SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

32,697 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

43,268 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile form a laptop pairing that sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPU and GPU combinations. This is a system built around balance, but the data reveals a fascinating tension between a high-core-count processor and a mobile GPU that, while modern, is clearly the limiting factor in many scenarios. The combined benchmark picture and the measured frame rates suggest a machine that excels at multi-threaded productivity but is constrained in the most demanding gaming workloads, particularly at higher resolutions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data indicates a system where the CPU is rarely the bottleneck, but the GPU frequently is, especially when resolution scales. The CPU’s multi-core might is substantial, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, while also in the 83rd percentile for its class, shows a different story in real-world gaming. When comparing the measured FPS at 1920x1080 versus 3840x2160, the pattern is clear: performance drops dramatically as resolution increases, a classic sign of GPU limitation.

For instance, in "Counter-Strike 2", the frame rate falls from 135 FPS at 1080p to 50 FPS at 4K. This is a 63% reduction, which is far more than what a CPU bottleneck would produce. In "Call of Duty: Warzone", the drop is from 133 FPS to 100 FPS, a smaller but still significant 25% decline. The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 1743, is strong enough to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, but the RTX 5050 Mobile’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth simply cannot sustain high frame rates at 4K. The bottleneck is the GPU's raw processing power and memory subsystem, not the processor's ability to calculate game logic or physics.

This is further confirmed by the CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 24873, which indicates it can handle heavy background tasks like streaming or encoding while gaming. The GPU, however, with its FP32 performance of 7.680 TFLOPS, is a mid-range mobile part. The data suggests a system where the CPU has headroom to spare in gaming, but the GPU is consistently at its limit. For esports titles at 1080p, the pairing works well, but for AAA titles at 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, capping performance well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32697, which places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong showing, putting it in the same tier as the Intel Core i5-14600T, which scores 32707, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, which scores 32662. The deltaPct values are negligible, all within 0.2%, indicating these are all very closely matched processors in aggregate performance. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 is particularly noteworthy, showcasing its ability to handle multi-threaded workloads like video rendering and code compilation.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 43268, also in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, with a deltaPct of 0, meaning they are statistically identical in these benchmarks. Interestingly, it is also within 0.9% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, which scores 43667. This is a surprising result, as the RTX 5050 Mobile is a newer, lower-tier chip, but the data shows it holds its own in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test (2365) and Geekbench OpenCL (84171). However, the 4090 Mobile is a much larger and more power-hungry part, so this benchmark parity is likely specific to these tests and may not represent overall gaming performance.

The combined picture is a system that is well above average, with both components performing in the top 17% of their respective categories. The pair's rank by FPS is 3136 out of 3861 pairs, with an average FPS of 87 across all tested games. This rank seems low relative to the individual component percentiles, but it reflects the reality that this is a balanced mid-range laptop, not a high-end desktop replacement. The average FPS of 87 suggests that this system is most comfortable at 1080p, where it can deliver high frame rates in most titles, but it will struggle to maintain 60 FPS at 4K in demanding games.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 28 W, making it an efficient mobile part. The cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is critical for gaming and content creation, as it reduces the latency of frequently accessed data.

In terms of real-world workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 indicates that this CPU is a productivity powerhouse. It can handle demanding tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation with ease. The single-core score of 1743 is also solid, ensuring responsive performance in everyday tasks and games that are not heavily multi-threaded. The Passmark scores further break down its strengths: a floating-point math score of 63703 and an integer math score of 86870 show strong arithmetic capabilities, while the extended instructions score of 16456 and data encryption score of 16358 indicate good performance in specialized workloads. The data compression score of 277353 is exceptionally high, suggesting this CPU is excellent for file archiving and data-heavy applications.

The 22 threads are a significant advantage for multi-tasking. The Passmark multithread score of 24873 is strong, meaning the CPU can handle simultaneous workloads, such as gaming while streaming and running background applications, without significant frame drops. The architecture, with its integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics, also provides a fallback for light graphical tasks. However, its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a potential constraint for some compute-heavy tasks, though it is adequate for most mobile use cases.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. This is a mobile platform, so there is no traditional CPU upgrade path. The CPU supports DDR5 memory, with the specific speed depending on the motherboard, and it uses a dual-channel memory bus. This is a standard configuration for laptops and provides sufficient bandwidth for most tasks. The CPU provides 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are primarily for the GPU and NVMe SSDs, and the GPU itself uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Given the soldered nature of the CPU, a "sensible next upgrade" is not about swapping the processor. Instead, it would involve upgrading the GPU, but this is also typically soldered in laptops. The real upgrade path is the entire system. However, if considering a new build, the data suggests that pairing this CPU with a more powerful GPU would yield significant gains in gaming performance, as the CPU clearly has headroom. The RTX 5050 Mobile has a TDP of 50 W, which is quite low for a discrete GPU, leaving room in the power budget for a more powerful part in a future system. The CPU's 28 W TDP also contributes to the overall power efficiency of the platform.

The GPU's power connector is listed as "None", and its slot width is "IGP", which suggests it is a low-power, integrated-style design that draws power from the motherboard. This means the PSU headroom is not a major concern for this specific laptop, as the system is designed to run within a modest power envelope. The lack of a suggested PSU in the data reinforces this. For a future desktop build, the data would suggest a PSU that can handle a more powerful GPU, but for this mobile platform, it is not a primary consideration. The platform's support for DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 ensures it is not immediately outdated, but the upgrade path is limited to the entire machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile for this pairing is 83rd, placing it in the top 17% of all CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 32697 is virtually identical to the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662), with deltaPct values of 0% and 0.1%, respectively.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck in gaming?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. For example, in "Counter-Strike 2", FPS drops from 135 at 1080p to 50 at 4K, confirming the GPU's limitations.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 15028 points in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, indicating strong performance for multi-threaded workloads.

Q: Does this system support PCIe 5.0?

A: Yes, the CPU provides 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, captured at ultra settings, reveals a system that is a strong performer at 1920x1080 but falls off sharply at higher resolutions. The data is measured, not estimated, providing a reliable picture of real-world performance. At 1080p, the system excels in esports titles. "Valorant" runs at an excellent 310 FPS, and "Counter-Strike: Global Offensive" achieves 299 FPS. "Counter-Strike 2" is also playable at 135 FPS, and "Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege" hits 161 FPS. These numbers indicate a great experience for competitive gaming.

For AAA titles at 1080p, performance is more varied. "Call of Duty: Warzone" runs at 133 FPS, which is great, but "Red Dead Redemption 2" only manages 36 FPS, and "Ark: Survival Ascended" is a slideshow at 20 FPS. This shows that while the system is capable, it is not a high-end gaming machine. At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop further. "Call of Duty: Warzone" remains playable at 119 FPS, but most other titles fall below 60 FPS. "Grand Theft Auto V" runs at 42 FPS, and "Control" at 43 FPS. At 3840x2160, 4K gaming is largely not viable. Most titles fall below 40 FPS, with "Valorant" being the only exception at 211 FPS. The average FPS across all games is 87, but this is heavily skewed by esports titles. The data clearly shows that this laptop is best suited for 1080p gaming, with 1440p being a stretch for most modern games and 4K being reserved for older or less demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for a user who needs a powerful and versatile laptop for both work and play, but who prioritizes productivity over maximum gaming fidelity. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance makes it an excellent choice for content creators, video editors, and software developers who need to compile code or render 3D scenes. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 ensures that these tasks will be handled quickly and efficiently. For gamers, this system is best suited to those who play at 1080p and prefer high frame rates in competitive titles like "Valorant" and "Counter-Strike 2", where the system delivers over 300 FPS.

Students and professionals who need a reliable workstation for office tasks, data analysis, and programming will find the CPU's performance more than sufficient. The high Passmark data compression score of 277353 makes it useful for handling large datasets. Small business workstations that require multitasking capabilities, such as running virtual machines or processing financial models, will also benefit from the 22 threads. However, this is not the system for a hardcore gamer who wants to play the latest AAA titles at maximum settings and 4K resolution. The GPU simply does not have the power to deliver a smooth experience in games like "Ark: Survival Ascended" (20 FPS at 1080p) or "Red Dead Redemption 2" (36 FPS at 1080p). The target user is someone who values a balanced, high-performance mobile platform for all-around use, with gaming being a secondary, but still important, consideration.

Build Overview

This pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is a laptop-class build that sits in the upper-midrange tier of performance. Both components are in the 83rd percentile of their respective categories, making this a well-above-average system. The CPU is a 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake part with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture chip with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory.

The combined percentile of 83 indicates that this is a top-tier mobile platform, but the pair's rank by FPS (3136 out of 3861) shows that it is not a high-end gaming monster. This is a system designed for balanced performance, excelling in CPU-intensive tasks and providing solid, but not spectacular, gaming performance. The CPU's TDP of 28 W and the GPU's TDP of 50 W suggest a power-efficient design, which is typical for a modern laptop. The CPU's strong multi-core scores and the GPU's modern feature set make this a future-proof platform for a few years, but its gaming limitations at higher resolutions are the key trade-off for its portability and efficiency.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, this system delivers excellent frame rates in esports titles, with "Valorant" hitting 310 FPS and "Counter-Strike: Global Offensive" at 299 FPS, making it ideal for competitive play. However, in demanding AAA titles like "Red Dead Redemption 2" (36 FPS) and "Ark: Survival Ascended" (20 FPS), the system falls short of high-refresh standards.

Streaming: The CPU's 22 threads and strong Passmark multithread score of 24873 provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming. The GPU's performance at 1080p is sufficient to maintain good frame rates in less demanding titles, making this a viable setup for a beginner streamer.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 indicates rapid rendering and export times in video editing software. The CPU's high data compression score of 277353 also helps with handling large video files, making this a capable machine for 1080p and some 1440p editing workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU is a workhorse for CPU-based rendering, as evidenced by its Cinebench scores. The GPU, with its 7.680 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, but its 8 GB of VRAM may limit the complexity of scenes. This is a competent entry-level 3D rendering machine.

Software Development: The 16 cores and 22 threads are ideal for compiling large codebases, and the high integer math score of 86870 suggests strong performance in logic-heavy applications. The system can handle multiple virtual machines or containers without significant slowdown, making it a great choice for developers.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing, but it will handle any student workload with ease. The CPU's single-core performance of 1743 in Cinebench R23 ensures a responsive system, and the efficient 28 W TDP contributes to good battery life, making it a reliable daily driver.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is a modern mobile GPU based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. It also includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, making it fully capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. Its base clock is 1020 MHz, with a boost clock of 1500 MHz, and its memory runs at an effective speed of 24 Gbps.

The GPU's benchmark scores show it is a capable mid-range part. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2365 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 84171 put it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. However, its FP32 performance of 7.680 TFLOPS is modest, and its pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 120.0 GTexel/s are indicative of its mid-range status. This limits its performance in high-resolution gaming, as seen in the measured FPS data. The 8 GB of VRAM is becoming a minimum for modern games, and it is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but it can be a limiting factor at 4K with high-resolution textures.

The inclusion of 20 RT cores means ray tracing is possible, but the GPU's overall power will likely make it a choice between ray tracing and high frame rates. The tensor cores enable DLSS, which can help improve performance in supported games. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, has a similar average benchmark score, but the RTX 5050 Mobile is a much more modern and feature-rich part. Its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 ensures compatibility with all modern games. For rendering workloads, the GPU is capable, but its 8 GB memory and 7.680 TFLOPS of compute mean it is not a professional-grade renderer. It is best suited for gaming at 1080p and light-to-moderate creative work.