SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and AMD Radeon RX 7400 represent a stark contrast in performance classes within a single desktop build. The processor is a high-end, 20-thread workhorse that sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the graphics card is an entry-level solution resting in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. This pairing creates a system with exceptional compute capability for productivity tasks, but with graphics performance that will limit gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The following analysis is based strictly on the available benchmark data, which contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all gaming frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is built for the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the mounting interface for Arrow Lake-S desktop processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This platform does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for users who require error-correcting memory for critical data integrity in workstation environments. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes available from the CPU, offering high-bandwidth access for modern NVMe storage and discrete graphics cards.

The power delivery requirements for this platform are modest relative to the CPU’s performance class. The Core Ultra 7 265 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 watts, which is notably efficient for a 20-core processor built on a 3 nm process node from TSMC. This low TDP means that a wide range of air coolers and compact liquid coolers can handle the thermal load without requiring a high-end cooling solution. The Radeon RX 7400 graphics card is similarly power-efficient, with a TDP of just 43 watts and a suggested power supply rating of 200 watts. The combination of a 65-watt CPU and a 43-watt GPU means that a modest power supply unit will provide ample headroom for the entire system, even when accounting for other components like storage, memory, and motherboard circuitry.

For users looking to upgrade this system over time, the platform offers clear pathways. The Socket 1851 interface is designed for the Core Ultra Series 2 family, meaning that users can potentially swap to a higher-tier processor within the same generation without changing the motherboard, provided the BIOS supports it. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are forward-looking, allowing for future expansion cards that can leverage the increased bandwidth. The most impactful upgrade path, however, would be replacing the Radeon RX 7400 with a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the current GPU means that the slot itself is not a bottleneck, and the 200-watt suggested PSU leaves substantial room for a more demanding graphics card that draws more power, though the exact wattage of such a card is not specified in the data. The DDR5 memory support also allows for capacity and speed upgrades, though the dual-channel configuration is already a solid baseline for most workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a clear performance disparity between the two components. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 achieves an average benchmark score of 64,640, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This places it in the upper echelon of desktop processors, competitive with enterprise-grade server chips. The nearest rivals for the CPU include the AMD EPYC 4464P with an average score of 64,823 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with a score of 64,438 (0.3% lower), the AMD EPYC 7343 at 64,202 (0.7% lower), and the AMD EPYC 9124 at 65,104 (0.7% higher). These results indicate that the Core Ultra 7 265 is essentially on par with high-core-count EPYC server processors, which is remarkable for a desktop chip.

In stark contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 7400 achieves an average benchmark score of 2,467, placing it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. This is a low-ranking position that puts the GPU in the entry-level category. The nearest rivals for the GPU are the AMD Radeon 8040S with a score of 2,440 (1.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce 710M at 2,433 (1.4% higher), the Intel HD Graphics 610 at 2,425 (1.8% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M at 2,422 (1.9% higher). These rival GPUs are all integrated or low-end mobile parts, indicating that the RX 7400’s discrete nature does not translate into superior performance over many integrated graphics solutions. The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 55, which reflects the balancing act between the high-performing processor and the low-performing graphics card.

The specific benchmark scores for the CPU paint a picture of a multi-threaded powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 42,216 in multi-core and 5,960 in single-core. The Cinebench R20 results show 6,268 multi-core and 884 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 4,255 multi-core and 600 single-core. PassMark results are equally strong, with a multi-thread score of 49,682, a single-thread score of 4,689, and notable scores in data compression (522,983), floating-point math (172,776), and integer math (134,773). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 is modest, and its PassMark G3D score of 11,897 reflects its entry-level positioning.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-S desktop variant. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process node by TSMC, packing 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. This high transistor density is a key factor in the CPU’s efficiency, allowing it to achieve a 65-watt TDP while delivering high performance. The base clock is 2.40 GHz, which can boost up to 5.30 GHz under load, providing strong single-thread performance when needed.

The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. This large cache pool helps reduce memory latency and improves performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which is adequate for feeding the 20 cores in multi-threaded tasks. The integrated graphics is an Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU, which provides basic display output capability but is not designed for gaming or compute workloads.

The benchmark results show that this CPU excels in multi-threaded scenarios. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 is exceptionally high, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682 confirms strong parallel processing capability. The data compression score of 522,983 is particularly noteworthy, suggesting excellent performance in file compression and archival tasks. The floating-point math score of 172,776 indicates strong scientific computing capability, while the integer math score of 134,773 supports general-purpose computing tasks. The extended instructions score of 41,478 and encryption score of 40,456 show that the CPU handles modern instruction sets efficiently. The single-thread score of 4,689 in PassMark and 5,960 in Cinebench R23 indicate that the CPU also performs well in lightly-threaded workloads, making it a versatile choice for mixed usage.

The 93rd percentile ranking places this CPU above the vast majority of processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P, scores within 0.3% of the Core Ultra 7 265, which is statistically negligible. This means that for most workloads, the two processors are interchangeable in performance. The fact that a desktop chip is competing with enterprise EPYC processors highlights the strength of the Arrow Lake architecture in multi-threaded tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics capability. The primary audience is content creators and professionals who work with multi-threaded applications that rely heavily on the processor. Video editors, 3D renderers, software developers, and data analysts will benefit from the 20-core CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking ensures that it can handle demanding compute workloads without becoming the bottleneck.

Gamers are not the ideal target for this build, as the Radeon RX 7400 sits in the 17th percentile of GPUs. While the CPU is more than capable of feeding a high-end graphics card, the RX 7400 will limit gaming performance significantly. However, for gamers who play at low resolutions with low graphical settings, or who primarily play less demanding titles, this system can provide a playable experience, though the exact frame rates are not measured and would need to be estimated from the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103.

Students and small business users who need a responsive desktop for everyday tasks will find this build more than adequate, though it is likely overkill for basic office work. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,689 in PassMark ensures snappy application response, and the 20 cores provide headroom for future multitasking demands. For small business workstations that run virtual machines, compile code, or process large datasets, the Core Ultra 7 265 offers server-grade performance in a desktop form factor. The 65-watt TDP also makes this an efficient choice for environments where power consumption is a concern.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not well-suited to this build. The Radeon RX 7400’s 17th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103 indicate that it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at high refresh rates. Even at lower resolutions, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor, and users should expect to lower graphical settings to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU is not the issue here, as its strong single-thread performance would support high frame rates if the GPU could deliver them.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and strong multi-threaded performance make this build viable for streaming, provided the game is not too GPU-intensive. The PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682 means that the CPU can handle both the game and the encoding workload without significant performance degradation. However, the GPU’s low performance will limit the quality and complexity of games that can be streamed effectively.

Video editing: This is a strong use case for the Core Ultra 7 265. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 and the data compression score of 522,983 indicate that video encoding and rendering tasks will complete quickly. The GPU’s low performance, however, means that GPU-accelerated effects and color grading will be slow, and users should expect to rely primarily on the CPU for processing. For 1080p and even 1440p video editing, this build is more than capable.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. The high multi-threaded scores in Cinebench R23 (42,216) and PassMark (49,682) make this build well-suited for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or 3ds Max. The GPU’s 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so GPU-based renderers like Redshift or Octane will not perform well. For pure CPU rendering, this build will deliver excellent results.

Software development: The 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallelism for compiling large codebases. The PassMark integer math score of 134,773 and extended instructions score of 41,478 indicate strong performance in the types of compute tasks common in software development. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the DDR5 memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s supports memory-intensive builds.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic office tasks, but it will handle them with ease. The single-thread score of 4,689 in PassMark ensures that document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work are all responsive. The 65-watt TDP means that the system will be quiet and power-efficient, making it suitable for a dorm room or office environment. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. As a result, all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The Radeon RX 7400’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 is low, and its PassMark G3D score of 11,897 places it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. This suggests that the GPU will deliver playable frame rates only at lower resolutions and graphical settings for modern titles.

For 1080p gaming at high settings, the RX 7400 is expected to struggle in demanding AAA games, likely requiring medium to low settings to maintain 30-60 frames per second. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p textures, but the 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance is limited. The nearest rival GPUs include the NVIDIA GeForce 710M and Intel HD Graphics 610, which are integrated or low-end mobile parts, indicating that the RX 7400’s performance is comparable to older integrated graphics solutions.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the GPU’s performance may be sufficient for 1080p at high refresh rates, but this is an estimate. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance of 5,960 in Cinebench R23 will not be the limiting factor in these games. For 1440p gaming, the GPU is likely to be too weak for most modern titles, and users should expect to play at low settings to achieve playable frame rates. The overall gaming experience will be defined by the GPU’s entry-level performance, which is the clear bottleneck in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 7 265 support ECC memory?

A: No, the Core Ultra 7 265 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the total L3 cache size on the Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has a shared 30 MB L3 cache.

Q: What is the suggested power supply rating for the AMD Radeon RX 7400?

A: The suggested PSU for the Radeon RX 7400 is 200 W.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is built on a 3 nm process node from TSMC.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Core Ultra 7 265’s DDR5 memory support?

A: The memory bandwidth is 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the Radeon RX 7400?

A: The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,103.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, a high-end 20-core processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, an entry-level graphics card. The build’s combined percentile is 55, which reflects the significant imbalance between the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 17th percentile ranking. The CPU is a top-tier performer in multi-threaded workloads, competing with enterprise AMD EPYC processors, while the GPU is comparable to low-end integrated graphics in performance.

The overall tier of this build is that of a workstation-oriented system where CPU compute is the primary focus. The processor’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 and PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682 make it an excellent choice for rendering, compilation, and data processing. The RX 7400, with its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103 and PassMark G3D score of 11,897, is sufficient for basic display output and light 3D acceleration, but it is not a gaming-capable card by modern standards. This build is best understood as a powerful CPU platform with a placeholder GPU, where the user can later upgrade the graphics card to match the CPU’s performance class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance in this build is extreme. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 17th percentile, creating a situation where the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in almost all graphics-related workloads. In gaming, the RX 7400’s low 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103 and PassMark G3D score of 11,897 mean that the CPU will spend most of its time waiting for the GPU to render frames. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance of 5,960 in Cinebench R23 is wasted in gaming scenarios because the GPU cannot deliver the frame rates to utilize it.

In CPU-bound workloads, the situation is reversed. The GPU is not involved in tasks like data compression (522,983 in PassMark), floating-point math (172,776), or multi-threaded rendering (42,216 in Cinebench R23). Here, the CPU is the sole performer, and the GPU’s low performance is irrelevant. The bottleneck in these scenarios is the CPU’s memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which may limit scaling in extremely memory-intensive tasks, but for most workloads, the 20 cores are the primary resource.

The combined percentile of 55 indicates that the system as a whole is average, but this is misleading because the two components are at opposite ends of the performance spectrum. The GPU limits the system’s gaming and graphics capabilities, while the CPU provides exceptional compute power. Users who primarily run CPU-intensive applications will find the system well-balanced, but those who intend to game will face a severe GPU bottleneck. The upgrade path is clear: replacing the RX 7400 with a higher-performing GPU would transform this system into a well-rounded machine, but the current configuration is heavily skewed toward CPU performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds