SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, the GPU at the 50th percentile, and the combined system at the 72nd percentile. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures in this analysis are estimates derived from component benchmark scores rather than direct frame captures.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake-S architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 2.40 GHz and the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz. Cache is organized as 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The TDP is 65 W, making it a relatively efficient high-core part. It also integrates an Arc Xe-LPG Graphics unit with 32 execution units.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture. Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 4,255 and single-core 600; R20 multi-core 6,268 and single-core 884; R23 multi-core 42,216 and single-core 5,960. PassMark multi-thread is 49,682, single-thread 4,689, data compression 522,983, data encryption 40,456, extended instructions 41,478, floating point math 172,776, integer math 134,773, physics 2,923, and random string sorting 63,833. The average benchmark score is 64,640, placing the CPU in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals show how close the competition is. The AMD EPYC 4464P has an average score of 64,823, which is 0.3% lower; the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64,438, 0.3% higher; the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202, 0.7% higher; and the AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65,104, 0.7% lower. This is a tightly packed band around 64,000–65,000, meaning the Core Ultra 7 265 is neither clearly ahead nor behind its closest competitors—it sits right at the center of a performance cluster.

The 20 cores without hyper-threading (20 threads equal to 20 cores) is notable. The high single-core R23 score of 5,960 indicates excellent per-thread performance, which benefits games and latency-sensitive applications. The multi-core score of 42,216 suggests that heavily parallel workloads—video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific simulations—will process quickly. The data compression score of 522,983 is especially strong, pointing to fast file archiving, database operations, and data-heavy workflows. The 30 MB L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 further support workloads that are cache-sensitive, such as code compilation or real-time physics.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 40,640 places it in the 93rd percentile, meaning it outperforms 93% of all CPUs in the database. The GPU has no recorded benchmark scores, but its percentile is 50th, meaning it outperforms half of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 72nd. This discrepancy is telling: the CPU is far above average, while the GPU is exactly at the midpoint. The combined percentile of 72 is dragged down by the GPU's mid-tier standing.

Looking at the CPU's specific results, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 is a strong figure for a desktop part. The nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 9124, has a score 0.7% lower, and the EPYC 4464P is 0.3% lower. The Core Ultra 7 265F, which is the same CPU without integrated graphics, is 0.3% higher. These differences are within noise margins, meaning the CPU is effectively tied with its rivals. The single-core score of 5,960 is also strong, and the PassMark single-thread score of 4,689 confirms it. The GPU's lack of benchmarks is a limitation, but its 50th percentile ranking provides a baseline: it is a mid-range GPU, not a high-end or entry-level part.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is based on the GA104 chip, built on Samsung's 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors. It has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The GPU includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and tensor operations. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 915 MHz, boost clock is 1,410 MHz, and memory clock is 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The FP32 throughput is 16.60 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 16.60 TFLOPS as well.

The pixel rate is 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 259.4 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The TDP is 220 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The GPU is a triple-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector, and it outputs via 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The 8 GB VRAM is a key constraint. While 448 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, the 8 GB capacity can limit high-resolution textures or ray-traced scenes. The RT cores (46) and tensor cores (184) enable ray tracing and DLSS, but the VRAM may require lower settings at high resolutions. The FP32 throughput of 16.6 TFLOPS is modest compared to higher-tier GPUs, aligning with the 50th percentile ranking.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 93rd percentile and strong single-core scores (R23 5,960) ensure it can feed high frame rates without bottlenecking. The GPU's 50th percentile and 16.6 TFLOPS suggest it can handle 1080p at high settings and 1440p at medium-to-high settings, but the 8 GB VRAM may force lower texture quality at higher resolutions. Exact FPS are estimates, but the data indicates a system capable of smooth high-refresh gaming at 1080p.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU can handle game encoding and gameplay simultaneously. The CPU's high multi-thread score (R23 42,216) means encoding will have minimal impact on frame rates. The GPU's tensor cores could also assist with AI-based encoding, but no specific encoder data is in the dataset. The system is well-suited for streaming at 1080p or 1440p.

Video editing: The CPU's R23 multi-core 42,216 and PassMark multi-thread 49,682 indicate fast export and rendering. The GPU's 16.6 TFLOPS can accelerate effects and previews. The 8 GB VRAM may be a bottleneck for large 4K projects, but for 1080p and light 4K work, the system is capable.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 cores and high multi-thread scores are excellent for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's FP32 and tensor cores support GPU rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The 448 GB/s bandwidth helps with data movement. This build is a competent entry-to-mid-level 3D workstation.

Software development: The CPU's 20 cores and 30 MB L3 cache are ideal for compilation and parallel builds. The single-core score of 5,960 ensures fast responses in IDE. The GPU is not critical for development, so the 50th percentile GPU is adequate for any GPU-accelerated tasks like UI or basic testing.

Student and office work: The CPU's integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics (32 EUs) can drive displays, and the 20-core CPU is overkill for office tasks but delivers snappy performance. The 65 W TDP keeps power low. The GPU is unnecessary for most office work, but the system handles it without issue.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is at the 93rd percentile, the GPU at the 50th percentile. This is a clear mismatch. In gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU's high single-core performance (R23 5,960) means it can push high FPS, but the GPU will limit at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's 50th percentile indicates it will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The CPU will not be a bottleneck until very high frame rates, where the GPU is already saturated. In CPU-bound workloads like rendering or compilation, the CPU is the primary engine. The combined percentile of 72 reflects the GPU's mid-tier position dragging down the overall system.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and want a CPU that will remain relevant for years. The CPU's 93rd percentile and 20 cores make it a strong foundation for a long-term build. Content creators who work with video, 3D, or large data will benefit from the CPU's multi-thread performance. Software developers who compile large codebases will see fast build times. Students and office users get a responsive system, though the GPU is more than needed for basic tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP and 550 W PSU suggestion make it a manageable system for most users.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-core score of 5,960 and 93rd percentile suggest it will not limit frame rates in most games. The GPU's 50th percentile and 16.6 TFLOPS indicate it can handle modern games at 1080p with high settings, and 1440p with some adjustments. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures or ray tracing. For a frame-rate estimate, the system is likely to deliver smooth 1080p performance, but 1440p will require moderate settings. These are estimates, not measurements.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 use?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support?

A: It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it has an Intel Arc Xe-LPG GPU with 32 execution units.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, and the GPU TDP is 220 W.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $394.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851, a current desktop platform. Memory is DDR5, so future upgrades can use faster or higher-capacity DDR5 modules. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which can support a fast NVMe SSD or a future PCIe 5.0 GPU. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so a new GPU will fit, though PCIe 4.0 bandwidth is sufficient for the current GPU. The PSU is 550 W, which is enough for the CPU (65 W) and GPU (220 W), leaving headroom for a more powerful GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM or higher performance, as the CPU is already a high-tier part.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build with a high-performance CPU and a mid-tier GPU. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile, the GPU in the 50th percentile, and the system in the 72nd percentile overall. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ampere-based RTX 3070 TiM with 8 GB VRAM. The combination is strong for CPU-intensive workloads and capable for 1080p/1440p gaming, but the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU provides a solid platform for future GPU upgrades, making this a balanced build with clear headroom.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds