SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 form a desktop pairing aimed at delivering strong 1080p and 1440p performance without demanding extreme power delivery. The data shows a processor with substantial multi-threading capability and a graphics card that trades for high frame rates in esports titles, though its memory configuration limits high-resolution potential. This analysis breaks down the components, their combined behavior, and the real-world workloads they handle best.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip features 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 per core, alongside 192 KB of L1 per core. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform and integrates Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 execution units.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance for a desktop part. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 points is exceptional, while the single-core score of 5,960 points shows strong per-thread capability. The data reveals a processor that is 0.3% slower than the AMD EPYC 4464P, which scores 64,823 in average benchmark, and 0.3% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, which scores 64,438. It also outperforms the AMD EPYC 7343 by 0.7% and the AMD EPYC 9124 by 0.7% in the negative direction.

In real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6,268 and R15 multi-core of 4,255 indicate strong rendering and compilation performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682, combined with integer math at 134,773 and floating-point math at 172,776, suggests the chip handles complex calculations efficiently. Data compression scores of 522,983 and encryption of 40,456 point to solid productivity performance, while the single-thread PassMark score of 4,689 confirms responsiveness in lighter tasks. The processor’s 20 threads, while not hyper-threaded, provide enough parallelism for demanding multithreaded workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the combination delivers high frame rates in competitive titles, with Valorant hitting 391 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaching 377 FPS. The Call of Duty: Warzone result of 183 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege at 203 FPS show the pair excels in fast-paced shooters, making it suitable for 144Hz or even 240Hz monitors at this resolution.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores handle encoding tasks without significant frame drops. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 provides headroom for simultaneous game capture and streaming software, though the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in some titles while broadcasting.

Video editing: With a PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682 and floating-point math at 172,776, the CPU accelerates timeline rendering and effects processing. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the DDR5 memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s supports high-bitrate footage. Editors working in 1080p or 1440p will find the system responsive, though 4K multi-stream projects may strain the GPU’s memory.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 places this CPU in a strong position for CPU-based rendering tasks like Blender or V-Ray. The 20 cores chew through ray tracing workloads, and the PassMark extended instructions score of 41,478 shows AVX-512-class performance for scientific and rendering applications.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 20 cores and high integer math score of 134,773. The PassMark data compression score of 522,983 indicates fast build times for large codebases, while the single-core boost of 5.30 GHz ensures quick IDE responsiveness. The 93rd percentile ranking confirms this is a capable developer workstation.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP and integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics provide an efficient baseline for document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,689 ensures snappy UI interactions, and the low power draw means quiet operation for study environments, though discrete GPU adds capability for media projects.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, with 28 ray tracing cores. Clock speeds reach 2,990 MHz boost and 2,400 MHz game clock, with a base of 1,700 MHz. The card supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested 300 W PSU.

Benchmark data places this GPU in the 59th percentile among all GPUs, which is mid-range territory. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322 is modest, while Geekbench OpenCL of 88,183 shows respectable compute performance. The PassMark G3D score of 17,631 indicates solid rasterization capabilities. The card is 0.7% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in average score, and 1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7700, with similar margins against the Radeon R9 370X and Radeon Pro W5500.

The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are the defining limits. At 1080p, this is sufficient for most games, but at 1440p, texture-heavy titles may exceed the frame buffer. The pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s support high detail settings, but the 128-bit bus constrains memory-intensive scenes. The 28 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the FP32 throughput of 21.43 TFLOPS suggests performance will be moderate with RT enabled. The GPU’s 132 W TDP keeps thermals manageable, fitting into a dual-slot design.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU significantly outclasses the GPU in relative performance. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 59th, creating a 34-point gap. This imbalance means the GPU is the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions. The pair’s combined percentile is 76, and its average FPS across games is 111.2, ranking 2,196 out of 3,732 pairs.

In CPU-bound titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system achieves 391 and 377 FPS at 1080p respectively, showing the CPU can push well beyond the GPU’s limits. However, in GPU-bound games like Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops to 50 FPS at 1080p, indicating the GPU is the bottleneck. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p and 4K confirms this: as resolution increases, frame rates drop proportionally, which is characteristic of GPU limitation.

The 8 GB VRAM becomes a bottleneck at 1440p and 4K in demanding titles. Red Dead Redemption 2 drops from 46 FPS at 1080p to 34 FPS at 1440p, and Cyberpunk 2077 falls from 50 to 38 FPS over the same range. This suggests the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity limit texture streaming. The CPU, meanwhile, has headroom, as evidenced by its high PassMark scores and 93rd percentile ranking, meaning it will not hold back the GPU in most scenarios.

Gaming Performance

Measured frame rates at ultra settings show a clear pattern of strong 1080p performance with diminishing returns at higher resolutions. The data is measured, not estimated, providing reliable figures for this pairing.

At 1920x1080, esports titles perform exceptionally: Valorant hits 391 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 377 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 manages 171 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 183 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege hits 203 FPS. These numbers indicate the system is ideal for competitive gaming on high-refresh monitors.

Single-player titles also perform well at 1080p. Assetto Corsa runs at 101 FPS, Minecraft at 168 FPS, and Roblox at 221 FPS. More demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (50 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (46 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (25 FPS) show the GPU’s limits with heavy graphical loads.

At 2560x1440, frame rates drop significantly. Valorant still delivers 334 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive manages 260 FPS, but demanding games struggle. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 38 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34 FPS, and Control to 54 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth become evident bottlenecks at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system is not viable for modern gaming. Most titles fall below 45 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 25 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 23 FPS. Even lighter titles like Fortnite drop to 28 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 manages only 63 FPS. The GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB capacity severely limit 4K performance.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh-rate play. The measured FPS in Valorant (391), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (377), and Rainbow Six Siege (203) at 1080p makes it a strong choice for competitive players. It also suits 1440p gaming at medium settings for less demanding titles, though modern AAA games will require reduced quality.

Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216, though the GPU may not accelerate rendering as much as higher-tier cards. The PassMark GPU compute score of 9,919 suggests moderate acceleration for effects, but the CPU will handle most heavy lifting.

Software developers and students will find the 20-core processor with a 65 W TDP efficient for compiling code and running virtual machines. The integrated graphics provide a fallback for office tasks, and the low power draw reduces cooling requirements. Small business workstations can leverage the CPU’s data compression and encryption scores for database and file-server workloads.

The system is not suited for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing at high resolutions. Users demanding those capabilities should look at GPUs with more VRAM and bandwidth. However, for the target audience of 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, this pairing offers balanced performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for fast NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades. The 65 W TDP means the CPU has thermal headroom, and the suggested 300 W PSU for the GPU indicates the system is not power-hungry.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM and a wider memory bus, as the CPU has significant headroom. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking suggests it can support a much faster graphics card without bottlenecking. Users could also add more DDR5 memory, though the dual-channel configuration is already optimal.

The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures the GPU slot is future-proof, and the 20 CPU lanes allow for multiple high-speed devices. The platform supports the integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics, providing a display output even without a discrete GPU. The 3 nm process and 65 W TDP indicate efficient operation, making the platform suitable for compact builds.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 have?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The CPU is 0.3% slower than the AMD EPYC 4464P, which scores 64,823, and 0.3% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, which scores 64,438.

Q: What is the system’s combined performance percentile?

A: The pair has a combined percentile of 76, with an average FPS of 111.2 across all tested games.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 300 W, and the GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported; the platform uses standard DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the release date of the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 was released on 2025-08-04.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 and a single-core score of 5,960. Its PassMark single-thread score is 4,689, and multi-thread is 49,682. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 64,640, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 3,322 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 17,631 in PassMark G3D. Its average benchmark score is 16,014, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is 34 percentile points stronger than the GPU. This creates a system where the processor has substantial headroom for future GPU upgrades. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, outperforms it by 0.7%, while the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is 1% slower. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P, is 0.3% faster, indicating near-parity at the top of the CPU charts.

In gaming, the pair ranks 2,196 out of 3,732 pairs by average FPS, with a measured average of 111.2 FPS across all games. This places it in the upper-middle tier of system pairings, with exceptional performance in esports titles and adequate performance in single-player games at 1080p. The data confirms this is a purpose-built combination for high-refresh 1080p gaming with strong productivity potential.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds