SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
83%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

17,074 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This laptop pairing combines Intel’s Meteor Lake Ultra 7 164U processor with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile graphics. The data shows a system built on a massive performance disparity: the CPU ranks in the 71st percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits in the 81st percentile of all graphics cards. This results in a combined percentile of 76, indicating a machine where the graphics processor is the dominant component, and the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor in many demanding tasks. The benchmark data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual component scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is a 12-core, 14-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 7 nm process node. It features a base clock of 1100.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. This is a mobile-focused chip with a TDP of just 9 watts, designed for efficiency within the Intel BGA 2551 socket. Its cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB of L3 cache. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, though the specific speed depends on the motherboard.

Benchmark results show a processor that is competent for everyday and moderately threaded tasks but not a powerhouse for heavy multi-core workloads. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 8766 points in multi-core and 1590 points in single-core. The single-core score is relatively strong, suggesting good responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on one or two threads. The multi-core score, while respectable, places it below many desktop-class alternatives. For context, its average benchmark score of 17074 places it in the 71st percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 7573X and Intel Core i5-11400, both with nearly identical average scores.

The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths. The processor achieves a single-thread score of 2996, which is solid for general use and light gaming. However, the multi-thread score of 13296 and the physics score of 918 are more modest, indicating that sustained all-core workloads will not be this chip’s primary strength. Integer math (50387) and floating-point math (33581) scores are moderate, suggesting that number-crunching tasks will be handled adequately but without the speed of higher-core-count parts. Data compression (137133) and encryption (8838) scores are respectable for a mobile chip, making it capable for file archiving and basic security tasks. The data indicates this CPU is best suited for latency-sensitive tasks like web browsing, office productivity, and coding, rather than long-duration rendering or complex simulations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Core Ultra 7 164U and the RTX 4080 Mobile is heavily skewed. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 17074, while the GPU’s average score is 38135. This gap of over 2x suggests that in many scenarios, the processor will be the primary bottleneck. The CPU’s 71st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 81st percentile ranking confirms this imbalance.

In practical terms, this means the RTX 4080 Mobile will often be waiting for the CPU to feed it data. In gaming at lower resolutions or with less demanding graphics settings, the CPU’s 14 threads will likely be saturated before the GPU reaches its full potential. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8766 indicates that the processor can handle a certain level of concurrent tasks, but it may struggle to keep up with the GPU’s high frame generation capacity in CPU-bound titles. The PassMark single-thread score of 2996 is decent, but not exceptional, which could lead to frame rate dips in games that are heavily dependent on a single core.

Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios, such as gaming at higher resolutions or rendering complex 3D scenes, the RTX 4080 Mobile will be the limiting factor. The data suggests that the system’s overall performance is best balanced for tasks that are heavily parallel and graphics-intensive, where the GPU can do the heavy lifting. For workloads that require both high CPU and GPU throughput simultaneously, such as high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p or live streaming with software encoding, the CPU may hold back the overall experience. This pairing is a clear case where the GPU is the star, and the CPU is a supporting actor that may limit the ensemble’s maximum output.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU and GPU combination. The following analysis is an estimate based on the individual benchmark scores of the Core Ultra 7 164U and the RTX 4080 Mobile.

The RTX 4080 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 24926 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 indicate a very high level of graphics performance. The GPU’s 81st percentile ranking suggests it can handle most modern titles at high settings. However, the CPU’s performance will be the deciding factor in many games.

For gaming at 1080p resolution, the Core Ultra 7 164U’s single-thread score of 2996 and multi-thread score of 13296 will likely be the bottleneck. In fast-paced esports titles that are CPU-bound, the frame rates may be lower than what the GPU is capable of producing. The processor’s 12 cores and 14 threads are sufficient for modern games, but the lower clock speeds under load and modest cache size could limit peak frame rates. We estimate that at 1080p, the system will deliver high frame rates in most games, but may not consistently hit the highest refresh rates in the most CPU-intensive titles.

At 1440p and 4K resolutions, the load shifts to the GPU. Here, the RTX 4080 Mobile’s strength will shine. The GPU’s high texture and pixel rates, combined with its 12 GB of memory, suggest it can maintain high frame rates at these higher resolutions. The CPU bottleneck becomes less pronounced as the GPU takes longer to render each frame. We estimate that this pairing is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and smooth 4K gaming, provided the game is not heavily dependent on CPU physics or AI. The overall experience will be good, but the CPU is the clear limiting factor in achieving the absolute maximum frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize graphics performance over multi-core CPU throughput. The data indicates a clear focus on gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

  • High-Resolution Gamers: The RTX 4080 Mobile’s 81st percentile ranking and strong benchmark scores make this an excellent choice for gamers who play at 1440p or 4K. The CPU is sufficient to feed the GPU at these resolutions, where the graphics card is the primary workhorse.
  • Content Creators (GPU-Accelerated): Users who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or AI workloads that leverage CUDA or the GPU’s tensor cores will benefit greatly from this pairing. The GPU’s compute score of 11191 indicates strong parallel processing capability.
  • Developers and Students: The CPU’s solid single-thread score of 2996 is adequate for software development, compiling code, and running virtual machines. The GPU can accelerate any graphics or compute tasks, making it a versatile machine for technical studies.
  • Small Business Workstations: For tasks like graphic design, CAD, or data visualization, this system offers a powerful GPU for rendering and a competent CPU for general workflow. The 9W TDP of the CPU suggests a more power-efficient system compared to higher-TDP desktop alternatives.

This is not the ideal choice for users who primarily need heavy multi-threaded CPU performance, such as those doing long-duration video encoding or complex physics simulations. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8766 is modest, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 13296 confirms this is not a high-end workstation processor.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 7 164U achieves an average benchmark score of 17074, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Its performance is nearly identical to the AMD EPYC 7573X and Intel Core i5-11400, with a deltaPct of 0%. It is slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 by 0.2% and behind the AMD EPYC 7H12 by 0.3%. In Cinebench R23, it scores 8766 multi-core and 1590 single-core. The PassMark single-thread score is 2996, and the multi-thread score is 13296.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile achieves an average benchmark score of 38135, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is slightly behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 by 0.4% and the RTX 5080 Mobile by 0.6%. It is ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 by 1.3% and the NVIDIA Tesla P4 by 1.3%. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score is 24926, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 159575.

The combined picture shows a system with a strong GPU and a mid-range CPU. The GPU’s average score is more than double the CPU’s, and its percentile ranking is 10 points higher. This indicates that the system’s overall performance in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks will be well above average, but its CPU-bound performance will be more moderate. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this blend, suggesting a system that is better than most but not at the absolute top tier for all workloads.

Usage Scenarios

  • High-Refresh Gaming: At 1440p, the RTX 4080 Mobile’s strong G3D score of 24926 should drive high frame rates. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2996 is adequate, but it may limit performance in esports titles where frame rates are extremely high. Expect a smooth experience, but not the absolute maximum FPS.
  • Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 14 threads can handle the encoding load for a single stream. The GPU’s NVENC encoder would be a better choice, offloading the work from the CPU and preserving gaming performance. The GPU’s high compute score supports this use case.
  • Video Editing: The RTX 4080 Mobile will accelerate effects, transitions, and rendering in GPU-accelerated editors. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8766 is sufficient for timeline scrubbing and basic tasks, but the GPU will be the main driver of export times.
  • 3D Rendering: The GPU’s compute score of 11191 and high FP32 performance make it a solid choice for rendering with GPU-accelerated engines. The CPU will be a bottleneck for CPU-based rendering, given its modest multi-core score. Use the GPU for the best results.
  • Software Development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2996 is good for code editing and compilation. The multi-thread score of 13296 helps with parallel builds. The GPU is not heavily utilized in this scenario but is available for any graphics or compute tasks.
  • Student and Office Work: The CPU’s 9W TDP and solid single-thread performance make this an efficient machine for everyday tasks. The GPU is overkill for this use case but provides future-proofing. The PassMark data compression score of 137133 indicates fast file archiving.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the Intel BGA 2551 socket, which is specific to the mobile Core Ultra Series 1 processors. This is a soldered platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the amount and speed will depend on the specific motherboard. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes, while the GPU connects via a separate PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Given the CPU’s TDP of 9 watts and the GPU’s TDP of 110 watts, the system’s power supply needs are modest. The GPU has no power connectors and is an IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) form factor, suggesting a laptop design where power is delivered through the motherboard. The data does not provide a suggested PSU rating, but the overall power envelope is low for this level of graphics performance.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase the amount of system RAM to ensure the CPU and GPU are not starved for data. The 12 GB of VRAM on the GPU is substantial, so system memory capacity is more likely a limiting factor for multitasking. There is no upgrade path for the CPU or GPU within this specific laptop design, so the next major step would be a new system with a newer platform.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U a good match for the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: The data suggests a significant imbalance. The GPU’s average benchmark score (38135) is over twice the CPU’s score (17074). In many gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, the CPU will be the limiting factor.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to its rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 7 164U has an average score of 17074, placing it in the 71st percentile. It performs nearly identically to the AMD EPYC 7573X and Intel Core i5-11400, with a deltaPct of 0%.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 Mobile have?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Based on the GPU’s high 81st percentile ranking and strong G3D score, it is well-suited for 4K gaming. However, performance will be game-dependent, and the CPU may cause frame dips in CPU-bound titles.

Q: What is the TDP of the processor?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U has a TDP of 9 watts, indicating a highly power-efficient mobile processor.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the fact pack indicates that ECC memory is not supported by this processor.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a high-end mobile graphics processor based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It features a massive 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1290 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz. Memory is clocked at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are substantial. It has 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. It also includes 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 24.72 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results confirm its high-end positioning. The PassMark G3D score of 24926 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 is very strong, indicating excellent compute performance. Its average benchmark score is 38135, which is slightly higher than the RTX 5080 Mobile and RTX 4070, according to the deltaPct values. For gaming, this level of performance suggests it can handle modern titles at high settings and resolutions. The high texture and pixel rates are ideal for high-resolution rendering, and the 12 GB of VRAM provides ample capacity for modern game assets. The RT and tensor cores also enable advanced features like ray tracing and DLSS, which can further enhance visual quality and performance. This GPU is the clear driving force in this laptop configuration.