SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

21,112 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile pairing represents a specific configuration for a thin-and-light laptop. This combination brings together Intel's latest low-power Lunar Lake architecture with NVIDIA's entry-level Ada Lovelace mobile GPU. The data indicates a system that is well-balanced for its class, but with distinct strengths in single-threaded CPU work and content creation rather than raw multi-core compute. The measured FPS data is absent from the database, so all gaming performance analysis here is derived from component-level benchmark scores and should be treated as an estimate.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V is an 8-core, 8-thread processor built on the Lunar Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3nm process by TSMC. It features a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of just 17 watts. This low power envelope is the defining characteristic of the chip, enabling fanless or near-silent operation in ultraportable designs. The 8 cores are all performance-oriented, with no efficiency cores present, which simplifies scheduling but means the chip relies entirely on its boost clock for heavy lifting. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache.

Benchmark results show the CPU's single-thread capability is its standout feature. The Geekbench single-core score of 1990 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1877.5 are strong figures for a 17W part. In contrast, the multi-core scores are more modest: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 10399 and Geekbench multi-core of 8643. These numbers indicate that the chip can handle bursty, latency-sensitive tasks like web browsing, office applications, and code compilation with ease, but sustained multi-threaded workloads will be limited by the thermal and power constraints. The Passmark single-thread score of 4029 reinforces this, placing it well ahead of typical mobile processors in responsiveness. The Passmark multithread score of 19530 shows a significant drop-off from the single-thread performance, confirming the multi-core ceiling.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ultra 7 256V sits in a tight cluster. Its average benchmark score of 21112 is effectively identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (21133, -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G (21088, +0.1%), and the Intel Core i3-1220P (21066, +0.2%). The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U is marginally ahead at 21174 (-0.3%). What this means is that for everyday use, the 256V will feel as fast as any of these alternatives. The real differentiation is efficiency: the 256V achieves this performance at a much lower TDP than the Ryzen 5 5600G, which is a desktop-class chip, or the Ryzen 5 7530U, which is a 15W part. The data suggests the 256V is not a performance leader in its class, but it delivers competitive results in a smaller power budget. The 75th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates that it outperforms three-quarters of all processors in the database, which is respectable for a low-power mobile part.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of the Core Ultra 7 256V and RTX 4050 Mobile. Therefore, all gaming performance figures in this section are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay testing. The data should be interpreted as an approximation of expected performance, with real-world results varying based on game optimization, driver maturity, and laptop thermal design.

Based on the component scores, this pairing is capable of 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most modern titles. The RTX 4050 Mobile's Passmark G3D score of 14423 places it in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, indicating solid mainstream performance. The GPU's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures, though it may struggle with high-resolution texture packs or ray tracing at higher settings. The 2560 shading units and 80 tensor cores provide good raw throughput for traditional rasterization, while the 20 RT cores enable entry-level ray tracing. The CPU's strong single-core performance will help maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, as the 8-core, 8-thread configuration at 4.80 GHz boost is more than adequate for modern game engines.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, or Fortnite, the combination of strong single-thread CPU performance and a capable GPU should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 144 FPS on competitive settings. For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, the estimate is more conservative. The RTX 4050 Mobile will likely manage 60 FPS at 1080p with DLSS enabled and medium settings, but may drop below that with ray tracing enabled. The 6 GB VRAM could become a limiting factor in the most demanding titles, particularly those with large open worlds. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 75235 and OpenCL score of 74748 indicate good API utilization, which should translate to consistent performance across different game engines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 21112, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result for a 17W mobile processor, indicating that it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database while consuming a fraction of the power of desktop parts. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10399 is a key figure: it shows the chip can sustain moderate multi-threaded loads, but it is not a workstation-class processor. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1877.5 is excellent, placing it near the top of mobile processors. The Geekbench scores (8643 multi-core, 1990 single-core) corroborate this pattern, with single-core performance being the clear highlight.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19049, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. The Passmark G3D score of 14423 is the primary gaming metric, while the Passmark GPU compute score of 5947 indicates moderate compute capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and Vulkan score of 75235 are strong for a mobile GPU, suggesting good driver optimization and API support. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (avg score 19036, +0.1%), the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, +0.1%), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954, +0.5%). The RTX 4050 Mobile is effectively tied with these, meaning its performance level is well understood: it is a capable 1080p gaming GPU, but not a high-end part.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 69, indicating that the system as a whole performs better than 69% of all configurations in the database. This is a solid mid-range placement. The CPU's 75th percentile is notably higher than the GPU's 63rd percentile, which suggests the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. This is an important consideration for balance: the system will be GPU-limited in most gaming scenarios, while CPU-heavy tasks like productivity and content creation will benefit from the processor's relative strength.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable platform. This means the CPU is permanently attached to the motherboard, and any upgrade requires a completely new laptop. The memory support is listed as "unknown, depends on motherboard," but the memory bus is dual-channel, which is standard for this class. The lack of ECC memory support is expected for a consumer mobile processor.

The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 4 lanes available from the CPU. This is sufficient for a single high-speed NVMe SSD, but it is a limitation for expandability. The RTX 4050 Mobile connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a reduced lane count compared to desktop GPUs but is standard for mobile implementations. The GPU's TDP is 50 W, and it has no power connectors, drawing power directly from the motherboard. The suggested PSU is not listed, but given the CPU's 17W TDP and the GPU's 50W TDP, the total system power draw is modest. This means a slim power adapter is sufficient, and the laptop will not require a large, high-capacity power supply.

The upgrade path for this platform is essentially non-existent. The CPU is soldered, the GPU is soldered, and memory is likely soldered as well. The only user-upgradeable components are typically the storage (M.2 SSD) and possibly the Wi-Fi module. A sensible next upgrade for a user of this system would be a new laptop with a higher-tier GPU, such as an RTX 4060 or RTX 4070 Mobile, and a CPU with more cores for multi-threaded workloads. Alternatively, for users who need more GPU performance, an external GPU enclosure is theoretically possible via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, but this is a niche solution and not a practical upgrade path for most users.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance compared to its multi-core performance?

A: The CPU scores 1990 in Geekbench single-core and 8643 in Geekbench multi-core. The single-core score is in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, while the multi-core score is more modest. This indicates the chip excels at single-threaded tasks but is limited in sustained multi-threaded workloads.

Q: How does the RTX 4050 Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 19049, which is within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600, NVIDIA Quadro K6000, and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation. It is effectively performance-equivalent to these parts.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU has 6 GB of VRAM on a 96-bit bus and scores in the 63rd percentile. The data suggests it is a 1080p gaming part, and 4K gaming would require significant settings reductions and upscaling to be playable.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, meaning the system performs better than 69% of all configurations in the database. The CPU's 75th percentile is higher than the GPU's 63rd percentile, indicating the GPU is the more limiting component.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, and the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. Overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 192.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, provided by 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus. This is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and memory-intensive workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 17 watts, which is very low and enables thin-and-light laptop designs. The GPU has a TDP of 50 watts, bringing the total chip power draw to 67 watts.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is for users who prioritize portability and energy efficiency over raw performance. The low 17W CPU TDP and 50W GPU TDP mean the system can be built into a slim chassis with a small power adapter, making it ideal for mobile professionals who travel frequently. The strong single-core CPU performance (Geekbench 1990, Cinebench R23 1877.5) makes it excellent for developers who compile code, compile single-threaded scripts, or run interactive development environments. The 75th CPU percentile indicates it handles office productivity suites, web browsing, and spreadsheet work with ease.

Content creators who work primarily with photo editing or light video editing will find the system adequate. The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 43358 and floating point math score of 58576 indicate solid performance for image processing tasks. The GPU's compute score of 5947 and OpenCL score of 74748 suggest it can accelerate some creative workloads, though it is not a professional-grade rendering solution. Students will appreciate the portability and battery life potential from the low TDP components, and the system can handle note-taking, research, and occasional gaming. Small business workstations that run standard office software, accounting packages, and web-based tools will find this more than sufficient, with the single-thread performance ensuring snappy responsiveness.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows that the GPU is the bottleneck for gaming workloads. The CPU's 75th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 63rd percentile means the CPU has more relative headroom. In gaming, the RTX 4050 Mobile will be the limiting factor at 1080p, particularly in graphically demanding titles. The CPU's strong single-core performance (4029 Passmark single-thread) ensures it is unlikely to cause frame rate drops in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture quality and resolution.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the limiting factor in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10399 is respectable but not exceptional, meaning video rendering or 3D modeling will be slower than on systems with more cores or higher TDP CPUs. However, the GPU can assist with some compute tasks, as evidenced by its Passmark GPU compute score of 5947. The balance is such that the system is well-matched for mixed workloads: the CPU handles single-threaded tasks exceptionally well, while the GPU handles graphics and parallel compute. Neither component is severely overpowered relative to the other, but in gaming, the GPU is the clear limiter, while in multi-threaded CPU workloads, the 17W power envelope caps performance.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile GPU. The CPU is an 8-core, 8-thread Lunar Lake part on a 3nm process with a 17W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 2560 shading units and 6 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 69 places this system in the upper-mid range of all configurations, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. The pairing is intended for thin-and-light laptops that balance portability with competent 1080p gaming and strong single-threaded productivity performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system can drive high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p, thanks to the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 1877.5) and the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14423. Expect 144+ FPS in competitive shooters on medium settings, but frame rates will vary by title.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) and the CPU's 8 threads can handle a single-stream setup at 1080p. The GPU's compute score of 5947 suggests it can handle encoding overhead, but the 6 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous gaming and streaming at high settings.

Video editing: The CPU's 10399 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides adequate performance for 1080p editing timelines. The GPU's OpenCL score of 74748 can accelerate effects and exports in supported software, but 4K editing may be sluggish.

3D rendering: This is not a primary use case. The CPU's multi-core score is modest, and the GPU's compute score of 5947 is low for rendering workloads. Small, simple scenes will render, but complex projects will be slow.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU's single-core performance (Geekbench 1990) and Passmark integer math score of 43358 make compilation of typical codebases quick. The 8 threads handle parallel builds, and the low TDP means sustained performance without thermal throttling.

Student and office work: Ideal. The 17W CPU TDP enables all-day battery life, and the single-thread performance handles document editing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing without delay. The GPU provides acceleration for any graphical tasks like presentations or basic design work.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds