SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing is a desktop configuration that targets a specific, performance-conscious segment. The data shows a CPU that ranks in the top tier against all processors, paired with a GPU that sits near the middle of the graphics hierarchy. This combination produces a system that excels at high-refresh competitive gaming at 1080p, handles modern AAA titles at 1440p, and provides a robust foundation for productivity, but it has clear limitations when pushed to higher resolutions or compute-heavy workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and the Arrow Lake-S microarchitecture. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, and the socket is Intel Socket 1851. The CPU has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, offering a theoretical memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The chip does not have an unlocked multiplier, and it has 20 lanes of Gen 5 PCIe connectivity. The integrated graphics are listed as Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU, making the CPU a fallback for display output without a dedicated GPU.

Benchmark data shows this is a high-performance processor. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 42,216 points in the multi-core test and 5,960 points in the single-core test. The single-thread performance is strong, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4,689. The multicore throughput is substantial, evidenced by a PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682 and a PassMark integer math score of 134,773. The processor is particularly adept at heavy math workloads, with a floating-point math score of 172,776 and a custom data compression score of 522,983 in PassMark, indicating strong throughput for data-dense tasks. The Cinebench R20 multi-score is 6,268, and the single-core is 884, which are solid numbers that scale well into the R23 results.

The processor ranks in the 93rd percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64,640. Its nearest rivals are a mix of enterprise and desktop chips. The AMD EPYC 4464P averages 64,823 points, coming in at -0.3% compared to the 265. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is nearly identical, scoring 64,438 for a deltaPct of 0.3%. The AMD EPYC 7343 is 0.7% behind at 64,202, and the AMD EPYC 9124 is 0.7% behind at 65,104. These are extremely close margins, showing that the Ultra 7 265 sits in a tightly contested performance band, within a 1% window of several enterprise and desktop parts. The multi-core performance is the defining factor here, as the 20 cores and 20 threads provide robust parallel processing for productivity and rendering.

The single-core performance, indicated by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,960 and PassMark single-thread of 4,689, is also excellent. These scores suggest the processor has a strong frequency headroom and good IPC, which is critical for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz is the physical limit, and the data shows that the chip can sustain high frequencies for demanding workloads. The core configuration is Intel's hybrid, with the 20 cores being performance cores. The absence of hyper-threading is notable; the 20 threads match the 20 cores, which is relevant for specific workloads that prefer true physical cores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 7 265 and the RTX 4060 is a classic pairing of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU. The CPU is performing in the top 7% of all processors, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile. This means the CPU is far more capable than the GPU, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is the limiting factor.

The data in the measured FPS across games shows a clear pattern. At 1920x1080, the CPU's raw speed is highlighted. In a title like Counter-Strike 2, the system hits 184 FPS, and in Valorant it hits 422 FPS. These high frame rates are possible because the CPU can feed frames to the GPU quickly, but the ceiling is still the GPU. In many 1080p scenarios, the CPU is not the bottleneck; the GPU is. For example, in Assetto Corsa at 1080p, the 109 FPS is likely GPU-bound, as the game is not that CPU-heavy. However, in CPU-heavy titles like Minecraft at 1080p, the 181 FPS is a strong showing that demonstrates the CPU's ability to handle complex world generation and simulation.

At higher resolutions, the bottleneck shifts. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the GPU's work load increases, and the CPU has more headroom. The data shows that, for most games, the frame rate drops at 1440p and again at 4K, which indicates the GPU is the dominant bottleneck. For instance, Cyberpunk 2077 goes from 54 FPS at 1080p to 41 FPS at 1440p to 27 FPS at 4K. The CPU's impact is less impactful at these resolutions. The system is a good balance for 1080p high-refresh gaming, where the CPU can push high frames, and the GPU can output them. For 1440p, the balance is acceptable, but the GPU will be the limit in demanding titles. At 4K, the system is heavily GPU-bound, and the CPU is not the bottleneck; it is the RTX 4060 that limits the frame rate.

The pair rank by FPS is 2001 out of 3732 pairs, and the average FPS across games is 119.5. This rank indicates that the average FPS is in the middle of the pack for all CPU+GPU combinations. It is not a top-tier pairing for high frame rates, but it is far from the bottom. The CPU is not the limiting factor in most games at 1080p, and definitely not at 1440p or 4K. The GPU is the bottle. The CPU's 93rd percentile, combined with the GPU's 61st, creates a situation where the CPU has a lot of headroom, which means the system will be stable and consistent in gaming, but the GPU will be the wall.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU benchmarks show a substantial performance gap in favor of the CPU. The CPU's average benchmark is 64,640, putting it in the 93rd percentile. The GPU's average benchmark is 17,639, which is in the 61st percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 77, which is a reasonable summary of the system's overall capability.

The CPU scores are strong, as already noted. The GPU scores are solid. For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 95,057, and the Vulkan score is 48,643. In PassMark, the GPU scores 19,545 in G3D, which is its primary gaming score. The GPU also has a compute score of 2,923 in PassMark's GPU compute test. The CPU's PassMark physics score is 2,923, which is a separate test from the GPU compute score, but the numbers are close.

The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 17,666 with a deltaPct of -0.2%, the AMD Radeon 780M, which scores 17,588 with a +0.3% deltaPct, the AMD Radeon Pro 560, which scores 17,551 with +0.5%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460, which scores 17,509 with +0.7%. These are all relatively older or low-end parts, which shows that the RTX 4060, while not a top-tier GPU, is in a performance class that is comparable to some older mid-range cards. The deltaPct values are all under 1%, meaning the RTX 4060 is in a performance band with these older cards, which is a bit of a surprise given the architecture differences. The RTX 4060's nearest rival list is not very strong, but it is an indication of the GPU's performance.

The combined picture is a system with a strong CPU and a mid-range GPU. The CPU is a high-tier desktop part, and the GPU is a mid-range desktop part. The data clearly shows that the CPU has a lot of headroom, and the GPU is the performance limiter in gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The system is an excellent choice for high-refresh 1080p gaming. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, combined with the GPU's solid 1080p capability, delivers high frame rates in competitive titles. In Valorant, the system hits 422 FPS at 1080p, and in Counter-Strike 2 it hits 184 FPS. These numbers are high enough for any 1080p high-refresh monitor.

Streaming: The 20 cores and 20 threads of the CPU provide a strong base for streaming, as the CPU has enough headroom to encode a stream while playing a game. The PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682 and the strong multi-core Cinebench scores suggest that the CPU can handle the encoding load without significant frame drops. The GPU also has NVENC, but the CPU is the one with the headroom.

Video Editing: The CPU is a strong performer for video editing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 and the strong memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s make it suitable for rendering and exporting. The GPU's 8GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing, but it might be limited for very complex 4K projects with many effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads make it a good choice for CPU-based rendering, such as in Blender or Cinebench. The PassMark floating-point math score and the Cinebench multi-core scores are strong. The GPU can assist with rendering, but its 8GB VRAM is low for high-poly scenes.

Software Development: The high core count and fast single-thread performance make this an ideal system for compiling code. The PassMark integer math score of 134,773 and the data encryption score of 40,456 are strong, indicating good performance in code development and encryption tasks. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is also beneficial for heavy development workloads.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for basic office tasks, but it will handle spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing without any difficulty. The strong single-thread performance ensures snappy performance in basic applications. The GPU is not necessary for these tasks, but the CPU's strong performance will make everything feel fast.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows the system's strong performance in a wide variety of games. The data is measured, and it shows a clear pattern of high frame rates at 1080p, good frame rates at 1440p, and playable but lower frame rates at 4K.

At 1920x1080, the system is a strong performer. In competitive titles, the frame rates are very high. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 407 FPS, Valorant hits 422 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 219 FPS. These are excellent numbers for competitive play. In AAA titles, the performance is also good. Cyberpunk 2077 hits 54 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 49 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone hits 183 FPS. The 1080p performance is robust, with many games hitting over 100 FPS, such as Assetto Corsa (109 FPS), Barony (156 FPS), and Inside (159 FPS).

At 2560x1440, the GPU starts to be the bottleneck. The frame rates drop, but the system remains playable for many titles. Valorant still hits 360 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 122 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone hits 162 FPS. In AAA games, the performance is playable but less high. Cyberpunk 2077 hits 41 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 37 FPS. The 1440p experience is a mix of high FPS in esports titles and medium FPS in demanding games.

At 3840x2160, the system is not the strongest. The GPU is heavily bottlenecked. Valorant hits 288 FPS, but most AAA games are below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 hits 27 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 24 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone hits 138 FPS. The 4K performance is not a strong point for this system, and the data shows that it is best used at 1080p or 1440p for high-FPS gaming.

The average FPS across all games is 119.5 FPS, which is a solid number. The pair rank of 2001 out of 3732 shows that this average is in the middle of the pack. It is not a top-tier gaming system, but it is a strong performer for high-refresh 1080p gaming and a good 1440p system.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core count and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has 20 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The GPU has a launch MSRP of 299 USD.

Q: What is the system's combined percentile ranking?

A: The combined percentile ranking for this build is 77th percentile.

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and percentile rank?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 64,640, and it is in the 93rd percentile against all CPUs.

Q: How does the GPU performance compare to a rival?

A: The RTX 4060's average benchmark is 17,639, which is 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon 780M.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p gaming. The system delivers 422 FPS in Valorant and 184 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p, making it a top choice for competitive esports titles. It is also a great option for 1440p gaming, where it can run AAA games at acceptable frame rates.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682 make it a strong choice for video editing, 3D rendering, and other productivity workloads. The system is very capable for these tasks, and the GPU can assist in the rendering process.

Software developers and compilers can use the CPU's high integer math score (134,773) and data compression score (522,983) to speed up code compilation and data handling. The 20 cores and 20 threads are a great asset for a developer workstation.

Students and office users will find this system to be more than enough for their needs. The fast single-thread performance ensures that the system is responsive for everyday tasks, and the CPU's strong multi-core performance means it will not be a bottleneck for future workloads.

Small business workstations can also benefit from this build, as the CPU's strong multi-core performance is a good fit for heavy spreadsheet work, database management, and data analysis, though the GPU is not a focus for these tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 GPU. The CPU is a high-performance part in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is a mid-range part in the 61st percentile. The combined percentile for the build is the 77th. The system is a good balance of a strong CPU and a mid-range GPU, with the CPU having a lot of headroom. The GPU is the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, especially at higher resolutions.

The build is designed for high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid 1440p gaming, as well as for productivity tasks. The CPU is a high-end desktop part, and the GPU is a mid-range desktop part. The overall tier is a high-end CPU and a mid-range GPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD107 chip. It is manufactured on a 5nm process by TSMC. The GPU has 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. It features 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which are the hardware blocks for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 1830 MHz, the boost clock is 2460 MHz, and the memory clock is 2125 MHz with an effective 17 Gbps data rate. The memory bus is 128-bit, and the GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. The GPU has a TDP of 115 W and requires a 300 W PSU, with a dual-slot design.

The GPU's FP32 performance is 15.11 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 15.11 TFLOPS, showing that it does not have a half-precision boost. The texture fill rate is 236.2 GTexel/s, and the pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark tests, the RTX 4060 has an average score of 17,639, placing it in the 61st percentile. Its PassMark G3D score is 19,545, which is its strongest result. The PassMark G2D score is 1,037. In 3DMark 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) it scores 2302. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 95,057, and the Vulkan score is 48,643. The PassMark GPU compute score is 9,213. These metrics show a solid mid-range GPU.

The GPU's nearest rivals are older or low-power parts. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 is only 0.2% behind it in score. The AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% behind, the Radeon Pro 560 is 0.5% behind, and the Radeon Pro 460 is 0.7% behind. This indicates the RTX 4060's performance is in the same class as these older mid-range parts, despite its newer architecture. The RTX 4060 is not a high-end GPU, but it is a capable 1080p and 1440p card. Its 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for many games at 1080p and 1440p, but it can be a limitation for high-texture 4K workloads.

The GPU's performance in gaming shows that it is best suited for 1080p and 1440p. At 4K, the frame rates drop below 60 FPS in most AAA titles. The RTX 4060 is not a 4K gaming GPU, but it has a strong performance at lower resolutions. The hardware ray tracing cores (RT cores) and tensor cores are available for ray tracing and DLSS, but the data does not show specific results for those features. The GPU is a solid choice for a mid-range gaming system.