SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

98 Score

Top 2% Ranking

98 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation presents a fascinating study in workload distribution. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU commands the 98th percentile among all graphics cards—a five-point gap that suggests the graphics subsystem holds a slight edge in raw capability. However, the combined percentile of 96 indicates that this pairing achieves near-top-tier status without one component dramatically overshadowing the other.

Examining the benchmark data, the CPU's multithreaded performance is robust but not class-leading. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,216 places it in the upper echelon, yet the single-core score of 5,960 reveals a more modest standing relative to the very fastest silicon available. This asymmetry between multi-threaded and single-threaded capability hints at where bottlenecks may emerge. In lightly threaded workloads—such as legacy applications or certain game engines that rely on a few fast cores—the CPU could become the limiting factor despite its 5.30 GHz boost clock.

The GPU, by contrast, exhibits extraordinary raw compute. With an FP32 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is positioned to handle compute-heavy tasks with ease. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM further reinforce its capacity for data-intensive operations. The bottleneck calculus here is intriguing: in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or large-scale 3D rendering, the RTX 5000 will dominate the workload, leaving the CPU with ample headroom. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios—particularly those with poor thread scaling—the Ultra 7 265's 20-core, 20-thread configuration (with no hyperthreading) could throttle overall system performance.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data, as no measured frame rates exist for this exact combination. But the percentile disparity—93 vs. 98—suggests that in gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates, while at lower resolutions or with high-refresh displays, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more critical. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,689 is respectable but not dominant, implying that extreme 500+ FPS competitive scenarios might expose CPU limitations.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 64,640 places it in a tightly contested field. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P, scores 64,823—a mere 0.3% advantage for the EPYC. Conversely, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F sits 0.3% behind, while the AMD EPYC 7343 trails by 0.7% and the EPYC 9124 leads by 0.7%. This clustering within a 1.4% band indicates that the Ultra 7 265 is positioned at a performance plateau where architectural differences matter more than raw throughput.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 184,664 tells a different story. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation outstrips the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5% and the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 1.4%. The GeForce RTX 4090 D trails by 3.7%, while the A100 SXM4 40 GB leads by 1.3%. This GPU is unequivocally in the top tier of workstation-class silicon, with a percentile ranking of 98 that places it among the fastest 2% of all graphics cards ever benchmarked.

When combined, the picture becomes clearer: this build delivers exceptional compute capability across the board. The CPU handles general-purpose and multi-threaded workloads competently, while the GPU excels at parallel processing, rendering, and AI-adjacent tasks. The combined percentile of 96 indicates that only a small fraction of all possible CPU-GPU pairings would outperform this configuration. For a desktop workstation, this represents near-flagship performance with practical power characteristics—the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP suggest a system that can sustain heavy loads without exotic cooling requirements.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process node. This is a notable departure from Intel's historical in-house fabrication, and the 3 nm process contributes to the chip's efficiency. The die contains 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² area, which is a remarkable density for a desktop processor.

The core configuration is 20 cores and 20 threads—a design choice that omits hyperthreading entirely. Each core has 192 KB of L1 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache, while the shared L3 cache totals 30 MB. This cache hierarchy is generous and should serve workloads that exhibit data locality well. The base clock of 2.40 GHz is modest, but the boost clock of 5.30 GHz provides substantial single-thread headroom when thermal and power conditions permit.

Benchmark results reveal the CPU's character. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,216 demonstrates strong all-core throughput, while the single-core score of 5,960 is competitive but not top-tier. The Passmark suite paints a detailed picture: integer math scores 134,773, floating-point math reaches 172,776, and extended instructions hit 41,478. The data compression score of 522,983 is particularly strong, suggesting excellent performance in archiving and storage-related tasks. Data encryption at 40,456 indicates capable cryptographic throughput, while random string sorting at 63,833 shows solid memory-bound operation.

The memory subsystem supports DDR5 via a dual-channel interface with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for general computing but may become a constraint in memory-bandwidth-intensive workloads that would benefit from quad-channel configurations. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-speed connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage. Integrated graphics are present in the form of Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 execution units, providing display output and basic acceleration without a discrete GPU.

The 65 W TDP is notably efficient for a 20-core processor, and the lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not an option. This positions the chip as a reliable, power-conscious workstation processor rather than an enthusiast overclocking part. The production status is active, with a launch date of January 2025 and a launch MSRP of $394.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 98th percentile ranking suggests exceptional frame delivery at high resolutions, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4,689 in Passmark indicates that extremely high refresh rates—beyond 240 Hz—might encounter CPU limitations in esports titles. For 1440p or 4K gaming at standard refresh rates, this pairing is overkill in the best possible way.

Streaming: The 20-core, 20-thread configuration provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Passmark multithread score of 49,682 and data compression score of 522,983 indicate that software encoding would not significantly impact gaming performance. The GPU also supports hardware encoding via its Ada Lovelace architecture, offering a dedicated alternative that would offload all encoding duties from the CPU.

Video Editing: The combination of strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore: 42,216) and massive GPU compute (65.28 TFLOPS FP32) is ideal for timeline playback, effects rendering, and export tasks. The 32 GB VRAM on the GPU allows for working with large timelines and high-resolution media without memory pressure.

3D Rendering: The RTX 5000's 12,800 shading units and 100 RT cores provide exceptional ray-traced rendering performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 suggests that GPU-accelerated renderers will perform at near-professional levels. CPU-based rendering would rely on the 20 cores, which deliver a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6,268—adequate but not dominant.

Software Development: The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 5,960) accelerates compilation of small projects, while the multithreaded score handles parallel builds efficiently. The data encryption score of 40,456 supports secure development workflows. The 65 W TDP allows for quiet operation during long compile sessions.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is dramatically overprovisioned for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics would suffice for office use, but the discrete GPU ensures that any GPU-accelerated application—from data visualization to machine learning assignments—runs without compromise.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 96, meaning this configuration outperforms 96% of all benchmarked CPU-GPU pairings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P?

A: The AMD EPYC 4464P has an average benchmark score of 64,823, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265's score of 64,640. The difference is negligible.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation features 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What socket does this CPU use?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Intel Socket 1851.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 600 W.

Q: How many RT cores does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 100 RT cores.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, and all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and the CPU's 93rd percentile suggest that this system will deliver exceptional gaming performance at virtually any resolution.

At 4K resolution, the RTX 5000's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth should sustain high frame rates in demanding titles, with the CPU rarely becoming the limiting factor. The 32 GB VRAM eliminates concerns about texture memory exhaustion even with maximum settings and high-resolution texture packs. At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the CPU, but the 5.30 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread performance should maintain high frame rates.

For competitive gaming at 1080p with high refresh rates, the CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4,689 becomes more relevant. While not the fastest single-thread performer available, it is sufficient for frame rates well beyond 144 Hz in most esports titles. The absence of measured FPS data means these are qualitative expectations, but the underlying benchmark scores support a confident assessment of strong gaming capability.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets professionals and enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance without the operational overhead of extreme high-TDP components. The desktop form factor and the 65 W CPU TDP make it suitable for workstations that run long durations under load.

Gamers at 4K resolution will find the GPU's 98th percentile ranking delivers the headroom needed for ultra settings with ray tracing enabled. Content creators—video editors, 3D artists, and motion graphics designers—benefit from the 32 GB VRAM and the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores in Cinebench R23 (42,216 multicore). Software developers working on large codebases will appreciate the 20 cores and the data compression score of 522,983, which accelerates build and packaging pipelines.

Students in engineering or data science programs will find this system overqualified for coursework but future-proof for advanced projects involving machine learning or simulation. Small business workstations handling CAD, financial modeling, or database workloads will leverage the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's compute capability for any visualization tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled or removed for troubleshooting.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel interface, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor itself. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The platform's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is a potential bottleneck for memory-intensive applications, but it is not a limitation for most workloads.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU and the 250 W TDP of the GPU suggest that a 600 W power supply—the suggested rating for the GPU—provides substantial headroom. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 267 mm in length. The lack of an unlocked multiplier on the CPU means overclocking is unavailable, so future performance gains would come from platform upgrades rather than tuning.

A sensible next upgrade would be increasing memory capacity or speed to maximize the dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth. For storage, the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support next-generation NVMe drives that can leverage the platform's throughput. The production status of both components is active, indicating ongoing availability and driver support.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class workstation pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake-S processor on Intel Socket 1851 with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture workstation card with 32 GB GDDR6 memory and a 250 W TDP. The combined percentile of 96 places this build in the top 4% of all benchmarked CPU-GPU combinations.

The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 98th percentile indicate a balanced yet GPU-leaning configuration. The GPU's average benchmark score of 184,664 is within 3.7% of the nearest rivals, while the CPU's average of 64,640 sits within a 1.4% band of its competitors. This is a system designed for serious work and play, with the efficiency of a 3 nm CPU process and the raw power of a 5 nm GPU.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on the AD102 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 76,300 million transistors across a 609 mm² area, with a transistor density of 125.3 million per square millimeter. This is a massive chip by any measure, and it delivers accordingly.

The GPU's memory subsystem consists of 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. The base clock is 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz, which drives the 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation units.

Compute performance is exceptional: FP32 throughput reaches 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate via a 1:1 ratio. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU's elite status. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 place it at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183,725—a 0.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 D trails by 3.7%, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 1.4% behind. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs through four DisplayPort 1.4a connections. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The 250 W TDP and dual-slot design make it manageable for workstation builds, with the 600 W suggested PSU providing adequate power headroom.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds