SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D form a desktop pairing that sits at the 93rd combined percentile, indicating a top-tier system. The CPU’s 20 cores and the GPU’s 32 GB of GDDR7 memory deliver benchmark results that place this build in the upper echelon of both processor and graphics card performance. This analysis examines the measured data to understand where this pairing excels, where it may face limitations, and who would benefit most from such a configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D pairing is 93, placing it in the top tier of desktop systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P?

A: The AMD EPYC 4464P has an average benchmark score of 64823, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265’s score. The data shows the Ultra 7 265 is essentially on par with this rival, with a deltaPct of -0.3.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: Is the measured FPS data for this build real or estimated?

A: The data is measured. The `dataIsMeasured` field is true, and the build has an average FPS across games of 237.8, ranking 7th out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What is the TDP of the GPU and what PSU is suggested?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D has a TDP of 575 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 950 W.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the GPU?

A: The launch MSRP for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is 2,299 USD.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is exceptional. At 1920x1080, the measured FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 reaches 392 FPS and Valorant hits 588 FPS, far exceeding the requirements of any high-refresh monitor. Even at 2560x1440, these titles maintain frame rates above 260 FPS, ensuring a fluid competitive experience.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s robust multi-threading and the GPU’s dedicated hardware. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42216 provides ample headroom for encoding, while the GPU’s tensor cores handle AI-enhanced broadcast effects. This combination allows for simultaneous gameplay, encoding, and streaming without significant performance degradation.

Video editing is a primary strength of this build. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 49682 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 310674 indicate rapid timeline rendering and effect processing. The 32 GB of VRAM on the GPU allows for smooth scrubbing and previewing of high-resolution footage without out-of-memory errors.

3D rendering workloads leverage both components heavily. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6268 demonstrates strong processor-side geometry and physics calculations, while the GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates final frame rendering. The 170 RT cores also speed up ray-traced previews in DCC applications.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960. This speeds up compilation times for single-threaded build steps, while the 20 cores handle parallel builds efficiently. The fast 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces data transfer bottlenecks in large projects.

For student and office work, this is an over-specified but responsive system. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4689 ensures snappy application launches, while the 30 MB of L3 cache helps with multitasking. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU is the primary workhorse.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a well-balanced system where the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload and resolution. In gaming, the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. For instance, in Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS drops from 116 at 1080p to 57 at 2160p, indicating the GPU is being pushed to its limits. Conversely, at 1080p, the high FPS figures suggest the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU adequately.

The CPU’s performance percentile of 93 versus the GPU’s 92 indicates they are closely matched in their respective fields. Neither component dramatically outstrips the other, preventing a clear bottleneck in synthetic benchmarks. However, in specific scenarios, the CPU’s 20 threads might limit heavily threaded workloads, as its Passmark multithread score of 49682 is notable but not class-leading.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s for the CPU could be a constraint in data-intensive tasks. While the GPU has 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, the CPU’s dual-channel DDR5 support might limit performance in workloads that require rapid access to large datasets. This is a potential bottleneck for scientific computing or massive database operations.

In gaming, the measured FPS scaling from 1080p to 2160p reveals the GPU’s dominance. For example, in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the FPS drops from 866 at 1080p to 352 at 2160p, a 59% reduction, clearly showing the GPU as the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU’s performance remains constant, ensuring it is not the constraint.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 4K resolution will find this build ideal, as the measured FPS at 3840x2160 remains playable in most titles. For instance, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 138 FPS and Control at 83 FPS at 4K, demonstrating the GPU’s capability to handle demanding modern games at ultra settings. This is a system for those who demand maximum graphical fidelity without compromise.

Content creators working with 8K video or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the 32 GB VRAM. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 44065 and the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42216 provide the computational power needed for rendering high-resolution frames. This build eliminates the need for proxy workflows in many cases.

Software developers building large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s balance of single and multi-thread performance. The 20 cores handle parallel compilation, while the 5.30 GHz boost clock accelerates single-threaded tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures fast NVMe storage speeds for quicker build times.

Students in engineering or data science fields will find the CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 40456 and integer math score of 134773 useful for algorithm development. The system’s overall responsiveness makes it a capable workstation for assignments, though its power may be excessive for basic tasks.

Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-tasking will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads. The Passmark multithread score of 49682 indicates smooth operation of virtual machines and database servers. The GPU’s compute capabilities also support CUDA-accelerated applications in fields like finance or medical imaging.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a GB202 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 92,200 million transistors. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz for an effective 28 Gbps. This configuration produces a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s.

The 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus provides 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, which is crucial for 4K texture packs and AI workloads. The 21760 shading units deliver 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the 680 tensor cores accelerate AI features like DLSS. The 170 RT cores handle ray tracing calculations, enabling realistic lighting effects.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 14326 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 310674 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 376915 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score of 44065 places it at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. Interestingly, its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT, has a 1.1% higher average score, suggesting the 5090 D’s performance is competitive but not dominant in every test.

The GPU’s 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 32 GB capacity make it suitable for large language model inference and other memory-intensive AI tasks. The FP16 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1) indicates strong mixed-precision capabilities. The dual-slot design and 1x 16-pin power connector require the suggested 950 W PSU for stable operation.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data shows this build excels in esports titles. At 1920x1080, Counter-Strike 2 achieves 392 FPS, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 466 FPS, and Valorant reaches an exceptional 588 FPS. These figures confirm the system can drive any high-refresh-rate monitor to its maximum potential.

For AAA titles at 1440p, the performance remains strong. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 86 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 79 FPS, and Control at 124 FPS. These are playable frame rates for demanding games, though not always hitting the 144 FPS mark for the most competitive play. The system’s 2560x1440 performance in Call of Duty: Warzone is 162 FPS, which is excellent.

At 4K resolution, the system delivers playable performance in most titles. Doom runs at 102 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 98 FPS, and Fortnite at 63 FPS. Heavier titles like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 19 FPS at 4K, indicating this game is too demanding even for this hardware. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 84 FPS at 4K, which is impressive for that simulator.

The average FPS across all tested games is 237.8, ranking 7th out of 3732 pairs. This high ranking demonstrates the system’s overall gaming strength. The data shows a clear trend: the system is most comfortable at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K performance being playable but not always exceeding 60 FPS in the most demanding titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42216 and a single-core score of 5960. In Passmark, the CPU scores 49682 in multithread, 4689 in single-thread, and 172776 in floating-point math. These scores place the CPU at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64640.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 14326, with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 310674 and 376915 respectively. The Passmark G3D score is 44065, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 77712.

Comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals, the AMD EPYC 4464P is 0.3% faster, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is 0.3% slower. The AMD EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9124 are 0.7% faster and 0.7% slower respectively. This indicates the Ultra 7 265 is a well-positioned processor in its performance class.

The combined picture shows a system where both components perform at similar percentile levels, creating a balanced platform. The CPU’s 93rd percentile and the GPU’s 92nd percentile mean neither component is a weak link. The combined percentile of 93 reflects the synergy between the two, resulting in a cohesive high-performance build.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 from the Core Ultra Series 2 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D from the GeForce 50-series. The CPU uses the Arrow Lake-S architecture on Intel Socket 1851, while the GPU uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. Both are active production parts, with the CPU released on 2025-01-06 and the GPU on 2025-01-29.

The overall tier of this build is top-tier, as indicated by the 93rd combined percentile. The CPU’s 20 cores and the GPU’s 32 GB of VRAM place this system in the enthusiast segment. The measured FPS data confirms it is capable of handling the most demanding games and professional workloads.

The pairing of a 65 W TDP CPU with a 575 W TDP GPU creates an interesting dynamic. The CPU is power-efficient, while the GPU is power-hungry, requiring a 950 W PSU. This combination allows for a system that can be cooled effectively for the CPU while needing robust cooling for the GPU.

The build’s performance is validated by its rank of 7th out of 3732 pairs by average FPS. This places it in the top 0.2% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations, confirming its status as a high-end system. The measured data shows consistent performance across a wide range of games.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 features 20 cores and 20 threads on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reveal its strengths. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42216 indicates strong multi-threaded performance for rendering and compilation tasks. The single-core score of 5960 is excellent for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The Passmark integer math score of 134773 and floating-point score of 172776 show robust mathematical processing capabilities.

The 20 threads are notable because the CPU does not support hyper-threading, meaning each core handles one thread. This design choice simplifies power management but may limit performance in highly threaded workloads compared to CPUs with more threads. The Passmark multithread score of 49682 reflects this configuration.

The memory support for DDR5 on a dual-channel bus provides 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for most workloads, though it lags behind the GPU’s memory bandwidth. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which may be a consideration for critical professional work. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes allows for fast NVMe storage and GPU connectivity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2. The memory support is DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed devices like the RTX 5090 D’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

The GPU requires a 950 W PSU due to its 575 W TDP, using a 1x 16-pin power connector. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is manageable with standard cooling solutions. The system’s power requirements are dominated by the GPU, so any future upgrades should maintain the PSU headroom.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to increase memory capacity, as the dual-channel DDR5 support is the primary limitation. The CPU’s 20 cores are sufficient for most tasks, and the GPU’s 32 GB of VRAM is ample. Storage upgrades to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would leverage the CPU’s PCIe lanes for faster data access.

The platform’s production status is active, ensuring continued support. The release dates of January 2025 for both components indicate they are current-generation products. The lack of an unlocked multiplier on the CPU means overclocking is not possible, so future performance gains would come from memory tuning or component upgrades. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU provides a basic display output for troubleshooting or power-saving scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Minecraft

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds