SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 155U

21,174 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile represent a striking pairing: a low-power, efficiency-focused processor from Intel’s Meteor Lake generation combined with a high-end Blackwell-architecture GPU. The data positions this combination in the 75th percentile of all hardware, indicating a system that sits comfortably above the median performer. This build is a mobile solution, designed for laptops where thermal and power constraints are paramount. The CPU’s 15 W TDP is remarkably low, suggesting a processor optimized for battery life and sustained light-load operation, while the GPU’s 50 W TDP is comparatively substantial, indicating a graphics solution capable of significant rendering work despite its mobile form factor.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U is a 12-core, 14-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 7 nm process node. Its base clock is 1700.00 MHz, which can boost up to 4.80 GHz under load. This is not a high-frequency desktop part; instead, it relies on a hybrid architecture to balance efficiency and performance. The cache layout includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. This configuration is typical for a mobile processor aiming to serve a range of tasks from light productivity to moderate content creation.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a mixed profile that reflects its design goals. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 9674.5 points in multi-core and 1666 points in single-core. The multi-core score indicates that the processor can handle heavily threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, though it will not match desktop-class alternatives. The single-core score is respectable, suggesting responsive day-to-day performance in applications that are not fully multi-threaded. PassMark results reinforce this: the multithread score is 16382, while the single-thread score is 3372. The data compression score of 177122 is strong, suggesting good capability in file archiving and compression tasks, while the encryption score of 11333 indicates a decent level of security-focused processing power.

The CPU’s overall average benchmark score is 21174, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are telling. The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U scores 21133, a negligible 0.2% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V scores 21112, a 0.3% difference, and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G scores 21088, a 0.4% difference. This places the 155U in a tightly-contested mid-range mobile segment. It is neither a clear leader nor a laggard; it is competitive with other mainstream mobile and entry-level desktop parts. Notably, the EPYC 9454, a server processor, is also within 0.2% on this metric, which highlights how the average benchmark score can flatten out differences in specialized workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no rows for measuredFpsUltraByGame, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. These estimates should be treated as a general guide, not a definitive guarantee of performance in any specific title.

The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20355 is the primary indicator for gaming capability. This score places the RTX 5070 Mobile in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, suggesting it is a high-end mobile part. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3372 in PassMark is adequate for feeding the GPU in most games, though it may become a limiting factor in titles that are heavily dependent on CPU physics or simulation. The 12 MB L3 cache is modest by modern standards, which could impact performance in games with large, frequently accessed datasets.

For 1080p gaming, this pairing should deliver high frame rates in most titles at high or ultra settings, given the GPU’s strong G3D score. At 1440p, the demands on the GPU increase, and the RTX 5070 Mobile’s 8 GB of VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth will become more critical. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.13 TFLOPS suggests it has the raw compute power to handle demanding games. However, the CPU’s low TDP and mobile focus may cause performance to dip in scenarios where the processor cannot sustain high boost clocks. The 4.80 GHz boost clock is capable, but the 15 W TDP means sustained all-core loads will likely see clocks drop, affecting CPU-bound game logic. Estimates for 1080p ultra settings are generally positive, with the system expected to be a capable gaming platform, but users should be prepared for potential CPU limitations in specific titles.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture is one of a system that is consistently above average. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 21174, and the GPU’s average benchmark score is 29928. The combined percentile for this build is 75, meaning it outperforms three-quarters of all recorded systems.

The GPU’s individual performance is its strongest asset. Its PassMark G3D score of 20355 is a high mark, and its Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 indicate strong compute capability in cross-platform APIs. The GPU’s nearest rivals in terms of average score are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (29945, a -0.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (29783, a 0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30095, a -0.6% delta). This firmly establishes the RTX 5070 Mobile as a performance tier above older high-end cards, matching or slightly exceeding them in synthetic benchmarks. The CPU, in contrast, sits in a mid-range position, with its rivals being a mix of mobile and older desktop processors.

The data shows a clear performance split. The GPU is a top-tier part, while the CPU is a mid-tier part. This creates a system where the GPU will often be waiting on the CPU in certain workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios, like physics calculations in games or single-threaded application logic, the CPU’s 75th percentile position will be the ceiling. In GPU-bound scenarios, like high-resolution rendering or complex pixel shading, the system will perform at the level of its high-end GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s overall performance standing?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U has an average benchmark score of 21174, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. It is extremely close in performance to the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, which is only 0.2% ahead.

Q: How does the GPU compare to previous-generation high-end cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 29928, which places it in the 75th percentile. It is 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti and 0.1% behind the RTX 3070 Ti.

Q: Is this build suitable for gaming?

A: Based on the GPU’s strong PassMark G3D score of 20355, it is likely capable of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in many titles. However, no measured FPS data exists for this specific combination, so these are estimates.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s, using 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not have support for ECC memory. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is built on Intel’s 7 nm process, while the GPU is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $490.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is the centerpiece of this build’s performance potential. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and uses the GB206 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation pipelines. It also includes 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, making it fully equipped for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS. The transistor count is 21,900 million on a die size of 181 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 121.0M / mm².

Memory is a critical aspect of this mobile GPU. It features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The base clock is 907 MHz, with a boost clock of 1425 MHz. The memory runs at 1500 MHz, effectively 24 Gbps. This configuration is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity may be a limitation in future titles or at higher resolutions with maximum texture quality. The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 13.13 TFLOPS, which is a solid figure for a mobile part and indicates strong raw compute throughput.

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU shows its strengths. The PassMark G3D score of 20355 is high, and the compute score of 8279 confirms its ability to handle non-graphics workloads. The DirectX 12 score of 93 is modest, but this is a synthetic test that may not reflect real-world gaming performance. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 29928 places it in the 75th percentile, with its nearest rivals being desktop cards like the RTX 3070 Ti and RX 6800. This suggests that for rendering, video editing, and 3D applications, this GPU will perform comparably to those established desktop parts.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a laptop that can handle both productivity and demanding graphics tasks. The CPU’s low TDP and competitive multi-threaded performance make it suitable for students and professionals who need a reliable machine for coding, document work, and light content creation. The PassMark data compression score of 177122 indicates it can handle large datasets and archiving tasks efficiently. The CPU’s 75th percentile standing means it is a competent processor for everyday multitasking and office applications.

The GPU’s high performance makes this a viable option for gamers who want a mobile system capable of running modern titles at high settings. The estimated FPS at 1080p and 1440p is expected to be strong, given the GPU’s benchmark scores. For content creators, the GPU’s 13.13 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 144 tensor cores make it suitable for video editing, 3D rendering, and AI-accelerated workflows. The 8 GB of GDDR7 VRAM is sufficient for most current creative applications, though large 4K video editing timelines or complex 3D scenes may push its limits.

Small business workstations could also benefit from this build. The CPU’s efficiency and the GPU’s compute power allow for a single machine to handle tasks like graphic design, CAD, and data analysis. The lack of ECC memory support is a minor drawback for mission-critical reliability, but for most small business workloads, the performance and portability will be more valuable. The overall 75th percentile combined ranking indicates this is a solidly above-average system for a wide range of professional and personal use cases.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The GPU sits in the high-end tier, with performance matching desktop cards like the RTX 3070 Ti. The CPU, however, is a mid-range mobile part, competing with the Ryzen 5 7530U. This creates a scenario where the CPU is the primary bottleneck in many workloads.

In gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark 3372) will be the limiting factor in titles that rely heavily on CPU logic. While the GPU can push very high frame rates, the CPU may not be able to keep up in complex scenes, leading to frame drops or stuttering. The 12 MB L3 cache is also relatively small, which can increase latency in games that stream large amounts of data. The GPU’s 75th percentile FPS potential will not be fully realized if the CPU cannot feed it enough data.

For productivity and rendering workloads, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. Multi-threaded CPU workloads, like video encoding, will be limited by the CPU’s 9674.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. While this is respectable, it is not high-end. In contrast, GPU-accelerated rendering will be extremely fast, as the GPU is the stronger component. The data suggests that for a truly balanced system, a higher-tier CPU would be needed to match the GPU’s capabilities. However, the low TDP of the CPU (15 W) suggests that this pairing is designed for a laptop where power consumption and heat are critical constraints, and the performance trade-off is intentional.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses an Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable platform. This means the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard. The GPU is also a mobile part, soldered to the board. Therefore, neither component can be upgraded in a traditional sense. The upgrade path for this system is limited to replacing the entire laptop or, at most, upgrading storage and memory if the system allows.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The amount of memory is not specified, but it is likely that a user could upgrade the RAM if the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots. The GPU features a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which is the latest standard and provides ample bandwidth for the GPU. The CPU provides 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which would be used for storage devices like NVMe SSDs.

The CPU has a TDP of 15 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 50 W. The combined power draw is relatively low, which means a standard laptop power adapter should be sufficient. The suggested PSU is null, indicating that the manufacturer does not specify a separate power supply, as it is an integrated system. For a sensible next upgrade, a user should look at a new laptop platform entirely, likely with a more balanced CPU-GPU pairing if performance is the primary goal. Alternatively, if the current system meets needs, adding more RAM or a larger, faster NVMe SSD would be the most practical enhancements.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile GPU. It represents a high-end graphics solution paired with a mid-range, power-efficient processor. The combined percentile is 75, placing it in the upper quartile of all tested hardware. The GPU is the dominant component, delivering performance comparable to desktop cards like the RTX 3070 Ti and RX 6800. The CPU is a capable, efficient partner that handles everyday tasks and moderate multi-threaded workloads well but will lag behind the GPU in demanding scenarios.

The overall tier of this build is high, driven by the GPU’s strong benchmark scores. It is a system designed for users who prioritize graphics performance in a mobile form factor, such as gamers and content creators who need desktop-class rendering power on the go. The CPU’s low TDP ensures good battery life for non-gaming tasks, making it a versatile machine. However, the imbalance between the components means that the CPU will be a limiting factor in CPU-intensive applications. This is a trade-off inherent to the mobile segment, where power and thermal constraints force compromises. The result is a laptop that excels at graphics-heavy workloads but is less suited for tasks that require sustained high-end CPU performance.