SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and a 3 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip features a cache hierarchy of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, and it supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Its benchmark scores place it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64640. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 42216 points in multi-core and 5960 points in single-core tests, while in Cinebench R20 it achieves 6268 multi-core and 884 single-core points. The data shows a significant multi-threaded advantage, with the R23 multi-core score being roughly 7 times higher than the single-core result, indicating strong scaling across the 20 physical cores.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 7 265's performance profile is defined by its 20 physical cores and 20 threads, a configuration that prioritizes parallel throughput for heavily threaded workloads. The 3 nm process node and Arrow Lake architecture contribute to a high level of efficiency, allowing the chip to reach a 93rd percentile standing among all CPUs. In the Passmark suite, the processor demonstrates its computational strengths with a multi-thread score of 49682 and a single-thread score of 4689, showing a balanced capability for both multi-core and single-core tasks. The floating-point math score of 172776 and integer math score of 134773 indicate robust general-purpose processing power, while the data compression score of 522983 highlights exceptional performance in tasks that rely on algorithmic throughput, such as file archiving and data management.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database provide context for the chip's positioning. The AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64823, a delta of -0.3 percent from the Core Ultra 7 265's average, making the two effectively equivalent in raw performance. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64438, which is 0.3 percent lower, confirming that the non-F variant with integrated graphics offers essentially identical compute capabilities. The AMD EPYC 7343 and AMD EPYC 9124 score 64202 and 65104, respectively, with deltas of 0.7 and -0.7 percent, all within a negligible performance band. This indicates that the Core Ultra 7 265 sits in a highly competitive performance tier where architectural differences and core counts lead to marginal score variations. For real-world workloads, the 42216-point Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggests that the CPU can handle demanding rendering tasks and complex simulations, while the 5960-point single-core score ensures responsive performance in everyday applications and lightly threaded games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Intel Socket 1851, a platform that supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU offers Gen 5 PCIe connectivity with 20 lanes from the processor itself, which provides ample bandwidth for high-end storage devices and graphics cards. The platform does not support ECC memory, which may be a consideration for users seeking error-correcting capabilities in professional workstations. The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 20-core processor, suggesting that a capable air cooler is sufficient for thermal management and that the system will not demand excessive cooling solutions.

The integrated graphics are provided by an Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU unit, which means that the system can operate without a discrete GPU for basic display and office tasks, though the performance is not intended for gaming. The CPU is paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600, which has a suggested PSU of 450 W and a TDP of 165 W. Combined with the CPU's 65 W TDP, the total system power draw is modest, indicating that a 450 W power supply provides sufficient headroom for the core components. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width, making it compatible with a wide range of cases. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the platform is well-balanced; users could consider a more powerful GPU to match the CPU's high percentile performance, as the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking outpaces the GPU's 57th percentile, which is a theme explored further in the balance section.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 57th percentile ranking indicate that the processor is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the graphics card. This suggests that in graphics-intensive workloads, particularly at higher resolutions, the GPU is the limiting factor. The measured FPS data across games supports this analysis. At 1920x1080, titles like Counter-Strike 2 achieve 156 FPS, while more demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 46 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same games see reduced frame rates of 103 FPS and 34 FPS respectively, and at 3840x2160, they fall to 58 FPS and 23 FPS. The consistent decline in FPS as resolution increases points to the GPU being the primary bottleneck, as the CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores should be capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, but the GPU's raw rendering power (21.75 TFLOPS FP32) limits overall output.

The combined percentile for the build is 75, with an average FPS across games of 101.7 at ultra settings, placing the pair at rank 2659 out of 3732 pairs. This data indicates that while the CPU could support a higher-tier GPU for better high-resolution performance, the current configuration is balanced for 1080p gaming, where the CPU's strength can be utilized. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-refresh competitive gaming at 1080p, the Core Ultra 7 265's single-thread performance shines, delivering 357 FPS in Valorant and 344 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p, which are well above the thresholds for high-refresh monitors. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming or demanding titles with ray tracing, the RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors, as evidenced by the 23 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at gamers who prioritize high-refresh-rate competitive play at 1080p, as the measured FPS in esports titles is exceptional. In Valorant, the system achieves 357 FPS at 1080p, and in CS:GO, it reaches 344 FPS, which are figures that far exceed the requirements of 144Hz and even 240Hz monitors. The CPU's 93rd percentile performance ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in these scenarios, making the pair ideal for gamers who value responsiveness and frame rate consistency. For content creators, the CPU's 42216-point Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates strong rendering capabilities for video editing and 3D modeling, but the GPU's 57th percentile may limit GPU-accelerated effects and rendering in some applications. The system is also suitable for software developers, as the high multi-thread score and data encryption score of 40456 facilitate compilation times and cryptographic workloads, while the 20 cores handle parallel build processes effectively.

Students and small business workstations can benefit from the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, which allows for a functional system without a discrete GPU for office tasks, and the 65 W TDP ensures low power consumption for extended use. The CPU's single-thread score of 5960 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy responsiveness in general productivity applications, while the 30 MB of L3 cache helps with data-intensive workloads. The system's moderate power requirements, with a suggested 450 W PSU, make it an economical choice for office environments where power efficiency is a concern. However, for users seeking to play the latest AAA titles at 1440p or 4K with high settings, the data suggests that the GPU will be the limiting factor, and the measured FPS in such titles at 1440p and 4K resolutions may not meet the expectations of enthusiasts.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The data shows exceptional performance in competitive titles at 1080p, with 357 FPS in Valorant and 344 FPS in CS:GO, making it ideal for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. At 1440p, these games still maintain high frame rates, with 305 FPS in Valorant and 237 FPS in CS:GO, ensuring a smooth experience for serious gamers.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming, as the multi-thread score of 49682 in Passmark suggests strong parallel processing. The GPU's hardware encoding capabilities, while not specified in the data, are part of the RDNA 3.0 architecture, and the system should handle streaming at 1080p without significant performance degradation.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 indicates strong performance in video rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p timelines, and the system's combined performance allows for smooth playback and editing of high-resolution footage, though 4K editing may see slower real-time effects due to the GPU's mid-range standing.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in this scenario, with the 42216-point multi-core score in Cinebench R23 and a floating-point math score of 172776 in Passmark, making it suitable for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, but its 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest compared to higher-end cards, so render times will be longer than a top-tier GPU system.

Software development: The 20 cores and high multi-thread performance make compilation and testing efficient, with the data compression score of 522983 aiding in handling large codebases and repositories. The system's balanced memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s supports rapid data access for development environments.

Student and office work: The integrated graphics allow for a fully functional system without a discrete GPU, and the CPU's single-thread score of 5960 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast application launches and multitasking. The 65 W TDP contributes to low operating costs, making it an energy-efficient choice for daily productivity tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz, with a game clock of 2250 MHz, and memory running at 2250 MHz with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. The chip contains 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 32 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU's compute capabilities are rated at 21.75 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), with a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 57th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15171. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2310 points, while in Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, it achieves 88051 and 34401 points, respectively. The Passmark G3D score is 16634, and the GPU compute score is 8790. These scores indicate that the RX 7600 is a mid-range performer, with its nearest rivals being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (score 15199, delta -0.2 percent), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X (score 15082, delta 0.6 percent), and the AMD Radeon 680M (score 15270, delta -0.7 percent). The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for 4K gaming, as the measured FPS at 3840x2160 in most titles falls below 60 FPS, with demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 dropping to 23 FPS. For rendering tasks, the 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for RT effects, but the performance is modest, as seen in the 46 FPS at 1080p in Cyberpunk 2077, which typically leverages RT features.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this build is dominated by the CPU's high performance relative to the GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 64640, placing it in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU's average score is 15171, placing it in the 57th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 75, with a rank of 2659 out of 3732 pairs, and an average FPS across all measured games of 101.7 at ultra settings. In CPU-centric benchmarks, the Core Ultra 7 265 scores 42216 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 6268 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 4255 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, showing a strong scaling pattern across versions. The single-core scores are 5960 in R23, 884 in R20, and 600 in R15, indicating a consistent single-thread performance that is competitive with the top CPUs.

The GPU's benchmark scores are more varied, with a strong showing in Geekbench OpenCL (88051) but lower in 3DMark Steel Nomad (2310), reflecting its mid-range classification. The Passmark DirectX scores show 226 in DX9, 172 in DX11, 84 in DX10, and 58 in DX12, which suggests that the GPU is more optimized for older APIs or that the benchmark suite reflects its mid-range capabilities. The measured FPS in games provides the most practical assessment. At 1080p, the system excels in esports titles, with 344 FPS in CS:GO and 357 FPS in Valorant, but struggles in AAA titles, with 46 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 42 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. The picture is consistent across resolutions, with the GPU being the bottleneck at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the sharp drop in FPS from 1080p to 4K in most games, such as the 67 to 22 FPS drop in Allods Online and the 92 to 39 FPS drop in Assetto Corsa.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, a 20-core desktop processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7600, a mid-range desktop GPU. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture, and the GPU is part of the Radeon RX 7000 series, based on RDNA 3.0. The build class is "desktop," and the combined percentile is 75, indicating that this system performs better than 75 percent of all benchmarked CPU-GPU pairs. The pair's rank by FPS is 2659 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 101.7 across all games at ultra settings. The CPU is a top-tier performer in its own right, sitting in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range component in the 57th percentile. This asymmetry defines the system's overall tier as a high-end CPU paired with a mainstream GPU, making it a strong choice for CPU-bound tasks and 1080p gaming, but not for high-resolution, GPU-intensive workloads. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $394, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 269 USD, though the data does not include a combined system price.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU build?

A: The combined percentile for the build is 75, meaning it outperforms 75 percent of all benchmarked CPU-GPU pairs. The average FPS across all measured games is 101.7 at ultra settings.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P?

A: The AMD EPYC 4464P has an average benchmark score of 64823, which is 0.3 percent lower than the Core Ultra 7 265's score of 64640. This makes the two processors nearly identical in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect gaming?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 3840x2160, the bandwidth becomes a limiting factor, as seen in the 23 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: The data indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, as the CPU's 93rd percentile performance outpaces the GPU's 57th percentile. At 1080p, the CPU can drive high frame rates, but at higher resolutions, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 limit performance.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The measured FPS at 3840x2160 across games is generally low, with most titles falling below 60 FPS. For example, Valorant achieves 243 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 23 FPS, making 4K gaming only viable for less demanding or esports titles.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The GPU has a suggested PSU of 450 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 65 W, so a 450 W power supply is sufficient for the core components. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics capability?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 execution units, which can drive a display for office tasks, but it is not intended for gaming. The discrete RX 7600 is necessary for any gaming or demanding graphics workloads.