SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 form a desktop pairing that is dominated by an exceptional CPU and a GPU whose benchmark data sits in a surprising mid-range position. The processor is the clear anchor, delivering top-tier multi-threaded performance that places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the graphics card’s single 3DMark score places it in the 59th percentile, next to professional and older gaming cards. This combination yields a system with massive compute potential for productivity but a graphics component whose gaming frame rates must be considered as estimates rather than measured results, as the FACT PACK contains no empirical FPS data for this exact configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5090 D V2’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504 places it in the 59th percentile, a level that suggests capable 1080p and 1440p performance, but its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (deltaPct 0.9) indicates it is not in the top tier of gaming graphics cards. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960 is excellent, providing the frame pacing needed for high-refresh monitors, but the GPU may be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. Expect solid, not elite, high-refresh gaming, with the 24 GB GDDR7 memory buffer providing ample headroom for texture-heavy titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 20 threads, combined with a PassMark multi-thread score of 49682, provide substantial parallel processing power for encoding and broadcasting workloads. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU offers a fallback for video tasks, though the discrete GPU’s NVENC-class performance (inferred from its architecture) would typically handle encoding. The 65 W CPU TDP means the processor does not generate excessive heat, leaving thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions alongside gaming or rendering tasks.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 demonstrates strong rendering capability for timeline exports and effect processing, placing the CPU in the 93rd percentile overall. The GPU’s 24 GB of GDDR7 memory is a significant asset for scrubbing high-resolution footage and applying GPU-accelerated effects, even if its raw 3DMark score is modest. The combination of a 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth CPU and a 1.34 TB/s GPU bandwidth suggests a system that can handle 4K multi-stream editing without stuttering.

3D Rendering: In CPU-bound rendering engines, the Core Ultra 7 265 is a powerhouse, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6268 and a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4255 that outpaces or matches server-class rivals like the AMD EPYC 7343 (deltaPct 0.7). The GPU’s FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS indicates it can accelerate viewport and final-frame rendering, but its mid-tier percentile ranking means it will not dominate GPU-based renderers. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-tier compute GPU, making it ideal for hybrid CPU+GPU rendering pipelines.

Software Development: The PassMark data compression score of 522983 and integer math score of 134773 show exceptional throughput for compilation, code analysis, and data processing tasks. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache reduce latency for frequently accessed code segments, while the 20 threads handle parallel build systems efficiently. The DDR5 dual-channel memory support at 102.4 GB/s provides adequate bandwidth for large codebases and virtual machines.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is massively overprovisioned for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the PassMark single-thread score of 4689 ensures snappy application responsiveness. The CPU’s 65 W TDP contributes to a system that can run quietly in a shared workspace, and the integrated graphics provide a backup display output should the discrete GPU be removed. The 20 cores handle background indexing, antivirus scans, and telemetry without impacting foreground tasks, making this a silent-but-overkill office machine.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 64640, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs and demonstrating near-flagship multi-threaded capability. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P, scores 64823, a deltaPct of -0.3 percent, meaning the Intel chip trails that server processor by a negligible margin. Against the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, the deltaPct is 0.3 percent, showing the two are effectively identical in performance, while the AMD EPYC 9124 is 0.7 percent behind, confirming the 265’s position in the upper echelon of desktop processors. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 is the headline figure, indicating a chip that can double as a workstation processor.

The GPU’s sole benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, yields a score of 16504, which places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs—a surprisingly low position for a GeForce 50-series card. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA T400 with a score of 16508 (deltaPct 0), meaning the 5090 D V2 is statistically tied with a professional entry-level card. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is 0.5 percent behind, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 0.6 percent behind, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT trails by 0.9 percent. This data suggests the 5090 D V2’s benchmark performance is not representative of its high-end branding, or the single 3DMark test is not capturing its strengths.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 76, reflecting the high CPU contribution and the moderate GPU showing. The average benchmark score of 64640 for the CPU versus 16504 for the GPU creates a lopsided picture: this is a system where the processor outshines the graphics card by a wide margin in compute-heavy tasks, but the GPU’s 24 GB memory and Blackwell architecture still provide modern feature support. The data indicates a pairing that excels in productivity and CPU-bound workloads, with gaming performance that is promising but unverified.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504, sitting at the 59th percentile, suggests that in modern DX12 titles at 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 5090 D V2 can be expected to deliver playable frame rates in the range of 60-90 FPS, based on its parity with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (deltaPct 0.9). At 1440p ultra, the 24 GB memory buffer and 384-bit bus width help maintain texture streaming, but the raw compute score indicates a drop to 45-70 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K ultra, the GPU’s mid-tier percentile ranking implies that 30-50 FPS is a realistic estimate, with the 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute providing some headroom for lower-detail settings.

The CPU’s single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960, ensures that frame times remain consistent, avoiding stutter even when the GPU is the bottleneck. For esports titles at 1080p, the 20-core processor can easily exceed 144 FPS in CPU-limited scenarios, but the GPU’s 59th percentile position may cap that at lower values. The absence of measured data means these figures are speculative, but the benchmark scores consistently point to a GPU that is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming rather than a 4K flagship.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1851, which natively supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-speed NVMe storage and the GPU’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which the RTX 5090 D V2 utilizes. The motherboard must be a 1851-socket model, and the CPU’s 65 W TDP means a modest VRM design is sufficient, leaving headroom for future upgrades. The GPU requires a 950 W suggested PSU, so the power supply is the primary constraint for any future component changes.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the RTX 5090 D V2 with a higher-performing GPU, as the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking has significant headroom for a more capable graphics card. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for one full-speed x16 GPU and additional Gen 5 storage, so there is no platform bottleneck for a GPU upgrade. The 65 W CPU TDP also means that a future Arrow Lake refresh with higher core counts could be installed without changing the power supply, provided the PSU already meets the 950 W requirement. The DDR5 memory support is current, so memory upgrades are limited to capacity or faster modules within the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth constraint.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 features 20 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that prioritizes multi-threaded throughput over simultaneous multithreading, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Built on TSMC’s 3 nm process node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, this Arrow Lake-S chip is efficient and dense. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3, totaling a substantial amount of fast storage for active data.

Benchmark results show a CPU that excels in both single and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 is the standout figure, placing it in the 93rd percentile and within 0.3 percent of the AMD EPYC 4464P, a server chip. The single-core score of 5960 ensures responsive application behavior, while the PassMark multi-thread score of 49682 and floating-point math score of 172776 indicate strong scientific and engineering compute. The data encryption score of 40456 and extended instructions score of 41478 show that the chip handles cryptographic and SIMD workloads effectively, making it suitable for security-sensitive applications.

The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for this level of performance, a direct result of the 3 nm process, and it means the CPU can be cooled by a capable air cooler without excessive noise. The lack of an unlocked multiplier limits overclocking, but the high boost clock of 5.30 GHz already provides strong out-of-box performance. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU is a basic iGPU that handles display output and light acceleration, but it is not intended for gaming. Overall, this is a processor that punches above its desktop class, rivaling server-grade silicon in multi-threaded benchmarks.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 64640, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 D V2 compare to its nearest GPU rival?

A: The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504 is tied with the NVIDIA T400 (deltaPct 0) and is 0.9 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 76, indicating a system that ranks above the majority of desktop configurations.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data available for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The boost clock is 5.30 GHz, and the TDP is 65 W.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the CPU as the dominant component, with a 93rd percentile ranking that far exceeds the GPU’s 59th percentile. In CPU-intensive workloads such as 3D rendering, data compression, and software compilation, the Core Ultra 7 265 will be the primary driver, and the GPU will have minimal impact. The PassMark data compression score of 522983 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 show that the CPU can handle massive parallel tasks without breaking a sweat, meaning the GPU is rarely a bottleneck in productivity scenarios.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504, comparable to the RX 5700 XT, indicates that the graphics card will limit frame rates in most titles, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU’s single-core score of 5960 ensures it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU’s compute throughput will cap the final output. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K will show the GPU’s limitations, with the 24 GB memory buffer preventing VRAM-related stutter but not improving raw pixel throughput.

The system’s balance is skewed toward compute rather than graphics. The 65 W CPU TDP versus the 575 W GPU TDP shows a power distribution that favors the graphics card, yet the performance data does not reflect that allocation. For a balanced build, the GPU should be upgraded to a model with a higher 3DMark score to match the CPU’s capability, or the CPU should be paired with a less powerful GPU to save cost. As it stands, the CPU is underutilized in gaming, while the GPU is the limiting factor in all graphical workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, a 20-core Arrow Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, a Blackwell-architecture GPU with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory. The CPU is a top-tier performer, scoring 42216 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and ranking in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504 places it in the 59th percentile. The combined percentile of 76 reflects a system that sits above average overall, driven almost entirely by the processor’s strength.

The build class is desktop, and it is best described as a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range gaming GPU. The CPU’s nearest rivals are AMD EPYC server chips, indicating its compute capability, while the GPU’s nearest rivals include professional cards like the NVIDIA T400 and AMD Radeon PRO W7500, suggesting its performance is more aligned with entry-level professional work than high-end gaming. This is an unbalanced but versatile machine, capable of exceptional productivity and modest gaming, with the GPU being the clear component to upgrade for a more cohesive system.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideal for professionals who prioritize CPU-bound workloads over gaming. Software developers and data analysts will benefit from the 20 cores and PassMark integer math score of 134773, which accelerates compilation and data processing. Video editors working with 4K or 8K footage will appreciate the 24 GB GPU memory for previewing and the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 for fast exports, though they should expect the GPU to be a secondary accelerator.

For gamers, this build is suitable for those targeting 1080p or 1440p with high settings, where the GPU’s 59th percentile performance is adequate, but not for 4K enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates. Students and office workers will find the system immensely overqualified, but the 65 W CPU TDP and integrated graphics offer a quiet and reliable workstation. Small business workstations handling financial modeling, scientific simulations, or 3D rendering will see the most value, as the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking provides server-level compute in a desktop form factor, while the GPU handles moderate graphical acceleration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds