SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance window: strong multi-threaded productivity with solid 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 72nd percentile among all graphics cards. Together, the pairing reaches the 83rd combined percentile, indicating a system that is well above average but not at the extreme high end. The data shows a clear division of labor: the CPU is the standout component, while the GPU provides competent but not class-leading rasterization.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB206 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It houses 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2497 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration is modest for 2025 standards, particularly the 8 GB VRAM capacity, which may constrain texture-heavy workloads at higher resolutions.

The shader array includes 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines. For ray tracing, there are 30 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, 120 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 119.9 GPixel/s, texture rate is 299.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 19.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1). These figures place the RTX 5060 as an entry-to-mid-level Blackwell part. The GPU consumes 145 W with a suggested 300 W PSU, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Benchmark results reflect this positioning. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3628. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 112787 and 113321, respectively. Passmark G3D score is 20891, with a GPU compute score of 10899. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26331, placing it at the 72nd percentile. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5060 is 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon 860M, 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, and 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, while being 1.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. These deltas are negligible, indicating the RTX 5060 sits in a tight competitive cluster. For rendering, the FP32 throughput of 19.18 TFLOPS is adequate for real-time graphics, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will likely become limiting factors for high-resolution textures or complex scene geometry.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 and a single-core score of 5960. In Cinebench R20, multi-core is 6268 and single-core is 884, while Cinebench R15 shows 4255 multi-core and 600 single-core. Passmark multi-thread score is 49682, and single-thread is 4689. The CPU's average benchmark score is 64640, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26331, at the 72nd percentile. The combined percentile is 83rd.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 4464P with an average score of 64823 (-0.3% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F at 64438 (+0.3%), the AMD EPYC 7343 at 64202 (+0.7%), and the AMD EPYC 9124 at 65104 (-0.7%). The CPU is essentially equivalent to these server-class parts in aggregate performance, which is notable for a desktop chip. The GPU's nearest rivals are all within a 1.2% delta, making the RTX 5060's position statistically indistinguishable from the AMD Radeon 860M, NVIDIA GeForce MX550, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the dominant performer relative to the rest of the market, while the GPU is mid-pack. The pairRankByFps indicates this combo ranks 1709 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 127.2. This rank suggests that while the CPU could drive higher frame rates, the GPU limits overall gaming performance to a level that is above the median but not exceptional. The data indicates a 21-percentage-point gap between the CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 72nd percentile, which is a meaningful imbalance to consider for workload-specific performance.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S), part of the Core Ultra Series 2. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The CPU is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. It includes integrated graphics in the form of Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 execution units. Thermal design power is 65 W, and the processor uses the Intel Socket 1851. It was released on January 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of $394. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not available.

The 20-core, 20-thread configuration (no hyperthreading) is a deliberate design choice for Arrow Lake, prioritizing efficiency and single-thread responsiveness. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz is high, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960 confirms excellent per-thread performance. Multi-core score of 42216 in Cinebench R23 is strong, placing it in the upper echelon of desktop processors. Passmark data compression score is 522983, data encryption is 40456, extended instructions is 41478, and floating-point math is 172776. Integer math scores 134773, find prime numbers scores 418, and random string sorting scores 63833. Physics score is 2923.

These benchmark results indicate a processor that excels in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads. The single-core score of 5960 in Cinebench R23 suggests rapid responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on a few fast cores. The multi-core score of 42216 indicates robust performance for video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 49682 reinforces this, showing strong parallel throughput. The data encryption score of 40456 and extended instructions score of 41478 suggest good capability for security-related tasks and SIMD-heavy code. The find prime numbers score of 418 is low, but this is a niche test. Overall, the CPU is a high-performance desktop part that can handle both gaming and productivity without major compromises.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance gap between the CPU (93rd percentile) and GPU (72nd percentile) is 21 points, which creates a predictable bottleneck pattern. In gaming, the GPU is almost always the limiting factor, as evidenced by the FPS scaling across resolutions. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 196 FPS at 1920x1080 to 130 FPS at 2560x1440 and 73 FPS at 3840x2160. This scaling indicates that the GPU is being saturated as resolution increases, while the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames. Similarly, in Valorant, the drop from 450 FPS at 1080p to 307 FPS at 4K shows the GPU becoming the constraint at higher resolutions.

For CPU-bound workloads, the picture is reversed. The CPU's average benchmark score of 64640 versus the GPU's 26331 indicates that compute-heavy tasks like video editing or 3D rendering will be limited by the GPU if they use GPU acceleration, but the CPU will handle pure CPU tasks with ease. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU can push very high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU will cap performance in graphically demanding games. For instance, Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p yields 58 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, and this is a GPU limitation given the CPU's single-core strength. The average FPS across games is 127.2, which is respectable but not exceptional.

The pairRankByFps of 1709 out of 3732 (top 46%) shows that this combination is slightly above median for gaming pairs. The bottleneck analysis suggests that for gaming, the GPU is the primary limiter at all resolutions, but the CPU is strong enough to avoid being a bottleneck in most scenarios. For productivity, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is sufficient for display output and light acceleration. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 145 W TDP of the GPU indicate a balanced power draw for a desktop system, with a suggested 300 W PSU providing headroom.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-core score of 5960 in Cinebench R23 enables very high frame rates in esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 hits 196 FPS, Valorant reaches 450 FPS, and CS:GO achieves 434 FPS at 1080p. At 1440p, these drop to 130 FPS, 384 FPS, and 299 FPS, respectively, still suitable for high-refresh monitors. The GPU limits AAA titles, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 58 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 53 FPS at 1080p, which is playable but not high-refresh.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU provides ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The multi-core score of 42216 in Cinebench R23 indicates that the CPU can handle x264 encoding while gaming, without significant frame drops. The GPU's tensor cores can also assist with NVENC, but the CPU is powerful enough to be the primary encoder.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 49682 and floating-point math score of 172776 suggest strong performance in timeline editing and effects. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit complex 4K compositions, but for 1080p and light 4K work, the system is capable. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and 30 MB L3 cache support large project files.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 indicates the CPU is very capable for CPU-based rendering, such as Blender's Cycles. The GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 is moderate for GPU rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM is a bottleneck for scenes exceeding that capacity. For smaller scenes, the RTX 5060 provides acceleration.

Software development: The CPU's high single-core score of 5960 in Cinebench R23 and integer math score of 134773 indicate fast compilation and code execution. The 20 threads handle parallel builds well. The Passmark data compression score of 522983 suggests efficient handling of large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application loading and multitasking. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 EU can handle basic display tasks, and the GPU is more than sufficient for office applications. The 65 W TDP makes it efficient for all-day use.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance while maintaining a reasonable GPU for 1080p gaming and light productivity. Gamers at 1920x1080 will see excellent esports performance, with Valorant at 450 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 196 FPS, but should temper expectations for AAA titles, where Cyberpunk 2077 sits at 58 FPS. At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more limiting, with esports still playable at 130 FPS or higher, but AAA titles drop below 60 FPS in demanding cases.

Content creators working with CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or software rendering will benefit from the 93rd percentile CPU performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 is competitive with server-class parts, making this suitable for freelance video editors or 3D artists who rely on CPU rendering. However, GPU-accelerated workflows will be constrained by the 8 GB VRAM and the 72nd percentile GPU performance.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times indicated by the high single-thread and integer math scores. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with large projects. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the system responsive for IDEs and simulations, though GPU compute tasks may be slower.

Small business workstations that run office suites, databases, or virtualization will find the CPU's performance more than adequate. The Passmark multithread score of 49682 and data compression score of 522983 indicate strong throughput for data processing. The GPU is overkill for office tasks but provides headroom for occasional graphics work. The 65 W CPU TDP and 300 W suggested PSU make this a power-efficient choice for always-on systems.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64640.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT?

A: The RTX 5060 is 1.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in average benchmark score, with 26331 versus 26011.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5060 have and what type is it?

A: The RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83rd, with a pair rank of 1709 out of 3732 pairs and an average FPS of 127.2 across games.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 145 W with a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Q: What is the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of the CPU?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 42216, and the single-core score is 5960.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR7 Blackwell part. The build class is desktop, confirmed by the CPU's market segment and the GPU's dual-slot form factor. The overall tier is above average, with a combined percentile of 83rd. The CPU is the stronger component at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is at the 72nd percentile. This creates a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks and handles 1080p gaming well, but is not optimized for 4K or GPU compute-heavy workloads. The average FPS across games is 127.2, placing the pair in the top 46% of all tested pairs.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data is measured (dataIsMeasured is true), and the FPS figures below are from actual testing at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in esports titles: Valorant at 450 FPS, CS:GO at 434 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 196 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 183 FPS. Roblox hits 254 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege reaches 234 FPS. Minecraft runs at 193 FPS, and Barony at 166 FPS. Assetto Corsa achieves 116 FPS, and Undisputed at 111 FPS. Mid-range titles like Thief (108 FPS), Outriders (103 FPS), and Heroes Of The Storm (101 FPS) are smooth. Demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (58 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (53 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (29 FPS) are below 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance drops but remains playable for esports: Valorant at 384 FPS, CS:GO at 299 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 130 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 162 FPS. Roblox at 169 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege at 153 FPS are strong. Assetto Corsa at 81 FPS and Undisputed at 80 FPS are fine. Cyberpunk 2077 at 43 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 39 FPS are below 60 FPS, as is Ark: Survival Ascended at 18 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Valorant (307 FPS), CS:GO (176 FPS), Call of Duty: Warzone (138 FPS), and Roblox (96 FPS) remain above 60 FPS. Most titles drop below 40 FPS, with Ark: Survival Ascended at 9 FPS.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to Arrow Lake. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and a fast NVMe SSD. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The motherboard must be a Socket 1851 model to support the CPU.

The GPU has a TDP of 145 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. The combined power draw is 210 W, leaving headroom with the 300 W suggested PSU, but a higher-wattage PSU would be needed for overclocking or additional components. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector, which is common and easy to accommodate.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM and higher throughput, as the RTX 5060's 8 GB capacity and 72nd percentile performance are the system's main limitations. The CPU has headroom to drive a more powerful GPU, as evidenced by its 93rd percentile ranking. Upgrading to a GPU with 16 GB or more VRAM would improve 4K gaming and GPU rendering. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes can support a faster GPU without bottlenecking. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory (if the motherboard has available slots) could benefit memory-intensive workloads, but the dual-channel 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is already adequate for most tasks. The platform is current with PCIe Gen 5 support, so a future GPU upgrade will not require a motherboard change.