SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX

62,738 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX processor and the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh graphics card. The benchmark data indicates a system with strong multi-threaded CPU capability and mid-range GPU performance, placing it at the 72nd combined percentile overall. While the CPU is a current-generation powerhouse, the GPU is from an earlier architecture and represents the primary constraint in demanding graphics workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts up to 5.20 GHz. The processor includes 30 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core. This is a mobile-class chip with a 55 W TDP, designed for high-performance laptops.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 32612 points in multi-core and 2163 points in single-core tests. These scores are substantial, showing that the processor excels in both heavily threaded workloads and single-threaded tasks. The multi-core score suggests strong capabilities in rendering, video encoding, and software compilation.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the CPU's average benchmark score of 62738 is competitive. It sits just 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (62839) and 0.5% behind the Intel Core i7-13790F (63080). It is slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 by 0.4% (62498) and ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX by 0.7% (63173). The performance deltas are minimal, indicating these processors are closely matched in overall capability. The Core Ultra 7 255HX holds its own against these alternatives, with differences that would be imperceptible in real-world use.

The PassMark results provide additional insight into specific workloads. The processor achieves 48234 in multithreaded tests and 4562 in single-thread tests. Data compression scores are 515143, and encryption reaches 39499. Extended instructions score 41247, and floating-point math hits 160624. Integer math is at 127126, with random string sorting at 62591. These figures collectively show a processor that handles data-intensive tasks with ease, making it suitable for scientific computing, financial modeling, and server-like workloads in a mobile form factor.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX perform in multi-core workloads?

A: The CPU scores 32612 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 17187 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. This places it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it is among the top processors for multi-threaded tasks like rendering and video encoding.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and how does it affect performance?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh uses the Turing architecture on a 12 nm process. It delivers 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and has 3072 shading units. This places it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, showing it is an average performer by modern standards.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for gaming?

A: The CPU is far stronger than the GPU. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will typically be the bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does this platform offer?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older interface standard.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The average benchmark score is 62738. This is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and 0.5% behind the Intel Core i7-13790F. It is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX. The performance differences are minimal.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Is the GPU considered current-generation technology?

A: No, the GPU is based on the Turing architecture and its production status is end-of-life. Its predecessor was the Quadro Pascal-M, and its successor is the Ampere-MW. It was released in 2020.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system performance places this build at the 72nd percentile overall. This reflects a pairing where the CPU is significantly more capable than the GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 62738, placing it in the 93rd percentile versus all CPUs. The GPU has an average benchmark score of 0, which is not meaningful for comparison, but its percentile ranking is 50th among all GPUs.

The CPU delivers strong results in both Cinebench and PassMark suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 4916 multi-core and 327 single-core. The R20 scores are 17187 multi-core and 2426 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that can handle both high-thread-count applications and responsive single-threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 48234 and single-thread score of 4562 reinforce this view.

The GPU, in contrast, shows its age through its specifications. With 3072 shading units and 48 RT cores, it provides 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is generous in capacity but the architecture is from an older generation. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it sits exactly in the middle of all GPUs, making it a moderate performer. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-tier GPU creates an imbalance where the CPU will wait on the GPU in many graphics-bound scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear performance imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile means the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, this means the GPU will be the primary constraint on frame rates, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load increases.

The CPU's exceptional multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 32612, means it can easily feed the GPU with data. Even in CPU-heavy scenarios like physics calculations or game logic, the 20-core processor will not struggle. The PassMark physics score of 2926 further indicates strong performance in this area. The GPU, however, with its 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, will cap the overall system performance in rendering tasks.

For non-graphics workloads, the CPU dominates. Data compression at 515143 and encryption at 39499 in PassMark show the processor handles these tasks rapidly. The floating-point math score of 160624 suggests strong performance in scientific and engineering applications. In these scenarios, the GPU is not the bottleneck, and the system performs at a level consistent with its 93rd-percentile CPU.

The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface for the GPU is another potential limitation, though it is unlikely to be a major bottleneck for the GPU's performance level. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support is not fully utilized by this GPU, but this does not affect the current workload balance significantly. The primary bottleneck remains the GPU's older architecture and lower relative performance.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who need exceptional CPU performance for productivity tasks but only moderate GPU capability. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D modeling, or software compilation will benefit from the 20-core processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32612 shows the CPU can handle long render times and complex simulations efficiently.

Developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance valuable. The PassMark multithread score of 48234 indicates rapid compilation times. Data encryption at 39499 and extended instructions at 41247 also suggest strong performance for security-sensitive applications and workloads using SIMD instructions.

Students and professionals in engineering or scientific fields will appreciate the floating-point math score of 160624. This supports computational fluid dynamics, finite element analysis, and other math-heavy applications. The CPU's single-thread performance of 4562 in PassMark also ensures responsive day-to-day use.

Small business workstations running virtualization, database management, or financial modeling will perform well. The high multithread scores and data compression results indicate the CPU can handle concurrent workloads without slowdown. The GPU, while not top-tier, provides 16 GB of VRAM, which is sufficient for moderate GPU-accelerated tasks like rendering previews or light machine learning inference.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it will deliver moderate frame rates in modern games. With 3072 shading units and 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle with demanding games, likely requiring reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates.

The CPU's high performance means it will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming. Even at lower resolutions where CPU load is higher, the 20-core processor with a 5.20 GHz boost clock will maintain high frame rates. The single-core performance of 2163 in Cinebench R23 is strong, ensuring games that rely on single-threaded performance will run smoothly.

The 16 GB of VRAM is a positive factor for gaming. This allows high-resolution textures to be loaded without exceeding memory capacity. However, the GPU's compute performance will still limit overall frame rates. Ray tracing performance, with 48 RT cores, will be modest compared to newer architectures, and enabling this feature will significantly impact frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process by TSMC. It contains 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks.

The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, with an effective speed of 14 Gbps. The base clock is 1035 MHz, with a boost clock of 1530 MHz. This configuration provides a pixel rate of 97.92 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 293.8 GTexel/s.

For FP32 compute, the GPU delivers 9.400 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 18.80 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is end-of-life, with its successor being the Ampere-MW architecture.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking indicates it is an average performer in the current GPU landscape. The 16 GB of VRAM is ample for rendering large scenes or handling complex datasets. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the GPU's compute capability, though newer GPUs offer higher bandwidth. The tensor cores enable AI features like DLSS, though the older architecture may not support the latest versions. The RT cores allow ray tracing, but performance will not match newer generations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a mobile-specific package. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, offering high-speed connectivity for storage and other devices.

The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older interface. The GPU's TDP is 110 W, and it uses an IGP slot width with no power connectors, indicating it is designed for laptop integration. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the CPU's 55 W TDP combined with the GPU's 110 W TDP suggests a total system power draw that a capable laptop power adapter can handle.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the entire laptop, as the CPU and GPU are both integrated into the motherboard. The GPU's end-of-life status means it will become increasingly outdated. A newer laptop with a current-generation GPU would provide better graphics performance while maintaining similar CPU capabilities. The CPU itself, being an Active production status, is current-generation, so the platform is not obsolete on that front.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX processor with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh GPU. The system ranks at the 72nd combined percentile, reflecting the strong CPU and moderate GPU. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a 93rd percentile ranking, making it one of the more powerful mobile CPUs available. The GPU is a Turing-architecture part at the 50th percentile, representing an average graphics solution.

The pairing is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over gaming or GPU compute. The processor excels in multi-threaded workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32612 and a PassMark multithread score of 48234. The GPU provides 16 GB of VRAM and 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is adequate for moderate graphics tasks but not for high-end gaming or professional rendering.

The overall tier of this system is that of a high-performance productivity laptop with a mid-range graphics component. It is not a gaming powerhouse, nor is it a top-tier workstation GPU. The CPU carries the system's performance, while the GPU serves as a capable but not exceptional companion. For users whose workloads are CPU-bound, this is an excellent configuration. For graphics-intensive tasks, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds