SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155U + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 155U

21,174 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U is a 12-core, 14-thread mobile processor built on the Meteor Lake architecture at Intel's 7 nm process node. Its configuration pairs performance cores with efficiency cores, running at a 1700 MHz base clock and boosting up to 4.80 GHz. The chip draws a 15 W TDP, positioning it firmly in the ultraportable and thin-and-light laptop segment rather than high-performance mobile workstations. Cache topology includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache, which is modest for a 12-core part but appropriate for a low-power design.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21174. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 9674.5 and single-core score of 1666 reveal the performance envelope: multi-threaded workloads benefit from the 14 threads, while single-thread responsiveness is strong enough for everyday applications. The Cinebench R20 scores of 5765 multicore and 813 single-core reinforce this pattern. PassMark results show a multithread score of 16382, a single-thread score of 3372, and a physics score of 1084. Data compression performance is notable at 177122, while data encryption reaches 11333, indicating solid throughput for archival and security tasks. Floating-point math scores 40256, integer math scores 57564, and extended instructions score 9903. Prime number finding is weak at 65, suggesting the CPU is not optimized for that specific workload pattern.

Compared to nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 7 155U is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, which scores 21133, a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V scores 21112, placing the 155U 0.3% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G scores 21088, with the 155U ahead by 0.4%. The AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, meaning the 155U trails that server chip by 0.2%. These deltas are negligible, indicating that the 155U delivers performance squarely within the mainstream mobile CPU tier. For real workloads, the data suggests this chip handles office productivity, web development, and moderate content creation without bottlenecking, but it will not rival high-core-count desktop or workstation processors.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 7 155U uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard, meaning the CPU itself is not upgradeable. This is standard for mobile platforms, and the upgrade path therefore centers on other system components. The processor supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Memory capacity depends on the motherboard, and ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is limited to Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a laptop-class GPU and NVMe storage.

The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output and basic acceleration when the discrete GPU is not active. The CPU's launch MSRP is $490, which positions it as a premium ultraportable processor, though the soldered nature of the platform means the total system cost is what matters. The GPU, AMD Radeon 8050S, has a TDP of 55 W and uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. No suggested PSU is listed, but given the combined 15 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP, the total power draw is low enough for a standard laptop power adapter. The system uses shared memory for the GPU, so the memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s is the same pool available to both CPU and GPU, which can be a limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads.

For a sensible next upgrade, users should prioritize increasing system memory, since the GPU relies on system shared memory for VRAM. A larger capacity and higher-speed DDR5 kit would directly benefit both CPU and GPU performance. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives are also viable. The CPU and GPU are both soldered or integrated, so they cannot be swapped. The platform is effectively a closed system, and the upgrade path is limited to memory, storage, and external peripherals.

# Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data shows no measuredFps data, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU individually. The AMD Radeon 8050S scores 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan, placing it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 62108. This GPU is a strong performer for integrated graphics, but it is not a discrete-class part.

The CPU's single-thread score of 3372 in PassMark and 1666 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate that it can feed the GPU in most games, though the 15 W TDP limits sustained performance. For esports titles at 1080p with medium to high settings, the estimated frame rates would be high, likely exceeding 60 FPS in most cases. For AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, the estimates are more conservative, with frame rates likely ranging from 30 to 60 FPS depending on the title's optimization. At 1440p, the GPU's shared memory bandwidth becomes a bottleneck, and frame rates would drop further. At 4K, the system would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896, which is 0.3% lower than the 8050S. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, putting the 8050S 2.5% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775, with the 8050S trailing by 2.6%. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830, meaning the 8050S is 2.7% behind. These are close margins, suggesting the 8050S delivers performance comparable to those mobile GPUs. Gamers should expect playable 1080p performance in most titles, with 1440p being a stretch for newer releases.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this system is unusual because the GPU uses system shared memory, creating a unified memory architecture. The CPU is at the 75th percentile while the GPU is at the 89th percentile, indicating the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU. This means in CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulation or data compression, the CPU will be the limiting factor. PassMark physics score of 1084 is low, and prime number finding at 65 is very weak, suggesting the CPU struggles with certain computational patterns.

In gaming, the GPU's higher percentile suggests it can outpace the CPU in many scenarios, but the shared memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s acts as a common bottleneck. The CPU's single-thread performance of 3372 in PassMark is adequate for most game logic, but the 15 W TDP limits sustained boost clocks. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's 14 threads provide reasonable throughput, but the 12 MB L3 cache is small, which can cause cache misses in data-intensive tasks.

The FPS scaling between the CPU and GPU is not measurable from the data, but the percentile gap of 14 points (75 vs 89) suggests that the GPU is capable of more than the CPU can feed in some scenarios. For productivity tasks like video editing, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9674.5 will be the limiting factor in rendering, while the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate effects and encoding. In mixed workloads, the system is reasonably balanced, but users should expect the CPU to be the primary constraint in compute-heavy tasks.

# FAQ

Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 8050S have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the GPU uses system shared memory for all graphics memory, with bandwidth described as system dependent.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S sits at the 89th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 62108.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U?

A: The Core Ultra 7 155U scores 21174 on average, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7530U's 21133.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU combined?

A: The CPU has a 15 W TDP and the GPU has a 55 W TDP, totaling 70 W before accounting for other system components.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the soldered BGA socket prevents any aftermarket cooling or overclocking.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth available to the system?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is shared with the integrated GPU.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a portable chassis. Gamers playing at 1080p with moderate settings will find the GPU's 89th percentile ranking sufficient for most titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be tempered. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the CPU's 14 threads, though rendering times will be longer than with higher-TDP parts. Software developers compiling code will appreciate the single-thread score of 3372 in PassMark, which handles compilation tasks reasonably well. Students and office workers will find the 15 W CPU TDP ideal for battery life, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics provide adequate acceleration for productivity apps.

Small business workstations that require moderate compute for data analysis or financial modeling will find the CPU's data compression score of 177122 useful, though the lack of ECC memory may be a concern for some. The system is not suited for high-end gaming at 1440p or 4K, nor for professional rendering workloads that demand sustained multi-threaded performance. The GPU's 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs are sufficient for rasterization at 1080p, and the 32 ray tracing cores enable some RT effects, but performance will be limited.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 21174, placing it at the 75th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, scores 21133, a 0.2% difference. The AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, with the 155U trailing by 0.2%. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V scores 21112, putting the 155U 0.3% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G scores 21088, with the 155U leading by 0.4%. These results show the CPU is a solid mainstream performer, neither a leader nor a laggard in its class.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 62108, placing it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 65818, and its Vulkan score is 58398. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, scores 61896, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, putting the 8050S 2.5% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775, with the 8050S trailing by 2.6%. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830, meaning the 8050S is 2.7% behind. The combined percentile for this pairing is 82, indicating a system that is above average overall but not exceptional.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is slightly above the median and a GPU that is well above the median. The 14-point percentile gap between the two components suggests the GPU is the stronger part, and users should prioritize workloads that leverage the GPU's compute capabilities. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9674.5 and the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance together provide a capable platform for mixed productivity and entertainment.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U with the AMD Radeon 8050S. The CPU is a Meteor Lake mobile processor with 12 cores and 14 threads, and the GPU is a Strix Halo integrated part based on RDNA 3.5. The overall tier is above average, with a combined percentile of 82. The CPU's 75th percentile and the GPU's 89th percentile indicate a system that outperforms most laptops in graphics tasks while remaining competitive in CPU-bound work.

The pairing is notable because both components are from different vendors, with the CPU using Intel's Arc Xe-LPG integrated graphics as a fallback, while the primary GPU is AMD's Radeon 8050S. This is a heterogeneous setup that relies on the motherboard to manage both graphics solutions. The GPU's 2048 shading units and 32 ray tracing cores provide solid compute throughput, while the CPU's 14 threads handle general processing. The system is designed for portability, with a combined TDP of 70 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest the system can drive high frame rates at 1080p in esports titles, though the lack of measured FPS data requires estimation. The CPU's single-thread score of 3372 in PassMark should keep frame pacing consistent in most games.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 threads and the GPU's 32 ray tracing cores provide enough headroom for encoding and streaming at 1080p, but the shared memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s may limit simultaneous game and encode workloads. The GPU's Vulkan score of 58398 indicates good API efficiency.

Video editing: The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9674.5 combine for reasonable 1080p editing, though 4K timelines will be sluggish. The GPU's 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs accelerate effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU's 14 threads and the GPU's OpenCL score of 65818 provide moderate rendering performance. The GPU's 2048 shading units are well-suited for GPU-accelerated renders, but the system shared memory may cause spills to system RAM.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 3372 in PassMark and data compression score of 177122 make compilation and version control tasks responsive. The 15 W TDP keeps thermals low during extended build sessions.

Student and office work: The 15 W CPU TDP and integrated graphics provide excellent battery life for document editing and web browsing. The CPU's 75th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking with multiple applications open.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is based on the Strix Halo chip with the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The die size is 308 mm², and the GPU is an integrated part, meaning it has no dedicated memory and instead uses system shared memory. The base clock is 1295 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. There are no tensor cores listed, but the FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 11.47 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. The GPU supports PCIe 5.0 x16, and its TDP is 55 W. It has no power connectors, as it is an integrated part. Display outputs are portable device dependent, and the API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU's percentile ranking is 89, with an average benchmark score of 62108. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 65818, and in Vulkan, it scores 58398. These scores are close to those of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which scores 61896, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, which scores 63775.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance is competitive with entry-level discrete GPUs. The 32 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though performance will be limited by the shared memory bandwidth. The 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs provide solid rasterization throughput for 1080p gaming. The GPU's 4 nm process node allows for efficient power consumption within its 55 W TDP, making it suitable for laptops. The lack of dedicated VRAM means the system memory bandwidth is the primary constraint, and users should ensure adequate DDR5 capacity to avoid bottlenecks in graphics-intensive tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155U + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 155U

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds