPYC 4464P (0.3% faster) and AMD EPYC 9124 (0.7% slower). The GPU, at the 50th percentile, is an average performer. This creates a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks and is adequate for GPU-intensive tasks. The overall tier is solid for productivity and gaming at mainstream resolutions, but the GPU prevents this from being a top-tier gaming or rendering machine.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The processor has a 65W TDP, which is remarkably low for a 20-core chip, indicating high power efficiency. It has a launch MSRP of $394. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores illustrate a processor that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 places it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a high-end result, competitive with server processors like the AMD EPYC 7343 (0.7% faster) and AMD EPYC 9124 (0.7% slower). The PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682 and integer math score of 134,773 confirm this strength in general-purpose and compute-heavy tasks.

Single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,960 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,689. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz is the driver of this performance, ensuring fast response in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark data compression score of 522,983 is particularly notable, indicating excellent performance in file archiving and data-heavy workloads.

The 20 threads (the processor has no hyperthreading, so 20 cores equal 20 threads) provide massive parallelism. This is evidenced by the floating-point math score of 172,776 and the extended instructions score of 41,478. The random string sorting score of 63,833 shows strong memory and cache performance. The physics score of 2,923 is more modest, suggesting that the processor's gaming physics performance is adequate but not the standout feature.

Real-world workloads that benefit from this CPU include video encoding, 3D scene rendering, software compilation, scientific computing, and data analysis. The high multi-thread scores mean these tasks will complete quickly. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps with data locality, and the 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth supports the 20 cores effectively. The 3nm process node and 65W TDP mean this performance comes with low power consumption, making it suitable for systems where heat and energy use are concerns. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU provides a basic display output, allowing the system to function without a discrete GPU if necessary.